Elsevier

Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Volume 21, Issue 4, 15 October 2005, Pages 678-683
Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Short communication
Detection of water-borne E. coli O157 using the integrating waveguide biosensor

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2005.01.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Escherichia coli O157:H7, the most common serotype of enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), is responsible for numerous food-borne and water-borne infections worldwide. An integrating waveguide biosensor is described for the detection of water-borne E. coli O157, based on a fluorescent sandwich immunoassay performed inside a glass capillary waveguide. The genomic DNA of captured E. coli O157 cells was extracted and quantitative real-time PCR subsequently performed to assess biosensor-capture efficiency. In vitro microbial growth in capillary waveguide is also documented. The biosensor allows for quantitative detection of as few as 10 cells per capillary (0.075 ml volume) and can be used in conjunction with cell amplification, PCR and microarray technologies to positively identify a pathogen.

Introduction

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (e.g., E. coli O157:H7) is a major food-borne and water-borne pathogen that causes diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis, and hemolytic uremic syndrome (Su and Brandt, 1995). Outbreaks have occurred in many developed countries, including Canada, Europe, Australia, and Japan. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that E. coli O157:H7 causes nearly 75,000 human infections in the U.S. each year (Mead et al., 1999).

Many methods have been developed to detect E. coli O157:H7 in food and water matrices, including traditional culturing with selective media (Hammack et al., 1997, March and Ratnam, 1986), serotyping with specific antibodies to O157 and H7 antigens (Chapman et al., 1997, Czajka and Batt, 1996, Shelton and Karns, 2001, Tomoyasu, 1998), amplification of specific genes by PCR (Higgins et al., 2003, Johnson and Stell, 2001, Maurer et al., 1999, Wang et al., 2002) or hybridization of virulence genes by DNA microarrays (Bekal et al., 2003). Each method has limitations with respect to sensitivity, specificity, and quantitation. Consequently, multiple assays are required to detect and quantify small numbers of water-borne E. coli O157:H7 and confirm strain identity.

The integrating waveguide biosensor was originally developed by Ligler et al. (2002) at the Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC. The biosensor utilizes a sandwich antibody technique for capture and detection, with the capture antibodies attached to the inner surface of a glass capillary tube. Detection and quantitation are achieved by illuminating the capillary tube (i.e., optical waveguide) at a 90° angle relative to the length of the waveguide and subsequent collection of the emitted fluorescence from the end of the waveguide (Fig. 1). Initial results gave a detection limit of 40 pg ml−1 for mouse IgG and 30 pg ml−1 for staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) in the sandwich assays (Ligler et al., 2002), which is more sensitive than other fiber optic and array biosensors (Anderson et al., 1994, Rowe et al., 1999).

Compared to the existing technologies, the integrating waveguide biosensor provides a platform with multiple advantages for the detection of E. coli O157:H7 and other analytes in low concentration. Although the capillary tube was originally envisioned only as a waveguide, it is readily available, convenient for laboratory experimentation, and compatible with other sample preparation and detection protocols. The capillary tube can serve as incubation vessel for growth of bacterial pathogens after capture, allowing for confirmation of viability, as well as amplification and retrieval for further characterization. The enclosed structure of capillary tubes is of particular benefit when dealing with pathogenic substances. In addition, clean up of the contaminants by washing, followed with in vitro lysis of pathogens, allows for rapid confirmation of strain identity using PCR or microarray technologies. Since the integrating waveguide biosensor was initially described for the detection of protein targets such as mouse IgG and SEB (Ligler et al., 2002), it remained unclear whether the biosensor could be used for the detection of whole bacterial cells or viral particles. Therefore, we conducted these studies to evaluate the use of the biosensor for the detection of water-borne E. coli O157, including assessment of capture efficiency, detection limit, and in vitro growth rates.

