Elsevier

Clinica Chimica Acta

Volume 498, November 2019, Pages 76-83
Clinica Chimica Acta

Review
Current status of urinary diagnostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2019.08.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Urinary biomarkers are ideal due to its non-invasiveness and easy handling.

  • Some urine components might reflect the presence of colorectal cancer.

  • This review article summarized urinary diagnostic biomarker for colorectal cancer.

  • Some of the candidates show good efficacy in discrimination of colorectal cancer.

Abstract

Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and flexible sigmoidoscopy are the currently using screening methods for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, these methods still have problems of high false positive rates in FOBT and increased invasiveness and cost associated with endoscopy. The development of non-invasive biomarkers is thus important for the diagnosis of CRC. Urine is one of the most commonly used samples for mass screening owing to its non-invasive and simple process of collection; however, the discovery of urinary diagnostic biomarkers for malignancies is still challenging and developing. Since urine contains abundant substances reflecting systemic body condition, urinary biomarker might contribute to detect CRC in a completely non-invasive manner. In this review, we describe the current utility of urinary diagnostic biomarkers for CRC.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide with an incidence rate of 31.6 (male) and 21.2 (female)/100,000 person-years and a death rate of 15.5 (male) and 10.5 (female)/100,000 person-years [1]. Since patients with early stage CRC can be cured with minimally invasive therapy including endoscopic resection, it is very important to identify patients with early stage CRC by mass screening. Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and flexible sigmoidoscopy have been established as screening methods and there is strong evidence that these methods can help reduce disease-specific morbidity and mortality in CRC [2,3]. The American Cancer Society recommends either stool-based tests (FOBT or DNA) or structural tests [colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography (CTC)] for adults aged 50 years and older [4]. However, FOBT is well known to have many false positives and is easily affected by non-specific bleeding, thus initiating unnecessary invasive examinations [5]. In addition to its invasiveness, colonoscopy is also costly and time consuming. These reasons make it difficult to disseminate colonoscopy globally as a method of medical checkup. Although CTC might be proposed for patients who refuse colonoscopy, benefits of CTC in terms of accuracy and comfortability are unclear [6,7].

Research for non-invasive detection of CRC has been conducted using various materials in serum/plasma, feces, and urine. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19–9) are commonly used as less-invasive biomarkers in clinical practice; however, their sensitivities are very low, and they cannot accomplish early stage detection [8]. Despite the less-invasiveness, serum sample collection still needs special instruments and healthcare professionals to draw blood. Compared to reports regarding serum and fecal samples, there are much fewer reports using urine samples as a diagnostic biomarker of CRC. However, urine containing various components is considered to be an ideal sample for medical checkup because it can be collected completely non-invasively without requiring the patients to visit the clinic (Fig. 1) [9,10]. In addition, the urinary tract is so clean biologically that the materials in urine might be less affected by microorganisms than in feces. The discovery of urinary biomarker is thus desirable for the diagnoses of several malignancies including CRC. We have had longstanding interest in the discovery of urinary diagnostic biomarkers for gastrointestinal cancers including gastric cancer and CRC [[11], [12], [13], [14]]. In this review, we summarize and discuss urinary biomarkers that can be used for the detection of CRC.

Section snippets

Protein markers

Since excreted proteins are not abundant in urine, a small amount of urinary protein may be a disadvantage in the detection of CRC because it is sometimes difficult to identify these slight differences in the concentration of target proteins. On the other hand, this small amount of target protein is an advantage in the identification of reliable biomarkers because the urinary target protein that emerges after glomerular filtering and tubular resorption in kidney is not contaminated with large

Genetic markers

DNA methylation regulates transcription and its abnormality could cause carcinogenesis. Furthermore, DNA methylation is also expected to be useful as a diagnostic marker and therapeutic target for CRC [[25], [26], [27]]. It is possible that mutated DNAs that originate from cancer tissues are excreted into the urine either within enclosed microvesicles such as exosomes or in the naked form [28,29]. As shown in Table 2, there are several reports of urinary genetic markers using methylated or

Metabolomics

Since urinary metabolites are derived from glomerular filtration of serum and secretion in the renal tubule, it is possible that the metabolites secreted into the blood from cancer tissues are detected in urine of the patients with CRC. The development of metabolomics using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS) has made it possible to analyze a large number of metabolites [37,38].

Table 3 lists the urinary metabolite biomarkers used in the detection of CRC. Notably, despite

Prostaglandin/reactive oxygen species

It has been reported that prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) plays crucial roles in promoting angiogenesis and carcinogenesis under the regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), consequently resulting in proliferation and metastasis [53,54]. Meanwhile, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by oxidative stress such as inflammation can induce nucleic acid damage and ROS are associated with carcinogenesis [[55], [56], [57]]. Based on these reports, some studies identified the diagnostic biomarkers related to

Other markers

Other specific biomarkers are summarized in Table 5. Hirotsu et al. reported a very unique method that used Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) having chemotaxis to the urine from patients with CRC. Albeit a small sample size of CRC, C. elegans showed an excellent diagnostic performance with 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity [61]. There is another unique method that uses canine scent in the detection of CRC from breath and fecal samples with over 90% sensitivity and specificity [62].

