Review
Molecular engineering for synthesizing novel structures of metal–organic frameworks with multifunctional properties

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2009.07.020Get rights and content

Abstract

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) which are constructed from metal ions or metal ion clusters and bridging organic linkers, have recently emerged as an important family of porous materials due to their unique structural and functional properties. This review provides the molecular engineering for synthesizing novel MOF structures and summarizes their potential applications. In this review, we present the promotion of the synthesis chemistry in this area and introduce the general methods and the important factor of organic template in the synthesis process. To obtain MOFs with high porosity, three strategies will be introduced. We also discuss how to functionalize the MOFs from two directions: chiral frameworks and frameworks constructed from rare earth metals. The burgeoning area of MOF membranes will also be introduced. Most applications of MOFs are based on their ability to function as hosts. The potential applications including hydrogen storage and methane storage, molecular separation, catalysis, and sensor, are summarized. It is expected that MOFs will provide extraordinary advantages over traditional porous materials and have an important and permanent impact on the future of porous compounds.

Introduction

During the past 10 years, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs, also known as porous coordination polymers (PCPs)) have attracted wide scientific attention, as can be seen from the increasing number of publications devoted to this field [1]. Such high interest is caused not only by the enormous variety of interesting molecular topologies but also owing to their excellent properties, with promising applications such as the storage of gases, molecular separation from the gaseous and liquid mixtures, catalysis, sometimes showing the enantioselectivity, and sensors for special classes of molecules [2], [3]. They also can be designed as multifunctional materials with excellent physical properties like magnetism, luminescence, and optoelectronics [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. However, the majority of these applications are based on the ability of MOFs to behave as hosts for certain molecules. MOFs have already been tested as microporous materials with exceptionally high porosity, uniform but tunable pore size and with well-defined molecular adsorption sites. Many metal–organic frameworks are now reported in the literatures with surface areas greater than 1000 m2 g−1, while some surface areas reported in MOFs have exceeded 5000 m2 g−1, such as MIL-101, UMCM-1, etc. [9], [42]. One of the most important goals in the synthesis of new materials is to achieve real “design” and to obtain compounds with expected structures and properties.

Generally speaking, MOF structures have two main components: the organic linkers and the metal centers. The organic linkers considered as organic secondary building unit (SBU), act as “struts” that bridge metal centers considered as inorganic SBU, which in turn act as “joints” in the resulting MOF architecture [10], [11]. The two main components are connected to each other by coordination bonds, together with other intermolecular interactions, to form a network with a definite topology.

Metal centers in MOF structure are usually metal clusters, like metal–carboxylate clusters, metal–azolate clusters, etc. (Fig. 1) [12], [13], sometimes just metal atoms or rod-shaped clusters [11]. The coordination number and geometries of metal centers rule the inorganic SBU nodes in the target network. However, the challenge to produce the target network structure from the reactions of simple metal ion and organic linkers is that free metal ions contain too many binding sites and have little directional information. The promotion of inorganic synthesis chemistry to needed to solve this problem. The concept inorganic SBU borrowed from the description of zeolites facilitates the design and synthesis of the extended frameworks. The organic linkers are multidentate organic ligands, which are usually carboxylates, azoles, nitriles, etc. (Fig. 2) [10]. The ligands can also be designed for the nodes in the target network, and can be synthesized and modified by organic synthesis. The properties of the metal centers and linkers usually determine the function of the target material, like porosity, pore size, pore surface and other physical properties [2]. If the nodes of network are well-defined, the network structure could possibly be predicted (Fig. 3) [10], [14], [15]. However, there are a large number of possible structures for each geometrical shape, which is another big challenge in the molecular engineering of MOF materials. For example, more than 100 different topologies are possible for linking tetrahedral building blocks together into structures with just one kind of vertex (that is, all vertices related by symmetry), like diamond, the zeolite topologies, etc. Research reveals that only a small number of simple, high-symmetry structures will be expected to form most commonly. More complicated structures can be targeted by judicious use of appropriately shaped inorganic SBUs and linkers, and the consideration of effects of the solvent and template and reaction conditions [10], [16].

One of the most important objectives is the design of a third generation of molecular sieve, with large, regular, accessible cages and tunnels [17], [18]. There are many strategies to achieve large pores and high porosity. In this review, we will introduce three which are mainly considered from three important elements of MOF: topology of framework, inorganic metal centers, and organic ligands:

  • (1)

    Synthesizing four-connected and porous MOFs with zeolite topology: by designing inorganic and organic four-connected nodes, the structures of MOFs with expanded zeolite topology would have larger pores and higher porosity than zeolites.

  • (2)

    Synthesizing MOFs constructed from large metal clusters. Large metal clusters replace a vertex in a network, expanding the size of inorganic SBUs and the dimensions of the network, which leads to large pore size and high porosity.

