Elsevier

Carbohydrate Polymers

Volume 229, 1 February 2020, 115553
Carbohydrate Polymers

Acetylated cellulose nanocrystals with high-crystallinity obtained by one-step reaction from the traditional acetylation of cellulose

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115553Get rights and content

Highlights

Abstract

One-step reaction instead of two-step or multi-step reaction is simple and feasible to prepare the acetylated cellulose nanocrystals (ACNCs). Herein, a common and moderate one-step reaction for obtaining the acetylated cellulose nanocrystals (ACNCs) with high-crystallinity via traditional acetylation of cellulose is first proposed. Morphology property analysis indicates that ACNCs with a rod-like structure have a length of 21-140 nm and a width of 12-20 nm. The ACNCs show an allomorph of cellulose II with a high-crystallinity of ∼70%. 13C NMR and FT-IR analysis indicate that the obtained ACNCs have been acetylated, and the DS of ACNC-1.5 and ACNC-2.0 are 0.18 and 0.42, respectively. By studying the reaction mechanism, it can be found that ACNCs were obtained in the synergetic process of hydrolysis and acetylation. They can be redispersed in both water and organic solvent systems. This study provides a simple new method to prepare the acetylated CNCs with high crystallinity.

Introduction

Cellulose has attracted immense interest from scientific researchers due to its great potential for producing a variety of high-value-added, renewable products (Habibi, Lucia, & Rojas, 2010; Qiu & Hu, 2013; Siró & Plackett, 2010). Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) are obtained by acid hydrolysis of cellulose under controlled conditions in which the cellulose chains are broken down and the amorphous regions are removed. Acids commonly used for cellulose hydrolysis mainly include sulfuric acid (Klemm et al., 2011; Roman & Winter, 2004), hydrochloric acid (Cheng et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2013) and phosphoric acid (Tang et al., 2015). CNCs got by hydrolysis of sulfuric acid can stably disperse in water (Abitbol, Kloser, & Gray, 2013; Lu & Hsieh, 2010; Wu, Xu, Gong, Li, & Mo, 2018). Because of this hydrophilic property, they are poorly dispersed in hydrophobic polymer substrates (Lin, Huang, Chang, Feng, & Yu, 2011; Yan et al., 2013). Therefore, surface hydrophobic modification of CNCs has been proposed as an available route to change surface hydrophobicity of CNCs (Habibi et al., 2010; Habibi, 2014; Klemm et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2011).

Acetylation which is simple and versatile can enhance the hydrophobicity of CNCs. Most of the preparation processes of ACNCs include two steps: the strong acid hydrolysis of CNCs and acetylation (Ávila Ramírez, Fortunati, Kenny, Torre, & Foresti, 2017; Lin et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2018; Yan et al., 2013; Zhao, Zhao, Wang, & Peng, 2016). However, the multiple steps of these modification processes are not only costly and time consuming, but also damaging to the morphology and crystallinity of CNCs (Abraham et al., 2016; Habibi et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2018). As we all known, the acetylation of CNCs in an acid system improve their thermal stability, but the crystallinity is greatly reduced from ∼80% to ∼45% (Abraham et al., 2016; Eyley & Thielemans, 2014; Wu et al., 2018). This illustrates that the crystalline structure of CNCs is inevitably destroyed in the process of modification.

One-step method to achieve the preparation and modification of CNCs can avoid the erosion of CNC crystalline structure in multi-step reaction to some extent. This may be an effective solution to obtain ACNCs with high-crystallinity. So far, only several studies on the surface modification of CNCs in one-step reaction have been reported. Dorgan’s group first reported a study on the acetylation of CNCs by single-step method in 2009 (Braun & Dorgan, 2009; Sobkowicz, Braun, & Dorgan, 2009). CNCs were isolated and surface modified through the Fischer esterification process by using a mixture of organic acid (acetic and butyric acid, respectively) and HCl. Subsequently, a study on the preparation of ACNCs by one-step process was demonstrated using phosphoric acid as a strong acid for hydrolysis and catalysis and acetic anhydride as an acetylation reagent, in which different degrees of substitution of ACNCs were obtained by controlling the reaction time (Yan et al., 2013). These works involving one-step methods to replace multistep methods are particularly beneficial for the environment and economy. However, these few works do not provide many details about the crystal allomorph, crystalline structure and properties of the obtained ACNCs. Therefore, it is necessary to develop some new one-step methods, from which to study the differences in crystal structure and performance compared with the two-step method in detail.

