Elsevier

Clinica Chimica Acta

Volume 455, 1 April 2016, Pages 7-14
Clinica Chimica Acta

Invited critical review
Emerging molecular biomarker targets for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.01.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Novel biomarkers are critical for ALS diagnosis and prognosis, and in trials.

  • pNFH and NFL have been largely studied and constitute promising ALS biomarkers.

  • Novel biomarker targets are investigated and others will be discovered in the future.

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects upper (UMN) and lower motor (LMN) neurons. It is associated with a short survival and there is no effective treatment, in spite of a large number of clinical trials. Strong efforts have been made to identify novel disease biomarkers to support diagnosis, provide information on prognosis, to measure disease progression in trials and increase our knowledge on disease pathogenesis.

Electromyography by testing the function of the LMN can be used as a biomarker of its dysfunction. A number of electrophysiological and neuroimaging methods have been explored to identify a reliable marker of UMN degeneration. Recently, strong evidence from independent groups, large cohorts of patients and multicenter studies indicate that neurofilaments are very promising diagnostic biomarkers, in particular cerebrospinal fluid and blood levels of phosphoneurofilament heavy chain and neurofilament light chain. Furthermore, their increased levels are associated with poor prognosis.

Additional studies have been performed aiming to identify other biomarkers, which alone or in combination with neurofilaments could increase the sensitivity and the specificity of the assays. Emerging molecular marker targets are being discovered, but more studies with standardized methods are required in larger cohorts of ALS patients.

Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has an incidence of 2–3/100,000 and a prevalence of 6–7/100,000 in Europe [1], [2]. Most patients die within 2–5 years after first symptoms, due to complications related to impairment of the respiratory function [3]. However, some patients have a shorter survival, in particular patients presenting with respiratory impairment [4], and others have a very slow progression surviving for more than 30 years. Generally, first symptoms occur in the age interval of 55–65 years, but disease can start in very old subjects or in very young people [5]. About 5–10% of the cases have a positive family history for this disease; but, in most cases (90–95%) there is no other affected family member — sporadic cases. The only available drug used worldwide for this disease is the Riluzole, but its effectiveness in increasing survival is modest [6]. Non-invasive ventilation is a quite accepted intervention to increase quality of life and survival of ALS patients [7]. Gastrostomy, multidisciplinary care [7], sialorrhea treatment [8] and communication aids [9] are useful to increase quality of life of ALS patients.

Strong efforts have been made to identify novel biomarkers for ALS that could be useful to support earlier diagnosis, inform about prognosis, monitor disease progression in clinical trials and provide better understanding of disease pathogenesis. Targeted approaches based on the known mechanisms of the disease have been largely explored aiming to identify deregulated molecules. On the other hand, untargeted approaches based on the systematic analysis of biomolecules using metabolomics, genomics, proteomics, glycomics and lipidomics strategies have been used with the same purpose. The biological material used in the analyses consisted of tissues from human patients, such as biofluids – blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), urine – or skin, as well as samples from necropsy (spinal cord and brain). Animal and cell models of ALS deriving from known mutations associated with the disease have also constituted a source of material for analysis.

Different aspects in the search of biomarkers for ALS have been excellently reviewed by several authors [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. In this paper we will focus on the literature about neurofilaments, which are the most promising biomarkers for ALS at present, and also other emerging targets from the CSF, blood and urine.

Section snippets

Diagnosis

Diagnosis of ALS is mostly supported by clinical observation and electrodiagnostic testing. Patients are affected by progressive weakness and functional impairment. Neurological examination should disclose lower (LMN) and upper (UMN) signs, in particular muscular atrophy, weakness and fasciculations (LMN signs) and brisk tendon reflexes, spasticity and extensor plantar response (UMN signs), and it should be confirmed by normal sensory function and no other clinical signs that could indicate a

Genetics

Mutations in several genes have been associated with the development of ALS (Table 1) (http://alsod.iop.kcl.ac.uk/; [21], [22]). The first gene found to be associated with ALS was cupper, zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD1), which accounts for about 20% of familial cases [23], but with large variability in different countries. At present, more than 170 different mutations have been identified in this gene (http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene/SOD1) that cause the disease, curiously pathogenic mutations are

