Effect of preparation method on the properties of potato starch acetates with an equal degree of substitution☆
Highlights
► Preparation method of retrograded starch affects its susceptibility to acetylation. ► Preparation method influences properties of the resultant acetylated starch. ► Resistance of acetylated starch is positively correlated with substitution at carbon atom 2 and 3.
Introduction
Starch – as one the most abundant polysaccharides in nature – has been widely applied in both the food and non-food industries. Yet, in its native form starch has low industrial applicability. Depending on demands and mode of utilization, most of the starch produced is subjected to successive physical and chemical modifications. These modifications enable obtaining starch preparations with different structure and properties. The change of starch structure by means of physical and chemical modifications may affect a decrease in its susceptibility to amylolytic degradation. One of the groups of modified preparations used in recent years as food additives includes preparations of resistant starch that have been reported to play a health-promoting role (Laguna et al., 2011, Perera et al., 2010), as the so-called prebiotics (Angioloni and Collar, 2011, Scarminio et al., 2012). One of the forms of resistant starch is retrograded starch (RS3) produced as a result of physical modification of starch (Haralampu, 2000, Zhou and Lim, 2012). Retrogradation is a process defined as the linking of starch chains into ordered structures being crystalline in character. Properties of the resultant retrograded starch are determined by, among other things, the origin and type of starch, conditions of retrogradation and presence of other compounds (Funami et al., 2008, Korus et al., 2008, Silverio et al., 2000, Zhou et al., 2008). The chemical modification of starch also leads to the production of resistant starch which is referred to as RS4 fraction. Acetylation, hydroxypropylation, phosphorylation, roasting with glycine, cross-linking with epichlorohydrin or saturation with iron ions are chemical modifications that increase starch resistance to amylolysis (Juansang et al., 2012, Leszczyński, 2004). Acetylation of retrograded starch has bee shown to enable obtaining preparations of resistant starch RS3/4 with high resistance to the activity of amylolytic enzymes (Kapelko et al., 2012a, Zięba et al., 2011b) and characterized by the capability to form viscous pastes (Kapelko et al., 2012a, Zięba et al., 2011). The process of starch acetylation is determined by a number of factors. Both the degree and site of substitution with acetyl groups depend on, among other things, the origin (Mirmoghtadaie, Kadivar, & Shahedi, 2009) and form of starch (Kapelko, Zięba, Golachowski, & Gryszkin, 2012), size of starch granules (Mirmoghtadaie et al., 2009), degree of crystallinity (Golachowski, 2003), amylose content (Mirmoghtadaie et al., 2009), and conditions of the acetylation process (González & Pérez, 2002).
The objective of this study was to preparation starch acetates with a degree of substitution DS = 0.1 from native potato starch and retrograded potato starch, and to compare selected properties of the resultant preparations.
Section snippets
Materials
The initial experimental material was Superior Standard potato starch produced by PEPEES Łomża in the year 2010 (Poland). Starch was acetylated with analytically pure acetic acid anhydride purchased from POCH SA Gliwice (Poland).
Production of preparations of acetylated retrograded starch
Five-kilogram portions of starch suspensions in water with concentrations of 1, 4, 10, 18, or 30 g/100 g were prepared from native potato starch. The suspensions were heated to a temperature of ca. 70 °C for 30 min, with continuous stirring until paste thickening that made
Results and discussion
Starch industry is producing, on a commercial scale, acetylated potato starch that is characterized by a low degree of substitution with acetic acid residues, not exceeding 0.1 (Zięba et al., 2011b). In the conducted experiment, preparations of acetylated starch with an equal degree of substitution (ca. 0.1) were produced from native starch and from preparations of retrograded starch produced from pastes with different concentrations. Differences in the quantity of acetic acid anhydride used
Conclusion
Starch acetates produced from native potato starch and from retrograded potato starch, and having an equal degree of substitution (ca. 0.1), were found to differ in their properties. Different methods of their preparation (various contents of pastes used to produce retrograded starch and different doses of acetic acid anhydride used for starch acetylation) resulted in the production of acetates with a differentiated degree of substitution with acetic acid residues at carbon atoms 2, 3 and 6.
References (28)
- et al.
Physicochemical and nutritional properties of reduced-caloric density high-fibre breads
LWT – Food Science and Technology
(2011) - et al.
Functions of fenugreek gum with various molecular weights on the gelatinization and retrogradation behaviors of corn starch -1: Characterizations of fenugreek gum and investigations of corn starch/fenugreek gum composite system at a relatively high starch concentration; 15 w/v%
Food Hydrocolloids
(2008) - et al.
Evaluation of lentil starches modified by microwave irradiation and extrusion cooking
Food Research International
(2002) - et al.
Influence of prior acid treatment on acetylation of wheat, potato and maize starches
Food Chemistry
(2007) Resistant starch – A review of the physical properties and biological impact of RS3
Carbohydrate Polymers
(2000)- et al.
Effect of gelatinization on slowly digestible starch and resistant starch of heat–moisture treated and chemically modified canna starch
Food Chemistry
(2012) - et al.
Effect of production method on the properties of RS3/RS4 type resistant starch. Part 2. Effect of a degree of substitution on the selected properties of acetylated retrograded starch
Food Chemistry
(2012) - et al.
Effect of production method on the properties of RS3/RS4 type resistant starch. Part 1. Production method, analytical methods and characteristics of the raw material subjected to chemical modification
Food Chemistry
(2012) - et al.
Grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) starch as an alternative for cereal starches: Rheological properties and retrogradation susceptibility
Journal of Food Engineering
(2008) - et al.
Performance of a resistant starch rich ingredient in the baking and eating quality of short-dough biscuits
LWT – Food Science and Technology
(2011)
Effects of cross-linking and acetylation on oat starch properties
Food Chemistry
An improved colorimetric procedure for determining apparent and total amylose in cereal and other starches
Journal of Cereal Science
Resistant starch: A review of analytical protocols for determining resistant starch and factors affecting the resistant starch content of foods
Food Research International
Dietary intervention with green dwarf banana flour (Musa sp AAA) prevents intestinal inflammation in a trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid model of rat colitis
Nutrition Research
Cited by (40)
Effect of dry heat and its combination with vacuum heat on physicochemical, rheological and release characteristics of Alocasia macrorrhizos retrograded starches
2024, International Journal of Biological MacromoleculesProperties of butyrylated lotus seed starch with butyryl groups at different carbon positions
2022, Carbohydrate PolymersApplication of dual modified corn starch as a polymer for the colon targeted direct compressible budesonide tablet
2022, Journal of Drug Delivery Science and TechnologyCitation Excerpt :The slurry was left for 2h at room temperature for cooling, then it was refrigerated at −20 °C for 3 days. The resultant retrograded starch (RS) was washed with distilled water, filtered and dried at 45 °C and kept for further processing [11]. The dried native and retrograded starch samples were separately mixed with acetic acid for 10 min by stirring at 100 rpm in a two-necked flask at room temperature.
- ☆
This article is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere including electronically in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the copyright-holder.