Elsevier

Aquaculture

Volume 539, 30 June 2021, 736654
Aquaculture

Potency and efficacy of VP20-based vaccine against tilapia lake virus using different prime-boost vaccination regimens in tilapia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736654Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Tilapia inoculated with VP20 based vaccine induced strong humoral and cellular immune responses.

  • Tilapias in the DNA prime-protein boost group developed a stronger immune response than those immunized with either the DNA or the protein alone.

  • TiLV VP20 based vaccine significantly lower the viral loads and resulted in significant increases in survival.

  • The DNA prime-protein boost immunization strategy showed the potential advantage over a solo vaccination for the prevention of TiLVD.

Abstract

Tilapia lake virus (TiLV) is a newly emerged pathogen responsible for high mortality and economic losses in the global tilapia industry. Vaccination is the most effective way to prevent and control viral diseases. There is currently no vaccine on the market to control TiLV infections. Recently, we identified that TiLV segment 8 encoded a protein (VP20) with immunogenicity sufficient for use as a vaccine antigen. In this study, the immune responses and protective efficacy elicited by VP20 with different prime-boost vaccination regimens (DNA only, protein only, and DNA plus protein) in tilapia was evaluated. The results indicated that both pV-optiVP20 plasmid and rVP20 protein induced humoral and cellular immune responses. Tilapia in the DNA prime-protein boost group developed significantly higher levels of antibody response compared with those immunized with either the DNA or the protein alone (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the highest mRNA levels of the genes TNF-α, IL-1β, IgM, CD4, MHC-Ia and MHC-II were induced following priming with the pV-optiVP20 and boosting with the rVP20. Additionally, tilapia inoculated with the pV-optiVP20 prime-rVP20 boost regimen had a 72.5% survival rate against challenge with the lethal TiLV 2017A compared with 50% or 52.5% survival using the pV-optiVP20 and the rVP20 vaccinations alone. These findings demonstrated that VP20-based vaccine could elicit both humoral and cellular immune responses and significantly protected the fish against infectious challenge by TiLV. The DNA prime-protein boost immunization strategy showed the potential advantage over a solo vaccination.

Introduction

Tilapia represents fish in the genus Oreochromis and are the second most farmed fish and these numbers combined with the wild caught populations in 2015 accounted for more than 6.4 M tons and production has been steadily increasing (FAO, 2016; Ng and Romano, 2013; FAO, 2017; Thammatorn et al., 2019; FAO, 2019). However, infections due to the emerging tilapia lake virus (TiLV) has resulted in mass mortality of wild and farmed Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and caused a significant impact on tilapia aquaculture in many countries (Surachetpong et al., 2020). Currently, outbreaks have been reported in 16 countries in Asia, Africa, South and North America and involve 6 of the major tilapia producers and is a serious threat to the industry (Del-Pozo et al., 2017; Koesharyani et al., 2018; Mugimba et al., 2018; Surachetpong et al., 2017; Nicholson et al., 2017; FAO, 2018; Jansen et al., 2019; OIE, 2019; Surachetpong et al., 2020). These infections have resulted in high levels of morbidity and 20–90% mortality in field outbreaks and this had been reproduced in laboratory challenged fish (Eyngor et al., 2014; Tattiyapong et al., 2017; Jansen et al., 2019; Dong et al., 2017b; Surachetpong et al., 2017; Ferguson et al., 2014).

TiLV is a negative-sense single-stranded RNA virus containing 10 genomic seqments and is the only member of the genus Tilapinevirus in the family Amnoonviridae (ICTV, 2018; Del-Pozo et al., 2017; Surachetpong et al., 2017; Surachetpong et al., 2020). Its 10,323 kb total genome encodes 14 functional genes and 14 viral proteins although functions have not been assigned to all these proteins (Acharya et al., 2019; Bacharach et al., 2016; Surachetpong et al., 2017). Our previous research indicated that viral genome segment 8 encoded a 20 kDa protein (VP20) that was highly antigenic and induced high titers of specific anti-TiLV antibodies (Hu et al., 2012). Therefore, VP20 is a potential vaccine candidate against TiLV but this protein has not been assessed for its protective potential in tilapia.

