Techno-economic study of NMMO pretreatment and biogas production from forest residues
Introduction
The global market and demand for biogas as a vehicle fuel, electricity production, and even as a heating energy source has had a positive trend. The biogas is produced in household digesters to provide cooking or lightening energy to replace kerosene or LPG, while the larger plants burn it in gas engines to produce electricity or upgrade it to almost pure methane to inject in the gas grids or compress it to CBG (compressed biogas) and sell as car fuel. The traditional substrates utilized for biogas production are municipal solid waste, organic wastes from industrial and agricultural activities, as well as high strength wastewater are. However, these sources are limited, and there is a demand for the development of new technologies utilizing other substrates. Lignocellulosic-rich materials have a great potential as an alternative feedstock for anaerobic digestion, since they are found in high abundance globally.
The degradation of lignocelluloses into biogas is a complicated process, since lignocelluloses have a recalcitrant structure which is naturally designed to prevent enzymatic degradation. Lignocelluloses are formed in a compact and crystalline structure and often contain a high amount of lignin. In order to permit degradation of these materials in an anaerobic digester, the structure has to open up and/or the lignin has to be degraded or removed. This can be performed by using different pretreatment methods [1], such as mechanically, e.g., by milling; physically by steam explosion or radiation; chemically by acids, bases or solvents; and biologically by enzymes or fungi [1], [2], [3].
Solvent pretreatment on lignocelluloses was shown to be an effective method due to the low degradation of the carbohydrates in the material under the applied, relatively mild conditions. Furthermore, pretreatment with a solvent does not require neutralization, and almost a complete recirculation of the treating chemical is possible [4]. The pretreatment using the solvent N-methylmorpholine oxide (NMMO) has previously been studied on bagasse [5] and on spruce [6] for ethanol production, and on spruce, rice, and triticale straws [7] as well as pure cellulose [8] for biogas production. NMMO is an organic solvent that interrupts inter- and intra-molecular bonds [9] in the lignocelluloses, making the carbohydrates of the material more accessible and thereby facilitating the enzymatic degradation. NMMO is an environmentally friendly cellulose solvent, and used in industrial scale in the lyocell process [10], [11], where cellulose fibers are treated to produce textile. Since no toxic compounds are produced within the NMMO pretreatment and the recirculation of the solvent is possible [10], [12], this process can be regarded as environmentally friendly.
Techno-economic analysis is a useful tool to examine the profitability and performance of a proposed process. Recently, Shafiei et al. [6] performed a techno-economical study on bioethanol production from NMMO pretreated wood. They found that the process is feasible when bioethanol production is combined with a subsequent biogas production utilizing the pentoses. Conversion of lignocellulosic pentoses to ethanol is one of the obstacles in the utilization of lignocelluloses to ethanol, since the ordinary industrial yeast species are unable to assimilate pentoses [13]. Furthermore, the production of biogas from lignocelluloses has several advantages compared to bioethanol production, since the overall energy efficiency is much higher in biogas production compared to that in ethanol production [14].
The focus of this study was therefore to develop a feasible industrial process for NMMO pretreatment and subsequent utilization of forest residues (branches, tops, barks, and needles) in anaerobic digestion. Forest residues were selected because they are the most abundant lignocellulosic waste stream in Sweden, and several other countries. In 2008, 1.6 M tons total solids (TS)/year of the tree tops and branches were delivered from the forests in Sweden, and this is expected to increase to 3.5 M tons total solids/year by 2018 [15]. Moreover, the total energy potential of bioenergy production from the forest is calculated as being 49 TW h [15]. An industrial scale process was designed and simulated using SuperPro Designer® 8.0 simulation software (Intelligen, Inc., NJ, USA) based on unpublished biomethane potential test (BMP) experimental data. A process including an NMMO pretreatment step with filtration, evaporation and recirculation of NMMO and washing water together with a following co-digestion step was evaluated to determine economic feasibility and profitability, such as capital costs for the total plant, annual operating costs, and unit costs. Finally, sensitivity analyses were performed on different scenarios, where effects of the plant size, different co-digestion set-ups as well as the methane price and the water consumption were evaluated.
