Direct inhibition of CaV2.3 by Gem is dynamin dependent and does not require a direct alfa/beta interaction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.11.052Get rights and content

Highlights

  • CaV2.3 channels are a target of modulation by RGK GTPase.

  • Gem but Rem, inhibits CaV2.3-mediated current independently of the CaVβ subunit.

  • Gem promotes a CaVβ-independent, dynamin-mediated endocytosis CaV2.3 channels.

Abstract

The Rad, Rem, Rem2, and Gem/Kir (RGK) sub-family of small GTP-binding proteins are crucial in regulating high voltage-activated (HVA) calcium channels. RGK proteins inhibit calcium current by either promoting endocytosis or reducing channel activity. They all can associate directly with Ca2+ channel β subunit (CaVβ), and the binding between CaVα1/CaVβ appears essential for the endocytic promotion of CaV1.X, CaV2.1, and CaV2.2 channels. In this study, we investigated the inhibition of CaV2.3 channels by RGK proteins in the absence of CaVβ. To this end, Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing CaV2.3 channels devoid of auxiliary subunit were injected with purified Gem and Rem and found that only Gem had an effect. Ca currents and charge movements were reduced by injection of Gem, pointing to a reduction in the number of channels in the plasma membrane. Since this reduction was ablated by co-expression of the dominant-negative mutant of dynamin K44A, enhanced endocytosis appears to mediate this reduction in the number of channels. Thus, Gem inhibition of CaV2.3 channels would be the only example of a CaVβ independent promotion of dynamin-dependent endocytosis.

Introduction

High-voltage-activated (HVA) calcium channels are the most important pathway for the regulated calcium flux across the plasma membrane that controls fast physiological processes such a muscle contraction, neurotransmitter release, and propagation of somatic action potentials; but also much slower processes like gene expression, spine plasticity, and hormone secretion [1,2]. This multiplicity of function relies upon the modular assembly that forms the channels and controls its expression and function. The core of this assembly is the pore-forming (CaVα1), that harbor two structural and functional domains: the conductive pore domain (PD) and the voltage-sensing domain (VSD). The minimal channel HVA protein complex is composed of CaVα1 and the modulatory β-subunit (CaVβ) that regulates channel membrane insertion and decreases the energy required to activate the channel [3]. HVA channels are targeted by a plethora of cytoplasmic proteins that regulate their expression and function [4]. Among them, the RGK GTPase (Rad, Rem, Rem2, Gem/Kir) family has arisen as the most potent inhibitor of calcium current [5,6]. All members of RGK proteins associate directly with CaVβ in vitro and cells [[7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]], and since CaVβ appears to be present in all mature HVA Ca2+ channels, a foregone conclusion is that all RGK potentially inhibit any HVA channels.

Two main routes have been described to inhibit HVA Ca2+ channels by RGK proteins: i) Reducing surface expression of mature channels and ii) Inhibiting the activity of channels already in the plasma membrane. Thus, RGK appears to control channel activity by fast (ii) and slow (i) processes in parallel. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the different routes are still a matter of controversy. A relevant limitation is that the co-expression experiment cannot separate slow from fast inhibitory mechanisms. Isolating fast inhibition was accomplished by Fan and coworkers [14] using inside-out membrane patches expressing CaV2.1 channels together with a CaVβ subunit mutant that can be washed out from the patch that can then be exposed purified Gem. They showed that Gem binds to CaV2.1-α1 in the absence of CaVβ subunit, but the inhibitory effect does not appear until CaVβ is re-instated. These results lead them to postulate that CaVβ binding exposes a site necessary for Gem's inhibition and that this inhibitory site would be distinct from a putative anchoring site mediating direct CaV2.1-α1/Gem association in the absence of CaVβ. Comparing the inhibitory power of different RGK proteins on CaV1.2 and CaV2.2 while ablating RGK-CaVβ binding, Puckerin et al. [15] revealed specificity in the CaVβ -independent inhibitory potency of different RGK proteins. For instance, Rad can inhibit CaV1.2 and CaV2.2 channels in a CaVβ independent manner, while Rem can only reduce CaV1.2 mediated currents. Inhibition by Gem and Rem2, on the other hand, was only observed when association with CaVβ was preserved. Fan et al. [14] results show that Gem can bind to CaV1.2 channel macro patches CaV2.1, seemingly free of CaVβ, but inhibition only proceeded after re-instating CaVβ. Here we took advantage of the robust expression of human CaV2.3 channel on Xenopus oocytes in the absence of CaVβ [16] to evaluate beta-independent inhibition by acute exposure to Gem or Rem. We report here that in the absence of any auxiliary subunit, Gem, but not Rem, induces the removal of channels from the plasma membrane in a dynamin-dependent fashion.

