Conducting randomised controlled trials across countries with disparate levels of socio-economic development: The experience of the Asia-Pacific Hepatocellular Carcinoma Trials Group

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2013.03.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which constitutes over 85–90% of all primary liver cancers, is the most predominant type of liver cancer, and the third leading cause of cancer related deaths in the world. While the Asia-Pacific is a highly heterogeneous region in geography, ethnicity and in the level of socio-economic development, the main burden of HCC falls in this region and there are compelling reasons and advantages to conduct definitive clinical trials in HCC where it is endemic. The Asia-Pacific Hepatocellular Carcinoma (AHCC) Trials Group was established in 1997 and has faced and overcome challenges that are inherent in conducting clinical trials in a disparate region. Clinical trial infrastructure is rudimentary at many sites and requires significant effort to be expended on training and monitoring to ensure production of definitive data. The benefits of industrial support of Investigator-Initiated Trials are discussed in the context of the Asia-Pacific. The positive experience of the AHCC trials group would be valuable to any collaborative trials in countries with disparate levels of socio-economic development.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which constitutes over 85–90% of all primary liver cancers, is the most predominant type of liver cancer, and the third leading cause of cancer related deaths in the world [1]. It has been estimated that HCC results in 650,000 deaths yearly, of which two-thirds are from Asia [2].

While HCC itself has been reported to be associated with many risk factors including dietary aflatoxin exposure [3], alcohol consumption [4], obesity [5] and diabetes [6], chronic viral hepatitis is most important risk factor [7]. The geographical prevalence of HCC in this region is attributed to the high incidences of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, the main etiological agents for HCC [8], [9], [10], [11]. HBV and HCV account for 80–90% of all HCC worldwide [12].

The resources and expertise required to conduct randomised controlled trials (RCT) were previously confined to economically more developed nations, mainly outside of the Asia-Pacific. There was a consequential paucity of randomised controlled trials in HCC in the endemic regions of the Asia-Pacific and other developing nations.

Clinicians in Asia however share a common goal of seeking efficacious treatment for a cancer epidemic in the region that had few available therapeutic options. This impetus marked the beginning of the AHCC trials group. Subsequently other groups in the region similarly embarked on multi-centre cancer trials namely the Aspirin for Dukes C and High Risk Dukes B Colorectal Cancers (ASCOLT) trial [13] and the Nimotuzumab and Cisplatin/Radiotherapy for locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer trial [14].

Section snippets

History of the trials group

The Asia Pacific Hepatocellular (AHCC) Trials Group was created in 1997 when its first randomised controlled trial in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was initiated by the Singapore General Hospital, and the NMRC Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Research Unit (CTERU), Singapore [15]. This started as a single centre prospective HCC clinical trial at the Singapore General Hospital. Within a year this expanded to a multi-centre trial in the Asia‐Pacific region when centres from leading universities

Paradigm shift: conducting clinical trials in the developing nations of Asia-Pacific

The AHCC trials group was formed at a time when there was very little interest from the pharmaceutical industry to conduct or support randomised controlled trials in the Asia-Pacific in HCC or other diseases [17], [18]. This has changed in the last decade. This paradigm shift was fuelled by mainly economic factors including the rapid expansion of the pharmaceutical industry, the significant potential of new markets, and cost-effectiveness mostly due to relatively cheaper costs of conducting

Meeting the challenges

From the inception of the first AHCC Trial in 1997, the trials group faced novel and significant logistical challenges. These challenges remain similar today, and the lessons learnt are widely applicable.

There were evident gaps in experience with local or multinational trials in some of the member sites of the AHCC trials group. Many centres were from countries that were challenged in socio-economic development and hence also largely rudimentary in medical facilities, infrastructure, and even

The strategic advantage of a collaborative trials network

There is rapidly growing competition globally in the clinical trial industry with an increasing number of Contract Research Organisations (CRO)s, Site Management organisations (SMO)s, academic medical centres, and independent non-academic sites. Consequently, more academic medical centres have started to form research networks [26], [27].

A collaborative trials group is highly valuable, yet continually undervalued. The AHCC trials group is the first of its kind in the Asia-Pacific. Individual

Working with industry

Although pharmaceutical-industry-initiated prospective trials are better funded compared to Investigator-Initiated Trials, increasing uncertainties are raised regarding the values, ethics, and accountability of such trials, and the degree of scientific independence from the pharmaceutical industry [29], [30], [30]. Objectively, both industry-initiated and investigator-initiated trials have deficiencies in clinical trials management [31]. While industry-initiated trials are entirely supported by

Conclusion

The extreme diversity and poor social-economic development in many sites make conducting randomised controlled trials across the Asia Pacific demanding. The experience of the Asia-Pacific Hepatocellular Carcinoma Trials Group has demonstrated that, producing reliable and definitive data is achievable through reinforcing mechanisms that ensure high ethical, regulatory, and training standards. The benefits reaped from conducting trials in this region far outweigh the difficulties. Such endeavours

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the AHCC trials group for providing the information regarding the history of the trials group.

References (34)

  • N.A. Goldenberg et al.

    Improving academic leadership and oversight in large industry-sponsored clinical trials: the ARO-CRO model

    Blood

    (2011)
  • Asia-Pacific Working Party on Prevention of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma in the Asia-Pacific region: consensus statements

    Prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma in the Asia-Pacific region: consensus statements

    J Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2010)
  • G.S. Qian et al.

    A follow-up study of urinary markers of aflatoxin exposure and liver cancer risk in Shanghai, People's Republic of China

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

    (1994)
  • F. Donato et al.

    Alcohol and hepatocellular carcinoma: the effect of lifetime intake and hepatitis virus infections in men and women

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2002)
  • A.M. Di Bisceglie

    Hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma

    Hepatology

    (2009)
  • M.-F. Yuen et al.

    Hepatocellular carcinoma in the Asia pacific region

    J Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2009)
  • Aspirin for Dukes C, High Risk Dukes B colorectal Cancers (ASCOLT)

  • Author Information: The author Nicole Kong is a member of the Secretariat of the AHCC trials group, and Professor Pierce Chow is the protocol chair of several AHCC trials, namely AHCC01, AHCC02, AHCC04, AHCC05 and the currently recruiting AHCC06.

    View full text