Anticipation of aerobic exercise increases planned energy intake for a post-exercise meal
Introduction
The most recent public health statistics suggest that the prevalence of overweight and obesity continue to rise, with 61% of UK adults currently classified as overweight or obese (Health Survey for England, 2016). Weight gain occurs due to chronic positive energy balance (i.e. energy intake greater than energy expenditure), leading to accumulation of fat in adipose tissue (Schrauwen, 2007). Increasing physical activity, particularly aerobic activity, is one method of increasing energy expenditure that has been suggested to assist with weight management (Caudwell et al., 2011). The premise of this strategy is that the accumulation of energy expended through physical activity manifests in a negative energy balance and subsequent reduction in body fat levels (Caudwell et al., 2011).
Clearly, the success of a weight loss strategy involving increased exercise will depend on the degree of compensation through the other components of energy balance (i.e. energy intake, resting energy expenditure and of physical activity; Caudwell et al., 2011). Acute exercise studies have typically reported a transient reduction in subjective appetite (Broom, Stensel, Bishop, Burns, & Miyashita, 2007; Pomerleau, Imbeault, Parker, & Doucet, 2004) and ideal portion size (Farah et al. 2012) during/after exercise, with minimal effect on subsequent energy intake compared to a resting control trial (Schubert, Desbrow, Sabapathy, & Leveritt, 2013). Whilst some studies report a small increase in absolute energy intake (i.e. total energy consumed) after exercise (Martins et al., 2007a, 2007b; Pomerleau et al., 2004; Shorten, Wallman, & Guelfi, 2009), relative energy intake (energy consumed minus energy expended through exercise/rest) is consistently reduced by exercise. Therefore, acute exercise studies suggest exercise produces an environment conducive to weight loss by increasing energy expenditure without a compensatory increase in energy intake.
However, chronic exercise interventions (i.e. ≥8 weeks) have typically not observed the anticipated weight loss that would be expected given the acute effects of exercise on relative energy intake (King, Hopkins, Caudwell, Stubbs, & Blundell, 2008; Turner et al. 2010; Wu, Gao, Chen, & van Dam, 2009). Typically, there is an initial weight loss, however, after this, the rate of weight loss attenuates or weight becomes stable over time (Curioni & Lourenco, 2005; Wu et al., 2009). Whilst there is likely a reduced energy requirement due to the reduction in body mass over time, these studies also suggest there is some alteration in the other components of energy balance to compensate in some way for the energy expended through exercise training. Given that non-prescribed physical activity energy expenditure (Turner et al., 2010) and resting metabolic rate (Lee et al. 2009; Speakman & Selman, 2003) do not appear to change with exercise training, alterations in dietary intake/eating behaviour have been suggested as the likely cause of this effect (Turner et al. 2010).
Aside from what we eat, a critical factor is how much we eat. Factors influencing portion size selection strongly affect energy intake, and therefore represent a crucial aspect of energy balance (Brunstrom, 2011). Previous studies that have investigated the relationship between exercise and energy intake have employed an ad-libitum approach to assess energy intake. In this approach, subjects are presented with a variety of food items in excess amounts and are asked to eat or drink until satiated. In day-to-day living, this type of eating occasion is relatively rare for most humans, with meals generally involving some planning of the type and/or the amount of food selected, in advance of the eating occasion (Brunstrom, 2011). Additionally, food choice is generally reduced in a laboratory environment.
Interestingly, Werle, Wansink, and Payne (2011) reported that participants who answered a series of questions related to exercise served themselves more snacks, and therefore more calories, than those in a control group whose questions were unrelated to exercise. In most cases, exercise sessions are scheduled in advance of being undertaken (i.e. individuals know that they will exercise and likely think about the exercise), meaning the size/nature of any meals prepared/cooked in advance of exercise might be influenced by the knowledge of the upcoming exercise session. However, the design of most previous exercise studies does not allow any planning behaviour in the context of exercise to be directly evaluated in advance of the session. More recently, Sim et al. (2014) reported that inactive overweight males scoring high for dietary restraint increased energy intake at a snack before exercise. These results suggest that exercise might increase energy intake (or planned energy intake) when decisions are made in advance of exercise, although the training and/or weight status of the volunteers may have influenced the results.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine how exercise influences meals planned for the post-exercise period of regularly exercisers by providing subjects with hypothetical exercise and rest scenarios and asking them to plan their post-exercise meal. It was hypothesised that subjects would plan to consume more energy after exercise than after rest.
Section snippets
Subjects
Twenty-four females (age 21 ± 3 years; BMI 22.0 ± 2.8 kg/m2; body fat % 30.1 ± 4.5) and sixteen males (age 26 ± 8 years; BMI 24.0 ± 3.7 kg/m2; body fat % 18.3 ± 5.5) completed this study, which was approved by the Loughborough University Ethics Approvals (Human Participants) Sub Committee (reference number: SSEHS-1917). Before participation, subjects provided written consent, and completed a health screen questionnaire and the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ; Stunkard & Messick, 1985)
Subjective appetite
Pre-trial values for hunger (Z = -1.013; P = 0.311), fullness (Z = -0.014; P = 0.989), DTE (Z = -0.587; P = 0.557) and PFC (Z = -1.356; P = 0.175) were not different between REST and EXERCISE trials (Table 2).
