Elsevier

Bioresource Technology

Volume 207, May 2016, Pages 353-360
Bioresource Technology

Methane production improvement by modulation of solid phase immersion in dry batch anaerobic digestion process: Dynamic of methanogen populations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.033Get rights and content

Highlights

Abstract

Several 60 L dry batch anaerobic digestion (AD) reactors were implemented with or without liquid reserve on cattle manure. The immersed part modulation of cattle manure increased the methane flow of about 13%. The quantitative real time PCR and the optimized DNA extraction were implemented and validated to characterize and quantify the methanogen dynamic in dry batch AD process. Final quantities of methanogens converged toward the same level in several inocula at the end of AD. Methanogen dynamic was shown by dominance of Methanosarcinaceae for acetotrophic methanogens and Methanobacteriales for the hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Overall, methanogens populations were stabilized in liquid phase, except Methanosaetaceae. Solid phase was colonized by Methanomicrobiales and Methanosarcinaceae populations giving a support to biofilm development. The methane increase could be explained by a raise of Methanosarcinaceae population in presence of a total contact between solid and liquid phases. Methanosarcinaceae was a bio-indicator of the methane production.

Introduction

Anaerobic digestion (AD) process is achieved by a consortium of microorganisms degrading organic matter of waste to produce a biogas composed of 50–70% of methane (valorized in electricity and heating) and a digestate with high agronomic values (used as a fertilizer). Several technologies of dry AD process are implemented according to the process temperature, the step number, the reactor configuration and the presence of mixing system. Dry anaerobic digestion generally occurs on waste with a total solid content superior to 15% (agricultural waste, food waste and industrial waste) (Karthikeyan and Visvanathan, 2013). Liquid phase is usually minimized in dry AD process, implying several constraints in process as humidity, temperature and microorganism repartitions. The liquid quantity improves biogas production (El-Mashad et al., 2006) by transporting and spreading microorganisms and metabolites in media (El-Mashad et al., 2006, Kusch et al., 2009, Shahriari et al., 2012). Increasing the recirculation frequency of inoculum improves the methane production until the second peak of methane flow in dry AD process (André et al., 2015).

A linear relation between water content and methanogenic activity has been established by Le Hyaric et al. (2011). Moreover, a high total solid content impacts on biogas production (Abbassi-Guendouz et al., 2012).

These phenomena understanding are possible due to the molecular biology methods developed since the 90’s. Furthermore, anaerobic microorganisms cultivation is difficult. Biomolecular tools can be used to monitor the process, to optimize anaerobic digestion and detect a potential drift of the process (Karakashev et al., 2005, Yu et al., 2005, Demirel and Scherer, 2008, Lee et al., 2009, Ike et al., 2010, Traversi et al., 2011, Traversi et al., 2012, Merlino et al., 2013, Williams et al., 2013, Guo et al., 2014, Town et al., 2014).

Methanogenic groups include the acetotrophic methanogens which transform acetate into methane and carbon dioxide (Ferry, 1992), and with the hydrogenotrophic methanogens which transform hydrogen and carbon dioxide into methane. The acetotrophic methanogens are always present in AD process. Operating and environmental parameters influence the activity and the diversity of methanogens. Karakashev et al. (2005) have used fluorescence in situ hybridization to observe the methanogenic diversity of 15 Danish biogas plants treating 50–500 tons of feedstock per day. These biogas plants have been operated at different conditions (temperature, hydraulic retention time and biogas production) implying the dominance of different methanogens orders. Diversity of methanogens depends on inoculum source and waste. Hydrogenotrophic methanogens ensure the stability and the efficiency of the AD process (Demirel and Scherer, 2008). A comparison between a single stage thermophilic and a two stage thermophilic AD process treating cattle manure has shown a similar range of hydrogenotrophic methanogens demonstrating that the reactor configuration in this case does not have any impact on the process (Nielsen et al., 2004).

