Candidate olfactory genes identified in Heortia vitessoides (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) by antennal transcriptome analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbd.2018.11.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Heortia vitessoides Moore is the most severe defoliating pest of Aquilaria sinensis (Lour.) Gilg (Thymelaeaceae) forests. Olfaction in insects is essential for host identification, mating, and oviposition, in which olfactory proteins, including odorant-binding proteins (OBPs), chemosensory proteins (CSPs), olfactory receptors (ORs), ionotropic receptors (IRs), and sensory neuron membrane proteins (SNMPs), are responsible for chemical signaling. Here, we determined the transcriptomes of male and female adult antennae of H. vitessoides. We assembled 52,383 unigenes and annotated their putative gene functions based on the gene ontology (GO), eukaryotic ortholog groups (KOG), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases. Overall, 61 olfactory-related transcripts, including nine OBPs, 10 CSPs, 28 ORs, 12 IRs, and two SNMPs, were identified. Expression patterns of OBPs and CSPs in the female antennae, male antennae, and legs were performed using reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). The results revealed that HvitOBP1, HvitOBP6, and HvitGOBP1 were enriched in the female antennae, while HvitOBP2, HvitOBP3, HvitOBP5, HvitGOBP2, and HvitPBP1 were enriched in the male antennae. HvitOBP4 was expressed at nearly the same level in the antennae of both males and females. Four CSPs (HvitCSP3, HvitCSP5, HvitCSP7, and HvitCSP10) and two CSPs (HvitCSP1 and HvitCSP4) were expressed at higher levels in the female and male antennae, respectively. HvitCSP6 was expressed at higher levels both in the female antennae and legs. Three CSP genes (HvitCSP2, HvitCSP8, and HvitCSP9) were expressed at higher levels in the legs. These results provide a basis for further studies on the molecular olfactory mechanisms of H. vitessoides.

Introduction

Insects detect chemical signals through their olfactory system, which obtains information from the environment and initiates behaviors such as habitat selection, mate selection, hunting, gathering, tropism, and communication (Field et al., 2000; Fatouros et al., 2008; Leal, 2013). Olfactory-related proteins are mainly located on the antennae, and to a lesser extent on other sensory appendages (Vosshall and Stocker, 2007; Sheng et al., 2017). There are many types of olfactory-related proteins, including odorant-binding proteins (OBPs), chemosensory proteins (CSPs), olfactory receptors (ORs), ionotropic receptors (IRs), and sensory neuron membrane proteins (SNMPs) (Fan et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2017).

Insect OBPs are soluble, acidic, and are highly concentrated in the lymph of the chemosensory sensilla of insect antennae (Vogt et al., 1991). OBPs are widely involved in olfactory perception and play a key role in transporting hydrophobic odorants to the ORs (Sanchez-Gracia et al., 2009). Based on the presence or absence of cysteine residues, OBPs can be divided into five groups: ‘Classical’ OBPs (with only one six-cysteine motif), ‘Dimer’ OBPs (with two six-cysteine motifs), ‘Plus-C’ OBPs (with extra cysteines), ‘Minus-C’ OBPs (with some cysteine residues missing), and ‘Atypical’ OBPs (with 9–10 cysteine residues) (Zhou et al., 2010). The classical OBPs are usually divided into subfamilies of pheromone-binding proteins (PBPs), general odorant-binding proteins (GOBPs), and antennal-binding protein X homologs (ABPXs) in lepidopteran species (Zhang et al., 2011). PBPs mainly bind to insect sex pheromones, which are a blend of compounds emitted by females to attract males, and GOBPs are usually expressed equally in the antennae of both sexes, consistent with a proposed role in the detection of both odorants and sex pheromones (Grosse-Wilde et al., 2006; He et al., 2010).

Insect CSPs are small, soluble, acidic proteins that have evolved to contain four conserved cysteine residues (Pelosi et al., 2014). Compared to OBPs, CSPs exhibit a wider expression profile, being found in olfactory tissues including the antennae, maxillary palps, and labial palps (Sheng et al., 2017). However, CSPs are also expressed broadly in non-olfactory tissues, including the pheromone glands, legs, and wings, suggesting that they participate in other physiological processes (Liu et al., 2015; Cui et al., 2017).

