Elsevier

Atmospheric Research

Volume 184, 1 February 2017, Pages 56-65
Atmospheric Research

On the temporal and spatial characteristics of tornado days in the United States

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.10.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Low-frequency tornado days became less common between 1974 and 2015.

  • High-frequency tornado days became more common between 1974 and 2015.

  • The variability of the number of tornadoes per tornado day increased between 1974 and 2015 more than the mean number.

  • Tornadoes that occur on high-frequency days tend to be located further east than those that occur on lower-frequency days.

Abstract

More tornadoes are produced per year in the United States than in any other country, and these tornadoes have produced tremendous losses of life and property. Understanding how tornado activity will respond to climate change is important if we wish to prepare for future changes. Trends in various tornado and tornado day characteristics, including their annual frequencies, their temporal variability, and their spatial distributions, have been reported in the past few years. This study contributes to this body of literature by further analyzing the temporal and spatial characteristics of tornado days in the United States. The analyses performed in this study support previously reported findings in addition to providing new perspectives, including that the temporal trends are observed only in low-frequency and high-frequency tornado days and that the eastward shift in tornado activity is produced, in part, by the increasing number of high-frequency tornado days, which tend to occur to the east of the traditionally depicted tornado alley in the Great Plains.

Introduction

The United States (US) experiences an average of > 1000 tornadoes per year, which is more than any other country on Earth (NCEI, 2016b). Tornadoes in the US often result in losses of life and property. They were responsible for an average of 70 fatalities per year over the period 1986–2015; the average fatality count is 110 over the period 2006–2015 (NWS, 2016). They also caused an average annual loss of $982 million (US dollars) over the period 1949–2006 (Changnon, 2009). These average values can be greatly exceeded, however, in extreme events when many tornadoes occur. For example, > 100 tornadoes were produced on 27 April 2011 in the US across the states of Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, and Virginia (NOAA, 2011, Knupp et al., 2014). These tornadoes were responsible for 316 fatalities and > 2700 injuries (NOAA, 2011, Knupp et al., 2014), and they, along with the others that occurred in April in the US, resulted in more than $11 billion (US dollars) in insured losses (Simmons and Sutter, 2012).

Understanding the environmental conditions in which tornadoes occur, and when and where they occur, is imperative for mitigating their negative impacts. Over the years, research on the environment in which tornadoes occur (e.g., Doswell, 1987, Johns and Doswell, 1992, Doswell et al., 1996, Rasmussen, 2003, Doswell and Schultz, 2006, Grams et al., 2012, Garner, 2012, Garner, 2013, Mercer et al., 2012, Schultz et al., 2014, Sherburn and Parker, 2014) has highlighted various conditions, or ingredients (Doswell et al., 1996), that promote tornadogenesis. These include ample low-level humidity, high instability, high shear, and a lifting mechanism (e.g., low-level convergence or a front) (Doswell, 1987, Johns and Doswell, 1992). Thorough reviews of research on the environments in which tornadoes occur and tornado forecasting efforts are provided by Galway (1985), Schaefer (1986), Galway (1992), Doswell et al. (1993), and Doswell (2007).

The temporal and spatial distributions of tornadoes in the US have been documented in numerous climatological studies (e.g., Kelly et al., 1978, Brooks et al., 2003, Kis and Straka, 2010). The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) and Storm Prediction Center (SPC) also provide information about tornado climatology and tornado data (NCEI, 2016a, NCEI, 2016b, SPC, 2016). This information and these data sources have been particularly useful to analyses of tornado hazard and to the development of tornado risk and vulnerability models (e.g., Boruff et al., 2003, Ashley et al., 2008, Dixon et al., 2011, Simmons and Sutter, 2011, Dixon and Moore, 2012, Widen et al., 2013, Ashley et al., 2014, Coleman and Dixon, 2014, Jagger et al., 2015, Rosencrants and Ashley, 2015, Shen and Hwang, 2015, Elsner et al., 2016, Romanić et al., 2016, Standohar-Alfano and van de Lindt, 2015).

In addition to understanding the environmental conditions that were and are favorable for tornadoes, and their climatological distributions, it also is important to consider how they may change in response to global climate change. In multiple studies, the environmental conditions that are known to promote tornadoes have been modeled (i.e., they examined the tornado-favorable ingredients rather than tornadoes) to determine if atmospheric conditions in the future will be more or less favorable for them (e.g., Brooks et al., 2003, Trapp et al., 2009, Gensini and Ashley, 2011, Diffenbaugh et al., 2013, Robinson et al., 2013, Gensini and Mote, 2014, Gensini et al., 2014, Gensini and Mote, 2015, Seely and Romps, 2015, Tippett et al., 2015). This approach is taken because it is currently not possible to project whether tornadoes will become more or less frequent, or more or less intense, in a warmer atmosphere with physics-based climate models because their spatial and temporal resolutions are too coarse (Tippett et al., 2015). Although uncertainty still exists, studies have reported that environmental conditions will likely favor more severe weather, and possibly tornadoes, in the future, largely because of an increase in atmospheric instability and low-level humidity.