Section snippets

Chemicals and reagents

NeutrAvidin™ was purchased from Pierce Biotechnology (Rockford, IL). One milligram of monoclonal anti-E. coli O157 antibody solution (BioDesign, Saco, Maine) was conjugated with Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's instructions. One milligram of goat anti-E. coli O157:H7 antibody (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD) dissolved in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was conjugated with Cy5 dye using the FluoroLink-Ab Cy5

Biosensor capture efficiency

Quantitative real-time PCR was used to determine the capture efficiency for O157 cells by the antibody-coated capillaries. Biosensor capillary tubes with immobilized anti-O157 antibody were incubated statically with different E. coli O157 concentrations (103, 104 and 105 cells ml−1 in PBS, n = 5) at ambient temperature for 1 h, then rinsed with PBST. Capture efficiency was estimated using in vitro lysis of captured cells with 1% Triton X-100 in PBS (37 °C for 10 min) followed by quantitative PCR. Five

Discussion

A variety of immunological methods have been described for the capture and detection of E. coli O157:H7 using solid supports such as magnetic beads, glass beads, filters, dipsticks, and other materials (Chapman et al., 1997, Czajka and Batt, 1996, Kim and Doyle, 1992, Pyle et al., 1999, Shelton and Karns, 2001, Tomoyasu, 1998, Weimer et al., 2001). Although conceptually similar, the integrating waveguide biosensor provides comparable or better sensitivity than other methods, with a detection

Conclusion

A novel approach is described for the detection of water-borne pathogens, combining the integrating waveguide biosensor with multiple assays, which allows for determination of bacterial serotype, genotype, and viability. The data presented here demonstrate the concept that the biosensor system is capable of directly capturing E. coli O157 from water with subsequent detection in a fluorescence sandwich assay and quantitative real-time PCR. This system can potentially be adapted for the detection

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Francis Ligler (Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC) for helpful advice and comments. We thank Valerie McPhatter (USDA/ARS, Environmental Microbial Safety Laboratory) for technical assistance. This work is supported by grant R43 AI052684 from the National Institutes of Health and a grant from the Maryland Technology Development Corporation.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (63)

  • Synthesis strategies and application of ternary quantum dots — in cancer therapy

    2020, Nano-Structures and Nano-Objects
    Citation Excerpt :

    Xiong et al. b [110] used CuInS2/ZnS NPs as signal labels for a fluoroimmunoassay of the biomarker IL-6, and they were found useful in applications for biomarkers of cancer. Zhu et al. [111] used QD based immunoassay for the detection of water pathogens. Biotinylated antibody was coupled to the coated QDs and the result showed an improvement over the conventional staining kits due to better photostability of the QDs.

  • Biosensors for the detection of waterborne pathogens

    2020, Waterborne Pathogens: Detection Methods and Applications
  • Optical detection technologies for waterborne pathogens

    2020, Waterborne Pathogens: Detection Methods and Applications
  • CapE (capture, amplify, extract): A rapid method for detection of low level contamination of water with Verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VTEC)

    2016, Science of the Total Environment
    Citation Excerpt :

    Molecular detection methods which identify virulence genes and serogroup specific genetic determinants offer a rapid, sensitive solution for testing samples for VTEC. A variety of PCR based methods for detection of VTEC in clinical, food and environmental samples with varying sensitivities have been reported (Fortin et al., 2001; Nielsen and Andersen, 2003; Perelle et al., 2004; Fu et al., 2005; Zhua et al., 2005; Heijnen and Medema, 2006; Bonetta et al., 2011; Fratamico et al., 2011; Park et al., 2011; Sen et al., 2011). Increasingly detection of genes encoding virulence characteristics (e.g. vtx1, vtx2, eae, aggR) in the absence of strain isolation is being used to expedite detection of VTEC in clinical and other specimens (Health Protection Surveillance Centre, 2014).

View all citing articles on Scopus

This work was created in the performance of a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The Government of the United States has a royalty-free government purpose license to use, duplicate or disclose the work, in whole or in part in any manner, and to have or permit others to do so, for government purposes.

View full text