Role of BCL2 (ala43thr), CCND1 (G870A) and FAS (A-670G) polymorphisms in modulating the risk of developing esophageal cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdp.2007.04.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Perturbations in the cell cycle and apoptotic genes have been implicated in human malignancies. A study of BCL2 ala43thr, CCND1 G870A and FAS A-670G gene polymorphisms was undertaken to explore their role in influencing the susceptibility for development of esophageal cancer. Methods: A total of 151 patients and age and gender matched 201 controls were investigated for BCL2 ala43thr, CCND1 G870A and FAS A-670G polymorphisms by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). Results: The ala43ala genotype of BCL2 anti-apoptotic gene was significantly associated with risk of developing esophageal cancer (OR 2.1, 95%CI = 1.0–4.4, P = 0.03), more so in males (OR 2.6, 95%CI = P = 0.03). In CCND1 G870A polymorphism, the AA genotype was marginally associated with higher risk of esophageal cancer (OR 1.5, 95%CI = 0.98–2.4, P = 0.05). No significant differences in genotype frequencies of FAS A-670G polymorphism were seen between esophageal cancer patients and controls (P = 0.32). Interaction of BCL2 ala43ala, CCND1 870AA and FAS -670AA genotypes did not increase the risk multiplicatively. Association with clinical characteristics showed BCL2 ala43ala genotype to be at increased risk for developing tumors in the middle third location (OR 2.3, 95%CI = 1.0–5.3, P = 0.03), while patients with CCND1 870AA genotypes were at higher risk for the development of cancer in the upper third location (OR 3.8, 95%CI = 1.6–9, P = 0.002). BCL2 ala43ala genotype did not modulate the cancer risk in tobacco users. However, patients with CCND1 870AA and FAS -670AA genotypes were associated with a significantly lower number of smoking and chewing pack-years, suggesting a dose-dependent interaction in the risk for esophageal cancer (P = 0.005). Conclusion: There appears to be an influence of BCL2 ala43ala and CCND1 870AA genotypes on esophageal cancer phenotype, particularly with regard to tumor location, which supports the theory of prevalence of site-specific genetic alterations. FAS A-670G was not associated with the risk of developing esophageal cancer. Gene–environment interaction analysis showed cancer susceptibility in CCND1 870AA and FAS -670AA genotype to be influenced by quantity of tobacco.

Introduction

According to the Population Based Cancer Registry of the Indian Council of Medical Research, esophageal cancer is the second most common cancer in males (crude rate of 4.08/100,000) and the fifth most common cancer in females (crude rate of 3.79/100,000) [1]. The 5-year survival in patients with early stage disease who undergo resection is of the order of 20%, but for others, with more advanced disease, who receive radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, the prognosis is more dismal with close to 10% of patients surviving a similar period [2].

Nutritional deficiency coupled with alcohol and tobacco abuse (both smoked and smokeless forms) and occupational exposure and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has been shown to be associated with the development of esophageal cancer [3], [4]. It is known to induce chromosomal aberrations, telomeric shortening and telomerase activity, and expression of certain genes such as c-myc, ras, bcl-2 and p53 resulting in loss of cell growth control and apoptosis, causing cellular transformation [5]. Studies have suggested that genes involved in apoptosis (BCL2, FAS), cell cycle regulation (CCND1) and their interaction with environmental exposure may play a significant role in neoplastic transformations [6], [7]. Emerging data from epidemiological and clinical studies suggest that tobacco exposure, treatment modality and prognosis vary as a function of location of disease within the esophagus, i.e. upper, middle or lower segments [8], [9], [10]. However, site-wise incidence of esophageal cancer is not available from the National Cancer Registry of India [1]. Further alterations in apoptotic and cell cycle regulatory genes may influence site-specific genetic alterations as has been pointed out [11], [12]. It has been hypothesized that polymorphisms in these genes may be an important determinant of site-specific phenotype [12].

However, in esophageal cancer, to the best of our knowledge, no study has been reported with regard to genotype–phenotype association of BCL2, CCND1 and FAS genotypes with tumor location, histopathology and spread to lymph nodes.

BCL2 gene (B cell lymphoma leukemia 2) encode protein which is localized on intracellular membranes prevents programmed cell death in response to various death inducing stimuli. Over expression and elevated levels of bcl-2 have been shown to promote cell survival [13], [14]. An in vitro study of ala43thr (G128A) polymorphism in BCL2 anti-apoptotic gene showed that ala43ala genotype increases the survival of cells, while the threonine variant acts as a suppressed haplotype for the anti-apoptotic factor [15]. To the best of our knowledge, till date, there is no reported study of BCL2 ala43thr polymorphism in esophageal cancer. The CCND1 gene encodes cell cycle regulatory proteins that regulate abnormal cell proliferation. The splice donor site CCND1 polymorphism G870A in exon 4 (codon 242) affects splicing of mRNA [16]. The variant A allele has aberrant functions with increased activity for cellular transformation [17]. Several association studies show CCND1 870AA genotype to be at an increased risk for several malignancies, e.g. upper aero-digestive tract, larynx and colon [18], [19], [20]. Only a few studies have analysed the association of CCND1 A870G polymorphism and risk of tumor induction, factoring in the site of tumor [12].

