Abstract
In gynodioecious populations of flowering plants females and hermaphrodites coexist. Gynodioecy is widespread and occurs in both asexual and sexual species but does not admit a satisfactory explanation from classical sex ratio theory. In sexual populations male fertility restoring genes have evolved to counter non-nuclear male sterility mutations. In pseudogamous asexual populations pollen retention and increased self-fertilization can make male sterility costly. Both of these mechanisms can promote coexistence. However, it remains unclear how either of these mechanisms could evolve if coexistence was not initially possible. In the absence of these adaptations non-spatial models predict that females either fail to invade hermaphrodite populations or else displace them until pollen shortage drives the population to extinction. We develop a pair approximation to a probabilistic cellular automata model in which females and hermaphrodites interact on a regular lattice. The model features independent pollination and colonization processes which take place on different timescales. The timescale separation is exploited to obtain, with perturbation methods, a more manageable aggregated pair approximation. We present both the mean field model which recreates the classical non-spatial predictions and the pair approximation, which strikingly predicts different invasion criteria and coexistence under a wide range of parameters. The pair approximation is shown to correspond well qualitatively with simulation behaviour.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auger, P., Bravo de la Parra, R., 2000. Methods of aggregation of variables in population dynamics. Comptes Rendus de l’ Académie des Sciences. Paris, Sciences de la vie/Life Sciences 323, 665–674.
Britton, N., Mogie, M., 2001. Poor male function favours the coexistence of sexual and asexual relatives. Ecology Letters 4, 116–121.
Carrillo, C., Britton, N., Mogie, M., 2002. Coexistence of sexual and asexual conspecifics: A cellular automaton model. Journal of Theorectical Biology 217, 275–285.
Charnov, E., 1982. Sex Allocation. In: Monographs in Population Biology, vol. 18. Princeton University Press.
Durrett, R., Levin, S., 1994. The importance of being discrete (and spatial). Theoretical Population Biology 46, 363–394.
Ellner, S., 2001. Pair approximation for lattice models with multiple interaction scales. Journal of Theorectical Biology 210, 435–447.
Harada, Y., Ezoe, H., Iwasa, Y., Matsuda, H., Satō, K., 1995. Population persistence and spatially limited social interaction. Theorectical Population Biology 48, 65–91.
Hassell, M., Comins, H., May, R., 1991. Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics. Nature 353(6341), 255–258.
Iwasa, Y., Nakamaru, M., Levin, S., 1998. Allelopathy of bacteria in a lattice population: Competition between colicin-sensitive and colicin-producing strains. Evolutionary Ecology 12, 785–802.
Joshi, A., Moody, M., 1995. Male gamete output of asexuals and the dynamics of populations polymorphic for reproductive mode. Journal of Theoretical Biology 174, 189–197.
Joshi, A., Moody, M., 1998. The cost of sex revisited: Effects of male gamete output of hermaphrodites that are asexual in their female capacity. Journal of Theoretical Biology 195, 533–542.
Matsuda, H., Ogita, N., Sasaki, A., Satō, K., 1992. Statistical mechanics of population. Progress of Theoretical Physics 88(6), 1035–1049.
Mogie, M., 1992. The Evolution of Asexual Reproduction in Plants. Chapman and Hall.
Molofsky, J., Durrett, R., Dushoff, J., Griffeath, D., Levin, S., 1999. Local frequency dependence and global coexistence. Theoretical Population Biology 55, 270–282.
Nogler, G., 1984. Gametophytic apomixis. In: Johri, B. (Ed.), Embryology of Angiosperms. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 475–518 (Chapter 10).
Noirot, M., Couvet, D., Hamon, S., 1997. Main role of self-pollination rate on reproductive allocations in pseudogamous apomicts. Theorectical and Applied Genetics 95, 479–483.
Pannell, J., 1997. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in a metpopulation. Evolution 51(1), 10–20.
Richards, A.J., 1986. Plant Breeding Systems. George Allen & Unwin (Publishers) Ltd.
Satō, K., Iwasa, Y., 2000. Pair approximations. In: Dieckmann, U., Law, R., Metz, J.A.J. (Eds.), The Geometry of Ecological Interactions. In: Cambridge Studies in Adaptive Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 341–358 (Chapter 18).
Schley, D., Doncaster, C., Sluckin, T., 2004. Population models of sperm-dependent partenogenesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 229, 559–572.
Schnable, P., Wise, R., 1998. The molecular basis of cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration. Trends in Plant Science 3(5), 175–180.
Stewart-Cox, J., Britton, N., Mogie, M., 2004. Timescale separated pollination-colonisation models. In: Sloot, P., Chopard, B., Hoekstra, A. (Eds.), Cellular Automata, 6th International Conference on Cellular Automata for Research and Industry. ACRI 2004, October 2004, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3305. Springer, pp. 765–774.
Stewart-Cox, J., Britton, N., Mogie, M., 2005. Pollen limitation or mate search need not induce an Allee effect. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (in press).
Takenaka, Y., Matsuda, H., Iwasa, Y., 1997. Competition and evolutionary stability of plants in spatially structured habitat. Researches on Population Ecology 39(1), 67–75.
Thomson, N., Ellner, S., 2003. Pair-edge approximations for heterogeneous lattice population models. Theoretical Population Biology 64, 271–280.
Verduijn, M., van Dijk, P., van Damme, J., 2004. Distribution, phenology and demography of sympatric sexual and asexual dandelions (taraxacum officinale s.l.): Geographic parthenogenesis on a small scale. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82, 205–218.
Wilson, W., 2000. Simulating Ecological and Evolutionary Systems in C. Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stewart-Cox, J.A., Britton, N.F. & Mogie, M. Space mediates coexistence of females and hermaphrodites. Bull. Math. Biol. 67, 1273–1302 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulm.2005.02.003
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulm.2005.02.003