Insect ORs are seven transmembrane domain proteins that have a specific reversed membrane topology (intracellular N-terminus) compared to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) (Benton et al., 2006). Insect olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) express two types of ORs: conventional ORs, a highly divergent family of receptors that are expressed in small subpopulations of OSNs; and a member of the olfactory co-receptor family, ORco (formerly called OR83b), a receptor without odor sensitivity, which is expressed in the majority of OSNs and is remarkably conserved across insect species (Larsson et al., 2004; Pitts et al., 2004; Smith, 2007). Based on chemical perception, ORs in the lepidopteran pheromone system are divided into two major groups: pheromone receptors (PRs) and general odorant receptors. PRs are considered to be connected to olfactory signal transduction of pheromone compounds in peripheral olfactory reception; and general odorant receptors are thought to detect plant volatiles (Jia et al., 2016). Insect ORs function via ORco, which transduces odorant signals by both heteromeric ligand-gated ion channels and cyclic nucleotide-activated cation channels, and therefore, can respond to signals rapidly, transiently, sensitively, and efficiently (Sato et al., 2008; Wicher et al., 2008).

IRs are a recently identified chemosensory receptor family and are another variant subfamily of the ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs). The insect IRs contain structural regions that are conserved in iGluRs, namely, three transmembrane domains, a bipartite ligand-binding domain with two lobes, and one ion channel pore (Cao et al., 2014). IRs are expressed in coeloconic OSNs and may function in the detection of acids and ammonia (Zhao et al., 2016a). Insect IRs can be divided into two distinct subfamilies based on where they are expressed: the conserved “antennal IRs” and the species-specific “divergent IRs” (Croset et al., 2010; Abuin et al., 2011). Similar to ORco, IR25a and IR8a act as co-receptors, are broadly expressed, and play essential roles in regulating IR sensory cilia targeting and IR-based sensory channels (Abuin et al., 2011).

SNMPs, the only identified neuronal members of the CD36 family, belong to a larger gene family of receptors characterized by the human protein CD36. Insect SNMP/CD36 genes are divided into three major groups, and SNMPs belong to group three, which are divided into two subgroups, SNMP1 and SNMP2 (Nichols and Vogt, 2008). The SNMP1 subgroup is expressed in the antennae, and its members are related to pheromone-specific OSNs. Members of the SNMP2 subgroup are expressed in neurons, and to a greater extent, in sensilla support cells (Benton et al., 2007; Forstner et al., 2008; Vogt et al., 2009).

Heortia vitessoides Moore (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) is a serious defoliating pest of Aquilaria sinensis (Lour.) Gilg (Thymelaeaceae), which produces valuable agarwood, a fragrant wood widely used in traditional medicine and the incense industry (Jin et al., 2016). The distribution of H. vitessoides ranges from India, Nepal, China, Sri Lanka, through South-East Asia and the East Indies to Queensland, the New Hebrides, and Fiji (Qiao et al., 2012). The biological characteristics, pesticide control methods, and behavior of H. vitessoides have been extensively studied for applications in insect control (Cheng et al., 2017). However, there have been no reports detailing an effective method of controlling this pest. Although the electroantennographic and behavioral responses of H. vitessoides to host plant volatiles have been studied (Qiao et al., 2012), little is known about the molecular basis of H. vitessoides olfaction. Therefore, the identification of olfactory genes will help expand our understanding of how this pest recognizes and locates its host, and may also facilitate the design of attractants for pest control. In this study, the female and male antennal transcriptomes of H. vitessoides were sequenced on a BGISEQ-500 platform, and 61 candidate olfactory genes were identified (nine OBPs, 10 CSPs, 28 ORs, 12 IRs, and two SNMPs). Furthermore, the sex expression profiles of nine OBPs and 10 CSPs were also determined by reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). To our knowledge, this is the first report on the identification and characterization of multiple olfactory genes in this forest pest.

Section snippets

Insect rearing and antennae collection

H. vitessoides larvae were collected in May 2017, from an A. sinensis plantation (22° 01′ N, 110° 25′ E) in Huazhou, Guangdong, China. No chemical treatment was applied before or during collection. The insects were fed with fresh A. sinensis leaves in the laboratory under conditions of 26 ± 2 °C with 70 ± 2% relative humidity, and a consistent 14 h:10 h light/dark cycle. After pupation, pupae were sexed according to the morphology of the eighth and ninth abdominal segments (Cao et al., 2013).

