Catching the audience in a job interview: Effects of emotion regulation strategies on subjective, physiological, and behavioural responses
Introduction
Acute social stress is an almost universal experience. Being intrinsically emotional, social stress requires using emotion regulation (ER) strategies (Gross, 2015). Difficulties in deploying such strategies may predict several negative outcomes; and in the long-term may contribute to the development of clinical symptoms (Sheppes, Suri, & Gross, 2015). ER is a dynamic and multifaceted regulatory process through which one tries to manage one’s emotions, their intensity, and the way the emotions are experienced or expressed (Gross, 2015). In everyday life, ER strategies are deployed spontaneously and in combination (Aldao & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2013; Ford, Gross, & Gruber, 2019). In contrast, research has mainly focused on using one strategy compared to another (Gross, 2015).
The Extended Process Model of ER by Gross (2015) outlines three primary stages: the need to regulate a certain emotion, strategy selection, and implementation. The author underlines the continuous and dynamic valuation process over time while considering the role of individual differences and the context, defending the use of more than one strategy during an ER process over time as an adjustment response. Ford et al. (2019) defined polyregulation as the concurrent or sequential use of multiple strategies to regulate emotions in a single emotional episode. The authors also postulate that evidence is lacking in regard to the impact of polyregulation.
Several ER strategies have been studied, with research indicating that cognitive change strategies (e.g. cognitive reappraise via perspective-taking) tend to be the more effective compared to strategies of attentional deployment (e.g. distraction, concentration) and response modulation (e.g. suppression) (see Webb, Miles, & Sheeran, 2012). In addition, the timing effect hypothesis proposes that ER is more effective when emotion is still at a low-intensity level than at a high level (Sheppes & Gross, 2011). According to the Model Process of ER (Gross, 1998), timing is essential for suppression because it operates at a later stage in the ER process. Thus, it requires more effort to modify existing and new emotional information (Sheppes & Gross, 2011). Research in negative contexts also suggests that acceptance and cognitive reappraise via perspective-taking are the most used, whereas suppression tend to be the least reported (Szasz, Coman, Curtiss, Carpenter, & Hofmann, 2018).
Considering the literature on ER strategies characteristics and related outcomes during negative, anxiety-inducing contexts The present research analysed the responses to a social stress situation using a combination of two cognitive reappraisal strategies (CCR: acceptance/reappraisal of the emotional response and cognitive reappraise via perspective-taking) compared to the suppression of emotional expression (SEE).
Section snippets
Emotion regulation strategies and outcomes
Cognitive reappraise of the stimulus via perspective-taking involves rethinking a stimulus to change its emotional meaning and impact (Webb et al., 2012) by targeting either the meaning or the self-relevance of a potentially emotion-eliciting situation (Gross, 2015). It has shown to be the most effective strategy in stressful situations in decreasing negative affect and increasing positive affect (Jentsch & Wolf, 2020; Quinones, Rodríguez-Carvajal, & Griffiths, 2017), decreasing behavioural
Present study
Our study expands previous research in two ways: first, the usage of the CCR strategies in a social evaluative situation; second, the analysis of the three-systems of emotion by measuring subjective, physiological (cardiovascular measures) and behavioural responses.
Few studies have addressed the ER responses across the three-systems of emotions and the associations between the systems. Therefore, the correspondence between the three-systems remains unclear, though some authors highlight the
Participants
We used GPower 3.1 to estimate the sample size. Based on prior effect size on reappraisal data from physiological (autonomic) and performance outcomes (d = 0.76, f = 0.38, Beltzer et al., 2014), two independent groups, power = .90, p < .05, and three covariates, we would require 65 participants for conducting Multivariate Analyses of Covariance. Nevertheless, we recruited a larger sample because we collected different outcomes.
We recruited participants via snowball sampling. As recommended (
Results
As shown in Table 1, groups did not differ on most sociodemographic variables, apart from marital status. No participant reported having a mental disorder, and both groups had similarly low levels of trait social anxiety/fear (M = 27.03, SD = 11.20). At baseline, both groups reported mild states of anxiety (M = 2.40, SD = 0.48), and showed normative physiological HRV index (RMSSD: M = 39.21, SD = 22.73) and stress indexes (M = 11.03, SD = 3.56). Correlations between physiological measures and
Discussion
This study investigated the impact of the combination of two cognitive reappraisal strategies on self-report, physiological, and behavioural responses in a socially stressful context. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first proposal for combining these two strategies. We investigated whether the use of CCR would be more appropriate than SEE for each of the outcomes.
