Effect of Ti(IV) loading on CH4 oxidation activity and SO2 tolerance of Pd catalysts supported on silica SBA-15 and HMS

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.06.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Pure silica SBA-15 and HMS and corresponding Ti(IV) modified mesoporous silica, with 5 and 10 wt% of TiO2, were prepared and used as support for palladium (1 wt%) catalysts. The materials, analysed by XPS, XRD, BET, NH3-TPD and FT-IR techniques, were tested in the total oxidation of methane. The catalytic activity was measured in lean conditions at WHSV = 60,000 ml g−1 h−1 in the absence and presence of 10 vol. ppm SO2. Moreover, the effect of a prolonged reaction aging and severe SO2 poisoning on the catalytic performance of the best performing catalyst was investigated. The addition of TiO2 improved the catalytic performance of the SBA-15 supported catalysts by increasing the sulfur tolerance and most importantly by favoring the regeneration of the catalyst in subsequent SO2-free runs. An opposite behavior was observed with the palladium supported on Ti(IV)-modified HMS support which exhibited lower activity and a substantial worsening of the SO2 tolerance as compared to palladium supported on pure HMS. On the bases of the structural and chemical investigation, the differences between the two series of catalysts were ascribed to the distinct structural and acidic properties of the supports. In particular, the good performance of the Ti(IV) doped SBA-15 supported catalysts was due to the combination of Ti(IV) structurally incorporated into the silica lattice and present as surface dispersed TiO2 particles. The negative effect of the Ti(IV) over the HMS supported catalysts was related to the high acidity induced by the more homogeneous incorporation of Ti(IV) into the silica structure.

Highlights

• Ti(IV) enhances the silica HMS total acidity inducing Brønsted acid sites. • Direct synthesis of TixSBA-15 gives rise to segregation of anatase TiO2. • Superior CH4 combustion activity and SO2 tolerance of Pd supported on TixSBA-15. • The creation of Bronsted acid sites are detrimental for Pd/TixHMS catalysts.

Introduction

Natural gas, mainly consisting of methane, is increasingly replacing gasoline or diesel as fuel for transportation vehicles [1], [2]. The reason for this change is the decline of the petroleum reserves and the lower emission of pollutants associated with the combustion of methane. Since the natural gas fuelled vehicles (NGV) typically run at low temperature (320–420 °C) the emission of NOx is lower and due to the high H:C ratio also the produced CO2 is less as compared to the other fuel driven vehicles [2]. Nevertheless a major concern related to the use of natural gas is the emission of the unburned methane which has an even stronger greenhouse effect as compared to the CO2 [3]. Since methane is an almost inert molecule, it requires high temperature for its complete oxidation. A crucial step in the achievement of the total combustion process is the activation of the first C–H bond [4], [5]. Either homolytic bond cleavage with the formation of radicals, or heterolytic C–H bond cleavage at the acid–base pair of sites is generally considered. In any case, in order to increase the efficiency of the methane combustion at low temperature (below 600 °C) it is necessary to use a suitable catalyst. For this specific reaction, two classes of catalysts are currently investigated, those based on transition metal oxides as solid solution oxides [6], [7], perovskites [8], [9], hexaaluminate [10], and those based on noble metals [11], [12], [13], [14]. Among this latter class, Pd-based catalysts are the most active for the methane total oxidation at low temperatures. As pointed out in several studies, their catalytic activity depends strongly on the nature of the support [12], on the palladium precursors [15], [16] and on the size of the PdO particles [17]. Their major drawback is represented by their easy poisoning by sulfur derived from the gas and engine lubricating oil [11]. According to the literature, when a sulfating support like Al2O3 is used, palladium deactivates slowly, due to the preferential interaction of SOx with the support, at variance with palladium over the inert SiO2 deactivating quickly because of the direct interaction between palladium and SOx. Nevertheless, the use of silica, in the absence of particle sintering, allows an easier regeneration of the sulfur-poisoned catalyst through the thermal decomposition of the palladium sulfate occurring at temperature above 600 °C [1], [11]. Recent studies in our group have shown that both methane conversion activity and sulfur tolerance could be improved substantially by using high surface area silica with specific characteristic of acidity and morphology. In particular, supporting palladium on mesoporous silica HMS yielded more efficient and more sulfur resistant catalysts as compared to a lower surface area silica supported catalyst [18]. Incorporation of a precise amount (10 wt%) of TiO2 during the sol–gel preparation of amorphous silica produced an additional improvement of the sulfur tolerance during the methane oxidation in the presence of SO2, still allowing the complete catalyst regeneration typical of a silica support [19], [20]. The positive behavior was attributed to the combination of the high surface area support and the scavenger action of the sulfating oxide like TiO2. Within this frame, the present study intends to further improve the catalytic behavior of palladium for the oxidation of methane by using titania-doped silica mesoporous materials as catalyst supports. To this aim two series of palladium catalysts supported on Ti(IV)-modified HMS and Ti(IV)-modified SBA-15 were prepared. In order to compare with the previous sol–gel prepared titania modified silica [19], Ti(IV) was incorporated using the one step synthesis in which titanium precursor was added during the preparation of the mesoporous materials. To evaluate the effect of the support structure on the Pd activity and stability, analyses by XPS, XRD, BET, NH3-TPD and FT-IR techniques were performed.