Sequencing and de novo assembly

To identify the olfactory genes from H. vitessoides, cDNA from the male and female antennae were sequenced using the BGISEQ-500 platform. Sequencing yielded a total of 117.05 and 117.04 Mb raw reads for the male and female antennae samples, respectively (Table S3). After removing adaptor sequences, low quality sequences, and N-containing sequences, 110.52 and 111.07 Mb clean reads were generated using the raw data from the male and female antennae, respectively (Table S3). All clean reads from

Discussion

There has been considerable progress at identifying olfactory genes in insects. Thanks to next-generation sequencing techniques such as RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and aided by decreasing costs and other technical advances, researchers are better able to obtain vast amounts of genetic information from non-model organisms without prior sequence knowledge (Liu et al., 2016). In recent years, RNA-seq has been used to identify olfactory genes by antennal transcriptome sequencing in many Crambidae

Conclusions

In summary, the female and male antennal transcriptomes of H. vitessoides were sequenced using next-generation sequencing technology. Moreover, we have identified a number of novel olfactory genes from this forest pest: nine OBPs, 10 CSPs, 28 ORs, 12 IRs, and two SNMPs. The OBP and CSP genes we identified were differentially expressed in various sexes and tissues, indicating their distinct functions in olfactory and other physiological processes. To investigate the olfactory recognition

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. MingLiang Yin (College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University) for his assistance with the phylogenetic analyses.

References (77)

  • Y.J. Liu et al.

    De novo assembly of the transcriptome for oriental armyworm Mythimna separata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and analysis on insecticide resistance-related genes

    J. Insect Sci.

    (2016)
  • Z. Nichols et al.

    The SNMP/CD36 gene family in Diptera, Hymenoptera and Coleoptera: Drosophila melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura, Anopheles gambiae, Aedes aegypti, Apis mellifera, and Tribolium castaneum

    Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.

    (2008)
  • S. Sheng et al.

    Candidate chemosensory genes identified in the endoparasitoid Meteorus pulchricornis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) by antennal transcriptome analysis

    Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D: Genomics Proteomics

    (2017)
  • L. Sun et al.

    Identification and expression patterns of Anoplophora chinensis (forster) chemosensory receptor genes from the antennal transcriptome

    Front. Physiol.

    (2018)
  • K. Tanaka et al.

    Highly selective tuning of a silkworm olfactory receptor to a key mulberry leaf volatile

    Curr. Biol.

    (2009)
  • R.G. Vogt et al.

    The insect SNMP gene family

    Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.

    (2009)
  • T.T. Zhang et al.

    Construction and analysis of cDNA libraries from the antennae of male and female cotton bollworms Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and expression analysis of putative odorant-binding protein genes

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (2011)
  • S.F. Zhang et al.

    Antennal transcriptome analysis and comparison of olfactory genes in two sympatric defoliators, Dendrolimus houi and Dendrolimus kikuchii (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae)

    Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.

    (2014)
  • S.S. Zhou et al.

    De novo analysis of the Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) antenna transcriptome and expression patterns of olfactory genes

    Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D: Genomics Proteomics

    (2014)
  • R. Benton et al.

    Atypical membrane topology and heteromeric function of Drosophila odorant receptors in vivo

    PLoS Biol.

    (2006)
  • R. Benton et al.

    An essential role for a CD36-related in pheromone detection in Drosophila

    Nature

    (2007)
  • C.L. Cao et al.

    A method used for distinguishing the pupae sexuality of Heortia vitessoide

    Chin. For. Sci. Technol.

    (2013)
  • D.P. Cao et al.

    Identification of candidate olfactory genes in Chilo suppressalis by antennal transcriptome analysis

    Int. J. Biol. Sci.

    (2014)
  • A. Conesa et al.

    Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research

    Bioinformatics

    (2005)
  • V. Croset et al.

    Ancient protostome origin of chemosensory ionotropic glutamate receptors and the evolution of insect taste and olfaction

    PLoS Genet.

    (2010)
  • J. Fan et al.

    An overview of odorant-binding protein functions in insect peripheral olfactory reception

    Genet. Mol. Res.

    (2011)
  • N.E. Fatouros et al.

    Foraging behavior of egg parasitoids exploiting chemical information

    Behav. Ecol.

    (2008)
  • B. Feng et al.

    Transcriptome and expression profiling analysis link patterns of gene expression to antennal responses in Spodoptera litura

    BMC Genomics

    (2015)
  • B. Feng et al.

    Antennal transcriptome analysis of the piercing moth Oraesia emarginata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

    PLoS One

    (2017)
  • L.M. Field et al.

    Molecular studies in insect olfaction

    Insect Mol. Biol.

    (2000)
  • M. Forstner et al.

    Differential expression of SNMP-1 and SNMP-2 proteins in pheromone-sensitive hairs of moths

    Chem. Senses

    (2008)
  • D. Gong et al.