  • (3)

    Synthesizing MOFs with larger or longer organic linkers. Larger or longer organic ligands would expand the length of linker between inorganic SBU, benefitting large pore diameter and also high porosity just as metal clusters would. Owing to the maturity of organic synthesis, this strategy has proven to be more effective and easier to implement.

Although there are challenges in rational syntheses, MOFs allow systematic engineering of chemical and physical properties and structures through the choice and modifications of their components.

Section snippets

Synthetic methods of MOFs

The most traditional and commonly used crystal growth method is solvent evaporation by evaporating or cooling a saturated solution. A wide variety of other methods to obtain metal–organic frameworks have been explored, such as diffusion method, hydro(solvo)thermal method, microwave reaction and ultrasonic methods.

  • (1)

    Solvent evaporation method. This technique needs convenient conditions: (a) crystals grow in saturated solutions; (b) solubility increases with temperature and crystals can appear

Multifunctional properties

As a new kind of porous material, MOFs manifest more attractive potential applications compared to traditional porous materials, which are mostly due to the possibilities for fine-tuning and modification of their pore structures and properties like pore dimensions, shapes, sizes, and pore surface properties. Most of MOFs have three-dimensional structures incorporating uniform pores and a network of channels. These pores and channels are often filled with terminal and guest species, usually

Conclusions

MOFs as a new member of porous materials have recently become a topic of central importance to inorganic and materials chemistry. In this review, we have provided molecular engineering for synthesis of MOFs and their potential applications. In the area of synthesis there are general methods, such as diffusion method, hydro(solvo)thermal method, microwave and ultrasonic methods, particularly the important factor of organic template in the reaction process. Meanwhile, we have described the

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the State Basic Research Project (2006CB806100), Outstanding Young Scientist Foundation of NSFC (20625102), NSFC (Grant nos. 20831D02, 20571030, 20531030, and 20371020) and “111” program of Ministry of Education of China and Bureau of Science & Technology of Jilin Province, China and International Cooperation Project of Ministry of Science and Technology (2007DFA40830). The results reviewed here have of course been obtained thanks to the contribution of other scientists,

References (106)

  • M.P. Suh et al.

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2008)
  • M. O’Keeffe et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (2000)
  • B. Kesanli et al.

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2003)
  • F.M. Mulder et al.

    Chem. Phys.

    (2005)
  • F.M. Mulder et al.

    Chem. Phys.

    (2008)
  • N.W. Ockwig et al.

    Acc. Chem. Res.

    (2005)
  • S. Kitagawa et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2004)
  • X.M. Zhang et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2007)
  • E.Y. Lee et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2005)
  • Q. Ye et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2006)
  • K.E. Drexler

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. -Phys. Sci.

    (1981)
  • A. Vonhippel

    Science

    (1956)
  • G. Ferey et al.

    Science

    (2005)
  • O.M. Yaghi et al.

    Nature

    (2003)
  • N.L. Rosi et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2005)
  • M. Dinca et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2006)
  • B.L. Chen et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2005)
  • S. Noro et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2002)
  • G. Ferey

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2008)
  • G. Ferey et al.

    Acc. Chem. Res.

    (2005)
  • M. Eddaoudi et al.

    Science

    (2002)
  • W.X. Zhang et al.

    Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.

    (2008)
  • Q.R. Fang et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2007)
  • X. Shi et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2004)
  • Z. Ni et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2006)
  • Q.R. Fang, G.S. Zhu, M. Xue, J.Y. Sun, G. Tian, G. Wu, S.L. Qiu, Dalton T (2004)...
  • O.M. Yaghi et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1996)
  • Z.Q. Wang et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2005)
  • Q.R. Fang et al.

    Cryst. Growth Des.

    (2008)
  • J. Li et al.

    Chem. Mater.

    (1999)
  • R.M. Barrer et al.

    J. Chem. Soc.

    (1951)
  • W.A. Dollase et al.

    Am. Mineral.

    (1993)
  • Y.L. Liu et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2006)
  • D.F. Sava et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2008)
  • Y.L. Liu et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2008)
  • X.C. Huang et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2006)
  • K.S. Park et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2006)
  • B. Wang et al.

    Nature

    (2008)
  • H. Hayashi et al.

    Nat. Mater.

    (2007)
  • R. Banerjee et al.

    Science

    (2008)
  • M. Du et al.

    Cryst. Growth Des.

    (2002)
  • Q.R. Fang, G.S. Zhu, M. Xue, J.Y. Sun, S.L. Qiu, Dalton T (2006)...
  • Q.R. Fang et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2005)
  • H. Li et al.

    Nature

    (1999)
  • Q.R. Fang et al.

    Cryst. Growth Des.

    (2007)
  • Q.R. Fang et al.

    Chem. Eur. J.

    (2006)
  • Q.R. Fang et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2006)
  • K. Koh et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2008)
  • Y.K. Park et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2007)
  • G. Ferey et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (640)

    • Advances in adsorption of Pb(II) by MOFs-based nanocomposites in water

      2024, Progress in Natural Science: Materials International
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text