Elsevier

Brain Research Bulletin

Volume 122, April 2016, Pages 12-18
Brain Research Bulletin

Research report
Differential response properties of peripherally and cortically evoked swallows by electrical stimulation in anesthetized rats

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2016.02.015Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We compared cortically and peripherally evoked swallows by electrical stimulation.

  • Cortically evoked swallows had longer latencies than peripherally evoked swallows.

  • Thyrohyoid burst duration was longer during peripherally evoked swallows.

  • A-area stimulation inhibited cortical swallows more than peripheral swallows.

  • Electrically evoked cortical and peripheral swallows have different properties.

Abstract

We compared onset latency, motor-response patterns, and the effect of electrical stimulation of the cortical masticatory area between peripherally and cortically evoked swallows by electrical stimulation in anesthetized rats. The number of swallows and the motor patterns were determined using electromyographic recordings from the thyrohyoid, digastric, and masseter muscles. The onset latency of the first swallow evoked by electrical stimulation of the cortical swallowing area (Cx) was significantly longer than that evoked by stimulation of the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN). The duration of thyrohyoid burst activity associated with SLN-evoked swallows was significantly longer than that associated with either Cx-evoked or spontaneous swallows. Combining Cx with SLN stimulation increased the number of swallows at low levels of SLN stimulation. Finally, A-area (the orofacial motor cortex) stimulation inhibited Cx-evoked swallows significantly more than it inhibited SLN-evoked swallows. These findings suggest that peripherally and cortically evoked swallows have different response properties and are affected differently by the mastication network.

Introduction

Swallowing is considered an essential action for life as it provides two vital functions: alimentation and protection of the upper respiratory tract. Basic swallowing movements may be programmed by the central pattern generator (CPG) for swallowing, which is located in the lower brain stem (Jean, 2001). In humans (Dziewas et al., 2003, Michou and Hamdy, 2009, Shingai et al., 1989) and animals (Kitagawa et al., 2002, Sumi, 1969), the swallowing CPG can be activated through cortical input as well as sensory input from the pharynx and larynx.

In humans, a number of spatially and functionally distinct cortical regions are involved in swallowing, including activation of the insular cortex during voluntary swallowing (Martin et al., 2001). The importance of the insula is shown by clinical studies in which swallows were evoked in subjects with epilepsy via insular stimulation (Penfield and Faulk, 1955, Soros et al., 2011), and from a patient who developed dysphagia after acute perisylvian infarcts (Foix–Chavany–Marie opercular syndrome) involving the bilateral insular cortex (Singh et al., 2011). Although these reports strongly suggest a critical role of the insular cortex in swallowing, to our knowledge, few studies have systematically investigated this function (Jezzini et al., 2012).

Two major cortical masticatory regions have been reported in rats, an anterior area (A-area) and a posterior area (P-area) (Zhang and Sasamoto, 1990). The P-area is located in the insula, and we previously found that electrically stimulating this region induced swallowing with rhythmic jaw movements (RJMs) in anesthetized rats (Tsujimura et al., 2012a). In the current study, we successfully initiated swallowing by electrically stimulating the cortical swallowing area (Cx) within the insular cortex. Although peripheral and central inputs are capable of inducing swallowing, few studies have investigated how these two types of swallows are functionally different. Sumi studied peripherally and cortically evoked swallows from the same animal, and also showed facilitation of swallowing initiation with the combination of peripheral and cortical stimulation (Sumi, 1969). However, to our knowledge, no report has quantitatively compared peripherally and cortically evoked swallows. Thus, the first aim of the current study was to determine the differences between swallows induced by peripheral electrical stimulation of the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) versus those induced by cortical electrical stimulation of Cx.

Initiation of the swallowing reflex is affected by peripheral input from mechanical, gustatory, thermal, and noxious receptors (Chee et al., 2005, Hamdy et al., 2003, Tsujimura et al., 2009, Tsujimura et al., 2011, Tsujimura et al., 2013). When chewing, bolus processing in the oral and pharyngeal cavity always precedes swallowing (Hiiemae and Palmer, 1999, Palmer et al., 1992), suggesting that initiation of swallowing may be inhibited by chewing. Experimentally, during cortically (A-area)-evoked RJMs that resemble chewing, SLN-evoked swallowing was inhibited in anesthetized rats (Tsujimura et al., 2012a). Although we reported that SLN-evoked swallowing is inhibited by A-area stimulation, the initiation of swallowing during chewing in awake humans occurs in the hypopharynx (Saitoh et al., 2007), which is mainly innervated by the SLN. Thus, we hypothesized that SLN-evoked swallowing is less inhibited by A-area stimulation than cortically-evoked swallows. The second aim of this study was to investigate the difference in the effect of A-area stimulation between SLN and Cx-evoked swallows.

