Elsevier

Applied Geochemistry

Volume 50, November 2014, Pages 130-141
Applied Geochemistry

Intercomparison of tritium and noble gases analyses, 3H/3He ages and derived parameters excess air and recharge temperature

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.03.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Key results of the groundwater age-dating interlaboratory comparison exercise.

  • The reproducibility of the tritium measurements was 13.5%.

  • The noble gas reproducibility was <2% (R, He, Ne) and <3% (Ar, Kr, Xe).

  • The measurement uncertainty meets the requirements for 3H/3He dating.

  • Other sources of uncertainty are less well defined than the analytical uncertainty.

Abstract

Groundwater age dating with the tritium–helium (3H/3He) method has become a powerful tool for hydrogeologists. The uncertainty of the apparent 3H/3He age depends on the analytical precision of the 3H measurement and the uncertainty of the tritiogenic 3He component. The goal of this study, as part of the groundwater age-dating interlaboratory comparison exercise, was to quantify the analytical uncertainty of the 3H and noble gas measurements and to assess whether they meet the requirements for 3H/3He dating and noble gas paleotemperature reconstruction.

Samples for the groundwater dating intercomparison exercise were collected on 1 February, 2012, from three previously studied wells in the Paris Basin (France). Fourteen laboratories participated in the intercomparison for tritium analyses and ten laboratories participated in the noble gas intercomparison. Not all laboratories analyzed samples from every borehole.

The reproducibility of the tritium measurements was 13.5%. The reproducibility of the 3He/4He ratio and 4He, Ne, Ar, Kr and Xe concentrations was 1.4%, 1.8%, 1.5%, 2.2%, 2.9%, and 2.4% respectively.

The uncertainty of the tritium and noble gas measurements results in a typical 3H/3He age precision of better than 2.5 years in this case. However, the measurement uncertainties for the noble gas concentrations are insufficient to distinguish the appropriate excess air model if the measured helium concentration is not included. While the analytical uncertainty introduces an unavoidable source of uncertainty in the 3H/3He apparent age estimate, other sources of uncertainty are often much greater and less well defined than the analytical uncertainty.

Introduction

Groundwater age dating with the tritium–helium (3H/3He) method has become a powerful tool for hydrogeologists. The principle of 3H/3He dating (Tolstikhin and Kamenski, 1969) is the decay of radioactive 3H (half-life τ½ = 12.32 a (Lucas and Unterweger, 2000)) to helium-3 (3He) and the accumulation of the decay product 3He in groundwater. Combined determination of the 3H and tritiogenic 3He (3Hetrit) concentrations in groundwater allows for the calculation of the apparent 3H/3He age (τ) given the decay constant of 3H (λ = ln(2)/τ½ = 0.05626 a−1) (Eq. (1)).τ=ln1+3Hetrit3Hλ-1

The apparent 3H/3He age corresponds to the groundwater travel time under the assumption that 3He is confined in groundwater below the water table and both 3H and 3He are transported at the same rate as the groundwater flow. First applications of 3H/3He dating were published in 1987 (Takaoka and Mizutani, 1987) and 1988 (Poreda et al., 1988, Schlosser et al., 1988).

Tritium is naturally produced in the atmosphere by cosmic radiation resulting in a tritium concentration in precipitation of less than 10 tritium units (1 TU corresponds to a 3H/1H ratio of 10−18). Large quantities of 3H were released into the stratosphere since 1953 by above ground testing of thermonuclear devices. 3H enters the groundwater system by infiltration of tritiated water (3H1HO) in precipitation. The historical concentrations of tritium in precipitation have been monitored at several locations around the world by the Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation (GNIP) network and are available online from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Groundwater contains 3He from five sources: equilibration with the atmosphere, excess air from bubble entrainment in the unsaturated zone, nuclear fission of 6Li (nucleogenic: 6Li(n,α) 3H  3He) associated with the production of 4He by U–Th decay (radiogenic 4He) (Schlosser et al., 1989), mantle helium and tritium decay (tritiogenic). 3H/3He dating requires calculating the tritiogenic component by subtracting the atmospheric components (equilibrium and excess air) from the measured 3He concentration (if the nucleogenic and mantle helium components are negligible). If the recharge temperature is known, the excess air is assumed to be unfractionated with respect to the atmosphere and the 4He/Ne ratio indicates that no terrigenic helium (radiogenic or mantle helium) is present, the atmospheric component can be derived from the concentration of 4He. If terrigenic helium is present, the atmospheric helium component can be derived from the concentration of neon (Schlosser et al., 1989) assuming a known recharge temperature and unfractionated or no excess air. A more advanced method is to derive the atmospheric 3He component from inverse fitting the concentrations of the other noble gases to excess air fractionation models. The resulting “derived parameters” (noble gas recharge temperature, excess air amount and fractionation) are in itself useful proxies of past recharge conditions (Aeschbach-Hertig et al., 2000, Stute et al., 1995). Radiogenic helium is also a tracer for groundwater age, typically in the range of 103 to 106 years (Marine, 1979).

