Elsevier

Bone

Volume 77, August 2015, Pages 31-41
Bone

Original Full Length Article
A distinct regulatory region of the Bmp5 locus activates gene expression following adult bone fracture or soft tissue injury

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2015.04.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We survey the mouse Bmp5 locus for both embryonic and postnatal enhancers.

  • Embryonic expression is controlled by many stereotyped locally-acting enhancers.

  • Expression after adult injury is activated by a separate “injury response region.”

  • The same “injury response region” turns on after bone fracture, skin, or lung injury.

  • Development and repair activate the same gene, but via distinct control sequences.

Abstract

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are key signaling molecules required for normal development of bones and other tissues. Previous studies have shown that null mutations in the mouse Bmp5 gene alter the size, shape and number of multiple bone and cartilage structures during development. Bmp5 mutations also delay healing of rib fractures in adult mutants, suggesting that the same signals used to pattern embryonic bone and cartilage are also reused during skeletal regeneration and repair. Despite intense interest in BMPs as agents for stimulating bone formation in clinical applications, little is known about the regulatory elements that control developmental or injury-induced BMP expression. To compare the DNA sequences that activate gene expression during embryonic bone formation and following acute injuries in adult animals, we assayed regions surrounding the Bmp5 gene for their ability to stimulate lacZ reporter gene expression in transgenic mice. Multiple genomic fragments, distributed across the Bmp5 locus, collectively coordinate expression in discrete anatomic domains during normal development, including in embryonic ribs. In contrast, a distinct regulatory region activated expression following rib fracture in adult animals. The same injury control region triggered gene expression in mesenchymal cells following tibia fracture, in migrating keratinocytes following dorsal skin wounding, and in regenerating epithelial cells following lung injury. The Bmp5 gene thus contains an “injury response” control region that is distinct from embryonic enhancers, and that is activated by multiple types of injury in adult animals.

Introduction

Enhancing bone formation is an important objective in medicine. In the Western world, approximately 300–400 individuals per 100,000 suffer long bone fractures each year leading to billions of dollars in health care costs [1], [2], [3]. While the majority of injuries heal within several months, approximately 5–10% of bone fractures exhibit delayed healing or a failure of the repair process [4], [5]. Although, recombinant growth factors such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are widely used clinically in orthopedic applications to stimulate bone fusion in cases ranging from trauma to spinal fusion, recent studies suggest that supra-physiological doses are sometimes associated with adverse side effects [6], [7]. Therefore, a better understanding of regulatory mechanisms underlying the normal bone fracture response may suggest new therapeutic routes to treat skeletal injuries through increased expression of endogenous growth factors [8].

The process of skeletal repair mimics many aspects of skeletal formation [9], [10]. Mesenchymal cells initially proliferate and condense, followed by differentiation into cartilage, vascularization, and endochondral ossification of tissue at either fracture sites or in skeletal precursors. Shared patterns of gene expression further support the similarities between embryonic bone formation and adult regeneration. Transcriptional analysis of bone repair has shown that many genes are reactivated upon injury in the same temporal and spatial patterns that can be observed during earlier skeletal formation [10], [11], [12]. For example, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) proteins, early signals of chondrogenic condensations, appear during the inflammatory phase, followed by other markers of cartilage formation including Runx2, Wnt2, and Sox9. Although, these similar molecular and histological signatures suggest that fracture healing occurs by reactivation of a program of embryonic bone formation [11], [13], [14], the regulatory relationship between these two processes, including the mechanism that reactivates developmental signaling molecules in injured adults, is still unclear.

BMPs play important roles during the embryonic development of many tissues, including the skeleton [15]. Members of the TGF-β superfamily of secreted signaling molecules [16], BMPs are expressed within the mesenchymal stem cell anlagen that prefigure future skeletal structures [17], continue to be expressed in the perichondrium and periosteum layers surrounding growing bones [18], [19], and are upregulated following bone injury [20], [21], [22], [23]. Several BMP mutants display characteristic skeletal and soft tissue defects [24], [25], [26], providing strong genetic evidence that BMPs are endogenous signals used to control cartilage and bone formation during embryogenesis [18].

