Elsevier

Biochemical Pharmacology

Volume 74, Issue 6, 15 September 2007, Pages 891-897
Biochemical Pharmacology

Allosteric effects of antagonists on signalling by the chemokine receptor CCR5

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2007.06.032Get rights and content

Abstract

Antagonists of the chemokine receptor, CCR5, may provide important new drugs for the treatment of HIV-1. In this study we have examined the mechanism of action of two functional antagonists of the chemokine receptor CCR5 (UK-396,794, UK-438,235) in signalling and internalisation assays using CHO cells expressing CCR5. Both compounds were potent inverse agonists versus agonist-independent [35S]GTPγS binding to membranes of CHO cells expressing CCR5. Both compounds also acted as allosteric inhibitors of CCL5 (RANTES) and CCL8 (MCP-2)-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding to CHO-CCR5 membranes, reducing the potency and maximal effects of the two chemokines. The data are consistent with effects of the allosteric inhibitors on both the binding and signalling of the chemokines. Both compounds inhibited CCR5 internalisation triggered by chemokines. When CHO-CCR5 cells were treated with either of the two compounds for prolonged periods of time (24 h) an increase (∼15%) in cell surface CCR5 was detected.

Introduction

The G protein-coupled chemokine receptor, CCR5, was originally characterised as a receptor responding functionally to the CC-chemokines CCL3 (MIP-1α), CCL4 (MIP-1β) and CCL5 (RANTES) [1]. CCR5 was subsequently described as the primary co-receptor for macrophage tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) [2], [3], [4], [5].

Chemokine interaction with CCR5 initiates several events. Activated receptor associates with G proteins, leading to activation of signalling processes, e.g. changes in Ca2+ followed by receptor phosphorylation by G protein coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) [6]. This results in association of β-arrestin with the receptor [7] and desensitisation via uncoupling of receptor and G protein. A number of CC chemokines (CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, CCL8, CCL13 and CCL7) bind to CCR5 with different affinities and abilities to activate the receptor [8]. These chemokines can be divided in two subgroups based on amino acid sequence identity [9], [10]. CCL3, CCL4 and CCL5 form one subgroup and are full agonists, whereas CCL7, CCL8 and CCL13 form a second subgroup, which share ∼60% amino acid identity within the group and ∼30% identity with CCL3, CCL4 and CCL5. The two groups of chemokine exhibit differential abilities to activate signalling systems. For example, whereas CCL5 and CCL8 can both stimulate [35S]GTPγS binding, CCL5 will cause internalisation of CCR5 but CCL8 is unable to do so [7], [11], suggesting that the two groups of chemokines may stabilise different conformations of CCR5.

The role of CCR5 as a co-receptor for the entry of HIV-1 into cells has prompted the development of small molecule antagonists of CCR5 as a potential therapy for preventing infection by HIV-1 [12]. Several such compounds have been described including 873140 (aplaviroc) [13], UK 427,857 (maraviroc) [14], SCH 351125 (vicriviroc) [15] and TAK 779 [16] and some biochemical studies on these compounds have been reported. The emerging data suggest that the compounds may act as allosteric inhibitors of chemokine binding and function at CCR5 and some differential effects of compounds on the actions of chemokines have been reported. For example, 873140 inhibited CCL3 and CCL5-induced Ca2+ responses via CCR5 but did not inhibit CCL5 binding to CCR5 [13]. These small molecule antagonists may also stabilise different conformations of CCR5 accounting for the differential antiviral spectrum of different antagonists [14] and the lack of cross-resistance seen for these different antagonists [17].

In order to probe this further we have analysed the interaction of two small molecule antagonists directed at CCR5 (UK-396,794, UK-438,235, Fig. 1) for their effects on the actions of two chemokines (CCL5 and CCL8) which have previously been shown to interact with CCR5 in a different manner [7], [11]. We have examined the interactions between the small molecule drugs and chemokines at CCR5 by determining effects on chemokine-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding to membranes of CHO cells expressing CCR5 (CHO-CCR5 cells) and by determining effects on chemokine-induced internalisation of CCR5 in CHO-CCR5 cells.

