Elsevier

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volume 81, October 2015, Pages 234-241
Biomass and Bioenergy

Research paper
Covalent immobilization of enzymes and yeast: Towards a continuous simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process for cellulosic ethanol

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.07.009Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A continuous saccharification and fermentation was proposed.

  • Immobilization of cellulase and yeast was achieved on plasma treated polystyrene.

  • The immobilization maintained enzyme and yeast activities under a continuous flow.

  • The continuous operation reduced end product inhibition.

Abstract

The immobilization of enzymes and yeast cells is a key factor for establishing a continuous process of cellulosic ethanol production, which can combine the benefits of a separated hydrolysis and fermentation process and a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process. This paper investigates the use of cellulase enzyme and yeast cell immobilization under a flow regime of ethanol production from soluble substrates such as cellobiose and carboxymethyl cellulose. The immobilization was achieved by incubating enzymes and yeast cells on polystyrene surfaces which had been treated by nitrogen ion implantation. The saccharification by immobilized enzymes and the fermentation by immobilized yeast cells were conducted in two separate vessels connected by a pump. During the experiments, glucose concentrations were always maintained at low levels which potentially reduce product inhibition effects on the enzymes. Covalent immobilization of enzymes and yeast cells on the plasma treated polymer reduces loss by shear flow induced detachment. The potential for continuous flow production of ethanol and the influence of daughter yeast cells in the circulating flow on the immobilized enzyme activity are discussed.

Introduction

In ethanol production from cellulosic biomass based on enzymatic catalysis, there are three common designs of processes: consolidated bioprocessing (CBP), separated hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF). CBP is a process in which enzyme production, cellulose hydrolysis and fermentation are all accomplished by microorganisms [15]. Apart from having fermentation capability, the microorganisms selected for CBP must be capable of expressing enzymes for hydrolysing cellulose (i.e. cellulases) as well as enzymes for converting glucose into ethanol. Microorganisms that are efficient in carrying out all of these processes are rare in Nature and must be created by genetic engineering [11]. SHF is a simple process in which the hydrolysis step occurs before fermentation. The separation of these two steps allows the optimum operation of each step to be achieved [20]. However, the separation of these two steps also causes the accumulation of hydrolysis products in the hydrolysis vessel which inhibit enzyme activity, consequently reducing the reaction rate over time [1].

To overcome the disadvantages of both of these processes, Takagi et al. [19] proposed a SSF process in 1977 and since then, it has been widely used for studying cellulosic ethanol production. In the SSF process of Takagi et al., enzyme hydrolysis and fermentation occur at the same time and in the same vessel. The simultaneous saccharification and fermentation enhances the hydrolysis efficiency by reducing the accumulation of hydrolysis products that would otherwise impede the activity of the key enzymes. Ghosh et al. [7] reported an increase in hydrolysis rate by 13–30% by using SSF compared to a normal saccharification process that allows glucose to accumulate. Ohgren et al. [14] also reported a 13% higher yield of ethanol from the SSF process compared to SHF process. However, some disadvantages of the SSF process have been reported in the literature. Ooshima et al. [16] found that when the ethanol concentration exceeded 0.2 M, it disturbed the adsorption of exoglucanase on cellulose and depressed the saccharification rate. In addition, the presence of cellulase enzyme mixtures in the same vessel significantly influences yeast growth [17]. Since the hydrolysis and fermentation steps have so far been carried out in the same vessel, the process is often operated in the temperature range between 30 and 40 °C due to the restricted thermostability of yeast. Removing this constraint by separating the yeast from the enzyme processes in separate vessels would enable the use thermophilic enzymes to achieve higher activities by allowing operation at higher temperatures. Here we report on the operation of such a process in which the yeast and enzyme reaction steps are carried out in separated zones, while allowing a continuous flow process to be operated.