Contrary to our expectations, results on subjective self-report measures have not confirmed our initial hypothesis
Funding
The Portuguese National Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) supported this work [grant numbers SFRH/BD/126304/2016, UID/PSI/03125/2020].
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Anabela Caetano Santos: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing - original draft. Patrícia Arriaga: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Resources, Software, Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Celeste Simões: Writing - review & editing.
Declaration of Competing Interest
None
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Adriano Mendes, Antonino Chorinca, Joana Alegrete, Sofia Sequeira and Virginia Pedro for their collaboration as judges in the TSST task, Rob Richards for his great support in proofreading the manuscript, and João Daniel with the FDR analysis consulting.
References (65)
- et al.
The Trier Social Stress Test: Principles and practice
Neurobiology of Stress
(2017) - et al.
Emotional reactivity to social-evaluative stress: Gender differences in response systems concordance
Personality and Individual Differences
(1999) - et al.
Heart rate variability as a transdiagnostic biomarker of psychopathology
International Journal of Psychophysiology
(2015) - et al.
Heart rate variability during acute psychosocial stress: A randomized cross-over trial of verbal and non-verbal laboratory stressors
International Journal of Psychophysiology
(2018) - et al.
Acute psychosocial stress: Does the emotional stress response correspond with physiological responses?
Psychoneuroendocrinology
(2012) - et al.
The temporal dynamics of emotional acceptance: Experience, expression, and physiology
Biological Psychology
(2015) - et al.
Emotion regulation in social anxiety and depression: A systematic review of expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal
Clinical Psychology Review
(2018) - et al.
Emotion response coherence: A dual-process perspective
Biological Psychology
(2014) - et al.
Acceptance and mindfulness-based therapy: New wave or old hat?
Clinical Psychology Review
(2008) - et al.
How to handle anxiety: The effects of reappraisal, acceptance, and suppression strategies on anxious arousal
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2009)
Heart rate variability indices as bio-markers of top-down self-regulatory mechanisms: A meta-analytic review
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
The impact of emotion regulation on cardiovascular, neuroendocrine and psychological stress responses
Biological Psychology
Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the Trier Social Stress Test in eliciting physiological stress responses in children and adolescents
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Social phobia: The role of in-situation safety behaviors in maintaining anxiety and negative beliefs – Republished article
Behavior Therapy
One versus many: Capturing the use of multiple emotion regulation strategies in response to an emotion-eliciting stimulus
Cognition & Emotion
Methodical recommendations. Use KARDIVAR system for determination of the stress level and estimation of the body. Standards of measurements and physiological interpretation
Attentional deployment is not necessary for successful emotion regulation via cognitive reappraisal or expressive suppression
Emotion
Rethinking butterflies: The affective, physiological, and performance effects of reappraising arousal during social evaluation
Emotion
Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B
Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate
Biometrika
MOTE: Measure of the Effect: Package to assist in effect size calculations and their confidence intervals
R package version 1.0.2
Psychometric properties of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale in a large cross-cultural Spanish and Portuguese speaking sample
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
A cognitive model of social phobia
A new measure of the expression of shame: The shame code
Journal of Child and Family Studies
Emotion regulation: Why beliefs matter
Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne
Broadening our field of view: The role of emotion polyregulation
Emotion Review
Versão reduzida da escala portuguesa de afeto positivo e negativo - PANAS-VRP: Análise factorial confirmatória e invariância temporal [Short-Form of the Portuguese version of the positive and negative affect schedule - PANAS-Port-VRP: Confirmatory factor
Revista Psicologia/Psychology Journal
Is emotion suppression beneficial or harmful? It depends on self-regulatory strength
Motivation and Emotion
Acceptance versus reappraisal: Behavioral, autonomic, and neural effects
Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
Effects of emotion regulation strategies on anxiety during job interviews in Chinese college students
Anxiety, Stress, and Coping
The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review
Review of General Psychology
Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects
Psychological Inquiry
Cited by (5)
Cardiovascular, self-report, and behavioral stress reactivity to the group-based Trier Social Stress Test with pandemic-related protocol adaptations
2023, International Journal of PsychophysiologyInteraction between rs10052957 polymorphism of glucocorticoid receptor gene and environmental factors increases the risk of suicide: A study of 66 cases
2023, Journal of Army Medical UniversityThe link between emotion regulation and size estimation of spiders pictures among women with fear of spiders
2022, Frontiers in Psychology“We Will Let You Know”: An Assessment of Digital vs. Face-to-Face Job Interviews via EEG Connectivity Analysis
2022, Information (Switzerland)Computer Simulation as a Tool of Psychological Readiness for Employment Process for Migrant Students
2021, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series