Original research
Social Support and Actual Versus Expected Length of Stay in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities

Presented in part as a poster to the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, October 28, 2015, Dallas, TX.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

To describe impairment-specific patterns in shorter- and longer-than-expected lengths of stay in inpatient rehabilitation, and examine the independent effects of social support on deviations from expected lengths of stay.

Setting

Inpatient rehabilitation facilities.

Participants

Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries (N=119,437) who were discharged from inpatient rehabilitation facilities in 2012 after stroke, lower extremity fracture, or lower extremity joint replacement.

Intervention

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

Relative length of stay (actual minus expected). The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services posts annual expected lengths of stay based on patients' clinical profiles at admission. We created a 3-category outcome variable: short, expected, long. Our primary independent variable (social support) also included 3 categories: family/friends, paid/other, none.

Results

Mean ± SD actual lengths of stay for joint replacement, fracture, and stroke were 9.8±3.6, 13.8±4.5, and 15.8±7.3 days, respectively; relative lengths of stay were −1.2±3.1, −1.6±3.7, and −1.7±5.2 days. Nearly half of patients (47%–48%) were discharged more than 1 day earlier than expected in all 3 groups, whereas 14% of joint replacement, 15% of fracture, and 20% of stroke patients were discharged more than 1 day later than expected. In multinomial regression analysis, using family/friends as the reference group, paid/other support was associated (P<.05) with higher odds of long stays in joint replacement. No social support was associated with lower odds of short stays in all 3 impairment groups and higher odds of long stays in fracture and joint replacement.

Conclusions

Inpatient rehabilitation experiences and outcomes can be substantially affected by a patient's level of social support. More research is needed to better understand these relationships and possible unintended consequences in terms of patient access issues and provider-level quality measures.

Section snippets

Data source

Medicare data were obtained from the CMS. We selected patients discharged from IRFs in 2012 using the 100% Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility–Patient Assessment Instrument file. We then linked the assessment data from those cases to the claims data in the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review file and the enrollment and demographic data in the Beneficiary Summary File.10, 11 A data usage agreement was established with the CMS, and the study was approved by the university's institutional review

Results

Table 1 provides sample characteristics for the 3 impairment groups. Mean ages ± SD ranged from 73.2±9.2 years for joint replacement to 79.7±9.4 years for fracture. The percentages of patients reporting they have family or friends, or both, for social support for fracture, joint replacement, and stroke were 62%, 65%, and 69%, respectively. Admission FIM motor ratings ranged from 35.8±10.0 for fracture to 42.7±9.2 for joint replacement. The percentages of patients with no tier comorbidities were

Discussion

Many studies2, 3, 4, 5 have reported on the trend in decreasing lengths of stay since implementation of the IRF prospective payment system and have examined the potential impacts of these shorter stays on clinical outcomes. However, there is no published information on the degree to which the Medicare inpatient rehabilitation population deviates from its condition-specific expected lengths of stay, or on patient characteristics that may be associated with either shorter- or longer-than-expected

Conclusions

Almost half of Medicare beneficiaries receiving inpatient rehabilitation services for stroke, lower extremity fracture, and joint replacement are discharged more than 1 day earlier than expected. Our findings provide new information on variables influencing length of stay to the growing body of evidence that inpatient rehabilitation experiences and outcomes can be substantially affected by a patient's level of social support. More research is needed to better understand the effects of social

Supplier

  • a.

    SAS for Windows, version 9.3; SAS Institute, Inc.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jessica M. Jarvis, BS, and Ioannis Malagaris, MS, for their contributions in formulating and designing the project and their critical feedback during the development of this manuscript.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (8)

  • Association of Caregiver Availability and Training With Patient Community Discharge After Stroke

    2023, Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation
  • A novel comorbidity risk score for predicting postoperative 30-day complications in total shoulder arthroplasty and elucidation of potential racial disparities

    2022, JSES International
    Citation Excerpt :

    Descriptive statistics were calculated using Chi-squared tests and one-way analysis of variance where appropriate. For initial assessment of the comorbidities to be assessed,2,4,11,14,17,22,23,34 univariate logistic regressions were used. Factors that were significant under this analysis were included in a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis modeling the odds of any complication based on comorbidity factors.

  • Moving Back Into the Community: Obstacles for People With an Acquired Brain Injury or Physical Disability

    2022, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
    Citation Excerpt :

    Other involved individuals could be a spouse or partner, family, friends, or health care providers. Previous studies have shown that tangible social support, such as living with a family member or a friend, or emotional support for the consumer’s decision to return to the community, are critical determinants of successful transitions.17,19–22,31,32 Lack of family support may be because of a worsening of the individual’s condition, 24-hour or intensive care requirements, belief that needs would be better met in long-term care, amount of care required to manage incontinence or memory issues, and lack of interest or ability to manage support staff.22,33

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (grant nos. P2CHD065702 and K01HD086290) and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. 90IF0071).

Disclosures: none.

View full text