Section snippets

Support and catalyst preparation

The mesostructured HMS material was synthesized according to a published procedure [21]. Basically, HMS was assembled from 4:1 molar mixtures of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) (Aldrich) as the inorganic precursor and dodecylamine (DDA) (Aldrich) as the structure-directing surfactant in 90:10 (v/v) water/ethanol. About 49 mmol of DDA were dissolved in 50 ml of ethanol and 450 ml of H2O. To the surfactant solution, heated to 60 °C, 196 mmol of TEOS were added. The gel mixture was kept in a closed

N2 adsorption–desorption analyses

The N2 adsorption and desorption isotherms of the pure silica supports and of the titania doped ones are shown in Fig. 1. The isotherms are of type IV, with hysteresis loops characteristic of mesoporous compounds. According to the IUPAC classification, the hysteresis loops of the SBA-15 and HMS can be classified as H1 and H3 types, respectively [24]. As already reported in literature, the hysteresis loops of the SBA-15 and TixSBA-15 supports are larger and typically of the presence of mesopores

Conclusion

The effect of the addition of titania to different mesoporous silica oxides on the methane oxidation activity of supported palladium was found to depend on the type of mesostructured material. The addition of 10 wt% of TiO2 to the silica SBA-15, improved the catalytic performance of the supported palladium catalysts, in terms of better activity and better sulfur tolerance as compared to palladium over pure SBA-15 support. This result confirmed the positive effect played by titania, acting as SO2

Acknowledgements

This research has been performed in the framework of the D36/003/06 COST program and a NATO grant ESP.CLG. No. 984160.

References (51)

  • P. Gelin et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2002)
  • F. Arosio et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2006)
  • T.V. Choudhary et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2002)
  • R. Burch et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A

    (1995)
  • Y.-x. Pan et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2008)
  • L.F. Liotta et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2006)
  • N. Bahlawane

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2006)
  • Z. Gao et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2010)
  • E. Tzimpilis et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2009)
  • H. Yoshida et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2007)
  • F. Yin et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2008)
  • K. Persson et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2007)
  • M. Schmal et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2006)
  • K. Fujimoto et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1998)
  • A.M. Venezia et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2007)
  • A.M. Venezia et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2009)
  • N. Marin-Astorga et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A

    (2006)
  • V. La Parola et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2010)
  • A. Tuel

    Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.

    (1999)
  • T.A. Zepeda

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2008)
  • N.N. Trukhan et al.

    Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.

    (2003)
  • Y. Bi et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2003)
  • E. Santacesaria et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2004)
  • A.M. Venezia et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2006)
  • R. Castillo et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text