Elsevier

Biological Control

Volume 54, Issue 2, August 2010, Pages 107-113
Biological Control

High host specificity in Encarsia diaspidicola (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a biological control candidate against the white peach scale in Hawaii

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.04.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Pre-introductory host specificity tests were performed with Encarsia diaspidicola, a biological control candidate against the invasive white peach scale, Pseudaulacaspis pentagona. False oleander scale, P. cockerelli, coconut scale, Aspidiotus destructor, cycad scale, Aulacaspis yasumatsui, greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum, green scale, Coccus viridis, and long-tailed mealybug, Pseudococcus longispinus were tested in quarantine using traditional no-choice tests and examined for wasp emergence. The Hawaiian endemic palm scale, Colobopyga pritchardiae was also tested using no-choice tests and evaluated using species-specific molecular markers. All tests used unexposed non-target cohorts and no-choice exposure of white peach scale to the parasitoid as controls. None of the non-target exotic species yielded wasp emergence, and exposure to wasps had no effect on the mortality of the non-target species examined. Molecular tests with the endemic palm scale showed no evidence of parasitism by E. diaspidicola. These results strongly support that E. diaspidicola has a narrow host range and that its release in Hawaii will have negligible risk of non-target effects.

Introduction

White peach scale, Pseudaulacaspis pentagona Targioni-Tozzetti (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), is one of the most polyphagous armored scale insects in the world (Miller and Davidson, 2005), but so far in Hawaii it is only known as a crop pest in papaya, Carica papaya L. Infestation can rapidly increase to levels where large areas of the trunks of papaya trees are completely covered by white peach scales. Overcrowding causes scales to spread up the trunk, and in heavily infested trees scales move up onto fruit, preferring to settle in the calyx and peduncle regions. White peach scale on the fruit is a quarantine problem. Infested fruit shipments may be rejected in California, and Japan, a very important market for Hawaii papayas, has zero tolerance for white peach scale. Infested fruits may be brushed to physically remove scales at considerable cost. In papayas grown for the Japan market, fields may be abandoned after 5% of the trees are infested. White peach scale can also decrease plant vigor and yield. Control with available chemical insecticides is not effective (Follett, 2000). The advancing infestation, which is at outbreak levels in some areas of the Big Island (Island of Hawaii), where the largest Hawaii papaya orchards are located, and the inefficiency of chemical control necessitated the development of a biological control program.

Female white peach scales deposit all their eggs (≈100–150 total/female) in about a week. Eggs hatch in 3–4 days and the young scales (“crawlers”) settle on the host plants within 2 days after hatching. Crawlers do not actively disperse far from the point of hatching but can be spread by the wind. Once crawlers settle they remain attached to the host plant throughout their lives. Two subsequent molts requiring about three weeks time produces adult females. Females form a slightly oval waxy cover (scale) during development. Second instar males form an oblong cover and after three molts emerge as adults 19–22 days later. Adult males are winged and immediately start inseminating females. Oviposition by females begins 14–16 days after mating. A generation is completed in 36–40 days at 25 °C (Miller and Davidson, 2005).

Encarsia diaspidicola Silvestri (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) is a thelytokous solitary endoparasite. The adult females deposit eggs singly in immature stages of white peach scale. The development time of the parasitoid at approximately 23 °C is 30–35 days. In the scientific literature, E. diaspidicola is reported from white peach scale (Huang and Polaszek, 1998) and Quadraspidiotus pernicious Comstock, San Jose scale (Peck, 1963). The Universal Chalcidoidea Database (Noyes, 2003) lists other primary hosts but those records may have been based on misidentifications. Later workers (Heraty et al., 2007) only list white peach scale and San Jose scale as primary hosts with a single reference to San Jose scale (Peck, 1963). As there have been no reports since 1963 of E. diaspidicola attacking San Jose scale, the Peck record may be questionable.

Several biological control programs have targeted white peach scale worldwide (Collins and Whitcomb, 1975, Waterhouse and Norris, 1987, Liebregts et al., 1989). Encarsia berlesei Howard (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and E. diaspidicola were released in Samoa as biological control agents to control white peach scale on passion fruit, Passiflora edulis L. Over time, E. diaspidicola displaced E. berlesei in Samoa and lowered white peach scale population numbers significantly (Liebregts et al., 1989). Because of its successful establishment and control of white peach scale populations in Samoa, which has a similar climate to Hawaii, E. diaspidicola was selected as the preferred biological agent and was imported into Hawaii from Samoa in 2006. A colony was established at the USDA Forestry Service Quarantine Facility in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park.

Parasitoid wasps in the genus Encarsia Foerster mostly attack whiteflies (Aleyrodidae) and armored scale insects (Diaspididae) (Huang and Polaszek, 1998), with four species recorded from aphids in the family Hormaphididae (Evans et al., 1995). Females of most Encarsia species develop as primary internal parasitoids of diaspidid armored scales or whiteflies, but the males of the same species develop as parasitoids of female parasitoid larvae or pupae, often of their own species (Viggiani, 1984, Hunter and Woolley, 2001). In the case of E. porteri, females develop as primary parasitoids of whiteflies and males are obligate parasitoids of lepidopteran eggs (Hunter et al., 1996).

