Induced geochemical reactions by compressed air energy storage in a porous formation in the North German Basin
Introduction
As a means of reducing greenhouse gas emission and mitigating climate change effects, renewable energy sources are increasingly substituting fossil fuels. Wind farms and solar power stations are the major sources for renewable energy production, which implies strong fluctuations in electric power generation in the short term due to changing weather conditions and in the longer term due to seasonality effects. To compensate for these fluctuations, a large storage demand of electrical energy is required, with estimates up to 50 TWh for Germany (Bräutigam et al., 2017) or 600 GWh for Denmark aiming for 80% renewable energy share (Sorknæs et al., 2013). Grid-scale standby storage systems in the geological subsurface provide promising storage options, due to their large potential storage capacities, high achievable input and output rates and their flexibility to be employed on time scales varying from hourly to seasonally (Kabuth et al., 2017).
Of these options, large-scale compressed air energy storage (CAES) in the subsurface is one of the gas storage options which is able to compensate strong fluctuations on the hourly to daily basis (Budt et al., 2016). CAES represents a “power to power” energy storage option (Sternberg and Bardow, 2015), which converts off-peak electricity to mechanical energy in the form of pressurized air, stores the compressed air in the subsurface geological formations and retrieves the stored air during times of peak electricity demand to produce power using gas turbines. Currently, only two CAES facilities, i.e. in Huntorf, Germany, and in McIntosh, US, are operating, both using subsurface salt caverns to store the compressed air (Kushnir et al., 2012). Because suitable geological salt formations for mining the required caverns are not widely available but porous formations are more frequently occurring, porous formation storage of compressed air becomes a promising world-wide option (Succar and Williams, 2008). Moreover, porous formations can provide much larger potential storage capacities (Kabuth et al., 2017). Although currently no CAES in porous formations is operating, the concept has been shown feasible in first studies in the 1980s at a field test site in Pittsfield, Illinois, USA (ANR Storage Company, 1990).
The operation of CAES using porous formations as storage reservoirs is governed by thermal (T), hydraulic (H), mechanical (M) and chemical (C) processes and induces relevant impacts, and a reliable quantification of these is required for designing and dimensioning a storage operation (Bauer et al., 2015, 2013). In terms of the induced hydraulic, mechanic and thermal processes, CAES is comparable to natural gas storage or carbon dioxide capture and storage, which are well known from decades of experience in the oil and gas industry as well as recent research efforts. Anticlinal sites show especially high potential (e.g. Mitiku and Bauer (2013)) for CAES in a porous formation, therefore, the induced pressure is highest as well as lowest at the gas wells and needs to stay within the pressure thresholds for formation damage (Wang and Bauer, 2017a). Due to the expected short operational cycles in CAES, the pressure response during the cyclic operation will be restricted mainly to the gas reservoir (Wang and Bauer, 2017b). The induced temperature change in the storage formation can be limited to only a few Kelvin, as the temperature of injected air from the compressor is cooled down close to the reservoir temperature (Oldenburg and Pan, 2013a). A cyclic operation may introduce cyclic stresses in the formation rock, and Erikson (1983) found a loss of 22% in permeability during the first cycle due to the hysteresis effect for St. Peter sandstone, and much smaller decreases in subsequent cycles as the sandstone shows an elastic behavior.