Section snippets

Preparation

This study was reviewed and approved by the Niigata University Intramural Animal Care and Use Committee (82-2). Experiments were performed on 26 male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing between 250 and 350 g. Animals were anesthetized with urethane (1.3 g/kg, i.p.), and supplemented with urethane whenever necessary to maintain anesthesia at a level that resulted in total absence of the corneal reflex. Rectal temperature was maintained at 37–38 °C by a thermostatically controlled heating pad. A midline

Comparison of SLN- and Cx-evoked swallows

Stimulation sites for the Cx (n = 10) were identified histologically in the granular (GI), dysgranular (DI), and the dorsal part of agranular (AID) insular cortex according to the Paxinos and Watson stereotaxic atlas (Fig. 1) (Paxinos and Watson, 2006). Swallowing was evoked by electrical stimulation of the SLN and Cx (Fig. 2A). The threshold to elicit a swallow ranged from 6 to 80 μA for the SLN and from 60–210 μA for the Cx. The onset latency of the first swallow was significantly longer when

Discussion

In the present study, we found that aspects of swallowing differed depending on whether the triggering input was peripheral (SLN) or cortical (Cx). The onset latency of the first swallow and burst duration of the Thy muscle were significantly shorter and longer, respectively, when swallowing was evoked from the periphery compared with centrally. The most effective stimulation frequencies for SLN-evoked swallows were 30 Hz and 50 Hz, whereas it was only 10 Hz for Cx-evoked swallows. When SLN input

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (#24390431 to M.I. and #23792507 and #26870207 to T.T.), and by the Strategic Young Researcher Overseas Visits Program for Accelerating Brain Circulation (S2504) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

References (35)

  • M.J. Beyak et al.

    Superior laryngeal nerve stimulation in the cat: effect on oropharyngeal swallowing: oesophageal motility and lower oesophageal sphincter activity

    Neurogastroenterol. Motil.

    (1997)
  • C. Chee et al.

    The influence of chemical gustatory stimuli and oral anaesthesia on healthy human pharyngeal swallowing

    Chem. Senses.

    (2005)
  • R. Dziewas et al.

    Neuroimaging evidence for cortical involvement in the preparation and in the act of swallowing

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • C. Ertekin et al.

    Voluntary and reflex influences on the initiation of swallowing reflex in man

    Dysphagia

    (2001)
  • M. Falempin et al.

    Effects of vagal deafferentation on oesophageal motility and transit in the sheep

    J. Physiol.

    (1986)
  • D. Gow et al.

    Characterising the central mechanisms of sensory modulation in human swallowing motor cortex

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2004)
  • S. Hamdy et al.

    Modulation of human swallowing behaviour by thermal and chemical stimulation in health and after brain injury

    Neurogastroenterol. Motil.

    (2003)
  • K.M. Hiiemae et al.

    Food transport and bolus formation during complete feeding sequences on foods of different initial consistency

    Dysphagia

    (1999)
  • S. Jafari et al.

    Sensory regulation of swallowing and airway protection: a role for the internal superior laryngeal nerve in humans

    J. Physiol.

    (2003)
  • A. Jean

    Brain stem control of swallowing: neuronal network and cellular mechanisms

    Physiol. Rev.

    (2001)
  • A. Jezzini et al.

    Functional organization of the insula and inner perisylvian regions

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2012)
  • J. Kitagawa et al.

    Pharyngeal branch of the glossopharyngeal nerve plays a major role in reflex swallowing from the pharynx

    Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.

    (2002)
  • S.Y. Lowell et al.

    Functional connectivity and laterality of the motor and sensory components in the volitional swallowing network

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (2012)
  • N. Maeda et al.

    Differential involvement of two cortical masticatory areas in submandibular salivary secretion in rats

    Brain Res.

    (2013)
  • R.E. Martin et al.

    Cerebral cortical representation of automatic and volitional swallowing in humans

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2001)
  • E. Michou et al.

    Cortical input in control of swallowing

    Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.

    (2009)
  • A.J. Miller

    Characteristics of the swallowing reflex induced by peripheral nerve and brain stem stimulation

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1972)
  • Cited by (20)

    • The coordination of chewing

      2023, Current Opinion in Neurobiology
    • Motor representation of rhythmic jaw movements in the amygdala of guinea pigs

      2022, Archives of Oral Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In terms of rhythmic motor control, the oromotor system is unique because a number of rhythmic jaw movements may be induced in laboratory animals by the repetitive electro-microstimulation of multiple brain sites. Cortically induced rhythmic jaw movements from the primary sensorimotor cortex have been extensively examined, including the cortical masticatory area in guinea pigs (Goldberg & Tal, 1978), rabbits (Liu et al., 1993) and cats (Iwata, Itoga, Ikukawa, Hanashima, & Sumino, 1985) and the insular cortex in rats (Sasamoto, Zhang, & Iwasaki, 1990; Tsujimura et al., 2016). Rhythmic jaw movements were found to be induced by subcortical structures such as the amygdala, a large and complex subcortical structure comprised of multiple heterogeneous nuclei that are interconnected (Pitkänen, 2000).

    • Effect of peripherally and cortically evoked swallows on jaw reflex responses in anesthetized rabbits

      2018, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      This discrepancy may be due to differences in the swallowing tasks used (voluntary or reflexive swallowing; bolus or saliva swallowing) and/or the demographics of the participants. Recently, we succeeded in initiating swallowing by electrical stimulation of the swallowing cortical area (Cx) within the insular cortex in anesthetized rats (Tsujimura et al., 2016). In this study, we found that the onset latency of the first swallow evoked by insular stimulation was significantly longer than that evoked by stimulation of the SLN.

    • Atropine facilitates water-evoked swallows via central muscarinic receptors in anesthetized rats

      2023, American Journal of Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text