    The odorant binding protein gene family from the genome of silkworm, Bombyx mori

    BMC Genomics

    (2009)
  • L. Gong et al.

    Cloning and characterization of three chemosensory proteins from Spodoptera exigua and effects of gene silencing on female survival and reproduction

    B. Entomol. Res.

    (2012)
  • M.G. Grabherr et al.

    Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome

    Nat. Biotechnol.

    (2011)
  • E. Grosse-Wilde et al.

    A pheromone-binding protein mediates the bombykol-induced activation of a pheromone receptor in vitro

    Chem. Senses

    (2006)
  • E. Grosse-Wilde et al.

    Antennal transcriptome of Manduca sexta

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2011)
  • S.H. Gu et al.

    Molecular characterization and differential expression of olfactory genes in the antennae of the black cutworm moth Agrotis ipsilon

    PLoS One

    (2014)
  • X.L. He et al.

    Binding of the general odorant binding protein of Bombyx mori BmorGOBP2 to the moth sex pheromone components

    J. Chem. Ecol.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Identification and expression profiling of chemosensory membrane protein genes in Achelura yunnanensis (Lepidoptera: Zygaenidae)

      2021, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - Part D: Genomics and Proteomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      For the remaining 121 genes, as many as 95 (61 AyunORs, 13 AyunGRs, and 21 AyunIRs) were detected in female and/or male antennae at considerable levels (FPKM ≥ 1.00 and qPCR results) (Fig. 8 and Table S2). The numbers of chemosensory receptors in antennae of A. yunnanensis were more than those of other lepidopteran species derived from antennal transcriptomes including H. rhodope in Zygaenidae (45 HrhoORs, eight HrhoGRs, and nine HrhoIRs) (Yang et al., 2020b), Cydia pomonella in Tortricidae (43 CpomORs, one CpomGR, and 15 CpomIRs) (Bengtsson et al., 2012), Plodia interpunctella in Pyralidae (47 PintORs, nine PintGRs, and 14 PintIRs) (Jia et al., 2018) and Heortia vitessoides in Crambidae (28 HvitORs and 12 HvitIRs) (Cheng et al., 2019). Moreover, their numbers were virtually equal to Ectropis grisescens in Geometridae (59 EgriORs and 24 EgriIRs) (Li et al., 2017), M. separate (62 MsepORs, eight MsepGRs, and 20 MsepIRs) (Du et al., 2018) and S. littoralis (56 SlitORs, ten SlitGRs and 17 SlitIRs) (Walker et al., 2019) in Noctuidae.

    • Identification and expression characteristics of putative chemosensory proteins in the peach fruit borer Carposina sasakii Matsumura (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae)

      2021, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - Part D: Genomics and Proteomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      According to their expression profiles, we considered 7 C. sasakii OBPs as candidates to be involved in chemoreception of environmental odorants, of which 4 OBPs may be responsible for sensing female sex-pheromone odorants and 3 OBPs may play a part in perception of host plant volatiles (Li et al., 2019). Identification of lepidopteran CSPs by transcriptome analysis is often reported, such as in Histia rhodope (Zygaenidae) (Yang et al., 2020), Heortia vitessoides (Crambidae) (Cheng et al., 2019), Athetis lepigone (Noctuidae) (Zhang et al., 2017b), C. punctiferalis (Crambidae) (Xiao et al., 2016) and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Pyralidae) (Liu et al., 2015). We identified 10 putative CSPs from C. sasakii head transcriptomes, all of which are classic CSPs that have 4 conserved cysteines with a spacing pattern C1–X6–C2–X1718–C3–X2–C4.

    • Antennal transcriptome analysis and expression profiles of putative chemosensory soluble proteins in Histia rhodope Cramer (Lepidoptera: Zygaenidae)

      2020, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - Part D: Genomics and Proteomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the expression levels of HrhoCSP8 and HrhoCSP14 were comparable in abdomens and legs. Similar expression patterns were observed in other insects, for example, AlepCSP5, 10 and 19 in A. lepigone were highly expressed in the legs (Zhang et al., 2017), CsasCSP1 and CsasCSP12 in C. sasakii were mainly expressed in abdomens (Tian et al., 2018b), HvitCSP2, 8 and 9 were expressed at high levels in legs (Cheng et al., 2019). Thus, these CSPs may be involved in other physiological functions.

    • Olfactory genomics within the Lepidoptera

      2020, Insect Pheromone Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text