Elsevier

Applied Soil Ecology

Volume 136, April 2019, Pages 158-162
Applied Soil Ecology

Short communication
Does the incorporation of dicyandiamide and hydroquinone with straw enhance the nitrogen supplying capacity in soil?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.12.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Effects of fixed NH4+ on N conservation and supply were greater than that of SMBN.

  • Inhibitors regulated SMBN mineralization and fixed NH4+ release, especially DCD.

  • Inhibitors increased crop yield in the absence of straw, which decreased crop yield.

  • The combination of DCD and straw further decreased N availability and crop yield.

  • Addition of HQ alleviated the decline of N availability caused by straw application.

Abstract

We conducted a pot experiment with spring wheat to examine the effects of microbial immobilization/mineralization and soil mineral fixation/defixation on nitrogen (N) conservation and supply and determine the influences of inhibitors and straw additions on these processes. Results showed that the effects of fixed NH4+ pool on N conservation and supply were 3.1- and 2.2-fold, respectively, of the effects of soil microbial biomass N (SMBN) pool in the treatments without straw and 1.3- and 1.4-fold, respectively, of the effects of the SMBN pool in the treatments with straw application. In the absence of straw, the nitrification inhibitor (dicyandiamide, DCD) and urease inhibitor (hydroquinone, HQ) improved crop yield. Conversely, crop yield declined when straw was used especially in combination with DCD. Meanwhile, HQ alleviated the decrease in crop yield induced by straw application. These phenomena were attributed to the fact that DCD coupled with straw further enhances microbial immobilization and decreases N availability. HQ delayed the hydrolysis of urea, asynchronizing the microbial immobilization and NH4+supply and consequently mitigating the decline in N availability. Both inhibitors regulated the fixed NH4+ release, especially the DCD. In general, DCD tends to conserve N in soil and lowers N availability, whereas HQ is favorable for the maintenance of N in mineral forms and increasing its availability.

Introduction

Soil microorganism is the primary driving agent of nitrogen (N) cycling and an important N sink and source for crops (Nannipieri and Paul, 2009). To regulate N cycling, many researchers improve microbial activity by adding organic materials (Chen et al., 2014). The fixation and defixation of ammonium by soil clay minerals are also important processes for N cycling in soils, especially in 2:1 clay minerals (Nieder et al., 2011). More than 70% of applied fertilizer N can be fixed in some types of soil, and over 80% of recently fixed NH4+ can be released after several weeks or during growing seasons (Ahmad et al., 1982, Matsuoka and Moritsuka, 2011). However, less attention has been given to the comparison between the effects of soil microbial biomass N (SMBN) pool on N conservation and supply and those of fixed NH4+ pool.

For the amelioration of N use efficiency (NUE) and mitigation of environmental pollution, fertilizer N transformation processes in soil are usually regulated with inhibitors (Abalos et al., 2014), which alter the form of fertilizer N by retarding ammonium oxidation (nitrification inhibitors) or urea hydrolysis (urease inhibitors). The cationic form of fertilizer N can be enhanced and retained through inhibitor additions, which is the preferred source of N for microorganisms (Jansson, 1958) and can be fixed by soil clay minerals (Nieder et al., 2011). Kaye and Hart (1997) inferred that the competition for NH4+ exists between microbial activity (immobilization or nitrificaton) and mineral fixation processes. Microbial activity is also a primary driving force of fixed NH4+ release, and NH4+ derived from organic N mineralization can be fixed by clay minerals (Nieder et al., 2011, Ma et al., 2015). Therefore, the relationship between SMBN and fixed NH4+ pools should be clarified for the assessment of N availability and optimization of N management.

In the present study, a pot experiment was carried out with inhibitors and straw additions. The objectives were as follows: (i) to elucidate the synergistic effects of nitrification inhibitor (dicyandiamide, DCD), urease inhibitor (hydroquinone, HQ), and straw on N transformation; (ii) to compare the contributions of the SMBN and fixed NH4+ pools to N supply; and (iii) to identify the effects on crop yield.

Section snippets

Experimental site, design, and treatments

Test soil (0–10 cm) without fertilization since 1990 was collected from a long-term experiment in Shenyang Experimental Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The study area and the test soil properties were described in detail by Ma et al. (2015).

The pot experiment was conducted with spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) from April 6 to July 4, 2013 in a net house, which was furnished with a rainproof shelter. Nine treatments were performed, namely, (1) control (CK), (2) urea (U), (3)

Result

Soil mineral N (NH4+-N plus NO3-N) was significantly influenced by the inhibitors and straw additions (Fig. 1a, b). In the absence of straw, the NH4+-N levels in the treatments that received DCD remained high relative to that in the U treatment. The SMBN and fixed NH4+ increased respectively by 4.0 mg kg−1 (25.5%) and 15.7 mg kg−1 (7.4%) in the DCD treatment and 6.2 mg kg−1 (39.3%) and 4.1 mg kg−1 (1.9%) in the DCD + HQ treatment, compared with the U treatment (Fig. 1c, d). However, the peaks

Discussion

Nitrogen was immobilized in the present study by microorganism approximately equal to 16.4% of the applied fertilizer N in the treatments without straw. Both inhibitors raised the average level of SMBN, especially when DCD was coupled with HQ. Xu et al. (2001) obtained parallel result and pointed out that inhibitors, particularly DCD, prolong the presence of NH4+, facilitating microbial immobilization (Jansson, 1958). When straw was applied, SMBN significantly increased, accounting for 39.0% of

Conclusion

In the absence of straw, inhibitor addition increased N supplying capacity in soil and crop yield. The most evident increase was observed when both HQ and DCD were used. The addition of straw, along with DCD, significantly decreased N supply in current season and crop yield. The decreases were attributed to drastic microbial immobilization and subsequent slow remineralization, which weakened the synchrony of the N supply with crop demand. However, urease inhibitor can be utilized for the

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 41471250, 41877106, 41877107), National Key Technology R&D Program (grant number 2015BAD05B01), and Doctoral Research Fund of Liaoning Province, China (grant number 20180540071).

References (22)

  • S.L. Jansson

    Tracer studies on nitrogen transformations in soil with special attention to mineralization-immobilization relationships

    Ann. R. Agric. College Sweden

    (1958)
  • Cited by (9)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text