Most of the studies analyze methanogenic dynamic in liquid processes; few data are available on dry processes. Degueurce et al. (2016) have quantified the bacterial and the archaeal communities on cattle manure in dry AD process. Dry batch AD process could be monitored, optimized and managed by using molecular biology.

The aim of this study was to optimize a dry batch AD process by modulation of the immersed part of cattle manure by using biomolecular tools, firstly to observe the consequence on the methane production and, secondly to understand methanogenic dynamic according to the reactor configuration. 60 L dry batch anaerobic reactors were implemented with two different configurations, with or without liquid reserve modulating the solid phase immersion. As a first step, DNA extractions of inoculum and cattle manure were optimized changing several parameters (thermal shock, mechanic shock). The quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) of methanogenic populations targeting 16S rRNA was implemented to quantify total Archaea, four orders of methanogens whether Methanococcales, Methanomicrobiales, Methanobacteriales, Methanosarcinales, and two families such as Methanosaetaceae and Methanosarcinaceae. An external validation of DNA extraction and qPCR method were made by an external laboratory. Methanogenic compositions of inoculum used in these experiments have then been compared to fresh manure and inoculum at the end of anaerobic digestion. The dynamic of methanogen populations was studied in order to explain the methane production difference between two reactor configurations according to the immersion of solid phase.

Section snippets

Chemical and microbial characterizations

Total solid (TS) and volatile solid (VS) contents were analyzed on cattle manure (22.0 ± 0.5% TS; 89.4 ± 0.6% VS) and inoculum (2.10 ± 0.5% TS; 54.2 ± 0.3% VS) at 105 °C during 12 h and 550 °C during 2 h, respectively relative to the standard methods (APHA, 1998, AFNOR NF U44-160, 1985). Analyses were made in duplicate.

Before anaerobic digestion, cattle manure (around 1 kg) and inocula (around 1 L) were sampling according to a sampling plan (Gy, 1988), in order to analyze the methanogen dynamics by the qPCR

DNA extraction validation

The both DNA extraction protocols were compared between the method described in Section 2.2.2, named as “optimized method” (column A) and the classical extraction method (column C) (Table 2). In this first part, the qPCR step was achieved by the ITE laboratory for both extraction protocols. The quantity of 16S rRNA gene copies with optimized method was higher than the classical method (about 100 times). The coefficient of variation was below 11% showing a low dispersion. The parameters of cell

Conclusions

The solid phase immersion was essential to produce more methane in dry AD process. DNA extraction and qPCR method were implemented and validated to quantify methanogens in liquid and solid phases during dry AD. Final quantities of methanogens converged toward the same level in several inocula at the end of AD. In liquid phase, methanogen dynamic showed few variations. Bio-molecular study of solid phase revealed a strong variation of Methanomicrobiales and Methanosarcinaceae. The improvement of

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank Conseil Régional de Picardie for the financial support of this work and ANRT for the Ph.D grant of Laura André. The authors thank also Samir Dou for his help, Camille Brun and Quentin André for their careful reading of this manuscript.

References (35)

Cited by (34)

  • Fate of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in wastewater treatment sludge during storage and thermophilic anaerobic digestion

    2022, Environmental Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The other remaining four reactors were similar except that the WWT sludge was not spiked (NS). The ratio employed between WWT sludge and inoculum had been previously identified as optimal to ensure a good AD process (André et al., 2016; Holliger et al., 2016). The viral decay dynamics was monitored by sacrificing pairs of reactors (S and NS) over a 5 days period, sufficient for most of the methane to be produced for the urban sludge (Yasui et al., 2008; Silvestre et al., 2011; Strömberg et al., 2014).

  • Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization

    2021, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    The former consumes acetates from the acetogenic phase of AD and converts them into CH4 and CO2 whereas the latter converts hydrogen and CO2 (also from the acetogenic phase of AD) into CH4, while hydrogen serves as an electron donor for the reduction of CO2. Suppression of hydrogenotrophic methanogens is necessary for biohydrogen production [225–228]. Hydrogen has a higher energy density in comparison to some other forms of energy.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text