Production of the cerebrospinal fluid

The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is contained in the brain ventricles and in the spinal and cranial subarachnoid spaces. CSF is mainly secreted by the choroid plexuses and absorbed in cranial and spinal arachnoid villi to its final pathway in the venous system; however, recently, it has been recognized that cranial and spinal nerve sheaths, the adventitia of cerebral arteries and the cribriform plate form a sort of lymphatic outflow system in the central nervous system. The CSF circulation is

Conclusions

Although diagnostic accuracy is high in ALS, as derived from clinical and electrophysiological assessment [96] diagnosis tend to be delayed [97]. The main delays in the diagnostic process are the time gap between symptoms onset to medical advice, and the time from initial medical assessment to diagnosis, in general established by a neurologist. Probably, a measurement based on CSF analysis will not shorten the second step, and any biomarker will not act on the first one. Nonetheless, a simple

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge funding from: EU Joint Programme — Neurodegenerative Disease Research(JPND) project SOPHIA, supported through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (JPND/0002/2011; JPND/0003/2011), Portugal; Euronanomed 2 ERA-NET project GlioEx, supported through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (ENMed/0001/2013), Portugal; iNOVA4Health — UID/Multi/04462/2013, a program financially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia/Ministério da Educação e Ciência, through national funds

References (124)

  • M. Goncalves et al.

    Phosphoneurofilament heavy chain and N-glycomics from the cerebrospinal fluid in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Clin. Chim. Acta

    (2015)
  • N. Norgren et al.

    Elevated neurofilament levels in neurological diseases

    Brain Res.

    (2003)
  • C. Gomes et al.

    Evidence for secretion of Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase via exosomes from a cell model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2007)
  • D. Chiasserini et al.

    Proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid extracellular vesicles: a comprehensive dataset

    J. Proteome

    (2014)
  • Z. Su et al.

    Discovery of a biomarker and lead small molecules to target r(GGGGCC)-associated defects in c9FTD/ALS

    Neuron

    (2014)
  • C. Wilke et al.

    Total tau is increased, but phosphorylated tau not decreased, in cerebrospinal fluid in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Neurobiol. Aging

    (2015)
  • N. Just et al.

    High erythropoietin and low vascular endothelial growth factor levels in cerebrospinal fluid from hypoxemic ALS patients suggest an abnormal response to hypoxia

    Neuromuscul. Disord.

    (2007)
  • J. Brettschneider et al.

    Proteome analysis reveals candidate markers of disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2010)
  • A. Wuolikainen et al.

    ALS patients with mutations in the SOD1 gene have an unique metabolomic profile in the cerebrospinal fluid compared with ALS patients without mutations

    Mol. Genet. Metab.

    (2012)
  • H. Nzwalo et al.

    Delayed diagnosis in ALS: the problem continues

    J. Neurol. Sci.

    (2014)
  • C.K. Hand et al.

    A novel locus for familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, on chromosome 18q

    Am. J. Hum. Genet.

    (2002)
  • A. Chio et al.

    Parals, epidemiology of ALS in Italy: a 10-year prospective population-based study

    Neurology

    (2009)
  • J. Mandrioli et al.

    The epidemiology of ALS in Modena, Italy

    Neurology

    (2003)
  • N. Stambler et al.

    Prognostic indicators of survival in ALS. ALS CNTF treatment study group

    Neurology

    (1998)
  • L.O. Gouveia et al.

    Young-onset sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a distinct nosological entity?

    Amyotroph. Lateral Scler.

    (2007)
  • J. Costa et al.

    Diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapeutic targets in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets

    (2010)
  • P.M. Andersen et al.

    EFNS guidelines on the clinical management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (MALS)—revised report of an EFNS task force

    Eur. J. Neurol.

    (2012)
  • J. Costa et al.

    Botulinum toxin type-B improves sialorrhea and quality of life in bulbaronset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    J. Neurol.

    (2008)
  • A. Londral et al.

    Quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients and caregivers: impact of assistive communication from early stages

    Muscle Nerve

    (2015)
  • J. Tarasiuk et al.

    CSF markers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    J. Neural Transm.

    (2012)
  • M. Otto et al.

    Roadmap and standard operating procedures for biobanking and discovery of neurochemical markers in ALS

    Amyotroph. Lateral Scler.