However, the potentially induced chemical impacts by CAES in a porous formation differ significantly from those of other gas storages, as air containing oxygen is introduced into porous geological formations long-free of oxygen. If redox-sensitive or ferrous-containing minerals are present, such as pyrite (FeS2, iron disulfide), oxidation processes will be induced. These oxidation processes are known from carbon dioxide storage considering oxygen as an impurity (André et al., 2015; Jung et al., 2013; Pearce et al., 2016b, 2016a; Wei et al., 2015), but not studied for the case of CAES applications. Operating CAES in a pyrite containing formations induces pyrite oxidation, and thus the oxygen in the stored air will be partly or completely consumed (ANR Storage Company, 1990). Without a refill of the storage reservoir, the reduced fraction of oxygen in the stored air may potentially cause a failure of a diabatic CAES facility, because the air extracted from the storage may not contain enough oxygen for the gas combustion process required to heat the expanding gas. Studies on acid mine drainage indicate that pyrite oxidation with on-going supply of oxygen, e.g. near gas wells for CAES operation, can lower the pH to very acidic conditions (INAP, 2012; Nordstrom et al., 2015), which thus increases the risk of wellbore corrosion at the gas storage wells. Meanwhile, mineral precipitation induced by geochemical reactions may clog the pore space, thus reducing porosity and permeability of the storage formation, which would again lower the well deliverability and power output (Pei et al., 2015).
Due to these induced geochemical reactions and potential impacts, a reliable quantification of induced geochemical reactions is a prerequisite for assessing the feasibility of porous media CAES. This study therefore focusses on investigating and quantifying potential induced geochemical impacts of a porous formation CAES operation. Potential porous media storage formations are present in the North German Basin (Hese, 2012, 2011), which stretches over parts of Germany, Poland, Denmark, the Netherlands and Great Britain. In this work, the Rhaetian sandstone formation is investigated as a potential storage formation for CAES, as it is well characterized and has been shown suitable in previous research for use in hydrogen storage (Pfeiffer et al., 2017, 2016a; Pfeiffer and Bauer, 2015) or CO2 storage (Mitiku et al., 2013). As the mineral composition of the Rhaetian sandstone shows the presence of pyrite (Dethlefsen et al., 2014; Mitiku et al., 2013), the induced pyrite oxidation and other geochemical reactions are investigated under a consistent geochemical reaction system for the Rhaetian sandstone. The induced impacts on the stored air as well as the storage formation are also quantified using scenario analysis and process based kinetic batch modelling of such a geochemical system.
Section snippets
Scenario definition
A synthetic diabatic CAES scenario is used here, assuming the same gas turbine as in the Huntorf power plant. With a minimum inlet pressure of 4.3 MPa, this gas turbine can produce 321 MW of electric power at an air mass flow rate of 417 kg/s and a natural gas mass flow rate of 11 kg/s (E.ON SE, 2016; Hoffeins, 1994; Hoffeins and Mohmeyer, 1986; Kushnir et al., 2012). The natural gas is required to heat the expanded air, which cools considerably in the turbine due to the Joule-Thompson effect.
Software
The coupled multiphase-multicomponent ECLIPSE-OpenGeoSys-PHREEQC simulator (see Pfeiffer et al. (2016b)) is used to quantify the induced geochemical reactions and the potential changes in composition of the stored air, the formation fluid and the solid mineral phase. The individual simulations codes used in the coupled simulator are briefly described in the following:
- •
ECLIPSE is a robust and widely-used reservoir simulators in the oil and gas industry for exploration and production predictions (
Short- and long-term change in the stored air pressure and composition
The kinetic batch model using the concept of constant volume was applied to investigate the short- and long-term changes of stored air pressure and air composition due to induced geochemical reactions. As one storage cycle consists of 6 h of air injection and 6 h of air extraction, air has a residence time of 12 h in the gas reservoir. Two different reservoir pressures were used, with 7.10 MPa representing the average pressure during one storage cycle and 10.65 MPa representing the highest
Influence of mineral reactive surface area
Parametrization of geochemical reactions in geochemical models involves a range of uncertainties, as e.g. the amount of pyrite reactive surface area may spatially vary strongly. During the Rhaetian time, the depositional system in the Northern German Basin changed spatially from a non-marine system in the east through a paralic system in the middle to a marine setting in the west (Doornenbal and Stevenson, 2010). These sedimentary conditions typically lead to a strong variation in grain sizes
Gas phase mixing in the storage reservoir
The short-term changes in stored air composition during one storage cycle assessed using the kinetic batch model show a very small decrease in oxygen content due to the induced geochemical reactions. This shows that on this short time scale no geochemical impacts on storage operation will occur. The long-term changes in stored air composition however indicate that the mole fraction of oxygen in stored air may be reduced to below MOC and even to zero at large time scales. In this case, an
Conclusions
A synthetic diabatic compressed air energy storage (CAES) based on the existing Huntorf facility and employing the Rhaetian sandstone formation in the North German Basin as porous storage reservoir is investigated for induced geochemical reactions. The chosen mineral assemblage shows the presence of pyrite in the Rhaetian sandstone, so that CAES in this porous formation will induce geochemical reactions mainly governed by pyrite oxidation. A geochemical reaction system for the Rhaetian
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the funding of the ANGUSII joint project by the German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) (grant number 03ET6122A), as well as the support of the Project Management Jülich (PTJ). We also thank Dr. Christof Beyer, Dr. Dedong Li, Dr. Wolf Tilmann Pfeiffer and Dr. Markus Ebert for all the great help and the fruitful discussions with them.