The Hawaiian insect fauna has a high rate of endemism, and biological control programs must show a high degree of host specificity for candidate agents and minimal risk to non-target native species before permission to release will be granted. E. diapidicola is known to attack only diaspidid scales and there are no native diaspidid scale insects in Hawaii, making it a promising candidate. Nevertheless, host specificity testing was required by state and federal regulatory agencies to demonstrate minimal risk of non-target effects. The native Hawaiian insect fauna includes three species of scale insects in the family Halimococcidae or pupillarial palm scales; these halimococcids were at one time classified as diaspidid scales (Beardsley, 1963). One of the species, Colobopyga pritchardiae, an endemic palm scale found only on Pritchardia palms and recently recorded for the first time on the island of Hawaii (Neumann et al., 2007), was included in host testing as a representative of the Hawaiian Halimococcidae. Encarsia diaspidicola was also tested for its ability to parasitize several invasive, economically important diaspidid scales and close relatives: the false oleander scale, P. cockerelli Cooley (Diaspididae), the coconut scale, Aspidiotus destructor Signoret (Diaspididae), the cycad scale, Aulacaspis yasumatsui Takagi (Diaspididae), the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood (Aleyrodidae), the green scale, Coccus viridis Green (Coccidae), and the long-tailed mealybug, Pseudococcus longispinus Targioni-Tozzetti (Pseudococcidae).

Section snippets

Insect colonies and rearing

Encarsia diaspidicola was originally collected in Samoa from white peach scale on passion fruit (P. edulis L.) and was imported to Volcanoes National Park Quarantine Facility in Hawaii.

White peach scale crawlers were collected in papaya, C. papaya L., orchards from the trunks of infested papaya trees to start a colony in quarantine, and thereafter propagated on butternut squash, Cucurbita moschata Duchesne ex Lam. For E. diaspidicola rearing, a squash infested with approximately 500 settled

Limited time exposure tests

In the limited time exposure no-choice tests, no E. diaspidicola emerged from any of the three non-target diaspidid species tested while the positive controls with white peach scale yielded E. diaspidicola emergence in all cases between 21.2 ± 17 and 25.8 ± 1.7 wasps/100 exposed white peach scales (Table 1). Experimental insect mortality in the limited time exposure tests was observed only in coconut scale (15.1 ± 1.7) but this was not significantly different from the mortality in the unexposed

Discussion

The no-choice tests in this study demonstrated that E. diaspidicola was specific to white peach scale. This was expected based on the scientific literature: except for a single, and maybe questionable report of E. diaspidicola from the San Jose scale (Peck, 1963), E. diaspidicola is known to attack only white peach scale. However, host testing with E. diaspidicola has not been reported in the literature. We tested three, closely related, economically important diaspidid scale insects, including

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Marissa González from USDA, ARS (Weslaco, TX) for her excellent technical assistance with the molecular work, and Michael P. McKenney for his excellent work in establishing a healthy E. diaspidicola colony in the USDA Forestry Service Quarantine Facility in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park.

References (30)

  • J.W. Beardsley

    Notes on Hawaiian Phoenicoccinae, with description of a new species

    Pacific Insects

    (1963)
  • C.P. Clausen et al.

    Introduced Parasites and Predators of Arthropod Pests and Weeds: A World Review. Agriculture Handbook

    (1978)
  • F.A. Collins et al.

    Natural enemies of the white peach scale, Pseudaulacaspis pentagona (Homoptera: Coccidae), in Florida

    Florida Entomologist

    (1975)
  • J.H. de León et al.

    Development of molecular diagnostic markers for sharpshooters Homalodisca coagulata and H. Liturata for use in predator gut content examinations

    Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

    (2006)
  • J.H. de León et al.

    Evaluation of molecular markers for discriminating Gonatocerus morrilli (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae): a biological control agent for Homalodisca vitripennis

    Annals of the Entomological Society of America

    (2007)
  • de León, J.H., Neumann, G., Follett, P.A., Hollingsworth, R.G., accepted for publication. Molecular markers...
  • G.E. Evans et al.

    The taxonomy of the Encarsia flavoscutellum species-group (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), parasitoids of Hormaphididae (Homoptera: Aphidoidea)

    Oriental Insects

    (1995)
  • S.E. Flanders

    The status of San Jose scale parasitization (including biological notes)

    Journal of Economic Entomology

    (1960)
  • P.A. Follett

    Arthropod pests of papaya in Hawaii

    Chronica Horticulturae

    (2000)
  • V. Fournier et al.

    Identifying the predator complex of Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): a comparative study of the efficacy of an ELISA and PCR gut content assay

    Oecologia

    (2008)
  • M.H. Greenstone

    Molecular methods for assessing insect parasitism

    Bulletin of Entomological Research

    (2006)
  • Heraty, J.M., Woolley, J.B., Polaszek, A., 2007. Catalog of the Encarsia of the world. Available from:...
  • J. Huang et al.

    A revision of the Chinese species of Encarsia Förster (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae): parasitoids of whiteflies, scale insects and aphids (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae, Diaspididae, Aphidoidea)

    Journal of Natural History

    (1998)
  • M.S. Hunter et al.

    Divergent host relationships of males and females in the parasitoid Encarsia porteri (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae)

    Annals of the Entomological Society of America

    (1996)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Sperm morphology of trichospilus diatraeae and palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: chalcidoidea: Eulophidae)

      2013, Micron
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although some Chalcidoidea are phytophagous or hyperparasitoids, most are parasitoids of other arthropods, thus playing an important role in controlling the populations of other insects. Therefore, chalcidoids have been successfully used in most biological pest control programs (Greathead, 1986; Neumann et al., 2010; Polaszek et al., 2012). Despite the economic and ecological importance of this group of insects, knowledge of evolutionary relationships among Chalcidoidea remains unclear, with is no consensus on the placement of several families (Heraty et al., 1997; Munro et al., 2011).

    • Services of DNA barcoding in different fields

      2016, Mitochondrial DNA Part A: DNA Mapping, Sequencing, and Analysis
    • Non-target effects of insect biocontrol agents and trends in host specificity since 1985

      2016, CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text