Determination of reference values for normal cranial morphology by using mid-sagittal vector analysis in Japanese children

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.12.010Get rights and content

Summary

Mid-Sagittal Vector Analysis (MSVA) is a method of measuring the distance from a defined central point on the skull surface in the entire mid-sagittal plane and provides a clear description of the lateral view of the skull. We used a series of images of normal skulls of Japanese children to determine normal MSVA values.

For this cross-sectional study, we first constructed a database of head CT and MRI images of children aged 0–6 years (41.5 ± 24.9 month (mean ± SD)) who showed no abnormality of cranial development and growth at the time of imaging. Measurement errors due to lateral shifting of the sagittal plane during MSVA were examined, CT and MRI images taken in the same patients at the same time were compared, and measurement differences were examined. Finally, MSVA was carried out, and the mean of the measured values was calculated according to age group.

Two hundred ninety-five images were included in the database. When the lateral shifting of the sagittal plane was within 4 mm from the true mid-sagittal plane, the mean errors were less than 1 mm at all measurement points. Between the CT and MRI images from the same patients, most differences in MSVA values were within ±1 mm. These differences were thus acceptable for use in clinical settings. After the above verifications, 220 images were extracted for determination of normal MSVA values. We established a normal dataset of MSVA for Japanese children that can be used effectively for preoperative diagnosis, surgery planning, and postoperative assessment of cranial deformities.

Introduction

Normalization of cranial morphology is an important goal in the surgical treatment of craniosynostosis.1, 2 To achieve this goal, establishing an evaluation method and a normal dataset of cranial morphology is necessary for comparisons during preoperative assessments, surgery planning, and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy. In addition, the evaluation method should allow for detailed description of morphology, and measurements should be easy to perform.

The cephalic index (CI) is an example of a widely used index, describing the percentage of the ratio of the maximum width of the skull to the occipitofrontal length; normal ranges of CI values have been established for different ethnicities.3 The CI has been used in a number of publications for the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of cranial deformities.2, 4, 5 It can however not be used for complex morphological abnormalities, and only allows for assessment of one horizontal plane; therefore, the CI alone is not enough to evaluate cranial morphology.6, 7

In contrast, several morphological evaluation methods using measurements conducted on three-dimensional images have recently been reported, and have made it possible to examine cranial morphology in a highly detailed manner.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Three-dimensional image analysis provides a detailed and accurate description of cranial morphology, but because it requires the use of expensive dedicated software and a specific workstation, it may take a long time for this method to be widely used.

A method evaluating cranial morphology in detail without an expensive workstation is thus needed. In this article, we focused on the Mid-Sagittal Vector Analysis (MSVA) that Marcus et al. have previously reported.6 MSVA is a two-dimensional morphological analysis for the mid-sagittal plane, and was developed to address inadequacies of CI while maintaining clinical applicability. This is performed by measuring each distance from the top of the dorsum sella summit to the skull surface, on radial lines in 10-degree increments, originated from the top of the dorsum sella summit on the mid-sagittal plane. MSVA can clearly represent the lateral morphology of the skull, and can be performed relatively easily without an expensive device.

Few reports have examined normal reference data on cranial morphology in Japanese children,3, 13 and particularly the normal morphology of the lateral view remains unknown. The main purpose of our study was therefore to determine normal MSVA values in Japanese children.

Additionally, we included cases with not only CT but also MRI scans available for analysis, in order to collect as many images as possible. We therefore provide auxiliary verification of the hypothesis that MSVA can achieve clinically acceptable results on the mid-sagittal plane, even when shifted, and in the sagittal plane on MRI images.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

We first evaluated errors that may occur during MSVA conducted on CT and MRI images and then determined normal MSVA values in Japanese children. We adhered to STARD guidelines.

After obtaining approval from the Okayama University Hospital ethics review committee (research no. 1702-006), CT and MRI scans of children between the age of 0 and 6 years (0 to 83 months) taken at Okayama University Hospital between January 2012 and December 2016 were collected. All charts were retrospectively reviewed,

Results

First, 2140 CT and MRI images were collected, and we constructed a database of 295 images extracted after chart review. As described in the following section, 64 images were excluded from the database due to misalignment, and, after optimization of overlapping samples, 220 images (123 males, 97 females) were finally analyzed for the determination of normal MSVA values. The subject flow chart is presented in Figure 3, and details of population characteristics are shown in Table 2.

Discussion

Various evaluation methods have been reported to conduct a precise and effective analysis of cranial deformity.15, 16, 17, 18 Recently, with the development of more advanced equipment, cranial morphology can be measured more accurately and more detailed in all three dimensions.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Marcus et al. proposed the three-dimensional vector analysis (3DVA), which has allowed for a more ultimate evaluation of morphology.7, 8 Because the three-dimensional coordinates of cranial CT images

Conclusion

Mid-sagittal Vector Analysis is a tool that clearly describes the lateral profile of the cranium without any expensive workstation. We verified that clinically acceptable accuracy of MSVA can be obtained even in the sagittal plane containing some misalignment and in the sagittal plane in MRI.

We further established the normal MSVA values of Japanese children up to 6 years of age. By establishing the normal range, this method became a useful guide for diagnosis, operation planning, surgical

Conflict of interest and funding

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

There are no sources of funding to declare.

Acknowledgments

We thank Noriaki Akagi and the radiological technologists in the Department of Radiology at Okayama University Hospital for their technical support in the creation of the database that has been used for this study.

References (27)

  • K.E. Reinbacher et al.

    Three dimensional comparative measurement of polyurethane milled skull models based on CT and MRI data sets

    J Craniomaxillofac Surg

    (2012)
  • J.L. Venes et al.

    Sagittal synostectomy. Technical note

    J Neurosurg

    (1976)
  • J. Panchal et al.

    Sagittal craniosynostosis outcome assessment for two methods and timings of intervention

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (1999)
  • T. Koizumi et al.

    Cephalic index of Japanese children with normal brain development

    J Craniofac Surg

    (2010)
  • J.J. Fata et al.

    The reversal exchange technique of total calvarial reconstruction for sagittal synostosis

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (2001)
  • J. Guimarães-Ferreira et al.

    Spring-mediated cranioplasty compared with the modified pi-plasty for sagittal synostosis

    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg

    (2003)
  • J.R. Marcus et al.

    Quantitative and qualitative assessment of morphology in sagittal synostosis: mid-sagittal vector analysis

    J Craniofac Surg

    (2006)
  • J.R. Marcus et al.

    Use of a three-dimensional, normative database of pediatric craniofacial morphology for modern anthropometric analysis

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (2009)
  • J.R. Marcus et al.

    Objective three-dimensional analysis of cranial morphology

    Eplasty

    (2008)
  • D. Khechoyan et al.

    Changes in frontal morphology after single-stage open posterior–middle vault expansion for sagittal craniosynostosis

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (2012)
  • P. Meyer-Marcotty et al.

    Three-dimensional analysis of cranial growth from 6 to 12 months of age

    Eur J Orthod

    (2014)
  • D.J. Netherway et al.

    Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometry of plagiocephaly: asymmetry and shape analysis

    Cleft Palate Craniofac J

    (2006)
  • J. Pindrik et al.

    Normative ranges of anthropometric cranial indices and metopic suture closure during infancy

    J Neurosurg Pediatr

    (2016)
  • View full text