Elsevier

Atmospheric Environment

Volume 44, Issue 23, July 2010, Pages 2767-2779
Atmospheric Environment

Responses of future air quality to emission controls over North Carolina, Part II: Analyses of future-year predictions and their policy implications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.022Get rights and content

Abstract

The MM5/CMAQ system evaluated in Part I paper is applied to study the impact of emission control on future air quality over North Carolina (NC). Simulations are conducted at a 4-km horizontal grid resolution for four one-month periods, i.e., January, June, July, and August 2009 and 2018. Simulated PM2.5 in 2009 and 2018 show distribution patterns similar to those in 2002. PM2.5 concentrations over the whole domain in January and July reduced by 5.8% and 23.3% in 2009 and 12.0% and 35.6% in 2018, respectively, indicating that the planned emission control strategy has noticeable effects on PM2.5 reduction in this region, particularly in summer. More than 10% and 20% of 1-h and 8-h O3 mixing ratios are reduced in July 2009 and 2018, respectively, demonstrating the effectiveness of emission control for O3 reduction in summer. However, O3 mixing ratios in January 2009 and 2018 increase by more than 5% because O3 chemistry is VOC-limited in winter and the effect of NOx reduction dominates over that of VOC reduction under such a condition. The projected emission control simulated at 4-km will reduce the number of sites in non-attainment for max 8-h O3 from 49 to 23 in 2009 and to 1 in 2018 and for 24-h average PM2.5 from 1 to 0 in 2009 and 2018 based on the latest 2008 O3 and 2006 PM2.5 standards. The variability in model predictions at different grid resolutions contributes to 1–3.8 ppb and 1–7.9 μg m−3 differences in the projected future-year design values for max 8-h O3 and 24-h average PM2.5, respectively.

Introduction

Air quality attainment for future-years posts significant challenges in emission control technologies, regulation revision and enforcement, as well as decision tool development and application. CMAQ is one of the decision tools for regulatory applications developed by the U.S. EPA. Several global and regional models including MM5/CMAQ have recently been applied to simulate future air quality and their responses to future climate changes and/or emission changes either as a result of changing climate (e.g., biogenic emissions) or as part of the emission control programs (e.g., anthropogenic emissions) (e.g., Hogrefe et al., 2004, Liao et al., 2006, Arunachalam et al., 2006, Tagaris et al., 2007, Wu et al., 2008a, Zhang et al., 2008). Most of these studies are conducted at a regional scale (≥36-km) and focus only on surface ozone (O3). Very few focus on fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and consider the changes in biogenic and/or anthropogenic emissions (e.g., Tagaris et al., 2007, Zhang et al., 2008). Since O3 and PM2.5 share common emission sources and precursors, studies excluding each other may not provide a complete description of future air quality and an emission control strategy focusing on one pollutant may not lead to an overall improvement of future air quality. For example, a reduction in emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) may decrease O3 but increase particulate nitrate formation (Meng et al., 1997, Liu et al., submitted for publication a). The effectiveness of the emission control strategies depends on chemical and meteorological conditions due to the complex, non-linear interplays of chemical and meteorological processes during the formation of O3 and PM2.5. For example, O3 can be most effectively reduced by reducing NOx under the NOx-limited conditions or by reducing VOCs under the VOC-limited conditions. Tsimpidi et al. (2007) found that NH3 emission control during winter time is a more effective and less costly control strategy than reducing NOx and SO2 emissions. Emission control strategies therefore require a careful design to reflect the characteristics of emissions, chemistry, and meteorology of regions of interest. In this Part II paper, the impact of emission control on future air quality will be evaluated by using CMAQ v4.5.1 described and evaluated in Part I (Liu et al., in press b). The effectiveness of the projected emission controls under winter and summer conditions will be assessed. As shown in Part I, the performance of MM5/CMAQ for January and July 2002 simulations is overall consistent with that reported in the literature, although some large biases occur for temperature at 1.5 m in January, precipitation in both months, and 24-h average PM2.5 concentrations in July. Compared with the simulation at 12-km, the 4-km simulation gives slightly larger biases for maximum 1-h and 8-h average mixing ratios of O3, 24-h average concentrations of PM2.5 and most PM2.5 components, and visibility parameters, but lower biases for EC and OM in January and wet deposition fluxes of NH4+ and NO3 in July.

The state implementation plan (SIPs) modeling for multiple pollutants is expected to be conducted at a grid resolution of 12-km or finer (U.S. EPA, 2007). Several studies have evaluated the sensitivity of model predictions over NC to horizontal grid resolution. For example, Arunachalam et al. (2006) evaluated the impact of grid resolution on O3 simulated by the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) for 19–25 June 1996 and a few days in summers 1995–1997, respectively. Neither work assessed the impacts of grid resolution on meteorology, PM2.5, visibility, and dry and wet deposition amounts, some of these were examined in Wu et al. (2008b) and Queen and Zhang (2008) at 4-, 12-, and 36-km for both August and December 2002 using CMAQ and an older version of the VISTAS’s emissions, and all of these have been examined at 4- and 12-km for both January and July 2002 using a variant of CMAQ and the latest VISTAS’s emissions in Liu et al. (in press b). Evaluation of such impacts has not been done for future-year simulations and for a complete set of model outputs over NC, which is another focus of this Part II paper. Such an evaluation aims to address some policy-related concerns regarding whether the model results at 4-km significantly differ from those at 12-km in terms of temporal variation, spatial distribution, and performance statistics and what species exhibit a large sensitivity; what the policy implications of such a sensitivity are to the SIP modeling; and what additional information can fine-scale simulations provide for SIP and future design values for O3 and PM2.5.