Recent empirical studies have searched for changes in the temporal and spatial distributions of tornadoes in the US. Some have shown that the annual numbers of tornadoes in the US have not increased (Brooks et al., 2014, Elsner et al., 2015, Tippett and Cohen, 2016, NCEI, 2016a), despite the projections for an increase in tornado-favorable environments (Diffenbaugh et al., 2013, Gensini and Mote, 2015, Seely and Romps, 2015, Tippett et al., 2015). Others have reported trends in tornado day frequencies and in various statistical characteristics of tornado activity. Brooks et al. (2014), for example, reported that the number of days per year with 1 + tornadoes declined since the 1970s, but that the number of days with > 30 tornadoes increased. Elsner et al. (2015), similarly, reported that the number of days per year with 4 + tornadoes decreased whereas the number of days with 8 +, 16 +, and 32 + increased over time. They also found similar trends when looking at the annual probability of tornado days and the annual proportion of tornadoes occurring on days meeting these frequency thresholds. Tippett and Cohen (2016) reported an upward trend in the mean number of tornadoes per outbreak per year.

Studies also have shown that several tornado metrics have become more variable over time. Brooks et al. (2014) reported an increase in the standard deviation of the ranks of monthly tornado frequency between 1954 and 2013. Tippett (2014) reported an increase, primarily in the 2000s, in the volatility of annual tornado frequency, defined as the standard deviation of the difference between the annual tornado frequencies of successive years. Tippett and Cohen (2016) showed that the variance of the number of tornadoes per outbreak increased at a rate of 2.89% per year over the period 1954–2014.

Temporal changes in the spatial distribution of tornadoes in the US also have been reported. Farney and Dixon (2014) plotted the annual average number of tornado days for the periods 1960–1989 and 1990–2011. Their plots show an increase in tornado day frequencies in the latter period throughout the Middle and Lower Mississippi, Ohio, and Tennessee River Valleys, and in a few places to the east of the Appalachian Mountains. Elsner et al. (2015) analyzed tornado density and found that tornadoes became more clustered in space over the period 1954–2013, leading to an increase in tornado density. Most recently, Agee et al. (2016) analyzed the spatial distribution of tornadoes in the periods 1954–1983 and 1984–2013 and reported a decrease in tornado activity in the latter period in Texas and Oklahoma and an increase to the east in Tennessee and Alabama.

Understanding the environments in which tornadoes occur as well as their temporal and spatial distributions is important to many, including operational forecasters, emergency managers, and insurance companies. Continued study is needed to advance our understanding as new data become available. This is especially true in the context of climate change. This study builds upon the array of empirical studies on this topic by further analyzing the temporal and spatial trends of tornado days in the US.

Section snippets

Data sources and processing

Tornado reports were obtained from the SPC's Severe Weather Database (SWD; SPC, 2016). The SWD provides two tornado files. One has raw data and includes all state and county segments of a tornado track, meaning that a tornado could have multiple entries depending on the number of states and counties/parishes through which it tracked. The second includes only one entry per tornado, and therefore minimizes the overcount that results from long-tracked tornadoes that intersect multiple

Temporal trends: annual tornado frequency

A linear trend fit to the annual frequency of (E)F1 + tornadoes between 1974 and 2015 suggests that the number of tornadoes per year has decreased (Fig. 1). Other recent studies (Brooks et al., 2014, Elsner et al., 2015, Tippett and Cohen, 2016) did not report significant trends in annual numbers of (E)F1 + tornadoes, but these studies extended to 1954. Rather, a 20–25 year cycle is evident in the time series shown in these studies. A similar cycle also is evident in the quadratic polynomial curve

Conclusion

Temporal and spatial distributions of (E)F1 + tornadoes in the US over the period 1974–2015 were analyzed in this study. Similar to others (Brooks et al., 2014, Elsner et al., 2015), the results presented here show that the number of (E)F1 + tornado days has decreased since the mid-1970s whereas the number of high-frequency tornado days (30 + tornadoes) has increased. In addition to verifying these trends, this study also showed that the mid-frequency tornado days (i.e., those with 10–29

Acknowledgements

I thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.

References (86)

  • E. Agee et al.

    Spatial redistribution of USA tornado activity between 1954 and 2013

    J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol.

    (2016)
  • W.S. Ashley et al.

    Vulnerability due to nocturnal tornadoes

    Wea. Forecasting

    (2008)
  • W.S. Ashley et al.

    Spatiotemporal changes in tornado hazard exposure: the case of the expanding bull's-eye effect in Chicago, Illinois

    Wea. Clim. Soc.