Portion size selection
There was no trial order effect for the total energy content served, with similar amounts served for trial 1 and trial 2 (Trial 1 2990 ± 1096 kJ; Trial 2 2982 ± 1160 kJ; Z = -0.168; P = 0.867). Similarly, there was no difference between trial 1 and trial 2 for energy served from pasta (Z
Discussion
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of exercise on post-exercise meal planning. The main finding was that individuals chose a larger portion size (∼24% increase in energy content of food served) to consume after a hypothetical future aerobic exercise scenario compared to a hypothetical rest scenario.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effect of aerobic exercise on meal planning behaviour in anticipation of exercise. Previous investigations have
Acknowledgements
L.J. James is part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Center, which is a partnership between University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Loughborough University, and the University of Leicester. This report is independent research by the National Institute for Health Research. The views expressed in this publication are those ofthe authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, or the Department of
References (40)
- et al.
Food liking, familiarity and expected satiation selectively influence portion size estimation of snacks and caloric beverages in men
Appetite
(2010) - et al.
Measuring affective (liking) and non-affective (expected satiety) determinants of portion size and food reward
Appetite
(2009) - et al.
“Measuring ‘expected satiety’ in a range of common foods using a method of constant stimuli”
Appetite
(2008) - et al.
“Plasma ghrelin levels during exercise – effects of intensity and duration”
Regulatory Peptides
(2007) - et al.
Using a novel computer-based approach to assess the acute effects of exercise on appetite-related measures
Appetite
(2012) - et al.
What determines real-world meal size? Evidence for pre-meal planning
Appetite
(2011) - et al.
Oral processing characteristics of solid savoury meal components, and relationship with food composition, sensory attributes and expected satiation
Appetite
(2013) - et al.
Expected satiation alone does not predict actual intake of desserts
Appetite
(2018) - et al.
Matching energy intake to expenditure of isocaloric exercise at high- and moderate-intensities
Physiology & Behavior
(2014) - et al.
Acute energy compensation and macronutrient intake following exercise in active and inactive males who are normal weight
Appetite
(2012)
Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems
Physiology & Behavior
Effects of exercise intensity on food intake and appetite in women
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Acute exercise and subsequent energy intake. A meta-analysis
Appetite
Acute effect of environmental temperature during exercise on subsequent energy intake in active men
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Preliminary evidence of sex differences in behavioural and neural responses to palatable food reward in rats
Physiology & Behavior
Widespread reward-system activation in obese women in response to pictures of high-calorie foods
NeuroImage
The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Nonprescribed physical activity energy expenditure is maintained with structured exercise and implicates a compensatory increase in energy intake
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Just thinking about exercise makes me serve more food
Physical activity and calorie compensation”, Appetite
Conditioning 'fullness expectations' in a novel dessert
Appetite
Cited by (6)
Accentuated early postprandial satiety in people with spinal cord injury versus able-bodied controls
2021, AppetiteCitation Excerpt :The HE (2513 kJ, 10 g carbohydrate, 22 g fat, 0.8 g protein) and LE (1008 kJ, 100 g carbohydrate, 22 g fat, 0.8 g protein) preload drinks (Long et al., 2002) were prepared on the morning of the trial. The homogenous pasta meal was prepared the day before the trial, using consistent cooking procedures (Barutcu et al., 2019), before being refrigerated. To determine ad libitum energy intake, participants were presented with the pasta in a large Pyrex bowl, which was served chilled and in excess of predicted consumption (4339 kJ, 59% carbohydrate, 20% fat, 16% protein, 5% fibre).
Exercise-related factors that influence post-exercise energy intake: A psychological perspective
2020, Journal of Science and Medicine in SportCitation Excerpt :A possible explanation for this finding provided by the authors was that participants provided with the high energy expenditure information may have felt more deserving of a reward, and consequently experienced a greater license to consume, whilst the similar ratings of hunger may suggest that participants were not expecting, or planning, to eat more.45 Barutcu et al.46 have corroborated these findings, such that men and women served themselves more food from a pasta and chocolate test meal following a hypothetical ‘hard aerobic’ session than following a period of rest. In other work, Werle et al.47 found that labelling exercise as a scenic 1.6 km walk (which was perceived as ‘fun’), rather than an ‘exercise’ walk, led to reduced subsequent intake of unhealthy snacks, in middle-aged women.
Planned morning aerobic exercise in a fasted state increases energy intake in the preceding 24 h
2021, European Journal of NutritionCold-water effects on energy balance in healthy women during aqua-cycling
2021, International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise MetabolismPlanned Aerobic Exercise Increases Energy Intake at the Preceding Meal
2020, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise