Glutaminase inhibition with telaglenastat (CB-839) improves treatment response in combination with ionizing radiation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma models
Introduction
Survival remains poor for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Although, 40% of HNC patients receive curative ionizing radiation (IR) therapy, failure within the radiation field approaches 50% with resultant morbidity and mortality [1,2]. Multimodality treatment including the use of concurrent chemotherapy with radiation is used to treat many HNCs. However, the use of systemic therapy lacks a clear molecular basis and is often administered based on empiric evidence, contributing to limited efficacy and increased toxicity [[3], [4], [5]]. Radiotherapy dose escalation is limited by the need to protect surrounding healthy tissues and current options for FDA-approved radiosensitizers are limited. Even though an increasing variety of intelligently designed, gene-targeted drugs are in or are entering clinical use, many are transient in their activity with the majority of patients recurring after a short period of benefit [6]. Therefore, there is increased need to understand and overcome mechanisms of radiation resistance to improve patient survival.
Radiation induces programmed cell survival and metabolic responses within the cell [7,8], representing potential mechanisms of adaptive resistance that reduce radiation efficacy and are consequently interesting targets for combination therapy. Preliminary Reverse Phase Protein Array analysis by our laboratory identified activation of metabolic pathways upon radiation treatment (data not shown). Based on these findings as well as increasing evidence that glutamine plays an important role in DNA damage repair, and the availability of a targeted inhibitor already in Phase I/II trials, we explore the role of elevated glutaminase as a potential mechanism of adaptive resistance to radiation therapy [[9], [10], [11]].
Glutaminase is the enzyme responsible for the conversion of glutamine to glutamate. Glutamate is subsequently converted to α-ketoglutarate, a key component of the Krebs cycle. Notably, glutaminase overexpression has been linked to increased metastasis [12]. If increased glutaminase is independently associated with worse tumor control, and radiation induces glutaminase levels or activity, then we hypothesize that inhibition of glutaminase reduces substrate availability for the Krebs cycle, decreases aerobic respiration, and potentially reduces cellular proliferation.
Inhibition of glutaminase by telaglenastat (Calithera Biosciences, Inc.) has been associated with reduced growth of lymphomas, breast, renal and pancreatic cancers in pre-clinical studies [12]. In Phase II clinical trials for renal cell and triple-negative breast cancer in combination with chemotherapy, telaglenastat exhibited increased biostability and bioavailability as compared to other glutaminase inhibitors, and was well tolerated by patients [12,13]. Notably, neither the role of glutamine in HNC pathogenesis nor the efficacy of telaglenastat in combination with radiation has been previously evaluated.
Using The Cancer Genome Atlas's (TCGA) transcriptome database, we identified that increased glutaminase gene expression was associated with reduced survival in HNSCC patients. As this association supports glutaminase as an important drug target in the treatment of HNSCC, we examined if the combination of glutaminase inhibitor, telaglenastat, and IR is more effective than monotherapy. Clonogenic assays revealed that combinatorial treatment decreased cell survival in CAL-27 and HN5 cell lines. Using 2 heterotopic HNSCC xenograft models, we identified that the combination of telaglenastat and IR reduced tumor volume relative to monotherapy. Telaglenastat also increased IR induced oxidative stress and DNA damage. In summary, our finding that the addition of telaglenastat significantly improves radiation treatment response in HNSCC provides preclinical data in support of future clinical trials.
Section snippets
Cell culture
FaDu (pharynx) cells were grown in Gibco high-glucose MEM (10% FBS, 6 mM glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% Gibco MEM amino acids, 1% sodium pyruvate). HN5 (tongue) and CAL-27 (tongue) were grown in DMEM (10% FBS, 6 mM l-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% Gibco MEM amino acids and 1% sodium pyruvate). Cell lines were tested for mycoplasma every 3 months and authenticity was validated by STR.
Glutaminase activity assay
CAL-27 cells were treated with 0 or 10 Gy using a GammaCell cesium irradiator. Cell lysates
Results
To establish the role of glutaminase in HNSCC, we first queried the transcriptome database from TCGA. High glutaminase expression (upper quartile) versus low glutaminase expression (lower quartile) was associated with reduced patient survival (p = 0.03) (Fig. 1).