    (2014)
  • B.J. Boruff et al.

    Tornado hazards in the United States

    Clim. Res.

    (2003)
  • H.E. Brooks

    On the relationship of tornado path length and width to intensity

    Wea. Forecasting

    (2004)
  • H.E. Brooks et al.

    Climatological estimates of local daily tornado probability for the United States

    Wea. Forecasting

    (2003)
  • H.E. Brooks et al.

    Increased variability of tornado occurrence in the United States

    Science

    (2014)
  • S. Changnon

    Tornado losses in the United States

    Nat. Hazards Rev.

    (2009)
  • T.A. Coleman et al.

    An objective analysis of tornado risk in the United States

    Wea. Forecasting

    (2014)
  • N.S. Diffenbaugh et al.

    Robust increases in severe thunderstorm environments in response to greenhouse gas forcing

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2013)
  • R.W. Dixon et al.

    Tornado vulnerability in Texas

    Wea. Clim. Soc.

    (2012)
  • P.G. Dixon et al.

    Tornado risk analysis: is Dixie alley and extension of tornado alley?

    Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.

    (2011)
  • C.A. Doswell

    The distinction between large-scale and mesoscale contribution to severe convection: a case study example

    Wea. Forecasting

    (1987)
  • C.A. Doswell

    Historical overview of severe convective storms research

    Electron. J. Severe Storms Meteorol.

    (2007)
  • C.A. Doswell et al.

    On the use of indices and parameters in forecasting severe storms

    Electron. J. Severe Storms Meteorol.

    (2006)
  • C.A. Doswell et al.

    Tornado forecasting: a review

  • C.A. Doswell et al.

    Flash flood forecasting: an ingredients-based methodology

    Wea. Forecasting

    (1996)
  • C.A. Doswell et al.

    Climatological estimates of daily local nontornadic severe thunderstorm probability for the United States

    Wea. Forecasting

    (2005)
  • C.A. Doswell et al.

    The tornadoes of spring 2011 in the USA: an historical perspective

    Weather

    (2012)
  • R. Edwards et al.

    Possible impacts of the enhanced Fujita scale on the United States tornado data. 25th Conf. Severe Local Storms, Denver, CO

    Am. Meteorol. Soc.

    (2010)
  • R. Edwards et al.

    Convective modes for significant severe thunderstorms in the contiguous United States. Part III: tropical cyclone tornadoes

    Wea. Forecasting

    (2012)
  • R. Edwards et al.

    Tornado intensity estimation: past, present, and future

    Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.

    (2013)
  • J.B. Elsner et al.

    Daily tornado frequency distributions in the United States

    Environ. Res. Lett.

    (2014)
  • J.B. Elsner et al.

    The increasing efficiency of tornado days in the United States

    Clim. Dyn.

    (2015)
  • J.B. Elsner et al.

    Statistical models for predicting tornado rates: case studies from Oklahoma and the mid South USA

    Int. J. Safety Security Eng.

    (2016)
  • T.J. Farney et al.

    Variability of tornado climatology across the continental United States

    Int. J. Climatol.

    (2014)
  • C.M. Fuhrmann et al.

    Ranking of tornado outbreaks across the United States and their climatological characteristics

    Wea. Forecasting.

    (2014)
  • J.G. Galway

    J. P. Finley: the first severe storms forecaster

    Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.

    (1985)
  • J.G. Galway

    Early severe thunderstorm forecasting and research by the United States Weather Bureau

    Wea. Forecasting

    (1992)
  • J.M. Garner

    Environments of significant tornadoes occurring within the warm sector versus those occurring along surface baroclinic boundaries

    Electron. J. Severe Storms Meteorol.

    (2012)
  • J.M. Garner

    A study of synoptic-scale tornado regimes

    Electron. J. Severe Storms Meteorol.

    (2013)
  • V.A. Gensini et al.

    Climatology of potentially severe convective environmental from the North American Regional Reanalysis

    Electron. J. Severe Storms Meteorol.

    (2011)
  • V.A. Gensini et al.

    Estimations of hazardous convective weather in the U.S. using dynamical downscaling

    J. Clim.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (43)

    • Tornado damage in forest ecosystems of the United States

      2024, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
    • Numerical investigation on the aerodynamics and dynamics of a high-speed train passing through a tornado-like vortex

      2020, Journal of Fluids and Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      According to the statistics of tornadoes in China, Jiangsu Province and Guangdong Province have experienced a large number of high-intensity tornadoes in the recent years, where there exists quite a lot of important highways and high-speed railways (Cao et al., 2019; Fan and Yu, 2015). The largest number of severe tornadoes (more than 1000 per year) occurs in the United States, and the train accidents caused by tornadoes happened occasionally (Moore, 2017). Therefore, the operation safety of trains when encountering tornadoes is a serious topic that worths being studied.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text