The proposed separated continuous simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (continuous SSF) process is shown in Fig. 1. In this process, cellulosic biomass is continuously pre-treated and pumped to the hydrolysis vessel where a mixture of cellulases converts it into fermentable sugars. The fermentation substrates are pumped continuously to the fermentation vessel where the sugars are fermented to produce ethanol. Ethanol is continuously separated from the bulk by an ethanol selective membrane or continuous distillation. The remaining liquids, consisting of water and ethanol with incompletely reacted substrates, are recycled to the hydrolysis tank, and combined with newly pre-treated biomass, for further hydrolysis. The use of a circulating flow of the liquid medium allows the separation of saccharification and fermentation into two vessels while the concentrations of sugars and ethanol can be maintained stable over time, hence reducing the end product inhibition and enabling the optimum temperature to be used for each step. The activities of the enzymes used in hydrolysis and the yeast for ethanologenisis are thereby prolonged. Such a continuous SSF process would not only reduce the cost of enzymes and ethanologens but would also give higher yield as the intermediate products in the bulk are recycled. A continuous process based on immobilised agents would also require less reaction volume than a batch process, and would reduce the labour cost, minimise unproductive down time and reduce the production of waste water [4], [8].

The most important requirements for a continuous SSF are the maintenance of a stable population of active enzymes and ethanologen organisms inside the reactors. Under continuous flow, enzymes and yeast cells would normally be washed away quickly, reducing the activity of the reaction vessels over time. Therefore, a key prerequisite for a continuous SSF is strong immobilization of both enzymes and yeast.

The immobilization of cellulose enzymes (enzyme celB and β-glucosidase) and yeast cells on plasma activated polymers has been studied in our previous works [13], [21], [22]. The polymer surfaces were activated using a plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII) technique to create radicals that remain embedded in the ion implanted surface layer for a long period after treatment. Through reactions with these highly reactive radicals, the PIII treated polymer is able to form covalent bonds with side chain groups of biomolecules, providing strong surface immobilisation while preserving biomolecule activity [2], [3]. In this paper, we demonstrate the usefulness of this type of immobilization for the implementation of circulating flow continuous SSF. Two separate experiments were conducted with two soluble celluloses. In the first experiment, we demonstrate that immobilized β-glucosidase and yeast cells can be used to convert cellobiose into ethanol. In the second experiment, we use two immobilized enzymes (celB and β-glucosidase) working together to hydrolyse carboxymethyl cellulose and use immobilized yeast cells to convert fermentable sugars into ethanol. Corresponding saccharification experiments were carried out at the same time with the circulating SSF to estimate the effectiveness of the enzyme hydrolysis.

Section snippets

Immobilization of enzymes and yeast cells

Polystyrene films (0.19 mm thick from Goodfellow Cambridge Ltd) were treated by plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII) and used as supports for the immobilization of enzyme and yeast. The PIII treatment was conducted in a vacuum chamber with plasma, generated in nitrogen (2 × 10−3 torr) by inductively coupled radio frequency (13.56 MHz) power. Polystyrene film (8 × 8 cm2) was mounted on a conductive sample holder that was connected to a high voltage power supply. A bias of 20 kV was applied

Saccharification of cellobiose using CSSF

In the saccharification step of this experiment, β-glucosidase hydrolyses cellobiose into glucose. Fig. 3 shows glucose concentrations in the saccharification chamber as a function of reaction time. The glucose production rate decreases when the glucose concentration exceeds 10 mg/ml and decreases sharply when the glucose concentration reaches 25 mg/ml. The last two measurements may not be reliable as we observed contamination in the chamber from yeast cells by 141 h. Some contamination is

Discussion

In the first experiment using cellobiose as a substrate, the decrease in glucose production rate over the process operation time (Fig. 3) is attributed to the end-product inhibition effect. The amount of 25 mg/ml of glucose was reported to have an inhibition effect on β-glucosidase activity [24]. The low concentration of glucose in the circulating SSF process, arising from rapid consumption of glucose by yeast, would reduce the inhibition effect on β-glucosidase. This was proven by the

Conclusion

This work illustrates the feasibility of a continuous simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process by using cellulase enzymes and yeast cells immobilized on separate surfaces. The immobilization to polymer supports was achieved using reaction with radicals embedded in PIII treated polystyrene. This direct covalent immobilisation has been shown to be effective in maintaining the immobilised enzyme and yeast activities under a continuous flow. In the proposed process, the end product

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Mr Fernando Barasoain and Ms Natalia Kislova for the ethanol assay. The provision of laboratory facilities by Professor Cris dos Remedios is gratefully acknowledged. This study was financially supported by the Australian Research Council grant number DP1095765.