Section snippets

Responses of air quality to emission reductions in 2009 and 2018

Fig. 1 shows the emissions of major pollutants in current and future years and corresponding domain-average percentage reductions from the level of 2002–2009 and 2018 for these emissions and concentrations of O3 and PM2.5. CO, an important O3 precursor under rural conditions, is mainly emitted from motor vehicles in NC, with a total of 4,164,158 tons in 2002 and projected 19.7% and 32.6% reductions in 2009 and 2018, respectively, from the 2002 level. NOx, an important precursor of O3 and PM

The sensitivity of model predictions to horizontal grid resolution

The sensitivity of model predictions to horizontal grid resolution in 2009/2018 simulations is overall similar. Fig. 7 shows absolute differences in the monthly-mean maximum 1-h and 8-h O3 mixing ratios, 24-h average concentrations in PM2.5, and EXT_Recon and DCV_Recon between the 4- and 12-km simulations in January and July 2009. Compared with the 12-km simulation, the 2009 4-km simulation gives higher O3 (mostly 1–4 ppb, or < 10%, up to 6.6 ppb or 22.6%) in the mountain area but lower values

Modeled attainment test

The U.S. EPA’s modeled attainment test is performed to estimate the impact of emission controls in 2009/2018 on the attainment of 8-h average max O3 and 24-h average PM2.5 at a given monitor over NC. The results are summarized in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3. The site-specific current design values (DVCs) for 8-h max O3 are obtained from NCDENR, except for four CASTNET sites where those values are obtained from Arunachalam et al. (2006). The DVCs were calculated as 5-year weighted design values at

Summary

MM5/CMAQ simulations are conducted to simulate air quality of January and July 2002, 2009, and 2018. The impact of planned emission control strategies are examined to evaluate their effectiveness in controlling PM2.5 and O3 levels in NC in 2009 and 2018. The impact of horizontal grid resolution on simulated O3 and PM2.5 and their policy implications are assessed. The planned emission control strategy will reduce O3 levels by up to 22.5% in July 2009/2018 from its level in 2002. It will,

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Air Quality, the USDA Air Quality Program/National Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2008-35112-18758, and the National Science Foundation Career Award Atm-0348819. Thanks are due to Mike Abraczinskas, Chris Misenis, Wayne Cornelius, Karen Harris, and Hoke Kimball of NCDENR for providing VISTAS’s 12-km CMAQ inputs and results and observational data; Don Olerud, BAMS, for providing

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (19)

  • Climate change and pollutant emissions impacts on air quality in 2050 over Portugal

    2016, Atmospheric Environment
    Citation Excerpt :

    the studies that only consider the effect of climate change, keeping anthropogenic emissions constant (Langner et al., 2005; Racherla and Adams, 2008; Meleux et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2008; Fiore et al., 2011; Carvalho et al., 2010; Tai et al., 2012; Manders et al., , 2012); the studies that maintain the meteorological conditions constant (same as the historical year) in future scenarios and only change the pollutant emission scenarios (Dentener et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2010); the studies that consider the effect of climate change along with the modification of the anthropogenic emissions in the future scenarios (Unger et al., 2006; Dentener et al., 2006; Stevenson et al., 2006; Tagaris et al., 2007; Nolte et al., 2008; Lei et al., 2012; Gidhagen et al., 2012; Coleman et al., 2013; Doherty et al., 2013; Gao et al., 2013; Jiang et al., 2013; Colette et al., 2013; Penrod et al., 2014; Trail et al., 2014; Lacressonnière et al., 2014; Markakis et al., 2014).

  • Application of Weather Research and Forecasting Model with Chemistry (WRF/Chem) over northern China: Sensitivity study, comparative evaluation, and policy implications

    2016, Atmospheric Environment
    Citation Excerpt :

    It should be noted that the observational data of the indicators mentioned in the Section 6 in the supplementay material are not available over China to verify simulated model sensitivity. However, the observations of another indicator, i.e., the ratios of column mass abundance of HCHO/NO2 (Tonnesen and Dennis, 2000a, b; Y. Zhang et al., 2009b, 2010b), can be calculated from the satellite observed column mass concentrations of HCHO and NO2. Fig. 5 compares the simulated and observed tropospheric column mass abundance of HCHO and NO2, and their ratios.

  • Influence of the choice of gas-phase mechanism on predictions of key gaseous pollutants during the AQMEII phase-2 intercomparison

    2015, Atmospheric Environment
    Citation Excerpt :

    Such a measure is complementary to what we presented in the last section, as it represents the slope of the O3 surface in Figs. 7 and 8 at a certain point. The indicator of Martin et al. (2004) is especially useful as both quantities can be observed via satellite instruments and are hence eminently useful for 3-D model evaluation as is done in Zhang et al. (2010) or Campbell et al. (2015). CH2O/NO2 indicates VOC-limited conditions if the ratio is below 1, and NOx-limited conditions if above 1.

  • Evaluation of concentrations and source contribution of PM10 and SO2 emitted from industrial complexes in Ulsan, Korea: Interfacing of the WRF-CALPUFF modeling tools

    2014, Atmospheric Pollution Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Therefore, it is essential to collect many measurements of these air pollutants, which necessitates that local governments maintain the optimized air quality network with a correct spatial distribution according to the specific emissions, orography and weather conditions to determine ambient concentrations as accurately as possible near regional sources. Specifically, air quality models have proven useful for determining the spatio–temporal distribution of air pollutants and for developing emission control policies that allocate limits to air pollutant emissions (Holmes and Morawska, 2006; Zhang et al., 2010; Ma et al., 2013). Dispersion modeling describes the transport and dispersion of air pollutants, as well as chemical and physical processes within the plume.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text