The Bmp5 locus provides particularly useful genetic tools for studying both the embryonic and adult functions of BMPs. Encoded by the classical mouse short ear (se) locus [24], Bmp5 is expressed in early mesenchymal condensations, as well as in the perichondrium and periosteum layers surrounding growing cartilage and bones [19], [27]. Bmp5 null mutants are fully viable and fertile and exhibit defects in several skeletal structures, including the pronounced shortening of the external ear pinna due to defects in the formation and growth of ear cartilages [18], [28], [29]. Importantly, Bmp5 null mutations also cause bone regeneration defects in adult animals. Following rib cage injury, the formation and maturation of cartilaginous fracture calluses are delayed in Bmp5 mutants [30]. In addition, the fracture calluses are approximately half the volume of calluses in comparably staged controls [30]. Gene expression profiles of fracture repair have shown that Bmp5 expression begins during the chondrogenic phase of bone healing and remains elevated throughout the regeneration process [12], [22]. Thus, Bmp5 is both expressed during, and required for, normal injury responses. Notably, exogenous BMP5 has been shown to have potent osteogenic capacity in vitro and in an in vivo model of fracture repair [31], [32]. Finally, recent genetic studies show that epidermal stem cell numbers and ear regeneration differences in adult animals are also linked to the Bmp5 gene [33], [34], [35], [36], suggesting that Bmp5 may play an important role in the maintenance and repair of multiple tissues.

Molecular studies of radiation and chemical mutagen-induced DNA lesions revealed several interesting alleles that disrupt Bmp5 regulation without altering the Bmp5 coding sequence [37]. Notably, two of these regulatory alleles involve structural rearrangements that occur approximately 6 kb and 105 kb downstream of the last Bmp5 exon (Fig. 1A) [38]. Bmp5 expression is lost at particular anatomical locations in the corresponding mutants, confirming that a large 3′-region is required for normal Bmp5 regulation [38]. Hundreds of kilobases (kb) of the surrounding DNA have subsequently been screened for functional enhancers using lacZ reporter genes in transgenic mice. These studies have identified multiple modular enhancers that control expression in particular developing skeletal structures, or in soft tissues [38], [39], [40]. Here we use lacZ transgenic assays to further characterize the regulatory sequences that control where and when Bmp5 is expressed during embryonic development, and during recovery from acute tissue injury in adults.

Section snippets

Plasmid and BAC clones

Mouse sequences were assembled from BAC RP23-426K2 (GenBank accession # AC079245) and BAC RP23-343K17 (GenBank accession # AC079244) [40]. Evolutionarily conserved regions (ECRs) shared between mice and humans were identified using global sequence alignment programs as previously described [41]. Genomic clones corresponding to single or small clusters of ECRs were amplified using primers listed in Supplementary Table 2. Single copy PCR products were cloned directly into the NotI site of the

Tissue specific enhancers are distributed throughout the Bmp5 genomic region

To further characterize the regulatory landscape surrounding Bmp5, global sequence alignment programs were used to compare sequences representing 418,315 bp of the mouse Bmp5 locus (GRCm38/mm10 chr9:75,797,064–76,215,378, Fig. 1A) and the corresponding human BMP5 gene locus (Materials and methods). Evolutionarily conserved regions (ECRs) greater than 100 bp showing at least 60% identity between mouse and human sequences were selected for further analysis using a lacZ transient transgenic enhancer

Discussion

Despite the importance of BMPs in development and disease, relatively little is known about the regulatory mechanisms controlling BMP activation at particular times and places during development and following injury. Here, we have characterized a set of tissue-specific enhancers that coordinate Bmp5 developmental expression. Importantly, we find that activation following adult bone or soft tissue injury occurs through a distinct regulatory region that we hereafter refer to as the ‘injury

Acknowledgments

We thank Taconic (formerly Xenogen Biosciences; NY) and the Stanford Transgenic Core for transgenic mouse production; Christie Ham for initial experiments with mouse fracture models; Namrata Barbhaiya, Vania Rashidi, and Ernst Fattakhov for help with sectioning; Ruth Tevlin for technical assistance with TRAP staining; and members of the Yang, Nusse, and Kingsley labs for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes

References (98)

  • T. Kangsamaksin et al.