As HNSCC represents 90% of HNC cases, this study utilized 3 established human-derived HNSCC lines (CAL-27, HN5, and FaDu) to explore methods for reducing radiation resistance and response to combinations of radiation and glutaminase
Discussion
The primary goal of this study was to examine the role of glutaminase inhibition as a means to address adaptive resistance to IR in head and neck cancer. The combination of glutaminase inhibition with telaglenastat and IR was compared to the effects of independent treatment alone in clonogenic assays and in two xenograft models. We first demonstrate that radiation increased glutaminase activity in glutamine dependent cells within 5 min (Fig. S1). This increase could be used as a mean to exploit
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Christina A. Wicker: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization. Brian G. Hunt: Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Sunil Krishnan: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Kathryn Aziz: Investigation, Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Shobha Parajuli: Investigation, Writing -
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
Calithera Biosciences, Inc. provided telaglenastat (CB-839) for all in vivo experiments.
We acknowledge the MD Anderson Functional Proteomics Reverse Phase Protein Array Core and Preclinical Imaging Core (PIC) at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine for providing additional facilities and instrumentation.
We would like to thank Dr. Layne Weatherford, and McKenzie Crist for assisting with animal experiments and Dr. Eric Smith for helpful feedback on the manuscript.
References (37)
- et al.
Reirradiation of head and neck cancers with intensity modulated radiation Therapy : outcomes and analyses
Radiat. Oncol. Biol.
(2016) - et al.
Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): a comprehensive analysis by tumour site
Radiother. Oncol.
(2011) - et al.
Characterization of the interactions of potent allosteric inhibitors with glutaminase C, a key enzyme in cancer cell glutamine metabolism
J. Biol. Chem.
(2018) - et al.
HNSCC cell lines positive for HPV and p16 possess higher cellular radiosensitivity due to an impaired DSB repair capacity
Radiother. Oncol.
(2013) - et al.
Resistance of tumor cells to chemo- and radiotherapy modulated by the three-dimensional architecture of solid tumors and spheroids
Methods Cell Biol.
(2001) - et al.
Ionizing radiation induces mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production accompanied by upregulation of mitochondrial electron transport chain function and mitochondrial content under control of the cell cycle checkpoint
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
(2012) - et al.
Defects in mitochondrial energetic function compels Fanconi Anaemia cells to glycolytic metabolism
Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) - Mol. Basis Dis.
(2017) - et al.
Reirradiation of head and neck cancers with proton therapy: outcomes and analyses
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.
(2016) - et al.
Pattern of failure after helical tomotherapy in head and neck cancer
Strahlenther. Onkol.
(2010) - et al.
Chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer: toxicity of concurrent weekly cisplatin
Radiat. Med.
(2006)
J OURNAL OF C LINICAL O NCOLOGY factors associated with severe late toxicity after concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck Cancer
An RTOG Analysis
Oxidants, antioxidants and the current incurability of metastatic cancers
Open Biol
MAPK pathways in radiation responses
Oncogene
Phase 1 study of glutaminase (GLS) inhibitor CB-839 combined with either everolimus (E) or cabozantinib (Cabo) in patients (pts) with clear cell (cc) and papillary (pap) metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC)
Meric-Bernstam, Efficacy and safety of CB-839, a small molecule inhibitor of glutaminase, in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): initial findings from a multicenter, open-label phase 2 study
ENTRATA: Randomized, double-blind, phase II study of telaglenastat(tela; CB-839) + everolimus(E) vs. placebo (pbo) + E in patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Eur. Soc. Med. Oncol.
Antitumor activity of the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 in triple-negative breast cancer
Mol. Canc. Therapeut.
Cited by (32)
New insights into RAS in head and neck cancer
2023, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Reviews on CancerTherapeutic strategies targeting metabolic characteristics of cancer cells
2023, Critical Reviews in Oncology/HematologyPancreatic stellate cells exploit Wnt/β-catenin/TCF7-mediated glutamine metabolism to promote pancreatic cancer cells growth
2023, Cancer LettersCitation Excerpt :We further explored whether altered stromal metabolism was a driver that regulates tumor proliferation and whether disruption of the metabolic crosstalk between PSCs and PCCs created metabolic vulnerability in tumor cells. Previously, researchers have focused on the role of intracellular Gln catabolism in cancer cells [40,41]. However, GLS inhibition exerted anti-cancer activity in vitro but failed in vivo [22].
Sex differences in brain tumor glutamine metabolism reveal sex-specific vulnerabilities to treatment
2022, MedCitation Excerpt :Targeting glutamine metabolism continues to evolve as an attractive cancer treatment. Targeting GLS, which hydrolyzes glutamine to glutamate, was effective in pre-clinical cancer models25,26,27,28,29 and its clinical efficacy is currently being evaluated. The GLS family consists of two members, GLS1 and GLS2, which are expressed in the mitochondria and the cytosol, respectively.