FAS/Apo1 (CD95) gene expressed on epithelial cell surfaces mediates apoptosis and is involved in cell turnover in many tissues [21]. FAS A-670G polymorphism in the promoter region affects the transcription factor binding site, hence modulates expression levels of the gene. A previous study has shown FAS -670GG genotype to be associated with risk of esophageal cancer [22].

This case–control study reports the role, if any, of BCL2 (ala43thr) CCND1 (G870A) and FAS (A-670G) polymorphisms in influencing the risk of developing esophageal cancer and their association with certain tumor characteristics as these polymorphisms have only been studied individually as far as could be ascertained. In addition, a case-only analysis was used to analyze the influence of gene–environment interaction on the risk of developing esophageal cancer.

Section snippets

Patients and controls

Between January 2003 and September 2005, 151 histologically confirmed esophageal cancer patients of squamous or adenocarcinoma were inducted into this study. They had been referred to the Departments of Gastroenterology and Radiotherapy of the Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGI), a tertiary referral hospital in North India. Patients with Barrett's esophagus or with any pre-cancerous condition were excluded. During the same period, blood samples of 201 unrelated

Results

The study population included 151 patients with esophageal carcinoma and 201 control subjects. Their mean age (S.D.) (in years) was similar, 56.4 (12.3) vs. 56.6 (9.1) as was their gender distribution with 75.5 and 71% males, respectively. Other characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Following a history and examination, patients underwent routine blood tests along with an endoscopic biopsy to ascertain histology. A contrast enhanced CT scan of the thorax and abdomen was performed to

Discussion

It is now well known that both cancer initiation and neoplastic events are influenced by genetic background. Control of cell proliferation is achieved by a precarious balance between regulation of apoptosis and cell cycle genes. BCL2 was one of the first genes discovered that regulate apoptosis [28], [29]. In esophageal carcinoma, expression studies on bcl-2 suggest its role in regulating carcinoma growth, especially in the early stage of tumorigenesis [30]. It has been positively associated

Conflict of interest

None.

Acknowledgements

The study was sponsored by research grants from Department of Science and Technology and Indian Council of Medical Research. One of the authors (MJ) thanks the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India for providing Senior Research Fellowship. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Sandeep Bhattacharya, King George Medical University, Lucknow. Grant sponsor: Department of Science and Technology, Government of India and the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.

References (38)

  • Alcohol drinking

    (1988)
  • C. Li et al.

    Correlation between expression of human telomerase subunits and telomerase activity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

    World J Gastroenterol

    (2003)
  • N. Katada et al.

    Apoptosis is inhibited early in the dysplasia-carcinoma sequence of Barrett esophagus

    Arch Surg

    (1997)
  • D. Coppola et al.

    Significance of Fas and retinoblastoma protein expression during the progression of Barrett's metaplasia to adenocarcinoma

    Ann Surg Oncol

    (1999)
  • A. Nandakumar et al.

    Importance of anatomical subsite in correlating risk factors in cancer of the oesophagus—report of a case–control study

    Br J Cancer

    (1996)
  • J.D. Christein et al.

    Prognostic factors associated with resectable carcinoma of the esophagus

    Am Surg

    (2002)
  • S. Singhal et al.

    Prognostic implications of cell cycle, apoptosis, and angiogenesis biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer: a review

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2005)
  • F. Chu et al.

    Expression of Siva-1 protein or its putative amphipathic helical region enhances cisplatin-induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells: effect of elevated levels of BCL-2

    Cancer Res

    (2005)
  • J. Charo et al.

    Bcl-2 overexpression enhances tumor-specific T-cell survival

    Cancer Res

    (2005)
  • Cited by (37)

    • Gene-environment interactions in heavy metal and pesticide carcinogenesis

      2014, Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cell cycle gene polymorphisms may modify cancer risk [73,118,119]. These polymorphisms (such as those in the CCND1 gene) may influence gene–gene and gene–environment interactions, such as smoking and polymorphisms in BCL2 or FAS [120,121]. Inflammation may play a role in cancer pathogenesis [122,123].

    • Cyclin D1 (CCND1) G870A gene polymorphism is an ethnicity-dependent risk factor for digestive tract cancers: A meta-analysis comprising 20,271 subjects

      2012, Cancer Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The search terms resulted in 962 papers (Fig. 1). Data were available from a total of 33 case–control studies (29 in English and 4 in Chinese) with 8534 cases and 11,737 controls: esophageal cancer (n = 4) [22–25], GC (n = 4) [26–29], esophageal cancer and GC (n = 2, we treated them independently) [30,31], liver cancer (n = 4) [32–35], CRC (n = 19) [36–54]. The characteristics of the included studies are listed in Table 1.

    • Genetic variation in BCL-2 and response to interferon in hepatitis C virus type 4 patients

      2011, Clinica Chimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      The nested forward primer of PCR2 (F2): CCC GTT GCT TTT CCT CTG GGA. The nested reversed primer of PCR2 (R2): GGG AGG AGA AGA TGC CCG CCG CGG GG, resulting in a (178 bp) amplicon [16–20]. The PCR1 reaction conditions were as follows; denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 63 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text