Elsevier

Applied Nursing Research

Volume 57, February 2021, 151350
Applied Nursing Research

Curbside consultation: A means to promote quality patient care

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151350Get rights and content

Highlights

What does this paper contribute to the wider global clinical community?

  • Screening nurse practitioners is an essential first step in engaging clinicians in a discussion about a natural clinician behavior, curbside consultation.

  • Nurse practitioners are able to provide quality care resulting in increased patient satisfaction and cost-savings. Improving access to expertise through curbside consultation may be a means of expanding the nurse practitioners’ autonomy and role.

  • A promoter of relationships and institutional culture, curbside consultation may be incorporated in the national strategy to provide impactful, interprofessional, and coordinated care.

  • With effective communication among clinicians, curbside consultation may be an important facilitator to achieve necessary levels of proficiency, assimilation, and knowledge sharing, including evidence-based practices.

Abstract

The objective of this descriptive, cross-sectional study was to describe curbside consultation, a bidirectional informal discussion with a colleague “expert” concerning patient care, among nurse practitioners. Curbside consultations are valuable, yet little is known about this process use for nurse practitioners. A national convenience sample was recruited using online social media platforms and email. Data were collected in June 2019 via Qualtrics survey software. Web-based survey included 80 questions concerning use and definition of curbside consultation, and followed STROBE guidelines for reporting. Questions also concerned work environment, personal and interpersonal qualities, communication modality and patient engagement. Descriptive and survey item analyses including frequency, percentage, means and standard deviation, Chi-square and Fisher's Exact Test, Pearson's correlation analysis, and one-way independent t-tests. Participants included nurse practitioners (N = 402) in primary (51.2%, N = 206) and specialty care (46%, N = 185). Nurse practitioners reported positive experiences with curbside consultations (96.8%, N = 384) and that reliable access to colleagues was correlated with multiple variables, including practice culture (r = 0.494, p = .001). Most reported (99%, N = 387) patients receive better care with successful curbside consultation. Curbside consultations provide nurse practitioners information access at point-of-care for implementation of evidence-based practice to promote quality patient care. Addition of curbside consultation education is a compelling consideration of nurse practitioner curriculum.

Introduction

Curbside consultations (CC) or informal discussions with colleagues about the care of a patient occur commonly and are favored by clinicians as an information-seeking resource. This study describes the process of CC for nurse practitioners (NPs) using a national cross-sectional survey. Understanding the CC process for NPs will allow optimization of this process and identification of potential limitations. Improved communication among clinicians can increase interprofessional collaboration and collegiality for providing holistic patient care using the CC process (IOM, 2015; WHO, 2010).

Section snippets

Background

The translation gap between evidence and practice impedes provision of the best care. Lack of accessible resources contributes to this gap, as clinicians cannot synthesize this information in isolation. The increasing patient volume including elderly with high complexity and multiple co-morbidities also contribute to difficulty in providing evidence-based care (IOM, 2001). Nonetheless, consultation of colleagues through CC is a means for dissemination of new knowledge and occur frequently. CC

Sociodemographics

The majority of all participants (N = 402) were female (93%, N = 374) with a mean age of 43.9 ± 10.1 years (see Table 1). Participants represented 48 of the 50 states in the United States as demonstrated by the zip codes. The participants included primary care (51.2%, N = 206) and specialty care (46%, N = 185) NPs. The largest percentage of NPs currently practiced in family or internal medicine settings (38.3%, N = 154) (see Table 2). The majority of NPs reported a full or independent practice

Discussion

Socio-demographics of the survey population are similar to NPs nationally. The national average age of NPs is 49 years, and average practice is 10 years (NP Fact Sheet, 2019). NPs are familiar with the term, “CC”, yet there is diversity in defining CC, substantiating previous qualitative findings. Previous systematic review evaluating the definition of CC, “without formal consultation” was mentioned in 8 of the 15 studies and appears to be an important aspect of CC (Papermaster & Champion, 2017

Conclusion

CC brings individual, bidirectional answers that accelerate patient care (Cook et al., 2014). These survey findings advance an understanding of the CC process including overall beliefs and values of the experience, advantages and disadvantages, decision-making and approach. Dimensions of CC including personal and interpersonal, environmental, and patient-centered were explored.

There are many obstacles to providing quality patient care. CC is valuable to NPs, with most NPs reporting improved

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Amy Papermaster: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Visualization. Jane Dimmitt Champion: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Visualization, Supervision, Writing - review & editing.

References (32)

  • M.A. Clarke et al.

    Information needs and information-seeking behaviour analysis of primary care physicians and nurses: A literature review

    Health Information & Libraries Journal

    (2013)
  • K.W. Cogdill

    Information needs and information seeking in primary care: A study of nurse practitioners

    Journal of the Medical Library Association

    (2003)
  • R.F. DeVellis

    Scale development: Theory and applications

    (2017)
  • G. Eysenbach

    Improving the quality of Web surveys: The checklist for reporting results of internet E-surveys (CHERRIES)

    Journal of Medical Internet Research

    (2004)
  • Institute of Medicine

    Committee on quality of health care in America

  • Institute of Medicine

    Measuring the impact interprofessional education and collaborative practice and patient outcomes

    (2015)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text