    Bone morphogenetic protein 5 regulates the number of keratinocyte stem cells from the skin of mice

    J Invest Dermatol

    (2011)
  • L.J. Ng

    SOX9 binds DNA, activates transcription, and coexpresses with type II collagen during chondrogenesis in the mouse

    Dev Biol

    (1997)
  • G. Cotsarelis et al.

    Label-retaining cells reside in the bulge area of pilosebaceous unit: implications for follicular stem cells, hair cycle, and skin carcinogenesis

    Cell

    (1990)
  • J.C. Masterson et al.

    Bone morphogenetic protein signalling in airway epithelial cells during regeneration

    Cell Signal

    (2011)
  • S.D. Reynolds et al.

    Clara cell: progenitor for the bronchiolar epithelium

    Int J Biochem Cell Biol

    (2010)
  • W. Razzell et al.

    Calcium flashes orchestrate the wound inflammatory response through DUOX activation and hydrogen peroxide release

    Curr Biol

    (2013)
  • G. Hubner et al.

    Differential regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines during wound healing in normal and glucocorticoid-treated mice

    Cytokine

    (1996)
  • E. Haertel et al.

    Transcriptional regulation of wound inflammation

    Semin Immunol

    (2014)
  • G. Gloire et al.

    NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species: fifteen years later

    Biochem Pharmacol

    (2006)
  • S. Ohta

    Fracture healing induces expression of the proto-oncogene c-fos in vivo. Possible involvement of the Fos protein in osteoblastic differentiation

    FEBS Lett

    (1991)
  • O.O. Oni

    Proto-oncogene expression during fracture repair

    Injury

    (2000)
  • S. Gangnuss

    Regulation of MAPK activation, AP-1 transcription factor expression and keratinocyte differentiation in wounded fetal skin

    J Invest Dermatol

    (2004)
  • A. Neub et al.

    Biphasic regulation of AP-1 subunits during human epidermal wound healing

    J Invest Dermatol

    (2007)
  • A. Auden et al.

    Spatial and temporal expression of the Grainyhead-like transcription factor family during murine development

    Gene Expr Patterns

    (2006)
  • S.N. Lissenberg-Thunnissen et al.

    Use and efficacy of bone morphogenetic proteins in fracture healing

    Int Orthop

    (2011)
  • N. DeWitt

    Bone and cartilage

    Nature

    (2003)
  • T. Tosounidis et al.

    Fracture healing and bone repair: an update

    Trauma

    (2009)
  • T.A. Einhorn et al.

    Significant advances have been made in the way surgeons treat fractures

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (1998)
  • M.J. Bosse

    An analysis of outcomes of reconstruction or amputation after leg-threatening injuries

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • T. Niikura et al.

    Global gene profiling reveals a downregulation of BMP gene expression in experimental atrophic nonunions compared to standard healing fractures

    J Orthop Res

    (2006)
  • T.A. Einhorn

    The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (1998)
  • M.B. Goldring et al.

    The control of chondrogenesis

    J Cell Biochem

    (2006)
  • L.C. Gerstenfeld et al.

    Fracture healing as a post-natal developmental process: molecular, spatial, and temporal aspects of its regulation

    J Cell Biochem

    (2003)
  • M. Bais

    Transcriptional analysis of fracture healing and the induction of embryonic stem cell-related genes

    PLoS One

    (2009)
  • B.L. Hogan

    Bone morphogenetic proteins: multifunctional regulators of vertebrate development

    Genes Dev

    (1996)
  • J. Massague

    The transforming growth factor-beta family

    Annu Rev Cell Biol

    (1990)
  • J.A. King et al.

    The role of BMPs and GDFs in development of region-specific skeletal structures

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (1996)
  • M.P. Bostrom

    Immunolocalization and expression of bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 in fracture healing

    J Orthop Res

    (1995)
  • A.H. Reddi

    Initiation of fracture repair by bone morphogenetic proteins

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (1998)
  • T.J. Cho et al.

    Differential temporal expression of members of the transforming growth factor beta superfamily during murine fracture healing

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2002)
  • G. Karsenty et al.