Vaccination is the most effective way to prevent viral disease and many kinds of vaccines have proved successful in reducing the severity of fish viral diseases (Zeng et al., 2016; Hjeltnes et al., 2017; Jee et al., 2017; Matsuura et al., 2019). A recent study revealed that following tilapia exposure to TiLV, the surviving fish mount a robust and protective immune response which provide a complete protection against reinfection (Tattiyapong et al., 2020). It means that developing an efficacious vaccine against TiLV is very promising. There are four primary vaccine types: attenuated live vaccines, inactivated vaccines, subunit vaccines and DNA vaccines and all four types are already commercially available (Wang et al., 2020; Evensen and Leong, 2013). At present, both attenuated and inactivated TiLV vaccines are being developed and tested (Surachetpong et al., 2020; Zeng et al., 2021), but none of them are commercially available. In addition, inactivated vaccines are expensive to produce and susceptible to the loss of important immunogenicity during inactivation and live-attenuated vaccines carry a limited antigen mass and pose potential risks of virulence reversion and immunosuppression (Pitcovski et al., 2003; Celene et al., 2014). Furthermore, a major shortcoming of these two vaccine types is that they do not allow for the differentiation of vaccinated from naturally infected fish. In contrast, protein subunit and DNA vaccines solve the latter problem and the protein subunit vaccines are stabile and possess better safety profiles may not elicit complete T cell-mediated immunity (Ridpath, 2013; Pecora et al., 2012). Fortunately, plasmid DNA vaccines provide several advantages over classical vaccines and both humoral and cellular immunity can be induced with this vaccine type (Ferraro et al., 2011; Menon et al., 2017; Evensen and Leong, 2013; Chen et al., 2018; Hanne et al., 2018). Despite the great potential for plasmid-based vaccines, recent studies have concluded that plasmid vaccines used alone fail to induce significant protection against pathogens even when combined with molecular adjuvants (Lu, 2009; Liu, 2011). Interestingly, a DNA prime-protein boost regimen has proven more effective at eliciting an immune response than either the solo DNA or subunit vaccine immunizations (Pal et al., 2006; Li et al., 2006a, Li et al., 2006b; Liang et al., 2006; Kardani et al., 2016; Gupta and Garg, 2015; Costa et al., 2016).

In the present study, the S8 gene that encodes the VP20 protein of the TiLV isolate 2017A was codon-optimized for fish usage and cloned into plasmid vector pVAX1 (pVoptiVP20). Previous studies have shown that protein-based vaccines should be supplemented with adjuvants (Roozbehani et al., 2018; Kordbacheh et al., 2019). Aluminum is a safe and effective adjuvant that improved antigen uptake by antigen presenting cells and is widely used in vaccine formulations (He et al., 2015). Therefore, the VP20 subunit vaccine used in this study was prepared by purified recombinant VP20 protein combined with M402 enhanced aluminum adjuvant. Tilapia were vaccinated singly with pVoptiVP20 and VP20 subunit vaccine and together using VP20 subunit vaccine as a booster after DNA vaccination. We evaluated the immunogenicity and protective efficacy against TiLV infection that were elicited using these strategies to control TiLV infections. Our work may identify a novel, safe and effective vaccine and approach for controlling TiLV infections.

Section snippets

Cell lines, virus, plasmids and antibodies

The tilapia brain (TiB) cell line was used for TiLV propagation and transfection (Wang et al., 2018) and were maintained at 28 °C in M199 medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS HyClone, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA). The TiLV 2017A isolate was kindly provided by the Institute of Infectology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut Insel Riems in Germany. The eukaryotic expression vector pVAX1 was used for expression cloning (Thermo Fisher.

Expressin of rVP20

The rVP20 protein was purified from E. coli inclusion bodies and migrated as a single of 37 kDa band on SDS-PAGE and Western blotting indicating high purity. These results indicated that rVP20 was highly antigenic (Fig. 2). The protein yields were 962 μg/mL.

Eukaryotic expression constructs (pV-optiVP20 and pV-VP20) also successfully expressed VP2 in TiB cells. The protein could be detected using IFA in whole cells using a VP2-specific polyclonal antibody in cells containing the expression

Discussion

The production of tilapia has made this fish as one of the most important species for the 21st century and are important nutritional sources of protein (Fitzsimmons, 2000). Recently, the emergence of TiLV disease has put the global tilapia industry as well as food security at risk (Jansen et al., 2019). The disease has been reported from over 16 countries and is spreading globally (Behera et al., 2018; Pulido et al., 2019; Jansen et al., 2019; Surachetpong et al., 2020). Vaccination is a

Author statement

I have made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work;

I have drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content;

I have approved the final version to be published.

I agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

All persons who have made

Declaration of Competing Interest

We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in the manuscript entitled “Potency and efficacy of VP20-based vaccine against tilapia lake virus using different prime-boost vaccination regimens in tilapia”.

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research was provided by Guangdong Provincial Special Fund For Modern Agriculture Industry Technology Innovation Teams (2019KJ119), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030313757), the scientific research project of General Administration of Customs, P.R.China (2019HK047) and the Shenzhen Scientific Project Fund (JCYJ20170410103015603) and the Scientific and innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality (JCYJ20170818140641071).

References (94)

  • K. Kardani et al.

    Prime-boost vaccine strategy against viral infections: mechanisms and benefits

    Vaccine

    (2016)
  • E. Kordbacheh et al.

    Recombinant HcpA-EspA-Tir-Stx2B chimeric protein induces immunity against attachment and toxicity of Escherichia coli O157: H7

    Microb. Pathog.

    (2019)
  • X. Li et al.

    MHC class II alpha, beta and MHC class II-associated invariant chains from Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis) and their response to immune stimulation

    Fish Shellfish Immunol.

    (2017)
  • Z.X. Liu et al.

    Protective immunity against CyHV-3 infection via different prime-boost vaccination regimens using CyHV-3 ORF131-based DNA/protein subunit vaccines in carp Cyprinus carpio var Jian

    Fish Shellfish Immunol.

    (2020)
  • K.J. Livak et al.

    Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method

    Methods.

    (2001)
  • S. Lu

    Heterologous prime-boost vaccination

    Curr. Opin. Immunol.

    (2009)
  • Y. Matsuura et al.

    Current status of fish vaccines in Japan

    Fish Shellfish Immunol.

    (2019)
  • I. Nobiron et al.

    Cytokine, adjuvancy of BVDV DNA vaccine enhances both humoral and cellular immune responses in mice

    Vaccine

    (2001)
  • R. Pal et al.

    Immunization of rhesus macaques with a polyvalent DNA prime/protein boost human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vaccine elicits protective antibody response against simian human immunodeficiency virus of R5 phenotype

    Virology

    (2006)
  • J. Pitcovski et al.

    Development and large-scale use of recombinant VP2 vaccine for the prevention of infectious bursal disease of chickens

    Vaccine

    (2003)
  • I.A. Ramshaw et al.

    The prime-boost strategy: exciting prospects for improved vaccination

    Immunol. Today

    (2000)
  • J.F. Ridpath

    Immunology of BVDV vaccines

    Biologicals.

    (2013)
  • M. Roozbehani et al.

    Characterization of a multiepitope peptide with selective MHC-binding capabilities encapsulated in PLGA nanoparticles as a novel vaccine candidate against Toxoplasma gondii infection

    Vaccine

    (2018)
  • N. Sabarth et al.

    Comparison of single, homologous prime-boost and heterologous prime-boost immunization strategies against H5N1 influenza virus in a mouse challenge model

    Update

    (2010)
  • P. Tattiyapong et al.

    Experimental infection of Tilapia Lake Virus (TiLV) in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and red tilapia (Oreochromis spp.)

    Vet. Microbiol.

    (2017)
  • P. Tattiyapong et al.

    Tilapia develop protective immunity including a humoral response following exposure to tilapia lake virus

    Fish Shellfish Immunol.

    (2020)
  • M. Vaine et al.

    Antibody responses elicited through homologous or heterologous prime-boost DNA and protein vaccinations differ in functional activity and avidity

    Vaccine

    (2010)
  • Q.C. Wang et al.

    Current use and development of fish vaccines in China

    Fish Shellfish Immunol.

    (2020)
  • D.L. Woodland

    Jump-starting the immune system: prime-boosting comes of age

    Trends Immunol.

    (2004)
  • J. Ye et al.

    The teleost humoral immune response

    Fish Shellfish Immunol

    (2013)
  • W.W. Zeng et al.

    Immunogenicity of a cell culture-derived inactivated vaccine against a common virulent isolate of grass carp reovirus

    Fish Shellfish Immunol.

