Elsevier

Applied Surface Science

Volume 358, Part A, 15 December 2015, Pages 15-27
Applied Surface Science

Review
A review on g-C3N4 for photocatalytic water splitting and CO2 reduction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.173Get rights and content

Highlights

  • New synthesis strategy for g-C3N4 production was summarized.

  • Novel ideas on extending the absorption edge of g-C3N4 were reviewed.

  • The overall water splitting and CO2 photoreduction were highlighted.

Abstract

Solar fuel generation through water splitting and CO2 photoreduction is an ideal route to provide the renewable energy sources and mitigate global warming. The main challenge in photocatalysis is finding a low-cost photocatalyst that can work efficiently to split water into hydrogen and reduce CO2 to hydrocarbon fuels. Metal-free g-C3N4 photocatalyst shows great potentials for solar fuel production. In this mini review, we summarize the most current advances on novel design idea and new synthesis strategy for g-C3N4 preparation, insightful ideas on extending optical absorption of pristine g-C3N4, overall water splitting and CO2 photoreduction over g-C3N4 based systems. The research challenges and perspectives on g-C3N4 based photocatalysts were also suggested.

Introduction

Solar fuel generation through water splitting and CO2 photoreduction over photocatalysts has great potential to supply the renewable energy for the future and alleviate the environmental issues [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. However, the positive Gibbs free energy change, 237 kJ mol−1 for water splitting to H2 and 1135 kJ mol−1 for CO2 photoreduction to CH4, makes the solar hydrogen production and CO2 photoreduction be thermodynamically unfavorable reactions [9], [10], [11]. Attractively, a photocatalyst with sufficiently high conduction band (CB) bottom and deeply low valence band (VB) top can be applied to facilitate these photocatalytic redox reactions. Up to now, more than one hundred of materials have been demonstrated as potential photocatalysts for photocatalytic H2 generation and CO2 reduction [12], [13]. However, most of developed photocatalysts are wide bandgap semiconductors, and thereby lead to the weak light harvesting in visible light region that accounts for ∼43% of the solar energy. Meanwhile, these photocatalysts are almost all metal-containing materials, which is not only costly for large-scale applications but also but also raising environmental contamination concerns because of the metal ion leaching in usages. As a result, researchers have been stimulated to exploit metal-free photocatalysts with reasonable activities for solar-to-fuel conversion.

Recently, polymeric g-C3N4 has become a focus of attention for photocatalytic reactions [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. g-C3N4 is a visible-light-response material (2.7 eV bandgap), and the energy position of CB and VB is at −1.1 and 1.6 eV vs normal hydrogen electrode (NHE), respectively [14]. In addition, g-C3N4 has very high resistance to attack from heat, strong acid, and strong alkaline solution [20]. Unlike the metal-containing photocatalysts that need expensive metal salts for preparation, g-C3N4 photocatalyst can be facilely prepared by thermally polycondensing the cheap N-rich precursors, such as dicyanamide, cyanamide, melamine, and urea [14], [21], [22]. These excellent properties enable g-C3N4 to be used in water splitting, CO2 photoreduction, organic contaminants purification, catalytic organic synthesis, and fuel cells [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. There have been several excellent reviews on g-C3N4 preparation and applications in the last 5 years, and readers can refer to these review articles [15], [16], [17], [18], [19].

In this mini review, we mainly focused on the most current advances on the design, preparation, and photocatalytic activities for H2 generation and CO2 reduction over g-C3N4 in the past 2 years. We started to introduce the novel design idea and new synthesis strategy for g-C3N4, and then highlighted the enlightened ideas on extending the optical absorption of g-C3N4. Next, the overall water splitting and CO2 photoreduction over g-C3N4 based systems were summarized. Finally, the research status of g-C3N4 was briefly summarized. Also, the research challenges on g-C3N4 were concluded and the perspectives in future researches were also suggested.

