Formation flying for electric sails in displaced orbits. Part II: Distributed coordinated control
Introduction
In recent years, much effort has been devoted to the study of an Electric Solar Wind Sail (E-sail), an interesting propulsion system that uses the natural solar wind dynamic pressure to generate a continuous low-thrust, without the need of any reaction mass (Janhunen and Sandroos, 2007, Mengali et al., 2008, Sanchez-Torres, 2016). A potential and challenging mission scenario of an E-sail-based spacecraft is to generate a heliocentric closed trajectory, usually referred to as displaced orbit (McInnes, 1997, Gong and Li, 2014, Salazar et al., 2016), in which the continuous propulsive acceleration is used to shift the spacecraft orbital plane off the Sun’s center-of-mass. A scientific application of this unusual trajectory is, for example, to continuously observe the polar region of a celestial body, such as a planet or an asteroid. However, the propulsive requirements for this kind of mission scenario, given in terms of maximum value of propulsive acceleration necessary to maintain the displaced orbit, could be beyond the technological capabilities of an E-sail propulsion system. A possible solution to this problem is to reduce the spacecraft launch mass (with a subsequent increase of the E-sail characteristic acceleration) by distributing the payload among different E-sail-based vehicles operating in a formation flight, where each functional module (spacecraft) of the formation takes the essential mass only (Mazal and Gurfil, 2013, Salazar et al., 2015).
So far, the control problem of different spacecraft flying around a heliocentric displaced orbit falls into two main categories, that is, control with single or leader-follower strategy. In the first case the concept is to distribute a number of sail-based (either photonic solar sail or E-sail) spacecraft into different displaced orbits and to control them separately, without the need of any real-time information about the position of each spacecraft with respect to the chief vehicle (Wang et al., 2016b, Wang et al., 2016a). In a companion paper (Wang et al., 2017) the same idea has been applied to a set of E-sail spacecraft in a formation flight. With such a simple control strategy, some typical formation geometries, as well as the bounds of the spacecraft relative motion, can be analytically estimated by selecting the displaced orbital elements. However, the robustness of the formation system cannot be guaranteed since no stability control is involved.
The second concept, instead, assumes the chief spacecraft to follow a prescribed displaced orbit, and the deputies to adjust their thrust vectors (that is, both the sail attitude and the characteristic acceleration) in order to track the desired relative trajectories with respect to the chief (Gong et al., 2007, Gong et al., 2011). This is the so called chief-deputy or leader-follower control strategy. Nevertheless, inherent limitations also exist in the latter system arrangement. For example, the unique chief spacecraft, which represents the only information source about the reference state for each deputy, is a single point of massive failure for the whole group (Ren, 2007). Another weakness associated with a chief-deputy strategy is the absence of a mutual feedback information flow throughout the formation structure. As a result, an unfavorable situation may arise if a fault happens in the chief-deputy communication links. A possible improvement consists in including the information exchange among the deputies into the feedback control. In addition, it has been proved that the mutual connection of agents also contributes to an accuracy enhancement during the transient motion (Ren, 2006).
Recognizing these issues, this paper concentrates on the problem of cooperative control for multiple E-sail formation flight around a heliocentric (elliptic) displaced orbit, by making full use of the measurable information among the formation structure. In particular, two qualitatively different cases involving either a “directed” or an “undirected” weighted graph of communication topology are addressed via consensus algorithms (Ren, 2006). The basic idea of information consensus is that each agent in a group updates its state on the basis of the data obtained from its local neighbors, in such a way that the final state of each agent converges to some consistent common value. In addition, the fundamental protocol of the consensus algorithm can be extended to deal with the problem that the state of each agent converges to a desired relative separation value or incorporate different group behaviors into the consensus building process (Ren and Atkins, 2007). The emphasis of this work relies on the fact that every available neighbor-to-neighbor information exchange among deputy E-sails is included into the feedback control system, thus preventing an undesirable situation in which a failure of the chief spacecraft would give rise to potential risks to the whole formation structure. In this sense, this analysis completes the results of Wang et al. (2017) where the chief-deputy relative motion is discussed without the use of a cooperative control.
The paper is organized as follows. The next section briefly summarizes the mathematical model used to calculate the E-sail propulsive requirements necessary to maintain a prescribed heliocentric displaced orbit. In particular, with the aid of the main results discussed in Wang et al. (2017), Section 2 illustrates the model for analyzing the relative motion of two spacecraft around a heliocentric, elliptic, displaced orbit. This relative dynamics is then used in Section 3 for the study of the control system. The latter, which is based on the consensus algorithm, allows the E-sail thrust vector to be oriented so as to track the desired chief-deputy relative trajectory. The control system effectiveness is then investigated in Section 4 by means of numerical simulation of some mission scenarios of particular interest. Finally, Section 5 contains the concluding remarks.