Conclusions

The present review provided the candidates for urinary diagnostic biomarkers for the diagnosis of CRC. Although none of them have been clinically applied because of the lack of validation, accumulating evidence indicates the potency of urinary test as a screening tool for CRC. Although the fecal assays including FOBT and MT-sDNA are more advanced for CRC diagnosis, urine samples still have some advantages compared to faces and blood samples. First, as urine contains very few protein and

Declaration of Competing Interest

None of the authors declare any conflicts of interest. No financial support was received for this study.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Honyaku Center Inc. (https://www.honyakucenter.jp/) for the English language review. Financial support was not received for this study.

References (75)

  • C. Global Burden of Disease Cancer et al.

    Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted Life-Years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study

    JAMA Oncol.

    (2018)
  • P. Hewitson et al.

    Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update

    Am. J. Gastroenterol.

    (2008)
  • R.E. Schoen et al.

    Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2012)
  • A.M.D. Wolf et al.

    Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society

    CA Cancer J. Clin.

    (2018)
  • A. Kapidzic et al.

    Attendance and diagnostic yield of repeated two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening for colorectal cancer

    Gut

    (2017)
  • L. van Dam et al.

    Time requirements and health effects of participation in colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography in a randomized controlled trial

    Endoscopy

    (2013)
  • M. Pioche et al.

    Colon capsule versus computed tomography colonography for colorectal cancer screening in patients with positive fecal occult blood test who refuse colonoscopy: a randomized trial

    Endoscopy

    (2018)
  • N. Wild et al.

    A combination of serum markers for the early detection of colorectal cancer

    Clin. Cancer Res.

    (2010)
  • S. Bouatra et al.

    The human urine metabolome

    PLoS ONE

    (2013)
  • T. Shimura et al.

    Urinary ADAM12 and MMP-9/NGAL complex detect the presence of gastric cancer

    Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila.)

    (2015)
  • T. Shimura et al.

    Urinary kallikrein 10 predicts the incurability of gastric cancer

    Oncotarget

    (2017)
  • H. Iwasaki et al.

    A novel urinary microRNA biomarker panel for detecting gastric cancer

    J. Gastroenterol.

    (2019)
  • N. Carty et al.

    Urinary tissue factor activity in colorectal disease

    Br. J. Surg.

    (1990)
  • M. Tobi et al.

    Urinary organ specific neoantigen. A potentially diagnostic test for colorectal cancer

    Dig. Dis. Sci.

    (1995)
  • S. El-Masry et al.

    Utility of slot-blot-ELISA as a new, fast, and sensitive immunoassay for detection of carcinoembryonic antigen in the urine samples of patients with various gastrointestinal malignancies

    J. Immunoass. Immunochem.

    (2007)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Identification of kininogen-1 as a serum biomarker for the early detection of advanced colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer

    PLoS ONE

    (2013)
  • H.N. Liu et al.

    Serum microRNA signatures and metabolomics have high diagnostic value in colorectal cancer using two novel methods

    Cancer Sci.

    (2018)
  • Y.F. Song et al.

    Serum Cyr61 as a potential biomarker for diagnosis of colorectal cancer

    Clin. Transl. Oncol.

    (2017)
  • H. Xie et al.

    Diagnostic value evaluation of trefoil factors family 3 for the early detection of colorectal cancer

    World J. Gastroenterol.

    (2017)
  • Q. Li et al.

    Serum trefoil factor 3 as a protein biomarker for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer

    Technol. Cancer Res. Treat.

    (2017)
  • D.G. Ward et al.

    Proteomic profiling of urine for the detection of colon cancer

    Proteome Sci.

    (2008)
  • S.C. Glockner et al.

    Methylation of TFPI2 in stool DNA: a potential novel biomarker for the detection of colorectal cancer

    Cancer Res.

    (2009)
  • B.B. Lee et al.

    Aberrant methylation of APC, MGMT, RASSF2A, and Wif-1 genes in plasma as a biomarker for early detection of colorectal cancer

    Clin. Cancer Res.

    (2009)
  • D.J. Weisenberger et al.

    DNA methylation aberrancies delineate clinically distinct subsets of colorectal cancer and provide novel targets for epigenetic therapies

    Oncogene

    (2018)
  • M. van der Vaart et al.

    The origin of circulating free DNA

    Clin. Chem.

    (2007)
  • A. Amiot et al.

    The detection of the methylated Wif-1 gene is more accurate than a fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening

    PLoS ONE

    (2014)
  • W. Xiao et al.

    Quantitative detection of methylated NDRG4 gene as a candidate biomarker for diagnosis of colorectal cancer

    Oncol. Lett.

    (2015)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Multi sensor application-based for measuring the quality of human urine on first-void urine

      2021, Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Urinary bladder infections can cause odor and cloudiness of urine [13,14]. In medicine, urine is used to diagnose diseases, such as colorectal cancer [15], diabetes mellitus [16], pregnancy complications [17], and to determine various kidney diseases such as: (Glomerulonephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and pyelonephritis) [18]. Typically, diabetes mellitus is diagnosed using an invasive method that involves pricking the skin to draw blood [19], However, the invasive test requires high costs and a long testing time.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text