Elsevier

Bone

Volume 112, July 2018, Pages 177-186
Bone

Full Length Article
Prevalence of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw-like lesions is increased in a chemotherapeutic dose-dependent manner in mice

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2018.05.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Impaired tooth socket healing rarely occurred with cyclophosphamide (CY) monotherapy.

  • Bisphosphonate (ZA) monotherapy did not induce BRONJ-like lesions in mice.

  • High-dose CY in combination with ZA and tooth extraction induced BRONJ-like lesions in mice.

  • BRONJ-like lesions prevalently increased in a CY dose-dependent manner.

Abstract

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) worsens oral health-related quality of life. Most BRONJ occurs in multiple myeloma or metastatic breast cancer patients treated with bisphosphonate/chemotherapeutic combination therapies. Cyclophosphamide (CY), an alkylating chemotherapeutic drug, is used to treat multiple myeloma, although its use has been recently reduced. The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of CY dose on tooth extraction socket healing when CY is used with or without bisphosphonate in mice. Low-dose CY (50 mg/kg; CY-L), moderate-dose CY (100 mg/kg; CY-M), high-dose CY (150 mg/kg; CY-H), and bisphosphonate [Zometa (ZA): 0.05 mg/kg] were administered for 7 weeks. Each dose of CY and ZA in combination was also administered for 7 weeks. Both maxillary first molars were extracted at 3 weeks after the initiation of drug administration. Euthanasia was performed at 4 weeks post-extraction. Gross wound healing, microcomputed tomography analysis, histomorphometry, and immunohistochemistry were used to quantitatively evaluate osseous and soft tissue wound healing of tooth extraction sockets. ZA monotherapy induced no BRONJ-like lesions in mice. CY monotherapy rarely induced open wounds, though delayed osseous wound healing occurred in a CY dose-dependent manner. In contrast, CY/ZA combination therapy prevalently induced BRONJ-like lesions with compromised osseous and soft tissue healing in a CY dose-dependent manner. Interestingly, anti-angiogenesis was noted regardless of CY dose and ZA administration, even though only CY-M/ZA and CY-H/ZA combination therapies induced BRONJ-like lesions. Our findings suggest that high-dose CY may be associated with the development of BRONJ following tooth extraction only when CY is used together with ZA. In addition to anti-angiogenesis, other factors may contribute to the pathoetiology of BRONJ.

Introduction

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates bind and inhibit a key enzyme of the intracellular mevalonate pathway, thereby resulting in apoptosis of osteoclasts. In general, oral bisphosphonates are used to treat osteoporosis, whereas intravenous bisphosphonates are utilized to reduce the risks of skeletal-related events such as pathological vertebral fracture and bone pain in oncology or metastasis patients [1]. However, in 2003, bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) was first reported to occur following tooth extraction in patients taking intravenous bisphosphonates [2]. BRONJ is defined as “exposed bone or bone that can be probed through an intraoral or extraoral fistula in the maxillofacial region that has persisted for more than 8 weeks” [3]. The prevalence of BRONJ is rare, occurring in 0.05% of oral bisphosphonate users following tooth extraction, and 1.6%–14.8% of intravenous bisphosphonate users following tooth extraction [4]. A systematic review reported that BRONJ most frequently occurs in multiple myeloma or metastatic breast cancer patients taking intravenous bisphosphonates [5]. Tooth extraction (61.7%), dental implant treatment (3.9%), dental surgery (7.2%), periodontal disease (5.0%), prosthetic trauma such as ill-fitting removable prostheses (7.4%), and spontaneous cases (14.8%) are triggering factors of BRONJ [5], although all dental therapies including tooth cleaning, root canal filling, and prosthodontic treatment are not contraindicated in patients taking bisphosphonates. BRONJ worsens oral health-related quality of life [6], which results in negative effects on daily life and social activities. However, the exact mechanism of BRONJ has not been clear. Moreover, definitive treatment strategies for BRONJ have not been developed due to its uncertain mechanisms. Therefore, elucidation of the pathoetiology and pathophysiology of BRONJ is required.

Multiple myeloma, which represents 1% of all cancers and approximately 10% of all hematologic malignancies, occurs in 20,000 people in the United States every year [7]. Moreover, the age-adjusted 5-year relative survival rate increased from 39.8% to 53.2% [7]. The increase in survival rate of multiple myeloma patients is due to the development of therapeutic strategies. A current review reported that thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib, carfilzomib, pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, melphalan, dexamethasone, and prednisone are used to treat multiple myeloma solely or adjunctively [8]. Generally, cyclophosphamide or melphalan are utilized for the treatment of multiple myeloma in combination with intravenous bisphosphonates that reduce the risks of skeletal complications [9]. The use of cyclophosphamide or melphalan in combination with prednisone, thalidomide, bortezomib, or carfilzomib was introduced as the major treatment regimens for multiple myeloma in 2016 [8], whereas at the 2017 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting, the use of cyclophosphamide and melphalan were reportedly decreased [10]. Different doses of cyclophosphamide are administered to multiple myeloma patients depending on the patient's age and tolerability [9]. However, the effects of different doses of cyclophosphamide on tooth extraction socket healing, with or without bisphosphonate therapy, are not fully understood.

