The specificity principle in adoption
Section snippets
Adoption
Adoption among human beings is an extraordinary act. The principal purpose of parenting is to rear offspring to become well-functioning members of a social group or society (Bornstein, 2015, Bornstein, 2019a). Birthing and rearing the next generation are practically an evolutionary imperative (Bjorklund, 2020; Dawkins, 2016). The vast majority of adults in the world become parents, and in that vast majority parenting takes place between a parent and a genetically related child born to that
Specificity in adoption
The picture of adoption that has been developed to date portrays the people, processes, and pathways of the adoption experience in a somewhat piecemeal fashion. Undergirding this perspective, however, lies an assumption of coherence and unity. That is, theory and research have focused on individual areas in a larger picture. From that work, a science of adoption has gradually materialized that reveals that adoption is a subtle and nuanced, constructive and productive phenomenon that is
Specificity principle in adoption: setting condition
Setting conditions of adoption, and important variants of setting, include, for example, the specific pathways toward adoption, specific circumstances that set adoptions in motion, specific place(s) where adoptions occur, specific experiences encountered during adoption, and diverse issues of specific statuses associated with adoption. Each setting condition shapes the nature of adoption uniquely.
Specificity principle in adoption: person
Person is the second term in specificity. All individuals react to significant life-altering events in unique ways, follow unique timetables in adapting to those events, and achieve unique final states of adaptation to those events. Thus, every adoptee, birth parent or adoptive parent, and professional working in adoption develops or adapts in her or his own manner according to person characteristics that are specific to those individuals. Here, individual-difference characteristics of all
The specificity principle in adoption: time
Multiple variations of time likewise moderate adoption. Adoption is life-long (Gladney Center for Adoption, 2019), and all individuals in the adoption tetrad process and adapt to adoption continually over many years. Just as some experiences take longer to embed than others, and the effects of some experiences change over time, so adoption is a temporally unfolding process. When it takes place and when it is observed make a difference. Here, for illustration we review three prominent
The specificity principle in adoption: domain
Specific domains in the adoptee's development and the adoptive tetrad's psychology constitute a fourth moderating factor in adoption. Adoption is neither digital nor uniform, but in accord with relational developmental systems metatheory (Lerner, 2018) adoption is best framed as modular and multidimensional. All manner of the tetrad's beliefs and behaviors have been examined in the adoption literature. Should we expect all domains of life (qua dependent variables) to be affected identically in
The specificity principle in adoption: process
Beyond considerations of specific setting condition, person, time, and domain, what transpires in adoption is moderated by specific processes. Understanding the processes by which setting condition, person, time, and domain influence the adoptive tetrad ought to be a major contemporary focus in adoption thinking and research. The specificity framework presented here contributes to refining theory and empiricism aimed at exploring the processes involved in shaping the adoption experience.
So far,
Terms of the specificity principle in adoption interact
As is expected of moderators, the different terms of the Specificity Principle condition one another. The foregoing treatments of individual terms of the Specificity Principle have hinted at examples of such interactions; here we provide a few specific illustrations that give evidence of expected interactions. Consider the following examples of setting condition, person, domain, and process as each interacts with time.
Is specificity new to adoption?
This article attempts to formalize a Specificity Principle in Adoption. However, specificity is not entirely new to the study of adoption or to developmental or psychological science more generally. The terms that are presented here are terms that are common to the study of human development. All human development occurs in specific settings, refers to specific people, at specific times, and involves specific developmental processes and domains. These specific aspects are basic principles for
The specificity principle, adoption science, and social policy
Even today, with all the progress that has been made in understanding adoption, the field still faces challenges in defining concepts, marshalling appropriate methods of study, and advancing professional interventions (Palacios, 2015). With the foregoing in mind, we can see that the Specificity Principle has implications for adoption science and for social policy in adoption practice. A brief exposition of each is warranted.
Pertinence of the specificity principle in adoption for adoption science
The Specificity Principle has implications for defining and operationalizing adoption. Adoption research has moved in the last half-century from a narrow focus on clinical issues in adoptees to much more differentiated considerations of all adoption players in the tetrad and a wider range of circumstances surrounding adoptions before, during, and after. The terms of specificity identified here could help to refine, concretize, and invigorate theory and research in adoption and propel the thrust
Pertinence of the specificity principle in adoption for adoption practice and policy
The Specificity Principle has implications for the design of interventions and programs in the service of adoption and for policy in ideologies related to adoption. Adoption is a topic that transcends basic research to speak to practice and policy and as well suggests intervention and therapy design changes aimed to improve the adoption experience.
Policy makers need to become mindful of the Specificity Principle and how it can inform their goals and programs. As detailed in specificity,
Conclusions
A majority of newly married couples want and expect to give birth to a child, yet after 1 year of having unprotected sex approximately 15% of couples are unable to conceive (Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2021). Faced with that challenge, individuals must reassess the meaning and value of becoming a parent as well as decide on the additional steps they are willing to take to achieve that goal. Adoption is one prominent and (to many) appealing
Author statement
Both authors contributed to this review.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH/NICHD, USA, and an International Research Fellowship at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, London, UK, funded by the European Research Council under the Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 695300-HKADeC-ERC-2015-AdG).
References (419)
- et al.
Comparing ADHD symptom levels in children adopted from Eastern Europe and from other regions: Discussing possible factors involved
Children and Youth Services Review
(2012) - et al.