    BMP 7 is required for nephrogenesis, eye development, and skeletal patterning

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (1996)
  • M.J. Solloway et al.

    Mice lacking Bmp6 function

    Dev Genet

    (1998)
  • E.L. Green et al.

    Bifurcated xiphisternum and its relationship with short ears in the house mouse

    J Hered

    (1941)
  • E.L. Green et al.

    The development of three manifestations of the short ear gene in the mouse

    J Morphol

    (1942)
  • M.C. Green

    Effects of the short ear gene in the mouse on cartilage formation in healing bone fractures

    J Exp Zool

    (1958)
  • O.A. Arosarena et al.

    Defect repair in the rat mandible with bone morphogenic protein 5 and prostaglandin E1

    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    (2003)
  • A. Wutzl

    Bone morphogenetic proteins 5 and 6 stimulate osteoclast generation

    J Biomed Mater Res A

    (2006)
  • G.L. Masinde et al.

    Identification of wound healing/regeneration quantitative trait loci (QTL) at multiple time points that explain seventy percent of variance in (MRL/MpJ and SJL/J) mice F2 population

    Genome Res

    (2001)
  • E. Heber-Katz et al.

    Regeneration in MRL mice: further genetic loci controlling the ear hole closure trait using MRL and M.m. Castaneus mice

    Wound Repair Regen

    (2004)
  • Cited by (28)

    • An enhancer-based gene-therapy strategy for spatiotemporal control of cargoes during tissue repair

      2023, Cell Stem Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies in zebrafish have identified tissue regeneration enhancer elements, or TREEs, that can activate expression of their target genes at an injury site, maintain expression during regeneration, and diminish expression as regeneration concludes.10 TREEs are identifiable by chromatin profiling, which has revealed or suggested similar classes of regulatory elements in Drosophila imaginal wing discs,11,12,13 acoel worms,14 mouse bone,15 zebrafish and killifish fins,16,17,18 and zebrafish hearts19,20 among other species and tissues. Whereas some enhancers appear to respond to stress or trauma itself, other elements track regeneration weeks after the initial event or can direct gene expression in response to mitogenic stimuli in the absence of tissue damage.10,19

    • Characterization of mouse Bmp5 regulatory injury element in zebrafish wound models

      2022, Bone
      Citation Excerpt :

      Bony fin rays in the anal or caudal fin that were broken during manipulation also showed GFP expression surrounding the break (Fig. 1C, n = 9 breaks in 4 fish). Although typical vertebrate enhancers are less than a few kilobases in length [45,46], the original mouse IRE region was 17.8 kb in length [27]. To further refine the IRE, we tested three subregions for their ability to drive expression in the zebrafish caudal fin injury assay (R1, R2, R3).

    • Regeneration enhancers: Starting a journey to unravel regulatory events in tissue regeneration

      2020, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Developmental expression of mouse Bmp5 is controlled by anatomy-specific enhancers, each of which drives Bmp5 expression in discrete domains of bone and cartilage [49]. Recently, Guether et al. mapped out additional Bmp5 regulatory elements that appear to contain injury-induced enhancers in multiple tissues [25]. Interestingly, this injury response element is not activated during development, suggesting that development and regeneration programs target the same gene via distinct regulatory sequences (Fig. 1B).

    • A Regeneration Toolkit

      2018, Developmental Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      These sequences, in combination with a minimal promoter, were sufficient to direct and maintain expression of a transgenic reporter or even a potent mitogen in regeneration settings but not in uninjured adult tissue. Together, these studies and others, such as those identifying injury-responsive sequences near the murine BMP5 gene or chromatin regions that are modulated by exposure to inflammation in murine skin epithelial stem cells (Guenther et al., 2015; Naik et al., 2017), indicate that there may exist thousands of cis-regulatory elements that activate gene expression after tissue injury or stress and/or during regeneration. Elements such as these provide ways researchers can further probe gene function during regeneration through their inherent ability to turn on and off in response to injury and regeneration.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Co-first authors.

    2

    Present addresses: The Skin Care Centre, Dermatologic Surgery — 2nd floor, 835 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, B.C. V5Z 4E8, Canada.

    View full text