The aims of the present study were 1) to clarify the effects of cyclophosphamide dose on tooth extraction socket healing, and 2) to investigate the effects of each dose of cyclophosphamide and bisphosphonate combination therapy on osseous and soft tissue wound healing of tooth extraction sockets in C57BL6/J mice.

Section snippets

Animals, tooth extraction, and drug therapies

Eight- to twelve-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were used (CLEA Japan Inc., Osaka, Japan). The duration of drug therapies was 7 weeks. Both maxillary first molars were extracted at 3 weeks after the start of drug therapy. All mice were euthanized at 4 weeks post-extraction. Subcutaneous injection of zoledronate (Zometa; Novartis, Stein, Switzerland) was performed at 0.05 mg/kg twice a week for 7 weeks (ZA, n = 7). Intraperitoneal injection of cyclophosphamide (C7397; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO,

Effect of CY monotherapy dose on osseous healing of tooth extraction sockets

No open wounds were observed in the VC (0 out of 14 extraction sockets) and CY-L (0 out of 14 extraction sockets) groups at 4 weeks after tooth extraction. However, 7.14% (1 out of 14 extraction sockets) and 14.2% (2 out of 14 extraction sockets) open wounds were noted in CY-M and CY-H groups, respectively, at 4 weeks after tooth extraction (Fig. 2a). Hard tissue healing appeared to be the same between VC and CY-L groups (Fig. 2b). CY monotherapy for 7 weeks did not change osteoclast numbers in

Discussion

In the present study, we showed that CY monotherapy delayed osseous wound healing in a dose-dependent manner, although this therapy did not affect soft tissue wound healing. Moreover, we demonstrated that CY/ZA combination therapy prevalently induced BRONJ-like lesions in a CY dose-dependent manner by inhibiting both osseous and soft tissue wound healing following tooth extraction.

First, we investigated the effect of CY dose on hard and soft tissue wound healing following tooth extraction. In

Conclusions

In the present study, we demonstrated that CY therapy alone did not induce open wounds in mice, irrespective of CY dose, although CY monotherapy delayed osseous healing in a CY dose-dependent manner. ZA monotherapy did not induce BRONJ-like lesions. Moreover, we showed that BRONJ-like lesions were prevalently induced in a CY dose-dependent manner when tooth extraction was performed in mice treated with CY/ZA combination therapy.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 25870523, 15K11258 and 18H02994.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References (32)

  • J.J. Body et al.

    Current use of bisphosphonates in oncology. International Bone and Cancer Study Group

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (1998)
  • A.A. Khan et al.

    Diagnosis and management of osteonecrosis of the jaw: a systematic review and international consensus

    J. Bone Miner. Res.

    (2015)
  • R.A. Miksad et al.

    Quality of life implications of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw

    Oncologist

    (2011)
  • D. Pulte et al.

    Trends in survival of multiple myeloma patients in Germany and the United States in the first decade of the 21st century

    Br. J. Haematol.

    (2015)
  • E. Terpos et al.

    Multiple myeloma: clinical updates from the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting, 2017

    Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk.

    (2018)
  • S. Kuroshima et al.

    Intra-oral PTH administration promotes tooth extraction socket healing

    J. Dent. Res.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Preclinical models of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ)

      2021, Bone
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, the combination of ZOL, dexamethasone and docetaxel (a potent chemotherapeutic agent) worsened MRONJ like-lesions and increased the prevalence of exposed bone compared to mice treated with ZOL and dexamethasone [171]. Another study showed that when mice were subjected to healthy molar extraction and treated with combination therapy of ZOL and cyclophosphamide (cytotoxic chemotherapy), the oral lesions tended to be more severe and manifest histopathologic necrotic exposed bone and/or bony sequestrum [174]. Notably, when pARs, such as ZOL [26,150,152], RANK-Fc, or OPG-FC [23,43,152] were administered to mice with natural periodontitis or experimentally induced inflammatory dental diseases (periapical or periradicular disease), exposed necrotic bone was a distinctive histopathologic feature of the oral lesions, except in one study where mice developed non-exposed necrotic bone [150] (Table 2).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    S Kuroshima and M Sasaki equally contributed to this work.

    View full text