References (90)
- et al.
Thermal–hydraulic–mechanical behavior of bentonite and sand-bentonite materials as seal for a nuclear waste repository: Numerical simulation of column experiments
Appl. Clay Sci.
(2017) - et al.
Quantifying induced effects of subsurface renewable energy storage
Energy Procedia
(2015) - et al.
Evaluation of mineral reactive surface area estimates for prediction of reactivity of a multi-mineral sediment
Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta
(2016) - et al.
Short- and long-term regional pressure build-up during CO2 injection and its applicability for site monitoring
Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control
(2013) - et al.
Schwertmannite and the chemical modeling of iron in acid sulfate waters
Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta
(1996) - et al.
Integration of field measurements and reactive transport modelling to evaluate contaminant transport at a sulfide mine tailings impoundment
J. Contam. Hydrol.
(2006) - et al.
A review on compressed air energy storage: Basic principles, past milestones and recent developments
Appl. Energy
(2016) - et al.
Geochemical modeling of CO2 storage in deep reservoirs: The Weyburn Project (Canada) case study
Chem. Geol.
(2009) - et al.
The mechanisms of pyrite oxidation and leaching: A fundamental perspective
Surf. Sci. Rep.
(2010) - et al.
Reactive transport modelling of the impact of CO2 injection on the clayey cap rock at Sleipner (North Sea)
Chem. Geol.
(2005)
The coupled simulator ECLIPSE–OpenGeoSys for the simulation of CO2 storage in saline formations
Energy Procedia
Iron oxyhydroxide coating of pyrite for acid mine drainage control
Appl. Geochem.
Effect of oxygen co-injected with carbon dioxide on Gothic shale caprock-CO2-brine interaction during geologic carbon sequestration
Chem. Geol.
Evaluation of long-term mineral trapping at the Ketzin pilot site for CO2 storage: An integrative approach using geochemical modelling and reservoir simulation
Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control
A unified phase equilibrium model for hydrogen solubility and solution density
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
Geochemical modelling of CO2–water–rock interactions in a potential storage formation of the North German sedimentary basin
Appl. Geochem.
Hydrogeochemistry and microbiology of mine drainage: An update
Appl. Geochem.
Reactivity of micas and cap-rock in wet supercritical CO2with SO2and O2at CO2storage conditions
Appl. Geochem.
Mineralogical controls on porosity and water chemistry during O2-SO2-CO2reaction of CO2storage reservoir and cap-rock core
Appl. Geochem.
Thermodynamic impact of aquifer permeability on the performance of a compressed air energy storage plant
Energy Convers. Manag.
Attenuation of pyrite oxidation with a fly ash pre-barrier: Reactive transport modelling of column experiments
Appl. Geochem.