The uncertainty of the apparent 3H/3He age (στ) depends on the analytical precision of the 3H measurement (σ3H) and uncertainty of the tritiogenic 3He component (σ3Hetrit) derived from the propagation of the noble gas measurement uncertainty (Solomon et al., 1993). σ3Hetrit includes the uncertainty of the helium isotope ratio of a terrigenic component, if present. A linear approximation of the age uncertainty is given by Eq. (2).στ=λ-13H+3Hetrit-1σ3Hetrit2+3Hetrit3H2σ3H21/2

The uncertainty of the tritiogenic 3He component includes the uncertainty in the determination of the recharge temperature and excess air fractionation (Ballentine and Hall, 1999). The purpose of this study, as part of the groundwater age-dating interlaboratory comparison exercise (Labasque et al., 2014) including also CFC and SF6 dating techniques (Labasque, 2014), was to quantify the uncertainty related to field-sampling procedures as well as the analytical uncertainty of the 3H and noble gas measurements, and the resulting uncertainty of the apparent 3H/3He ages and derived parameters.

For low-level tritium activity measurements in water, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) regularly organizes interlaboratory comparison exercises (“TRIC”, Gröning, 2009). The last exercise, TRIC2008, included the results from 63 participating laboratories anonymously submitting the analysis results of five low level (<15 TU) tritium samples. The five samples are prepared by IAEA by gravimetric dilution of tritiated standard water with water of near-zero tritium concentration.

No such exercise exists for the analysis of noble gases in water samples. Interlaboratory comparison occurs occasionally when two laboratories with the same analytical capabilities participate in the same research project. Developments of new sampling or analytical techniques are often validated against accepted methods, often at the same laboratory (Roether et al., 2013). This is the first interlaboratory comparison exercise for noble gas analyses in water samples. The goal of this study was to assess how the demonstrated sampling and analytical uncertainty propagate into the 3H/3He groundwater age and noble gas paleotemperature reconstruction.

Section snippets

Methods

A detailed presentation of the experiment design, site geological and hydrogeological context and participants is given in (Labasque et al., 2014). Samples for the intercomparison exercise were collected from existing and previously studied wells. The observed variability is due to both analytical procedures and sample collection. The stability of the well was confirmed by repeat samples and field measurements during the time it took to collect all samples for the intercomparison exercise (

Measured tritium concentrations

Tritium was reported for 17 samples from the Albian borehole. Measured tritium concentrations are near zero in the Albian borehole (Fig. 1g, Table 3). Negative reported values for the Albian are expressed in the Fig. 1g boxplot. Two measured values were identified as outliers for the Albian samples. The tritium concentration was below the detection limit for nine of the 12 laboratories (14 of the 19 samples analyzed). Tritium was measured above the measurement uncertainty by two laboratories at

Measurement uncertainties

The uncertainty of a tritium measurement is less than 15% for the two samples containing 2.6 and 6.4 TU of tritium. Some laboratories provide measurements that appear to be biased from the borehole means of SLP4 and SLP5, pointing towards opportunities for improvement by recalibrating. Validating the results against a new tritium standard and participating in the IAEA TRIC exercises is recommended.

The single sample reproducibility was 1.3% for the helium isotope ratio, 1.5% for the helium and

Conclusions

This first intercomparison exercise for 3H/3He groundwater ages investigated the measurement uncertainty for the 3H/3He age dating community as a whole thanks to the participation of a large number of laboratories. Performing the exercise has not only provided an independent assessment of laboratory performance and a demonstration that such assessments are needed and are useful, but also with invaluable experience in organization and preparation for the joint sampling event.

A future 3H/3He

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the participating laboratories for providing the GDAT team with tritium and noble gas isotope analyses. We thank “Source du Val Saint-Lambert” for permission to sample the boreholes. We thank Peter Cook, Daren Gooddy, Ed Busenberg, Niel Plummer, Axel Suckow, Kip Solomon for discussions on the design of the GDAT intercomparison exercise and László Palcsu for his comments on the manuscript. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Part of this work

References (32)

  • W. Aeschbach-Hertig et al.