Section snippets

cDNA constructs and recombinant proteins

The cDNA encoding the Human CaV2.3 (Swiss-Prot Q15878) was as previously described [16]. cDNA encoding Gem and Rem were obtained from Addgene (Addgene plasmids # 41653 and # 4165, generated by Henry Colecraft [17]), and subcloned into pRSETB vector (Invitrogen) using BamHI and EcoRI restriction sites. Recombinant proteins were purified by Ni affinity, concentrated to 1 mg/ml, and stored at −80 °C. On the day of use, proteins were diluted three folds in the elution buffer with the following

Gem cRNA inhibits the expression of CaV2.3 mediated current in Xenopus laevis oocytes

We first investigated whether Gem and Rem inhibited R-type Ca2+ channels heterologously expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. We co-injected cRNA of Gem or Rem with CaV2.3, and measured the ionic currents 5–7 days after injection. While oocytes co-injected with Rem express similar current density as control oocytes injected with CaV2.3-CaV⍺1 cRNA, we could not record any CaV2.3-CaV⍺1 channel currents in those oocytes injected with Gem cRNA (Fig. 1A and B). Although these observations suggest

Discussion

Here we report the first characterization of functional effects of RGK GTPases on CaV2.3 Ca2+ channels. Taking advantage that Cav2.3 channels can be expressed without any auxiliary subunit, we could also show that Gem but Rem inhibits this Ca2+ channel isoform independently of CaVα-CaVβ association.

Although the prevalent pathway for RGK inhibitory requires binding to CaVβ, there is strong evidence for additional inhibition relying on direct interaction with CaVα. Furthermore,

Conflict of interest and authorship conformation form

Please check the following as appropriate:

✓All authors have participated in (a) conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of the data; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (c) approval of the final version.

✓This manuscript has not been submitted to, nor is under review at, another journal or other publishing venue.

✓The authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject

Acknowledgments

We thank Mrs. Victoria Prado for technical assistance. This work was supported by Chile’s FONDECYT Grants 1161672 (to A.N.),1180464 (to C.G), 3140590 (to G.C) and The Lankenau Institute for Medical Research Charitable Foundation, NHLBI (HL47678, HL138103 and HL152201) and the W.W. Smith Charitable Trust Fund to C.G. The “Centro Interdisciplinario de Neurociencia de Valparaíso” is a Millennium Institute (P09-022-F).

References (31)

  • W. a Catterall

    Voltage-gated calcium channels

    Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.

    (2011)
  • A. Neely et al.

    Structure-function of proteins interacting with the α1 pore-forming subunit of high-voltage-activated calcium channels

    Front. Physiol.

    (2014)
  • Z. Buraei et al.

    RGK regulation of voltage-gated calcium channels

    Sci. China Life Sci.

    (2015)
  • P. Béguin et al.

    Regulation of Ca2+ channel expression at the cell surface by the small G-protein kir/Gem

    Nature

    (2001)
  • B.S. Finlin et al.

    Regulation of voltage-gated calcium channel activity by the Rem and Rad GTPases

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Present address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

    View full text