    (2012)
  • M.R. Turner et al.

    Mechanisms, models and biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Frontotemporal Degener

    (2013)
  • T. Kruger et al.

    Proteome analysis of body fluids for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis biomarker discovery

    Proteomics Clin. Appl.

    (2013)
  • L. Robelin et al.

    Blood biomarkers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: myth or reality?

    Biomed. Res. Int.

    (2014)
  • A. Abdelhak et al.

    Brain-specific cytoskeletal damage markers in cerebrospinal fluid: is there a common pattern between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and primary progressive multiple sclerosis?

    Int. J. Mol. Sci.

    (2015)
  • S. Vucic et al.

    Assessment of cortical excitability using threshold tracking techniques

    Muscle Nerve

    (2006)
  • A. Chio et al.

    Motor neuron disease in 2014. Biomarkers for ALS—in search of the promised land

    Nat. Rev. Neurol.

    (2015)
  • D.R. Rosen et al.

    Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Nature

    (1993)
  • E.B. Lee et al.

    Gains or losses: molecular mechanisms of TDP43-mediated neurodegeneration

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2012)
  • B.N. Smith et al.

    The C9ORF72 expansion mutation is a common cause of ALS +/− FTD in Europe and has a single founder

    Eur. J. Hum. Genet.

    (2013)
  • K. Zhang et al.

    The C9orf72 repeat expansion disrupts nucleocytoplasmic transport

    Nature

    (2015)
  • B.D. Freibaum et al.

    GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9orf72 compromises nucleocytoplasmic transport

    Nature

    (2015)
  • A. Yuan et al.

    Neurofilaments at a glance

    J. Cell Sci.

    (2012)
  • D.G. Munoz et al.

    Accumulation of phosphorylated neurofilaments in anterior horn motoneurons of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients

    J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.

    (1988)
  • S.A. Yuzwa et al.

    Increasing O-GlcNAc slows neurodegeneration and stabilizes tau against aggregation

    Nat. Chem. Biol.

    (2012)
  • J. Brettschneider et al.

    Axonal damage markers in cerebrospinal fluid are increased in ALS

    Neurology

    (2006)
  • T.S. Reijn et al.

    CSF neurofilament protein analysis in the differential diagnosis of ALS

    J. Neurol.

    (2009)
  • J. Ganesalingam et al.

    Combination of neurofilament heavy chain and complement C3 as CSF biomarkers for ALS

    J. Neurochem.

    (2011)
  • J. Ganesalingam et al.

    pNfH is a promising biomarker for ALS

    Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Frontotemporal Degener

    (2013)
  • K.B. Boylan et al.

    Phosphorylated neurofilament heavy subunit (pNF-H) in peripheral blood and CSF as a potential prognostic biomarker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Exosomes based strategies for brain drug delivery

      2023, Biomaterials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Compared with cell-therapy, exosome based therapy may be more feasible and non-invasive, future investigation may also combine exosome based therapy to non-invasive deep-brain stimulation and local microenvironment regulation. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive muscular paralysis due to motor cortex brainstem and spinal cord motor neurons degradation [139–141]. In terms of novel treatment strategies, several exosome-based approaches have been explored for ALS.

    • Causal effects of serum metabolites on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A Mendelian randomization study

      2020, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      The clinical symptoms begin insidiously with focal weakness, but spread relentlessly to most muscles, including the diaphragm (Brown and Al-Chalabi, 2017). ALS generally leads to the death of the patient within 2–5 years of appearance of the first symptoms, due to complications in respiratory functions (Costa and de Carvalho, 2016; de Carvalho et al., 1996). So far, there have been no effective treatments for patients with ALS, despite a large number of clinical trials.

    • Biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid for synucleinopathies, tauopathies, and other neurodegenerative disorders

      2017, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      NF proteins are the most promising biomarkers for ALS. All 18 studies that evaluated CSF levels of NFL and phosphorylated NFH (pNFH) in ALS, recently reviewed by Costa and Carvalho (2016), consistently reported higher levels in ALS in comparison to controls, PD, and other neurodegenerative diseases. Moreover, NFL and pNFH CSF levels were also negatively correlated with survival rate and positively correlated with disease progression.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text