    Interpretation of dissolved atmospheric noble gases in natural waters

    Water Resour. Res.

    (1999)
  • W. Aeschbach-Hertig et al.

    Palaeotemperature reconstruction from noble gases in ground water taking into account equilibration with entrapped air

    Nature

    (2000)
  • U. Beyerle et al.

    A mass spectrometric system for the analysis of noble gases and tritium from water samples

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2000)
  • R.H. Byrd et al.

    A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization

    SIAM J. Sci. Comput.

    (1995)
  • J.A. Corcho Alvarado et al.

    Constraining the age distribution of highly mixed groundwater using 39Ar: a multiple environmental tracer (3H/3He, 85Kr, 39Ar, and 14C) study in the semiconfined Fontainebleau Sands Aquifer (France)

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2007)
  • J.A. Corcho Alvarado et al.

    European climate variations over the past half-millennium reconstructed from groundwater

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (28)

    • Machine learning predictions of mean ages of shallow well samples in the Great Lakes Basin, USA

      2021, Journal of Hydrology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Locally, many variables determine and are affected by the groundwater age; it is therefore not surprising to find differences between the GBM model and the tracer-based estimates of age. There is substantial uncertainty in tracer-based groundwater age estimates (Green et al., 2014; Visser et al., 2014; Massoudieh et al., 2014), especially, for example, for a sample with only a single tracer consisting of a low tritium concentration. In the GBM, changes in hydrogeochemistry over the timespan of sampling (1979 to 2017) potentially add noise and complexity to the relationships of predictor variables with age.

    • New evidences on groundwater dynamics from the Souss-Massa system (Morocco): Insights gained from dissolved noble gases

      2019, Applied Geochemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Dissolved noble gases have been widely used over decades as tracers of environmental conditions and groundwater age indicators in hydrogeology (Althaus et al., 2009; Batlle-Aguilar et al., 2017; Kaudse et al., 2016; Moeck et al., 2017; Tomonaga et al., 2016; Visser et al., 2016, 2014; Wang et al., 2015).

    • Dating groundwater with dissolved silica and CFC concentrations in crystalline aquifers

      2018, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Because no single tracer can determine the distribution of groundwater ages across these timescales, multi tracer approaches are necessary for reliable groundwater dating (Abbott et al., 2016). Several tracers are well suited to determine residence times for timescales relevant to nutrient pollution, including 3H/3He and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), because the atmospheric concentration of these gases were altered by human activity coincident with the great acceleration of nutrient loading in the mid-1900s (Aquilina et al., 2012b; Cook and Herczeg, 2000; Labasque et al., 2014; Steffen et al., 2015; Visser et al., 2014). However, CFC methods now lack resolution in the 5–20 years range because their atmospheric concentrations peaked around 1998 following their prohibition by the Kyoto Protocol (Fig. 1).

    • A compact tritium enrichment unit for large sample volumes with automated re-filling and higher enrichment factor

      2016, Applied Radiation and Isotopes
      Citation Excerpt :

      Enrichment factors in excess of 100 can be achieved which enables measurement of environmental 3H activities as low as 0.05 TU in water samples. This system may provide a lower cost reliable alternative to the tedious and expensive 3H/3He technique (Visser et al., 2014) for measuring 3H activities lower than 1 TU in water. The adoption of the 2H enrichment technique was previously difficult with isotope ratio mass spectrometry due to cost and the sample size requirements, and the need to measure highly enriched samples (up to ~60,000‰ or 10,000 ppm).

    • Nitrate vulnerability projections from Bayesian inference of multiple groundwater age tracers

      2016, Journal of Hydrology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Noble gas samples (9.75 cm3 pinch-clamped copper tubes) were analyzed for dissolved concentrations of neon, krypton and xenon by a quadrupole mass spectrometer (SRS RGA200) using isotope dilution (22Ne, 86Kr and 136Xe), argon by high capacitance manometer, and helium isotopes by a static sector field mass spectrometer (VG5400) (Visser et al., 2013d). Noble gas recharge temperature, tritiogenic 3He and terrigenic 4He components were derived assuming unfractionated excess air (Moore et al., 2006; Visser et al., 2014b). The uncertainty in the derived parameters was calculated by propagating the analytical uncertainty (Visser et al., 2014a).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +33 1 69 08 41 72.

    2

    Tel.: +1 514 987 3000x7786.

    3

    Tel.: +33 2 23 23 65 89.

    4

    Tel.: +1 925 423 0956.

    View full text