Evolving houses, demanding practices: A case of rising electricity consumption of the middle class in Pakistan
Introduction
Energy consumed in the building sector accounts for just over 20% of total global consumption. In the Global South, this consumption is predicted to grow nearly three times the rate for developed nations by 2040 [1]. By 2030, more than 80% of the middle-class globally is projected to be from the Global South, accounting for 70% of total energy consumption [2]. Yet most energy policies in countries of the South, like Pakistan, tend to focus on energy generation while neglecting demand management [3]. This becomes more evident when reviewing national housing policies as they prove inadequate in dealing with the current housing shortage. In addition, they fail to consider the energy efficiency of existing housing [4], [5].
During the first decade of the 21st century in Pakistan, middle-class households, defined as having daily per capita expenditures of US$2-US$10 (in 2005 purchasing power parity dollars2), grew from 32% to 55% of the total population. The middle-class is expected to contribute to 90% of the increase in national energy consumption [6]. Pakistan's housing shortage is approximately 10 million units and the deficit is growing, particularly in urban areas [7].
A socio-technical analysis of energy consumption can provide an in-depth and nuanced understanding of what this consumption is for and how it has come about, as has been proposed by practice theorists (see e.g. Refs. [[8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]]). Growing energy demand and comfort standards of middle-class households in the Global South have been the subject of recent study [[14], [15], [16], [17], [18]]. However, there is limited research on housing spatial arrangements and how these interlink with everyday practices that can lead to energy-intensive configurations. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of how and why this consumption has changed over time requires a longer temporal dimension [19]. Instead of considering buildings simply as grounds for technological efficiency in construction and appliances, there is a need to view buildings as the material counterparts of competing social practices [20]. Unsustainable practice-arrangements need to be challenged instead of being reproduced [21]. Hence, this research adopts a socio-material approach to understanding energy demand in middle-class households in Lahore, the second-largest urban centre in Pakistan, with a population of 11.13 million. It analyses the coevolution of everyday practices of homeowners and the associated material and spatial arrangements to target both efficiency and sufficiency in urban households' energy consumption. By applying Schatzki's [22] conceptualisation of ‘practice-arrangement bundles’ to the emergence, persistence and transformation of urban housing, this paper seeks to unfold links between spatial layouts and household practices in middle class households in Lahore.
This paper is structured as follows: Section 2 presents the methodology and the review of spatial evolution of middle-class houses in Lahore. Key findings are presented in section 3. Conclusions are made in section 4.
Section snippets
Social practices and spatial structures
Practice theorists have frequently focused on household practices in empirical energy-use studies ([[23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]] among others); however, the position of materiality in practices has been much debated [[29], [30], [31], [32]], especially with regards to buildings as infrastructure in practice formations. Adopting a socio-technical approach to interpret architecture, Gieryn [33] suggests that buildings are ‘objects of (re)interpretation, narration and representation’ (p.
Findings
The analysis reveals three key processes of change in household practice-arrangements which have resulted in increasing household electricity demands in middle-class households in Lahore.
Conclusions
This study shows that a historical analysis of coevolution of household practices and spatial layouts of middle-class houses in Pakistan can improve our understanding of how and why domestic electricity consumption continues to increase in the Global South, despite improvements in appliances and building fabric. Adopting a practice theoretical framework and Schatzki's [22] [40], concepts of historicity and prefiguration helped identify nexuses of ‘practice-arrangement bundles’ in urban housing
Acknowledgements
This work is part of a PhD research at the University of Cambridge, funded by Vicky Noon Cambridge Scholarship under the Cambridge Commonwealth, European & International Trust.
References (65)
Consuming technologies – developing routines
J. Clean. Prod.
(Jul. 2008)- et al.
‘How does air conditioning become “needed”? A case study of routes, rationales and dynamics’
Energy Res. Soc. Sci.,
(Dec. 2014) - et al.
“That's when we started using the living room”: lessons from a local history of domestic heating in the United Kingdom
Energy Res. Soc. Sci.
(Jun. 2017) How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system
J. Transport Geogr.
(Sep. 2012)- et al.
Homely social practices, uncanny electricity demands: class, culture and material dynamics in Pakistan
Energy Res. Soc. Sci.
(Dec. 2017) ‘International energy outlook 2016’, U.S. Energy information administration (EIA), Washington, D.C., 2016. DOE/EIA-0484
‘The rise of the South: human progress in a diverse world’, united nations development programme, New York, human development report
Pakistan's Energy Sector: from Crises to Crises- Breaking the Chain
(2012)National housing policy
(2001)- et al.
Housing Markets and Housing Policies in India
(2016)
‘The Emerging Middle Class in Pakistan: How it Consumes, Earns, and Saves’, in IBAICM 2014, Karachi
‘Pakistan - housing finance project’, world bank group, Washington, D.C
Consumption and theories of practice
J. Consum. Cult.
Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change
Environ. Plann.
Applying practice theory to the study of consumption: theoretical and methodological considerations
J. Consum. Cult.
What is energy For? Social practice and energy demand
Theor. Cult. Soc.
Consumption and the Transformation of Everyday Life: a View from South India
Progressive contextualisation of energy practices and trajectories: a case study in Thailand
Rural Soc.
Keeping Cool in Southeast Asia: Energy Consumption and Urban Air-conditioning
Histories, Trajectories and Patterns of Cleanliness, Energy and Water Consumption: Reflections on China
Staying cool, looking good, moving around: consumption, sustainability and the “rise of the South”
Forum Dev. Stud.
‘Is Efficient Sufficient? the Case for Shifting Our Emphasis in Energy Specifications to Progressive Efficiency and Sufficiency’, ECEEE
A Sociology of Energy, Buildings, and the Environment: Constructing Knowledge, Designing Practice
New needs for better understanding of household's energy consumption – behaviour, lifestyle or practices?
Architect. Eng. Des. Manag.
Materiality and social life
Nat. Cult.
Explaining showering: a discussion of the material, conventional, and temporal dimensions of practice
Socio. Res. Online
Households’ ICT use in an energy perspective
Standby consumption in households analyzed with a practice theory approach
J. Ind. Ecol.
Doing “healthier” food in everyday life? A qualitative study of how Pakistani Danes handle nutritional communication
Crit. Publ. Health
Housing renovations and energy efficiency: insights from homeowners’ practices'
Build. Res. Inf.
Home extensions in the United Kingdom: space, time, and practice
Environ. Plan. Soc. Space
Cited by (0)
- 1
Present/Permanent Address: Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, 1 Scroope Terrace, Cambridge CB2 1PX, United Kingdom.