References (24)

  • A.K. Chandel et al.

    Economics and environmental impact of bioethanol production technologies: an appraisal

    Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. Rev.

    (2007)
  • L. Galdieri et al.

    Transcriptional regulation in Yeast during Diauxic shift and stationary phase

    J. Integr. Biol.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Biosynthesis of fuel-grade ethanol from cellobiose by a cell-factory of non-GMO Saccharomyces cerevisiae/starch-gel-cellulase

      2022, Fuel
      Citation Excerpt :

      In other words, saccharification and fermentation will take place concurrently and in the same batch [12]. The benefits of such OSHF system are shorter processing time, lower energy demand, and an overall low production-cost [13]. For alcoholic fermentation, a common baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is usually preferred for its tolerance to ethanol, and high fermentation efficiency and that is indicated from the use of it in ethanol production from starch, watermelon waste etc [14–18].

    • One-step solid-state fermentation for efficient erythritol production from the simultaneous saccharified crop wastes by incorporating immobilized cellulase

      2022, Industrial Crops and Products
      Citation Excerpt :

      The increased stability of immobilized cellulase could be ascribed to the enhancement of enzyme rigidity and conformational flexibility by immobilization, preventing the conformation change of cellulase after a long-period activity at a certain temperature (Ling et al., 2016). Despite the cell growth and product yields of yeasts that are usually supported by cultivation at 28 °C, the optimal cellulase activity appeared at higher temperatures (Tran et al., 2015; Sui et al., 2019). However, cellulase immediately lost activity after a transitory efficient hydrolysis (general several hours) at the optimal high temperature (Sui et al., 2019).

    • Microbial cellulase for the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass

      2021, Current Status and Future Scope of Microbial Cellulases
    • Yeast encapsulation in nanofiber via electrospinning: Shape transformation, cell activity and immobilized efficiency

      2021, Materials Science and Engineering C
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the present, several methods, like 1) surface attachment including natural absorption, electrostatic absorption, covalent combination with cross-linking agents; 2) entrapment within a porous matrix; 3) containment behind barriers; 4) cell aggregation (flocculation), have been suggested and developed. For example, via formation of covalent bond between free radical of polymer film surface and side chain of biomolecules, Tran et al. [8] immobilized enzyme and yeast cells on polystyrene surfaces treated by nitrogen ion implantation in advance. However, they found that the optimum temperature for yeast cells is lower than enzyme, which may limit their applications because immobilized enzyme could improve its activity by increasing the temperature while yeast cells cannot.

    • Lignocellulosic ethanol production: Evaluation of new approaches, cell immobilization and reactor configurations

      2019, Renewable Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many microorganisms are able to adhere to different surfaces in nature; immobilization is a technique that mimics this phenomenon [107]. In principle, a continuous process that uses immobilized cells will require a lower reaction volume than a batch process, thereby reducing costs [108]. Immobilization has been demonstrated to enhance reactor productivity, ease the separation of cells from the bulk liquid and facilitate continuous operation over a prolonged period [109].

    • Covalent immobilization of Candida antarctica lipase on core-shell magnetic nanoparticles for production of biodiesel from waste cooking oil

      2017, Renewable Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among all the strategies used for enzyme immobilization, covalent attachment meets the demand of industrial applications of biocatalysts [21]. This method has advantages of no leaching of enzyme from the support, wide choices of organic linkers and established methods of functionalization and modification of the supports [22]. In recent decades, magnetic nanoparticles have drawn great attention for practical application as support for enzyme immobilization due to their high surface area and proper physical properties [23].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text