    (2016)
  • C. Zhang et al.

    Enhanced protective immunity against spring viremia of carp virus infection can be induced by recombinant subunit vaccine conjugated to single-walled carbon nanotubes

    Vaccine

    (2018)
  • L. Zhu et al.

    Effectivity of oral recombinant DNA vaccine against Streptococcus agalactiae in Nile tilapia

    Dev. Comp. Immunol.

    (2017)
  • V. Acharya et al.

    Structural characterization of open reading frame-encoded functional genes from tilapia lake virus (TiLV)

    Mol. Biotechnol.

    (2019)
  • E. Bacharach et al.

    Characterization of a novel orthomyxo-like virus causing mass die-offs of Tilapia

    mBio.

    (2016)
  • S.M. Celene et al.

    Viral vaccines for bony fish: past, present and future

    Expert Rev. Vaccines

    (2014)
  • M.R. Costa et al.

    Fc receptor-mediated activities of Env-specific human monoclonal antibodies generated from volunteers receiving the DNA prime-protein boost HIV vaccine DP6-001

    J. Virol.

    (2016)
  • J. Del-Pozo et al.

    Syncytial hepatitis of Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) is associated withOrthomyxovirus-like Virions in hepatocytes

    Vet. Pathol.

    (2017)
  • I. Delrue et al.

    Inactivated virus vaccines fromchemistry to prophylaxis: merits, risks and challenges

    Expert Rev Vacc.

    (2012)
  • L. Deml et al.

    Multiple effects of codon usage optimization on expression and immunogenicityof DNA candidate vaccines encoding the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gag protein

    J. Virol.

    (2001)
  • A.E. Ellis

    Fish Vaccination

    (1988)
  • M. Eyngor et al.

    Identification of a novel RNA virus lethal to Tilapia

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (2014)
  • FAO

    Contributing to food security and nutrition for all

  • FAO

    Outbreaks of Tilapia lake virus (TiLV) threaten the livelihoods and food security of millions of people dependent on tilapia farming

  • FAO

    The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture, 2018: Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals

    (2018)
  • FAO

    Global Tilapia Sector Set for Reshuffle as Tariffs Erode Chinese Dominance

  • H.W. Ferguson et al.

    Syncytial hepatitis of farmed tilapia, O reochromis niloticus (L.): a case report

    J. Fish Dis.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Chitosan nanoparticle immersion vaccine offers protection against tilapia lake virus in laboratory and field studies

      2022, Fish and Shellfish Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A DNA vaccine based on segment 10 of TiLV (TiLV-ORF10) provided an 85% RPS with significantly elevated immune-related gene expression, which included IgM, TLR2, MyD88, IL-8, and TNFα, in the vaccinated fish [41]. Indeed, a prime-boost vaccination strategy using a DNA and recombinant protein-based vaccine showed a 72.5% RPS and elicited both cellular and humoral immunity [42]. However, all these TiLV vaccines were based on traditional vaccine development and intraperitoneal delivery without the application of nanotechnology.

    • Screening the potential part of the G protein antigen is an achievable strategy to improve the immune effect of DNA vaccine against MSRV infection

      2022, Fish and Shellfish Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      All of the experimental animals were handled according to the guidelines of the Animal Experiment Committee, Northwest A&F University. In order to analyze the presence of specific antibodies, the serum of largemouth bass was determined by the method of double antibody sandwich (ELISA) [21,24,25]. Briefly, the serum was collected from the blood samples and diluted with PBS.

    • Mannose functionalized biomimetic nanovaccine enhances immune responses against tilapia lake virus

      2022, Aquaculture
      Citation Excerpt :

      Especially, vaccination is considered one of the effective ways to avoid devastating diseases in the aquaculture industry (Muktar et al., 2016; Ellis, 1988; Munang'andu and Evensen, 2019). At present, inactivated vaccines, protein subunit vaccines and DNA vaccines against TiLV have been developed, and their protection rates range from 42.9% to 85.72%, among them, vaccination of DNA vaccine is a relatively ideal approach to against TiLV infection (Zeng et al., 2021a; Yu et al., 2022). In addition, the prominence of DNA vaccines to prevent disease has been reported in other fish (Chen et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2020; Qiu et al., 2021; Xing et al., 2019; Ahmadivand et al., 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text