Subsurface porous media hydrogen storage – scenario development and simulation
Energy Procedia
Sodium sulphate and sodium chloride effects on batch culture of iron oxidising bacteria
Hydrometallurgy
Pressure response of large-scale compressed air energy storage in porous formations
Energy Procedia
Geochemical impact of aquifer storage for impure CO2 containing O2 and N2: Tongliao field experiment
Appl. Energy
The kinetics and electrochemical rate-determining step of aqueous pyrite oxidation
Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta
Numerical simulation of reactive processes in an experiment with partially saturated bentonite
J. Contam. Hydrol.
Reactive transport modeling to study changes in water chemistry induced by CO2 injection at the Frio-I Brine Pilot
Chem. Geol.
Computer simulation of CO2 trapped through mineral precipitation in the Rose Run Sandstone, Ohio
Appl. Geochem.
Long-term variations of CO2 trapped in different mechanisms in deep saline formations: A case study of the Songliao Basin, China
Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control
THEREDA. Thermodynamic Reference Database.Final Report
Pyrite oxidation in unsaturated aquifer sediments. Reaction stoichiometry and rate of oxidation
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Modeling the Geochemical Impact of an Injection of CO2 and Associated Reactive Impurities (SO2 and O2) into a Saline Reservoir
Transport Porous Media
Compressed-air energy storage: Pittsfield aquifer field test; Test data: engineering analysis and evaluation. Detroit, Michigan
Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution
Impacts of the use of the geological subsurface for energy storage: an investigation concept
Environ. Earth Sci.
Dynamics of fluids in porous media
Introduction to modeling of transport phenomena in porous media
Surface passivation model explains pyrite oxidation kinetics in column experiments with up to 11 bars p(O2)
Environ. Earth Sci.
Modelling CO2-induced fluid--rock interactions in the Altensalzwedel gas reservoir. Part II: coupled reactive transport simulation
Environ. Earth Sci.
The nanoscale basis of CO2 trapping for geologic storage
Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett.
The Energy Storage Market in Germany Small-scale Battery Systems
Hydraulic properties of porous media
Hydrol. Pap. Color. State Univ.
Studies of concentrated electrolyte solutions using the electrodynamic balance. 1. Water activities for single-electrolyte solutions
J. Phys. Chem.
Formation
Cited by (11)
Integration of geological compressed air energy storage into future energy supply systems dominated by renewable power sources
2023, Energy Conversion and ManagementFull cycle modeling of inter-seasonal compressed air energy storage in aquifers
2023, EnergyCitation Excerpt :In terms of field trials, initially the US Department of Energy conducted aquifer injection and production tests in Pittsfield, Illinois, demonstrating that air injection into an aquifer can form a large air bubble and verifying that aquifers can be used for compressed air energy storage [18], followed by the US Department of Energy's effort to build a 270 MW CAESA power plant in Iowa, which was finally terminated after detailed geological investigation and analysis found that the high heterogeneity and low permeability of the reservoir prevented it from achieving the desired scale [19]. In terms of theoretical studies and simulations, an approximate analytical solution for the pressure change in the pore space of anisotropic reservoirs was established, and the stable conditions of the well pressure and the gas-water interface were determined, through theoretical research on the air flow in the aquifer of the CAESA system [20]; subsequently, much work was carried out on the theories and simulations of the porous media compressed air energy storage (PM-CAES) system [21], the influence of the initial air bubble on the CAESA system [22], the similarities and differences between CAESA and CAESC systems [23], the geochemical reactions during CAESA operations [24], the influence of reservoir heterogeneity on the CAESA system [25], etc. The corresponding studies demonstrated the feasibility of the CAESA system, and on this basis, a series of methods were analyzed to improve the energy efficiency of the CAESA system, such as increasing the air injection temperature [26], coupling geothermal energy [27], using man-made low-permeability barriers [28], etc.
Numerical study on the impacts of layered heterogeneity on the underground process in compressed air energy storage in aquifers
2022, Journal of Energy StorageCitation Excerpt :Inspired by the experience of natural gas storage engineering in aquifers, compressed air energy storage in aquifers (CAESA) has been proposed, which utilizes appropriate brine aquifers as the air storage space [9,10]. A schematic diagram of CAESA is shown in Fig. 1 [11]. In comparison with the salt cavern, CAESA has two advantages.