Section snippets

Cells and materials

CHO cells stably expressing CCR5 (CHO·CCR5) were grown as described previously [7], [11]. [35S]GTPγS (∼37 TBq mmol−1) was from Amersham Biosciences (Buckinghamshire, UK). CCL5 and CCL8 were purchased from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ). Secondary antibodies were obtained from Sigma (Poole, UK), anti-CCR5 antibodies HEK/1/85a/7a have been described previously [7], [11] and all other chemicals were from Sigma (Poole, UK).

Membrane preparation

Membranes were prepared from confluent cells. Cells were harvested in ice-cold

Effects of UK-396,794 and UK-438,235 on agonist-independent [35S]GTPγS binding

Fig. 2 shows the effects of UK-396,794 and UK-438,235 on [35S]GTPγS binding to membranes of CHO cells expressing CCR5 (CHO-CCR5 cells). The two compounds were both potent inverse agonists (pIC50 ± S.E.M. UK-438,235 8.71 ± 0.05, UK-396,794 8.93 ± 0.09) with UK-396,794 giving a slightly larger inhibition of agonist-independent [35S]GTPγS binding in this preparation (UK-438,235 −27.9 ± 0.6%, UK-396,794 −30.4 ± 1.5%, P < 0.05).

Effects of UK-396,794 and UK-438,235 on CCL5- and CCL8-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding

Next we analysed the effects of different concentrations of the compounds on the

Discussion

In this study we have examined the effects of two small molecule inhibitors of the chemokine receptor CCR5. Both compounds were potent inverse agonists, inhibiting agonist-independent activation of CCR5 by about 30% in this preparation as assessed by [35S]GTPγS binding. This shows that CCR5 is constitutively active in this preparation assessed using this assay system. We examined this apparent constitutive activity further by carrying out chronic treatment of CHO-CCR5 cells with the two

Acknowledgement

We thank Pfizer GRD-Sandwich Laboratories for financial support and for supplying reagents.

References (29)

  • T. Dragic et al.

    HIV-1 entry into CD4+ cells is mediated by the chemokine receptor CC-CKR-5

    Nature

    (1996)
  • J.A. Pitcher et al.

    G protein-coupled receptor kinases

    Annu Rev Biochem

    (1998)
  • M. Baggiolini et al.

    Human chemokines: an update

    Annu Rev Immunol

    (1997)
  • A. Mueller et al.

    Pharmacological characterization of the chemokine receptor, CCR5

    Br J Pharmacol

    (2002)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Receptor conformation and constitutive activity in CCR5 chemokine receptor function and HIV infection

      2014, Advances in Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The wild-type CCR5 receptor is partially constitutively active, suggesting that some receptor molecules are in activated conformations that are coupled to cellular signaling proteins in the absence of agonist ligands. Compared with untransfected parent cells, cells expressing CCR5 show increased binding of GTPγS to Gαi, which is inhibited by the inverse agonists TAK779 and maraviroc (MVC) and other small-molecule antagonists (Garcia-Perez, Rueda, Staropoli, et al., 2011; Haworth, Lin, Fidock, Dorr, & Strange, 2007; Lagane et al., 2005). Wild-type CCR5 also constitutively activates G protein signaling pathways (Chen et al., 2000; Folefoc et al., 2010).

    • New insights into the mechanisms whereby low molecular weight CCR5 ligands inhibit HIV-1 infection

      2011, Journal of Biological Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Also, data remain scarce on which CCR5 conformations, to which gp120 would not bind, are induced by these inhibitors. We and others have previously demonstrated that some of these molecules behave as inverse agonists for CCR5, thus suggesting that they stabilize CCR5 in inactive conformations that are uncoupled from G-proteins (29, 30), but whether or not all members of this class of molecules share this property is not well documented. In fact, viruses showing resistance to some inhibitors retain susceptibility to others (31), thus suggesting that, although all of these molecules locate in the same binding pocket, their effects on CCR5 conformation differ to some extent.

    • Chapter 2 CCR5 Pharmacology Methodologies and Associated Applications

      2009, Methods in Enzymology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nonspecific binding (NSB) is subtracted (NSB is determined as the background binding of GTP to the assay plate in the absence of membranes). Vicriviroc, maraviroc, and its analogues UK‐396794 and UK‐438235 show the classic inverse agonist profile of small concentration‐dependent reductions in GTP‐binding assays, compared to relatively large agonist‐stimulated increase in binding as previously reported (Dorr et al., 2005b; Haworth et al., 2007; Strizki et al., 2001). This is depicted in the case of maraviroc in Fig. 2.6.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text