LSR promotes epithelial ovarian cancer cell survival under energy stress through the LKB1-AMPK pathway

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.12.079Get rights and content

Highlights

  • •Highlights in LSR promotes epithelial ovarian cancer cell survival under energy stress through the LKB1-AMPK pathway.

  • LSR has a pivotal role in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) tumor growth in vivo.

  • LSR regulates LKB1 localization to the cell membrane in EOC cells.

  • The increase of p-SAPK/JNK is attenuated in glucose deprivation by LSR in EOC cells.

  • LSR promotes EOC cell survival in glucose deprivation through the LKB1-AMPK pathway.

Abstract

Lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor (LSR), also known as a component of tricellular tight junctions, is highly expressing in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, the biological role of LSR in EOC cells remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated liver kinase B1 (LKB1) mediated AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity and investigated the effect of LSR on EOC cell survival under energy stress. LSR increased the levels of phospho-AMPKα at Thr172 and phospho-acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) at Ser79 via LKB1-AMPK pathway in glucose deprivation in vitro. The increase of P-AMPKα (Thr172) and P-ACC (Ser79) was also detected in tumor microenvironment in vivo. Meanwhile, LSR promoted LKB1 localization at the cell membrane of EOC cells. By cell survival analysis, LSR attenuated glucose deprivation-induced cell death in EOC cells in vitro. Our results suggest that LSR promotes EOC cell survival and tumor growth through the LKB1-AMPK pathway.

Introduction

Lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor (LSR), a type I transmembrane protein, was originally identified as a lipoprotein receptor in the liver [1]. LSR is also known as a tricellular tight junction protein in epithelial cells [2]. Our group reported that LSR was overexpressed in the tissues of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), and high LSR expression was associated with a poor prognosis in EOC [3]. However, the biological significance of LSR expression in cancer cells remains unclear.

Previously, Czulkies and colleagues illustrated that LSR-knockout CaCo-2 cells, a colorectal cancer cell line, formed much smaller tumors than their wild-type counterparts in vivo [4]. Additionally, our group demonstrated that anti-LSR monoclonal antibody for EOC and gastric cancer cell lines inhibited tumor growth in vivo by blocking lipid uptake [3,5]. These reports suggest that LSR plays an indispensable role in the tumor growth of several cancers in vivo. However, wild-type CaCo-2 cells exhibited lower proliferative potential than LSR-knockout CaCo-2 cells in growth medium in vitro [4], which seem to be a paradox in LSR expressing cancer biology. In general, tumor cells are exposed to energy stress, including glucose deprivation, low amino acid levels, and hypoxia because of insufficient vascularization in vivo [6]. Taken together, LSR expression may be a growth advantage for tumor cells especially under energy stress. Energy stresses increase intracellular AMP levels corresponding to the depletion of intracellular ATP.

AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) functions as a regulator of metabolism under energy stress. The active form of AMPK, phospho-AMPKα (Thr172), suppresses ATP consumption and promotes ATP production through acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) phosphorylation, which protects cancer cells from oxidative stress [7]. Shaw, R. J. and colleagues illustrated a model to explain the apparent paradox that loss of liver kinase B1 (LKB1); an apical-basal cell polarity protein also known as Par 4; in tumors can result in increased cell growth under basal conditions, yet LKB1 deficient cells readily undergo apoptosis under the condition that elevate AMP [8]. The model suggests that LSR deficient tumor cells are close to LKB1 deficient tumor cells in biological features. Interestingly, Sebbagh and colleagues have reported that E-cadherin regulated LKB1 localization at the cell membrane and the expression of phospho-AMPKα (Thr172) in apical-basal polarized epithelial cells [9]. Therefore, we investigated whether LSR also promotes LKB1-mediated AMPK phosphorylation and changes the response under energy stress in EOC cells.

In this paper, we evaluated AMPK activity in EOC cells expressing LSR via Western blotting and examined LKB1 localization using immunocytochemistry. In summary, LSR increased EOC cell survival through the LKB1-AMPK pathway under energy stress.

Section snippets

Materials

5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-β-d-ribofuranoside (AICAR) and antibodies recognizing for LSR, AMPK alpha subunits (AMPKα) (Thr172), phosphor-AMPKα (Thr172), phospho-ACC (Ser79), ACC, phospho-stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK)/c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) (Thr183/Tyr185), SAPK/JNK, Caspase-3 and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Tokyo, Japan). Ionomycin, 2-Deoxy-d-glucose (2-DG) and antibodies recognizing for FLAG M2 were purchased from

LSR is required for the growth of EOC tumor xenografts in vivo

To examine the effect of LSR expression on EOC tumor growth in vivo, we first established clones of OVISE cells stably expressing control scramble shRNA (OVISE-scramble) or stably expressing LSR shRNA (OVISE-LSR #1 and OVISE-LSR #2) via shRNA-expressing plasmid vector transfection. LSR levels were confirmed using Western blotting (Fig. 1a). After establishing tumor xenografts of these clones in athymic nude mice, we found mice inoculated with OVISE-LSR #1 (114.2 ± 15.9 mm3, 23 ± 4 mg) or

Discussion

High expression of LSR is a poor prognosis factor in EOC patients. Interestingly, previous reports suggested that LSR had an indispensable role in the growth of tumor xenografts of several cell lines in vivo [[3], [4], [5]]. In the present study, we demonstrated that LSR promoted EOC cell survival under glucose deprivation through the LKB1-AMPK pathway.

In previous reports, AMPK activation by LKB1 was reported to suppress ATP consumption by inhibiting anabolic pathways and stimulating catabolic

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under Grant No. JP17im0210606, JP20im0210111 and the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture Grant-in-Aid for challenging Exploratory Research (16K14637).

We would like to thank M. Inoue for useful discussions. We also thank Y. Kanazawa and M. Yamamoto for their secretarial assistance and R. Nishi and for technical assistance. The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (5)

  • AMPK: An odyssey of a metabolic regulator, a tumor suppressor, and now a contextual oncogene

    2022, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Reviews on Cancer
    Citation Excerpt :

    In human medulloblastoma and glioblastoma multiforme, AMPK increases cell survival in response to acute stress by activating eukaryotic elongation factor 2 kinase (eEF2K), limiting translation elongation and eEF2K expression, which correlates with increased overall survival [134]. The LSR/LKB1/AMPK pathway is essential in ovarian cancer cell survival and tumor formation [129]. According to these lines of evidence, AMPK activation or expression is increased in various cancers, and its expression regulates cancer growth in both normal and metabolic stress conditions.

View full text