Section snippets

New fabrication strategies of g-C3N4

Traditionally, g-C3N4 is generally synthesized by thermal condensation of N-rich precursors, such as urea, dicyandiamide, melamine, and so on [14], [21], [22]. However, the photocatalytic activity of as-obtained g-C3N4 is usually restricted by low efficiency due to fast recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs. Therefore, new strategy must be designed and fabricated to solve this problem.

g-C3N4/g-C3N4 heterojunction

The low quantum efficiency of solar fuel generation over photocatalysts has restricted the practical applications of photocatalysis. The low efficiency in photocatalytic reactions mainly caused by the fast recombination of photoinduced electron–hole pairs. To suppress this recombination, a heterojunction photocatalyst coupling g-C3N4 with other semiconductors can not only significantly facilitate the separation of photogenerated charge carriers but also broaden the solar light absorption, and

Important breakthrough oxygen production on g-C3N4

Comparing to the water reduction for H2 generation, water oxidation involves the four electrons to yield O2 and has been long regarded as the bottleneck of water splitting. Therefore, designing highly active and stable water oxidation photocatalysts is urgent for developing light-driven water splitting.

Presently, the photocatalytic O2 evolution activity of g-C3N4 is an order of magnitude lower than that of H2 evolution because of the relatively negative valence band position [113]. In order to

Conclusions and perspectives

Significant progresses have been achieved in the design and fabrication of g-C3N4 materials for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen and CO2 photoreduction in the past two years. A very recent work by Kang and co-workers show that g-C3N4, coupling with carbon nanodots, can stably photocatalyze the pure water splitting into H2 and O2 to 600 nm light irradiation without the assistance of any co-catalysts for 200 days reaction. It is noteworthy that the extraordinary high solar energy conversion

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51572003, 11374013, 51002001), Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (1508085ME105, 1408085MB22), the State “211 Project” of Anhui University, China, the Open Fund by Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control (KHK1403) and a Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

References (126)

  • Y. Xu et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2015)
  • S. Rani et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2014)
  • Q.Y. Li et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2014)
  • K.F. Li et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2014)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2012)
  • F. Chang et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2013)
  • F. Jiang et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2014)
  • N. Tian et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2014)
  • H. Wang et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2015)
  • Q. Wang et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2015)
  • Y.J. Zhong et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2014)
  • B.C. Zhu et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2015)
  • J.K. Gao et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (2015)
  • Y.P. Yuan et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2013)
  • L. Xu et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2014)
  • L. Liu et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2015)
  • S.W. Cao et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2014)
  • Y.P. Yuan et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2013)
  • S.W. Cao et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2013)
  • J.J. Zhou et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2015)
  • Y.P. Yuan et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2015)
  • F. Chang et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2014)
  • L.Y. Chen et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2014)
  • L. Huang et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2013)
  • S.Z. Wu et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2015)
  • Z. Xiu et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2014)
  • L. Zhang et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2015)
  • L. Ge et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2012)
  • M. Zhang et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2015)
  • S.Z. Hu et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2014)
  • J.S. Zhang et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2014)
  • Z.H. Chen et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2015)
  • X. Li et al.

    J. Mater. Chem. A

    (2015)
  • A. Kudo et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2009)
  • X.B. Chen et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2012)
  • M. Marszewski et al.

    Mater. Horiz.

    (2015)
  • Q.J. Xiang et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2015)
  • Y.P. Yuan et al.

    Energy Environ. Sci.

    (2014)
  • S.N. Habisreutinger et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2013)
  • F.E. Osterloh

    Chem. Mater.

    (2008)
  • X.B. Chen et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2010)
  • X.C. Wang et al.

    Nat. Mater.

    (2013)
  • F. Chang et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2012)
  • S.W. Cao et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. Lett.

    (2014)
  • Y.G. Gong et al.

    ChemSusChem

    (2015)
  • S.W. Cao et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2015)
  • Y.J. Zhang et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2009)
  • S.C. Yan et al.

    Langmuir

    (2009)
  • F. Dong et al.

    J. Mater. Chem.

    (2011)
  • P. Niu et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (716)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text