Elsevier

Biological Conservation

Volume 197, May 2016, Pages 124-130
Biological Conservation

Who hunts lemurs and why they hunt them

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.012Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Developing sound lemur conservation policy requires knowing why lemurs are hunted.

  • We test eleven popular hypotheses purporting to explain illegal hunting of lemurs.

  • High education, knowledge of laws, and ecotourism do not reduce illegal hunting.

  • Poverty, poor health, and child malnutrition best predict lemur hunting.

  • Improving human health and welfare may be the key to discouraging illegal hunting.

Abstract

The main threats to lemurs are habitat loss and hunting. Conservation policies often assume that people will decrease lemur hunting if they understand government prohibitions on hunting, are educated and/or involved in ecotourism, have access to affordable meat, and/or are healthy and financially secure. Yet these assumptions are often not well tested where conservation policies are implemented. We interviewed every member of a focal village in one of the most biodiverse places on earth, the Masoala peninsula of Madagascar. The factors that best predicted the decision to hunt lemurs were poverty, poor health, and child malnutrition. Knowledge of laws, level of education, involvement in ecotourism, traditional cultural values, taste preferences, opportunity, and human–wildlife conflict had no impact on lemur hunting. Our results suggest that the welfare of humans and lemurs are linked. The key to discouraging illegal hunting and improving the viability of Endangered lemur populations may be improving rural human health and welfare.

Introduction

Because humans interact dynamically with ecological systems, collaboration between the social and biophysical sciences is critical for advancing conservation and public health priorities (Gibson et al., 2000, Costanza et al., 2001, Ostrom, 2005, Milner-Gulland, 2012). Madagascar is a global biodiversity hotspot and a conservation priority (Myers et al., 2000). The island nation also currently faces a dual crisis in biodiversity and public health. Ninety-four percent of lemur species are threatened with extinction (Schwitzer et al., 2013), and the food security of Madagascar's people has plummeted to nearly last in the world (EIU, 2014). Meanwhile, Endangered lemurs continue to be hunted for food (Borgerson, 2015a).

We know that unsustainable hunting can threaten biodiversity as well as human health and food security (Milner-Gulland et al., 2003, Golden et al., 2011). Sound conservation policy to curb such practices must be grounded in the knowledge of why people choose to hunt Endangered animals and how they view their risks and alternatives. Of course, it is not easy to identify or quantify the reasons people hunt illegally when they have a great stake in keeping such activities hidden (Razafimanahaka et al., 2012). However, collecting these data is essential to devising effective conservation strategies. Conservation efforts will be more effective when they include site-specific policies that address why people illegally hunt wild animals.

Most forest resources are common-pool goods, both subtractable in consumption and difficult to exclude from potential users, thus challenging to provide and easy to deplete (Ostrom, 1990, McKean, 2000). Although national governments and international regimes for governance of specific resource systems may claim ownership or regulatory rights, local people retain the physical opportunity to utilize the forests. They can respect, ignore, or defy the government's laws. Conservation policies proposed for Madagascar aim to deter people from illegally hunting Endangered species by increasing their education and knowledge of hunting laws (Jenkins et al., 2011, Keane et al., 2011), by increasing their involvement in ecotourism (Schwitzer et al., 2014), by alleviating poverty (Sunderlin et al., 2005, Gardner et al., 2013), by reducing rural dependence on forest-based livelihoods (Gardner and Davies, 2014), and by improving domestic animal husbandry to increase access to affordable sources of animal-based protein, fats, and valuable micronutrients (Golden et al., 2011, Razafimanahaka et al., 2012). These assumptions, surprisingly, are often not well tested where conservation policies are implemented, and may not even be correct. We simply do not know how a person's knowledge or fear of the government's hunting laws, their education, wealth, involvement in ecotourism, access to affordable meat from domesticated animals, or family health actually affect the decision to hunt threatened species. For example, hunters may be fully aware of lemur hunting laws and may fear rigorous enforcement and punishment, but may still decide to hunt in spite of high risks because the alternatives are worse. Without concrete knowledge of the factors that drive individuals to hunt lemurs, conservationists cannot effectively change the incentives or alter the behavior of hunters.

Within Madagascar, the Masoala peninsula, a UNESCO world heritage site, is one of the highest priority areas for conservation (Kremen et al., 2008). Despite nearly 20 years of conservation efforts on the peninsula, people there still hunt lemurs and other threatened mammals (Golden et al., 2014, Borgerson, 2015a, Borgerson, 2015b).

We interviewed every person in a focal village and asked over 600 interview questions on extraction and use of forest and marine products and on variables that might predict which individuals and households hunt lemurs. We asked individuals about government regulation and local community rules concerning food and resources, level of education, involvement in ecotourism, demographic traits of household members, traditional cultural values about livelihoods and food, taste and preference for animal foods, opportunities for hunting, conflicts with wildlife, access to alternative animal foods, wealth and income, and the health of individuals and households in order to learn Who hunts threatened lemurs and why do they hunt them? We tested the following hypotheses about the proximate and ultimate causes of the decision to hunt lemurs:

H1

Institutions and resource regulation: People who are aware of the laws against lemur hunting and the potential consequences of their enforcement will decide not to hunt lemurs despite the potential strong incentives for hunting lemurs.

H2

Formal education: People with greater formal education will have opportunities for income and employment or a greater understanding of ecosystem services, so will not hunt lemurs.

