Toward a global perspective on farm animal welfare

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.011Get rights and content

Abstract

During the past half century, the less industrialized countries experienced rapid increases in animal production through both large-scale confinement systems and traditional small-scale systems. These countries now produce the majority of the world's meat. The regulations and other programs designed to safeguard animal welfare in the European and English-speaking countries may prove ineffective in the diverse and burgeoning production systems of the less industrialized nations. However, improvements to animal welfare may still be achieved (1) through the basic economic incentive to reduce losses caused by injury, stress and malnutrition, (2) through disease control programs, as long as these are well conducted, and (3) by international corporations applying their existing animal welfare standards on a more global basis. Moreover, low labour costs in less industrialized countries could allow labour-intensive, non-confinement systems to flourish, especially if there is an international market for such products. Although animal welfare plays no role in the agreements of the World Trade Organization, internationally recognized standards may still be incorporated by mutual agreement in bilateral and multilateral trade agreements, and they may be required in future by international food companies and their customers. There are important opportunities for animal welfare scientists to support animal protection initiatives in the less industrialized countries, especially through technical assistance programs, research and education.

Introduction

In 2005, the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) adopted its first global guidelines for animal welfare, specifically in the areas of land transport, sea transport, slaughter of animals for human consumption, and killing of animals for disease control (OIE, 2005). The passing of the guidelines by 167 countries, some of which did not have national animal protection legislation of their own, signaled that animal welfare was no longer a concern only of certain (generally prosperous) nations, but had become an issue for official attention at a global level (Bayvel et al., 2005).

The globalization of attention to animal welfare not only provides opportunities to improve the lives of animals on a large scale but also causes us to consider the means by which animal welfare can be safeguarded throughout the world. In this paper I will briefly discuss some of the developments in farm animal production that led to animal welfare reform in the industrialized nations, outline some of the key features of animal welfare reform and animal welfare science in those countries, discuss why different approaches will likely be needed in other nations, and suggest some opportunities for scientists and others to contribute to animal welfare in a broader range of countries. I will deal only with terrestrial animals, although a similar discussion would also be warranted regarding aquatic animals.

Section snippets

The “livestock revolution”

The second half of the 20th Century saw major changes in farm animal production levels worldwide. In the industrialized nations, production of meat increased steadily from the 1960s to the close of the century (Fig. 1). The increase occurred mainly in animal species that are fed on grain and other concentrated diets. Thus, poultry production (which is largely grain-based) increased five-fold from 1961 to 2001 in the industrialized countries, and pig production (which also relies mainly on

Animal welfare concerns and responses in the industrialized countries

During the half century when these changes were occurring, the industrialized countries, especially the northern European and English-speaking nations, also experienced cultural changes which involved increased attention to animals and increased concern over their quality of life (Fraser, 2001, Fraser, 2005). In the case of farm animals, concern was focused particularly on confinement production systems and it triggered a series of actions intended to safeguard farm animal welfare.

Many

Are these solutions adequate for the less industrialized nations?

In some respects the regulatory, scientific and other approaches used to improve animal welfare in the industrialized countries will not transfer easily to animal production at a more global level.

Regulatory reform, although providing a way to express public ideals or official policy, may have limited practical effect in societies that lack a culture of compliance or where insufficient resources are provided for inspection and enforcement. This problem is not specific to less prosperous

Opportunities for more global improvement in animal welfare

If the approaches used to improve animal welfare in the industrialized countries are likely to prove less useful elsewhere, are there other approaches and incentives that may lead to improved animal welfare on a more global basis?

Sheer economics could provide an important incentive because basic improvements to animal welfare can often increase economic benefits. For example Trent et al. (2001) point out that more humane transport, handling and slaughter of animals in the less industrialized

The role of international standards

Given that the OIE guidelines constitute one concrete development intended to apply on a global scale, let us consider the role likely to be played by these (and potentially other) international standards.

The OIE guidelines are not, of course, binding on the member countries. They do not have the force of national legislation, nor of European Union directives which member countries are required to translate into national legislation. Nor does the OIE have a mandate or capability for

The role of animal welfare science

To date, animal welfare science has tended to be a somewhat Eurocentric field. Much of the work has been done on production systems typical of agriculture in Europe and countries with European-derived culture, and the direction of some research has been influenced by actual or potential European regulations. As we enter a century when most animal production will occur in the less industrialized nations, it will be important for animal welfare scientists to redefine their field more broadly, so

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to colleagues Fernando Borderas, Renu Singh, Dan Weary, Jeff Rushen, Alex Thiermann, and David Bayvel for helpful comments, to Jane Orihel for diligent research assistance, and to many colleagues who have provided insight into animal welfare issues worldwide, most notably my fellow members of the Animal Welfare Working Group of the World Organization for Animal Health. Preparation of this paper was supported by the NSERC Industrial Research Chair in Animal Welfare at the

References (33)

  • R.O. Bates et al.

    Sow performance when housed either in groups with electronic sow feeders or stalls

    Livest. Prod. Sci.

    (2003)
  • H. Aidaros

    Global perspectives—the Middle East: Egypt

    Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’Office International des Epizooties

    (2005)
  • M.C. Appleby et al.

    Development of furnished cages for laying hens

    Br. Poult. Sci.

    (2002)
  • Bayvel, A.C.D., Rahman, S.A., Gavinelli, A. (Eds.), 2005. Animal Welfare: Global Issues, Trends and Challenges. Revue...
  • D. Bowles et al.

    Animal welfare and developing countries: opportunities for trade in high welfare products from developing countries

    Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’Office International des Epizooties

    (2005)
  • Brown, A.G. (Ed.), 2003. The Livestock Revolution: A Pathway from Poverty? Australian Academy of Technological Sciences...
  • V. Caporale et al.

    Global perspectives on animal welfare: Europe

    Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’Office International des Epizooties

    (2005)
  • CEC, 2006. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on a Community Action Plan on...
  • A.M. de Passillé et al.

    Food safety and environmental issues in animal welfare

    Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’Office International des Epizooties

    (2005)
  • FAO, undated. Global rinderpest eradication programme. FAO Animal Production and Health Division. Available at:...
  • FAO

    Guidelines for Humane Handling, Transport and Slaughter of Livestock

    (2001)
  • FAO, 2005. Food Balance Sheet. FAOSTAT Database, 14 July 2005 update. Available at:...
  • D. Fraser

    Farm animal production: changing agriculture in a changing culture

    J. Appl. Anim. Welfare Sci.

    (2001)
  • D. Fraser

    Animal Welfare and the Intensification of Animal Production: An Alternative Interpretation. FAO Readings in Ethics No. 2

    (2005)
  • D. Fraser

    Animal welfare assurance programs in food production: a framework for assessing the options

    Anim. Welfare

    (2006)
  • D. Fraser et al.

    Farm animals and their welfare in 2000

  • Cited by (100)

    • Slaughter of pigs

      2023, Advances in Pig Welfare, Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text