Section snippets
E-sail relative motion around an elliptic displaced orbit
Consider a mission scenario in which a chief spacecraft tracks a heliocentric elliptic displaced orbit while some deputy spacecraft are controlled to operate around the chief. The characteristics of the displaced orbit and the spacecraft control law are selected in order to ensure that the vehicles (closely) follow the heliocentric trajectory of a reference celestial body B with an eccentricity and a semimajor axis , as is now discussed.
Distributed coordinated control
In this section, the formation control of an E-sail-based system consisting of a chief and deputy spacecraft around an elliptic PFDO is considered. Distributed coordinated control laws are developed for both the undirected and directed cases. In particular, the relative motion topology will be represented by an undirected or a directed graph to characterize the information exchange among the formation system.
Numerical simulations
To illustrate the performance of the proposed consensus-based controllers, a mission scenario involving four E-sail-based spacecraft (one chief and three surrounding deputies, i.e. ) is investigated. Using the same example discussed in Wang et al. (2017), the chief is assumed to cover an Earth-synchronized elliptic PFDO with its semimajor axis , eccentricity and displacement . According to Eqs. (3), (4), the variation of with the true anomaly
Conclusions
The problem of E-sail formation flying around a heliocentric elliptic displaced orbit tracked by a chief has been investigated. The chief-deputy relative motion has been described in the chief rotating reference frame. Distributed architectures of the formation control system, which accommodate a single E-sail-based chief and a number of deputies, have been proposed for both the undirected and directed case. The maintenance of the formation flying relies on the proposed consensus algorithms
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11472213) and Open Research Foundation of Science and Technology in Aerospace Flight Dynamics Laboratory of China (No. 2015afdl016). This work was also supported by Chinese Scholarship Council.
References (27)
- et al.
Solar sail formation flying on an inclined earth orbit
Acta Astronaut.
(2011) - et al.
Intervening in earth’s climate system through space-based solar reflectors
Adv. Space Res.
(2016) - et al.
Zero drift regions and control strategies to keep satellite in formation around triangular libration point in the restricted sun-earth-moon scenario
Adv. Space Res.
(2015) Drag and propulsive forces in electric sails with negative polarity
Adv. Space Res.
(2016)- et al.
Extreme values of relative distances for spacecraft in elliptic displaced orbits
Adv. Space Res.
(2016) - et al.
Spacecraft Formation Flying: Dynamics, Control and Navigation
(2010) - et al.
Behavior-based formation control for multirobot teams
IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat.
(1998) - et al.
Solar sail formation flying around displaced solar orbits
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
(2007) - et al.
Solar sail heliocentric elliptic displaced orbits
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
(2014) Increased electric sail thrust through removal of trapped shielding electrons by orbit chaotisation due to spacecraft body
Ann. Geophys.
(2009)
Simulation study of solar wind push on a charged wire: basis of solar wind electric sail propulsion
Ann. Geophys.
Cluster flight algorithms for disaggregated satellites
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
The existence and stability of families of displaced two-body orbits
Celestial Mech. Dyn. Astron.
Cited by (17)
Optimal deep-space heliocentric transfers with an electric sail and an electric thruster
2024, Advances in Space ResearchThrust model and guidance scheme for single-tether E-sail with constant attitude
2023, Aerospace Science and TechnologyAdaptive fault-tolerant control for spacecraft formation under external disturbances with guaranteed performance
2023, Advances in Space ResearchA comprehensive review of Electric Solar Wind Sail concept and its applications
2022, Progress in Aerospace SciencesEffects of optical parameter measurement uncertainties and solar irradiance fluctuations on solar sailing
2021, Advances in Space ResearchDecentralized fault-tolerant control for multiple electric sail relative motion at artificial Lagrange points
2020, Aerospace Science and TechnologyCitation Excerpt :Unlike the existing studies in which the communication topology of the E-sail relative motion is fixed and remains constant, the E-sail sensing capability is now uniquely determined by the relative distances in the formation and therefore admits a time-varying property, which is a more reasonable assumption in a realistic situation. In particular, a robust adaptive fault-tolerant consensus protocol is developed, capable of compensating unpredictable actuator uncertainties of the E-sails, thus extending the previous results in which only the formation tracking problem was considered [11]. In this context, the formation control is achieved by suitably adjusting the attitude angles and the lightness number of the E-sail.