H3

Ecotourism: People involved in ecotourism will not hunt lemurs. People who gain income from ecotourism may prefer to leave lemurs alive in the wild to attract ecotourists to the area and thereby increase their own personal income, so will avoid and discourage lemur hunting.

H4

Demographic traits of household members: People in households with more men, more people, or more children to support will hunt lemurs. Men may trap more than women. Households with more people to support, or more children to raise, may also do more hunting to enlarge the food supply for the household.

H5

Traditional cultural values about livelihoods and food: People who embrace traditional values will hunt lemurs. Holding traditional values may affect hunting in multiple ways. Lemur-hunting might be a traditional occupation or activity for some households, and traditional values or food cultures may encourage or prohibit certain kinds of hunting.

H6

Taste and preference for animal foods: People who prefer or value the taste of lemurs over other foods will hunt lemurs.

H7

Opportunity: People with livelihood strategies that require spending large amounts of time in the forest will hunt lemurs.

H8

Human–wildlife conflicts: People whose crops and domestic animals have been threatened by wild animals will hunt lemurs.

H9

Access to alternative animal foods: People with less access to alternative sources of meat will hunt lemurs to supplement their diet.

H10

Wealth: Wealthy people will not hunt lemurs. People with relatively little wealth and income will hunt lemurs as free supplements to their diet, whereas people with more wealth and income will not need to do this.

H11

Health: People in households whose members are malnourished and frequently fall ill will hunt lemurs as an important dietary supplement more often than will people in better health.

Section snippets

Study site and data collection

This study took place over twelve consecutive months (July 2011–June 2012) in a focal village on the Masoala peninsula, in northeast Madagascar. The Masoala peninsula contains the wet and mountainous Masoala National Park, which is a UNESCO World Heritage Site and the largest national park in Madagascar (Kremen et al., 1999). The livelihoods of the predominately rural local people depend primarily on subsistence-based agriculture. The staple crop is rice, and rice production is supplemented by

Results

While both men and women opportunistically hunted forest mammals, all active trappers were men. Most households had members who had hunted a forest mammal in the prior year, but few had members who were lemur trappers (Table 1). While nearly all people had eaten lemur meat within their lifetime, only one third reported eating lemur meat during the last year (Table 1). Forty-three percent of all men trapped a forest animal in the prior year and twenty-six percent of men had intentionally set

Discussion

This study identifies poverty, poor health, and child malnutrition as the strongest predictors of the illegal trapping of lemurs in a biodiverse region of rural Madagascar. Most households at our study site on the Masoala hunt forest mammals (75%) and over a third (36%) eat lemurs. Given the insecure future of lemurs and the low food security of Madagascar's people (IUCN, 2014, Economist Intelligence Unit, 2014), it is clear that illegal hunting warrants attention of both conservationists and

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our deepest gratitude to the anonymous village, without whom this project would have been impossible. We would also like to thank Steve King, Tom Leatherman, Timothy Randhir, and several anonymous reviewers who substantially improved this manuscript, and Madagascar National Parks and MICET for their continued support. This research was funded by grants from the Margot Marsh Biodiversity Foundation, Conservation International Primate Action Fund, Oregon Zoo Future for

References (39)

  • J.S. Brashares et al.

    Economic and geographic drivers of wildlife consumption in rural Africa

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2011)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    (2000)
  • R. Costanza et al.

    Institutions, Ecosystems, and Sustainability

    (2001)
  • Economist Intelligence Unit

    Global Food Security Index 2014: An Annual Measure of the State of Global Food Security

    (2014)
  • C.J. Gardner et al.

    Rural bushmeat consumption within multiple-use protected areas: qualitative evidence from Southwest Madagascar

    Hum. Ecol.

    (2014)
  • C.J. Gardner et al.

    Protected areas for conservation and poverty alleviation: experiences from Madagascar

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2013)
  • C.C. Gibson et al.

    Explaining deforestation: the role of local institutions

  • C.D. Golden et al.

    Economic valuation of subsistence harvest of wildlife in Madagascar

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2014)
  • C.D. Golden et al.

    Benefits of wildlife consumption to child nutrition in a biodiversity hotspot

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (45)

    • Year-to-year ecosystem services supply in conservation contexts in north-eastern Madagascar: Trade-offs between global demands and local needs

      2021, Ecosystem Services
      Citation Excerpt :

      After habitat loss, hunting is probably the second most important direct threat to lemur populations in eastern Madagascar (Morelli et al., 2019), activity not always easy to detect and deter. Given the cornerstone role played by bushmeat in the nutrition of the poorest and most food insecure populations around the region’s PAs (Borgerson et al., 2016; Golden et al., 2016), in the absence of other protein sources, lemur hunting is likely to remain highly prevalent in the area. Cash crops production, with clove production as indicator, was the ES which showed the strongest increase in Fizono, and the second in Beanana.

    • Emergence of zoonoses such as COVID-19 reveals the need for health sciences to embrace an explicit eco-social conceptual framework of health and disease

      2020, Epidemics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Imposing bans on wildlife consumption for populations with few alternative food sources and without providing alternatives, would be deemed unethical from this perspective. Consumption of wildlife has been shown to be a critical source of nutrition for certain impoverished communities (Volpato et al., 2020; Borgerson et al., 2016). Cogent arguments have been made that a range of other health problems are best understood from eco-social perspectives.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text