Concentration-dependent oligomerization of cross-linked complexes between ferredoxin and ferredoxin–NADP+ reductase

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.04.033Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Cross-linked complexes of ferredoxin (Fd) and Fd–NADP+ reductase form oligomers.

  • In the crystal structures, Fd- and FNR moieties swap across the molecules.

  • The complexes exhibit concentration-dependent oligomerization at sub-milimolar order.

Abstract

Ferredoxin–NADP+ reductase (FNR) forms a 1:1 complex with ferredoxin (Fd), and catalyzes the electron transfer between Fd and NADP+. In our previous study, we prepared a series of site-specifically cross-linked complexes of Fd and FNR, which showed diverse electron transfer properties. Here, we show that X-ray crystal structures of the two different Fd–FNR cross-linked complexes form oligomers by swapping Fd and FNR moieties across the molecules; one complex is a dimer from, and the other is a successive multimeric form. In order to verify whether these oligomeric structures are formed only in crystal, we investigated the possibility of the oligomerization of these complexes in solution. The mean values of the particle size of these cross-linked complexes were shown to increase with the rise of protein concentration at sub-milimolar order, whereas the size of dissociable wild-type Fd:FNR complex was unchanged as analyzed by dynamic light scattering measurement. The oligomerization products were detected by SDS–PAGE after chemical cross-linking of these complexes at the sub-milimolar concentrations. The extent and concentration-dependent profile of the oligomerizaion were differentiated between the two cross-linked complexes. These results show that these Fd–FNR cross-linked complexes exhibit concentration-dependent oligomerization, possibly through swapping of Fd and FNR moieties also in solution. These findings lead to the possibility that some native multi-domain proteins may present similar phenomenon in vivo.

Introduction

Evidences have been shown that some proteins coexist in more than one oligomeric state under physiological conditions, and the ratio of these alternate oligomers can be varied depending on the protein composition or environment [1], [2], [3], [4]. One of the common mechanisms for protein oligomerization is domain swapping, which works by converting an intramolecular interface in the monomer to an intermolecular interface between subunits in the oligomer [4]. More than 100 domain-swapped structures have been characterized [5], but the functional and physiological relevance as well as the mechanism of the swapping is often not understood. However, growing evidence supports the hypothesis that domain swapping has diverse biological functions in oligomerization [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]; some potential advantages include higher local concentrations of active sites, larger binding surfaces, new active sites at subunit interfaces, the possibility of allosteric control, and economic ways to produce large protein interaction networks and molecular machineries [8], [12].

Ferredoxin (Fd) and Fd–NADP+ reductase (FNR) are redox partners responsible for the conversion between NADP+ and NADPH in the plastids of photosynthetic organisms [13], [14]. FNR forms a 1:1 complex with Fd, however, in some proteins of the FNR-family such as phthalate dioxygenase reductase [15] and benzoate dioxygenase reductase [16], Fd-like modules are found in domains fused to the N- or C-terminus of the FNR modules. In our previous study, we prepared a series of cross-linked complexes of maize leaf Fd and FNR by introducing, in each case, a specific disulfide bond between the two proteins, so that the two protein moieties assume various configurations [17]. These Fd–FNR cross-linked complexes showed diverse properties of electron transfer between Fd and FNR. In this study, we solved X-ray crystal structures (Fig. 1) of the two different cross-linked complexes which possessed different unique disulfide bonding sites and distinct electron transfer activity. Unexpectedly, both cross-linked complexes formed oligomers by swapping Fd and FNR moieties across the molecules in crystal. In order to verify whether these oligomeric structures are formed only in crystal or not, we addressed the possibility of the oligomerization of these cross-linked complexes in solution.

Section snippets

Preparation of Fd–FNR samples

Preparation of the site-specifically cross-linked complexes, Fd4C-FNR1C and Fd5C-FNR1C, was described previously [17]. Briefly, Fd4C-FNR1C and Fd5C-FNR1C were produced by incubation of each cysteine mutants of FNR (E19C) and Fd (S59C and A70C, respectively) to introduce a unique disulfide-bond between Fd and FNR. Electron transfer activity from FNR- to Fd domain of Fd4C-FNR1C was comparable to that of wild-type FNR with saturating concentration of Fd (at 40 μM), while the activity of Fd5C-FNR1C

Differential oligomerization of the two cross-linked complexes of Fd and FNR in crystal

The crystal structures of the site-specifically cross-linked complexes of Fd and FNR, Fd4C-FNR1C and Fd5C-FNR1C, were determined (Fig. 1). To our surprise, both cross-linked complexes exhibit oligomeric structures by swapping their Fd and FNR moieties across the molecules. Moreover, they present different oligomeric structures: Fd4C-FNR1C exhibits a dimer form, and Fd5C-FNR1C is a successive multimeric form. Relative orientation of Fd and FNR moieties intermolecularly interacting in these

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants-in-aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (23570165) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (to Y.K.-A.). Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under the following accession numbers: Fd4C-FNR1C, 3W5U; Fd5C-FNR1C, 3W5V.

References (42)

  • J. King-Scott et al.

    The structure of a full-length response regulator from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a stabilized three-dimensional domain-swapped, activated state

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2007)
  • R.J. Ellis

    Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (2001)
  • D.B. Huang et al.

    Three quaternary structures for a single protein

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1996)
  • H.M. Berman et al.

    The Protein Data Bank

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2000)
  • S. Hirota et al.

    Cytochrome c polymerization by successive domain swapping at the C-terminal helix

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2010)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    3D domain swapping: as domains continue to swap

    Protein Sci.

    (2002)
  • M. Yamasaki et al.

    Crystal structure of a stable dimer reveals the molecular basis of serpin polymerization

    Nature

    (2008)
  • Z. Wang et al.

    Peroxidase activity enhancement of horse cytochrome c by dimerization

    Org. Biomol. Chem.

    (2011)
  • G.T. Hanke et al.

    Fd:FNR electron transfer complexes: evolutionary refinement of structural interactions

    Photosynth. Res.

    (2004)
  • N. Carrillo et al.

    Open questions in ferredoxin–NADP+ reductase catalytic mechanism

    Eur. J. Biochem.

    (2003)
  • C.C. Correll et al.

    Structural prototypes for an extended family of flavoprotein reductases: comparison of phthalate dioxygenase reductase with ferredoxin reductase and ferredoxin

    Protein Sci.

    (1993)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Modulation of protein oligomerization: An overview

      2019, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Natural modulators are the group of molecules that is present in our system to modulate the protein oligomerization. These molecules can work either concentration dependent or ionic strength or effector molecules or cofactors or nucleic acids (Kimata-Ariga et al., 2013). It is well-known that concentration can be a regulatory factor persuading the oligomerization status of proteins such as serum albumin, etc.

    • Expression, purification and characterization of Plasmodium falciparum vacuolar protein sorting 29

      2016, Protein Expression and Purification
      Citation Excerpt :

      With highly pure and homogenous protein in hand, we intended to move towards its molecular characterization by various biophysical and biochemical techniques. We tested PfVPS29 for any kind of oligomerization or native multi-domain polymerization that it might go through by chemical cross linking, DLS and size exclusion chromatography [32]. The protein was found to be a monomer in solution.

    View full text