The influence of foster parent investment on children’s representations of self and attachment figures
Applied Developmental Psychology
(2005) - et al.
A survival analysis of the length of foster parenting duration and implications for recruitment and retention of foster parents
Children and Youth Services Review
(2017) - et al.
Personality development in the context of individual traits and parenting dynamics
New Ideas in Psychology
(2019) - et al.
Adopting adoption
Animal Behaviour
(1998) - et al.
Sampling in developmental science: Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards
Developmental Review
(2013) - et al.
Mental health in pediatric settings: Distribution of disorders and factors related to service use
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
(2000) - et al.
Reducing stigma in reproductive health
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
(2014) - et al.
An adoption study comparing the prevalence of psychiatric illness in women who have adoptive and natural children compared with women who have adoptive children only
Journal of Affective Disorders
(1995) - et al.
An evaluation of post-adoption services
Children and Youth Services Review
(2007)
Adoption laws
Discrepancies between parent and self-reports of adolescent psychosocial symptoms: Associations with family conflict and asthma outcomes
Journal of Family Psychology
How much income do you have to make to be able to adopt?
Thesaurus of psychological index terms
Mental health in internationally adopted adolescents: A meta-analysis
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Strengthening adoption practice, listening to adoptive families
Child Welfare
Adoption competent clinical practice: Defining its meaning and development
Adoption Quarterly
The psychological adjustment of transracial adoptees: An application of the cultural–racial identity model
Journal of Social Distress and Homeless
Culture camp, ethnic identity, and adoption socialization for Korean adoptees: A pretest and posttest study
“Do you know your real parents?” and other adoption microaggressions
Adoption Quarterly
International adoption: Counseling and the adoption triad
Adoption Quarterly
Searching for contact with birth relatives: Search angels and search facilitators
Journal of Social Work
Delaying adoption disclosure: A survey of late discovery adoptees
Journal of Family Issues
Early maltreatment and current quality of relational care predict socioemotional problems among institutionalized infants and toddlers
Infant Mental Health Journal
The predictors of unsuccessful transition to foster care
Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry
Behavioral and socioemotional adjustment in international adoptees: A comparison between Italian and Spanish adoptive parents’ reports
Adoption Quarterly
Testing an attachment-based parenting intervention-VIPP-FC/A in adoptive families with post-institutionalized children: Do maternal sensitivity and genetic markers count?
Frontiers in Psychology
A matter of attachment? How adoptive parents foster post-institutionalized children’s social and emotional adjustment
Attachment & Human Development
Adoption-related feelings, loss, and curiosity about origins in adopted adolescents
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Predicting adoption disruption
Social Work
Outcomes for drug-exposed children eight years post-adoption
The importance of maternal state of mind regarding attachment and infant age at placement to foster mothers’ representations of their foster infants
Infant Mental Health Journal
Mothers raising daughters: New complexities in cultural socialization for children adopted from China
Adoption Quarterly
Psychiatric disorders and treatment in adoptees: A meta-analytic comparison with non-adoptees
Adoption Quarterly
Remaining or becoming secure: Parental sensitive support predicts attachment continuity from infancy to adolescence in a longitudinal adoption study
Developmental Psychology
Predictors of white adoptive parents’ cultural and racial socialization behaviors with their Asian adopted children
Adoption Quarterly
This is my baby: Foster parents’ feelings of commitment and displays of delight
Infant Mental Health Journal
Foster parenting
Unique challenges and strengths for families formed through international adoption
A sense of belonging: Meanings of family and home in long-term foster care
British Journal of Social Work
Problem behavior of internationally adopted adolescents: A review and meta-analysis
Harvard Review of Psychiatry
Child development in evolutionary perspective
Adopted children and their families: A follow-up of adopted children, their background environment, and adjustment
Sensitive periods in development: Structural characteristics and causal interpretations
Psychological Bulletin
Toward a model of culture↔parent↔child transactions
Children’s parents
The specificity principle in acculturation science
Perspectives on Psychological Science
“Mixed blessings”: Parental religiousness, parenting, and child adjustment in global perspective
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Cited by (4)
Contributions of the specificity principle to theory, research, and application in the study of human development: A view of the issues
2021, Journal of Applied Developmental PsychologyCitation Excerpt :However, when analyzed at the person-specific level, the data indicated that the whole-sample findings only pertained to a subset of schoolchildren, indicating that greater attention needs to be paid to individual specificity in evaluating therapies intended to enhance specific children's psychosocial development (see also Shonkoff and Center on the Developing Child, 2017). Finally, Bornstein and Suwalsky (2021) in explicating “The Specificity Principle in Adoption” explain that that specific setting conditions for adoption of specific adoptees born to specific birth parents and adopted by specific adoptive parents at specific times in the adoptee's life cycle and in history moderate by specific processes outcomes in specific domains in all members of the adoption tetrad. Understanding successes and failures in adoption depends critically on what is studied in whom, how, and when.
Coherent lives: Making sense of adoptees’ experiences in education through narrative identity
2023, British Educational Research JournalIntroduction, personal and professional: A little etymology, a little history
2022, Parenting: Selected Writings of Marc H. BornsteinEnhancing the international study of positive youth development: Process, specificity, and the sample case of character virtues
2021, Journal of Youth Development