Elsevier

Cement and Concrete Composites

Volume 73, October 2016, Pages 29-41
Cement and Concrete Composites

The influence of microencapsulated phase change material (PCM) characteristics on the microstructure and strength of cementitious composites: Experiments and finite element simulations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.06.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Phase Change Materials (PCMs) incorporated into cementitious systems have been well-studied with respect to energy efficiency of building envelopes. New applications of PCMs in infrastructural concrete, e.g., for mitigating early-age cracking and freeze-and-thaw induced damage, have been proposed. Hence this paper develops a detailed understanding of the characteristics of cementitious systems containing two different microencapsulated PCMs. The PCMs are evaluated using thermal analysis, vibrational (FTIR) spectroscopy, and electron microscopy, and their dispersion in cement pastes is quantified using X-ray Computed Microtomography (μCT). The influences of PCMs on cement hydration and pore structure are evaluated. The compressive strength of mortars containing PCMs is noted to be strongly dependent on the encapsulation properties. Finite element simulations carried out on cementitious microstructures are used to assess the influence of interface properties and inter-inclusion interactions. The outcomes provide insights on methods to tailor the component phase properties and PCM volume fraction so as to achieve desirable performance.

Introduction

Among the multitude of methods to enhance the energy efficiency of building materials and indoor thermal comfort, one method that has gained prominence is the use of thermal energy storage (TES) materials. Phase change materials (PCMs) are combined sensible-and-latent thermal energy storage materials that can be used to store and dissipate energy in the form of heat [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. A large number of recent studies have focused on the use of PCMs in building materials to achieve this objective [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Several methods have been advanced to incorporate PCMs in concrete, including direct incorporation and in the form of microencapsulated particles [11], [12], [13]. Microencapsulated PCMs, that are commercially available in a powder form, can be directly added during the mixing process of concrete [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. The other common approach is to employ macro encapsulation, which refers to the impregnation of PCMs as a liquid into the pores of lightweight aggregates, which are then used as inclusions in concrete [19], [20], [21].

A recent work has outlined the other advantages that PCMs can offer to structural concretes by virtue of their capacity to store and release heat [18]. The influence of microencapsulated PCMs on semi-adiabatic temperature rise and cool-down rates in hydrating cementitious systems, the development of restrained thermal stresses and strains that result in thermal cracking, and on the fracture properties have been elucidated in the aforementioned study. PCMs having suitable phase change enthalpy and phase transition temperatures can also: (i) restrict the magnitude of diurnal-or-seasonal temperature variations and deformations of restrained concrete elements over long time scales to limit damage due to thermal fatigue, and (ii) help limit the number and/or intensity of freeze-thaw cycles experienced by exposed concrete structures [20], [22].

The applications described above require concretes to demonstrate adequate thermo-physical and mechanical properties over extended time periods. In general, incorporation of soft inclusions such as PCMs (either in the micro- or macro-encapsulated forms) decreases the mechanical properties of the composite including its strength and stiffness [17], [18]. The property reductions are substantial in the case of cement pastes; however the presence of stiffer phases such as aggregates can reduce the severity of property loss. It is also possible to mitigate some of the property loss through appropriate material design including matrix strengthening methods [18], [23]. Previous studies also have noted degradation of microcapsules in cementitious systems [17], [23]. The ability to store and release heat also depends on the pore volume, sizes, and their distribution in the cementitious system, which could be impacted by the incorporation of PCMs [24], as well as the size and dispersion of PCM particles. All of these necessitate a fundamental characterization of the PCMs and their effects on cementitious systems in order to design: (i) mechanical performance-equivalent systems containing adequate amounts of PCMs as needed to satisfy thermal requirements, and/or (ii) microencapsulated PCMs capable of enduring mechanical and chemical stresses produced during mixing and placing concrete, and induced due to the high pH cementitious environment.

This paper examines the influence of two microencapsulated PCMs having different particle sizes, and that are encapsulated in shells that have different physico-chemical and mechanical properties, on the microstructure and properties of the resultant cementitious system. A fundamental characterization of the microencapsulated PCMs is carried out, as are studies on microstructure and mechanical response of the resulting composites. Relevant insights on the influence of the PCM encapsulation and geometry on the resulting properties, and pointers to appropriate material design of PCM-cement composites are obtained through a combination of advanced experimental tools and finite element simulations.

Section snippets

Materials and mixtures

A commercially available Type I/II ordinary portland cement (OPC) conforming to ASTM C150, and two different microencapsulated, paraffinic phase change materials (PCMs) referred to as PCM-M and PCM-E were used. The median particle size (d50) of OPC is 10 μm and that for PCM-E is 7 μm as determined by laser diffraction. The median particle size of PCM-M was determined as 10 μm by laser diffraction; however this is the size of the primary particles in the agglomerations of PCM-M. PCM-M comprises

Characterization of the microencapsulated PCMs

This section presents a comprehensive characterization of the microstructural, chemical, and thermal characteristics of the two PCMs used in this study. The micrographs in Fig. 1 depict the morphology of the PCMs used in this study (PCM-M and PCM-E). It is apparent that PCM-M (Fig. 1(a)-(c)) shows an agglomerated structure composed of many individual PCM microcapsules. PCM-E (Fig. 1(d)), on the other hand, shows many individual PCM microcapsules that are distinct and present no agglomeration.

Conclusions

This paper has characterized two different microencapsulated PCMs and examined their influence on compressive strength of cementitious composites. The shell material, core-to-shell ratio, and the thermal characteristics (enthalpy and phase change temperature) were different for both the PCMs. The PCMs were also different in morphological characteristics: PCM-M consisted of aggregations ranging between 10 and 300 μm which were comprised of smaller nodules less than 5 μm in diameter, and PCM-E

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Science Foundation (CMMI: 1130028) towards this study. The first author acknowledges a Dean’s Fellowship from the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU). This research was conducted in the Laboratory for the Science of Sustainable Infrastructural Materials and the 4D Materials Science Laboratory at ASU. The support that has made these laboratories possible are acknowledged. JCEM and NC acknowledge

References (63)

  • V.V. Tyagi et al.

    Development of phase change materials based microencapsulated technology for buildings: a review

    Renew. Sustain Energy Rev.

    (2011)
  • A. Eddhahak-Ouni et al.

    Experimental and multi-scale analysis of the thermal properties of portland cement concretes embedded with microencapsulated phase change materials (PCMs)

    Appl. Therm. Eng.

    (2014)
  • T. Lecompte et al.

    Mechanical and thermo-physical behaviour of concretes and mortars containing phase change material

    Energy Build.

    (2015)
  • X. Shi et al.

    Experimental assessment of position of macro encapsulated phase change material in concrete walls on indoor temperatures and humidity levels

    Energy Build.

    (2014)
  • M. Hunger et al.

    The behavior of self-compacting concrete containing micro-encapsulated phase change materials

    Cem. Concr. Compos.

    (2009)
  • F. Fernandes et al.

    On the feasibility of using phase change materials (PCMs) to mitigate thermal cracking in cementitious materials

    Cem. Concr. Compos.

    (2014)
  • S.A. Memon et al.

    Utilization of macro encapsulated phase change materials for the development of thermal energy storage and structural lightweight aggregate concrete

    Appl. Energy

    (2015)
  • D.P. Bentz et al.

    Potential applications of phase change materials in concrete technology

    Cem. Concr. Compos.

    (2007)
  • A.R. Sakulich et al.

    Incorporation of phase change materials in cementitious systems via fine lightweight aggregate

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2012)
  • S.S. Lucas et al.

    Latent heat storage in PCM containing mortars—Study of microstructural modifications

    Energy Build.

    (2013)
  • J.C.E. Mertens et al.

    Development of a lab-scale, high-resolution, tube-generated X-ray computed-tomography system for three-dimensional (3D) materials characterization

    Mater. Charact.

    (2014)
  • J.C.E. Mertens et al.

    Modeling and characterization of X-ray yield in a polychromatic, lab-scale, X-ray computed tomography system

    Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. Accel. Spectrom. Detect Assoc. Equip.

    (2015)
  • D. Shi et al.

    Contact angle and damage during mercury intrusion into cement paste

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (1985)
  • A.A. Liabastre et al.

    An evaluation of pore structure by mercury penetration

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1978)
  • A.M. Borreguero et al.

    Synthesis and characterization of microcapsules containing Rubitherm®RT27 obtained by spray drying

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2011)
  • X. Qiu et al.

    Microencapsulated n-octadecane with different methylmethacrylate-based copolymer shells as phase change materials for thermal energy storage

    Energy

    (2012)
  • J.-F. Su et al.

    Micromechanical properties of melamine–formaldehyde microcapsules by nanoindentation: effect of size and shell thickness

    Mater. Lett.

    (2012)
  • T. Arima et al.

    Properties of highly cross-linked autopolymerizing reline acrylic resins

    J. Prosthet. Dent.

    (1995)
  • J. Giro-Paloma et al.

    Physico-chemical and mechanical properties of microencapsulated phase change material

    Appl. Energy

    (2013)
  • W. Li et al.

    Morphology, structure and thermal stability of microencapsulated phase change material with copolymer shell

    Energy

    (2011)
  • J.-F. Su et al.

    Influence of temperature on the deformation behaviors of melamine–formaldehyde microcapsules containing phase change material

    Mater. Lett.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (138)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text