Section snippets
Process description
A novel process of the NMMO pretreatment of forest residues prior to anaerobic digestion was developed. The process includes the feedstock handling, pretreatment by NMMO, anaerobic digestion, and upgrading of the biogas as well as the dewatering of the digestate. It is assumed that the plant is located close to a power plant, so that steam and electrical power are readily available. It is further assumed that the plant is situated in Sweden with a high availability of forest residues. The type
Process development and economic calculations
The plant was divided into five different sections (1) the NMMO pretreatment, (2) the filtration and evaporation following the NMMO pretreatment, which also includes the recirculation of water and NMMO, (3) the anaerobic digestion of both forest residues and OFMSW, (4) the upgrading of the biogas, and (5) the dewatering of the lignin-rich digestate. The fixed capital investment (FCI) for the different sections can be found in Fig. 3. The most capital-intensive sections are the anaerobic
Discussion
The anaerobic digestion of NMMO pretreated forest residues, co-digested with household organic wastes in the base case is an economically viable process, with an IRR over 15%. The analysis of different sections of the process shows that the price of the raw material, i.e., NMMO, used for the pretreatment has the largest share of the costs. A challenge for the future is to increase the recirculation of the NMMO, in order to limit the consumption of the raw material, and thereby the costs.
Conclusions
The possible co-digestion of NMMO pretreated forest residues together with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste is an economically feasible process with an IRR over 15%. In order to avoid nitrogen deficiency, one-third of forest residues were co-digested with two-thirds of OFMSW. Technical improvements such as increased recycling rate of the NMMO solvent, as well as decreased water consumption in the washing step can further increase the economic viability of the process. The
Acknowledgement
This work was financially supported by the Swedish Excellence Center Waste Refinery.
References (44)
- et al.
Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass
Bioresour Technol
(2009) - et al.
Pretreatment of spruce and oak by N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMMO) for efficient conversion of their cellulose to ethanol
Bioresour Technol
(2010) - et al.
Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse by N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide pretreatment
Bioresour Technol
(2009) - et al.
Techno-economical study of ethanol and biogas from spruce wood by NMMO-pretreatment and rapid fermentation and digestion
Bioresour Technol
(2011) - et al.
Enhanced biogas production from rice straw, triticale straw and softwood spruce by NMMO pretreatment
Biomass Bioenergy
(2012) - et al.
Kinetic and chemical studies on the isomerization of monosaccharides in N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMMO) under lyocell conditions
Carbohydr Res
(2004) - et al.
Structure formation of regenerated cellulose materials from NMMO-solutions
Prog Polym Sci
(2001) - et al.
The flammability of lyocell
Polym Degrad Stab
(1999) - et al.
Mucor indicus: biology and industrial applications perspectives: a review
Biotechnol Adv
(2013) - et al.
Technical and economic analysis of biogas production in Ireland utilising three different crop rotations
Appl Energy
(2009)
Techno-economic evaluation of bioethanol production from three different lignocellulosic materials
Biomass Bioenergy
Financial appraisal of wet mesophilic AD technology as a renewable energy and waste management technology
Sci Total Environ
Pretreatments for enhanced digestibility of feedstocks
Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review
Int J Mol Sci
Enhancement of ethanol and biogas production from high-crystalline cellulose by different modes of NMO pretreatment
Biotechnol Bioeng
Swelling and dissolution of cellulose part 1: free floating cotton and wood fibers in N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide-water mixtures
Macromol Symposia
Effect of the N-Methylmorpholine-N-Oxide (NMMO) pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of forest residues
BioResources
Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques––a review
Bioresour Technol
Substrathandbok för biogasproduktion
Cited by (42)
Assessment of agricultural residue-based electricity production from biogas in India: Resource-environment-economic analysis
2022, Sustainable Energy Technologies and AssessmentsBiogas, biohydrogen, and polyhydroxyalkanoates production from organic waste in the circular economy context
2021, Sustainable Biofuels: Opportunities and ChallengesTechno-economic and life cycle assessments of anaerobic digestion – A review
2019, Biocatalysis and Agricultural BiotechnologyCitation Excerpt :For example, a study assumed 99.5% recycle rate of NMMO a solvent, which is unrealistic considering that achieving such high recovery rates in a commercial facility is expensive and not practical (Teghammar et al., 2014). Performing a sensitivity analysis over the recovery rate could have provided more information on the overall feasibility of the process and increased the value of the study many folds (Teghammar et al., 2014). It can be concluded from many study results that unlike ethanol plants, for biogas decentralization approach would only be profitable and considering a large facility for biogas production, in reality, is worse due to the transportation costs.
A review on biomethane potential of paddy straw and diverse prospects to enhance its biodigestibility
2019, Journal of Cleaner Production
- 1
Present address: Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Bath, BA2 7AY Bath, United Kingdom.