Herein, a common and moderate one-step method for obtaining the acetylated cellulose nanocrystals (ACNCs) with high-crystallinity is first proposed via traditional acetylation of cellulose. Isolation and functionalization of CNCs were simultaneously occurred from the traditional cellulose acetylation reactions with acetic anhydride as the acetylation reagent, sulfuric acid as the catalyst and acetic acid as the dispersal agent (as shown in Fig. 1) (Malm, Tanghe, Laird, & Smith, 1953). The sample treatments performed after the traditional acetylation of cellulose indicated both acetylated CNCs and acetylated cellulose (the residue) were the products. The properties of the ACNCs and acetylated cellulose were investigated, and the mechanism of concurrent acetylation and hydrolysis was exploited. In the general preparation method of CNCs, people focus on the quality of the CNCs and neglect the utilization of their residue. In this study, we not only obtained the desired CNCs in one-step reaction but also fully considered the utilization of residues in the preparation process of CNCs.

Section snippets

Materials

The cellulose materials used in this study were commercial microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) power (Avicel PH-101, with a particle size of ∼50 μm, product of Switzerland) purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). The cellulose materials were dried for 10 hours at 60 ℃ in a vacuum dryer to remove residual moisture before use.

All other analytical-grade chemicals were used directly without further purification. Sulfuric acid (purity 95.0-98.0%) and acetic anhydride (purity ≥ 98.5%) were purchased from

Morphology property analysis

The morphologies of the ACNCs observed by TEM are shown in Fig. 2. Similar to CNCs obtained from hydrolysis with sulfuric acid (Gong, Li, Xu, Xiang, & Mo, 2017; Habibi et al., 2010), the ACNCs obtained from the acetylation of cellulose show rod-like particles. The length and width of ACNC-1.5 are 60-130 nm and 12-20 nm, respectively (as shown in Table 1). For ACNC-2.0, its length distribution is wider, i.e., 21-140 nm. The possible explanation is that the randomness of the hydrolysis process

Conclusions

In summary, ACNCs with high-crystallinity are successfully obtained through a one-step process via the traditional acetylation of cellulose. This one-step method can achieve simultaneous hydrolysis and acetylation, avoiding the destruction of the CNC structure during the modification process. X-ray analysis suggests that the ACNCs are cellulose II with a high-crystallinity of ∼70%, which is much higher than that of acetylated CNCs prepared by two-step method. The DS of ACNC-1.5 and ACNC-2.0 is

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support by National Key Research and Development Plan (No. 2017YFB0307902), the National Science and Technology Major Project (2017ZX07402004) and the Foundation of Tianjin Key Laboratory of Pulp & Paper (No. 201803).

References (31)

  • W.R. Wan Daud et al.

    Cellulose acetate from oil palm empty fruit bunch via a one step heterogeneous acetylation

    Carbohydrate Polymers

    (2015)
  • T. Abitbol et al.

    Estimation of the surface sulfur content of cellulose nanocrystals prepared by sulfuric acid hydrolysis

    Cellulose

    (2013)
  • E. Abraham et al.

    Highly modified cellulose nanocrystals and formation of epoxy-CNC nanocomposites

    ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

    (2016)
  • B. Braun et al.

    Single-step method for the isolation and surface functionalization of cellulosic nanowhiskers

    Biomacromolecules

    (2009)
  • M. Cheng et al.

    Efficient extraction of cellulose nanocrystals through hydrochloric acid hydrolysis catalyzed by inorganic chlorides under hydrothermal conditions

    ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

    (2017)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Cellulose nanocrystals modification by grafting from ring opening polymerization of a cyclic carbonate

      2022, Carbohydrate Polymers
      Citation Excerpt :

      These issues typically lead to a lower than expected mechanical strength and ductility as these are highly dependent on the dispersion of the reinforcing fibre in the polymer matrix and on the strength of the interface (Habibi, 2014). To find solutions, a large amount of work has been carried out on the surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals, typically using the hydroxyl groups (Eyley & Thielemans, 2014) via acetylation (Xu, Wu, Wu, & Kuang, 2020), carbamation (Girouard, Xu, Schueneman, Shofner, & Meredith, 2016), esterification (Trinh & Mekonnen, 2018), etherification (Sahlin et al., 2018), silanization (Anžlovar, Krajnc, & Žagar, 2020), amidation (Lasseuguette, 2008), and polymer grafting by different methods.( Wohlhauser et al., 2018) While “grafting to” polymerization, i.e the process of grafting a pre-synthesized polymer chain to the surface of cellulose can be successful (Azzam, Heux, & Jean, 2016), the “grafting from” method is usually the preferred pathway to cellulose modification with polymers as it is better controlled and avoids problems such as steric hindrance (Wohlhauser et al., 2018).

    • Modifying cellulose nanocrystal dispersibility to address the permeability/selectivity trade-off of thin-film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes

      2022, Desalination
      Citation Excerpt :

      A lack of peaks in the 1760–1840 cm−1 and 1700 cm−1 regions confirms that the ACNCs were free of unreacted acetic anhydride or any acetic acid by-products [45]. The higher acetyl content with increasing iodine catalyst concentration is also demonstrated by the proportionate increase in absorption at the carbonyl (1750 cm−1) and methyl (1370 cm−1) peaks in ACNC4 compared to the ACNC2 spectrum [47]. Esterification was further confirmed via solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy (Fig. 2).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text