Elsevier

Applied Catalysis A: General

Volume 571, 5 February 2019, Pages 42-50
Applied Catalysis A: General

W-SBA based materials as efficient catalysts for the ODS of model and real feeds: Improvement of their lifetime through active phase encapsulation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2018.12.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Incorporated HPW-SBA catalysts are more resistant toward deactivation in oxidative desulfurization of real fuel than impregnated ones.

  • Incorporated HPW-SBA catalyst showed enhanced interaction between supported phase and carrier as shown by Tof-SIMS analysis.

  • No deactivation was observed for 9 days on incorporated HPW-SBA catalyst in the ODS of a SRGO 2000 ppmS.

  • This preparation method appears promising to reduce deactivation in the ODS of real feeds.

Abstract

Incorporated W-SBA based catalysts were prepared by a direct synthesis method involving phosphotungstic acic (HPW) together with mixed structure directing agents, and by incipient wetness impregnation for comparison purpose. In the oxidative desulfurization (ODS) of dibenzothiophene (DBT, 500–1500 ppmS) and of a Straight Run Gas Oil (SRGO, 2000 ppmS) in batch reactor, the impregnated solids showed higher efficiency than the incorporated ones, which was attributed to a better accessibility of the active phase present at the surface of the support in the impregnated catalysts. However, in continuous evaluation using a fixed bed reactor, the incorporated catalyst showed a stable conversion in the ODS of SRGO 2000 ppmS for 9 days while within 24 h the impregnated solid was almost completely deactivated. Higher interaction of the active phase with the support in incorporated catalysts was evidenced by Time-of-Flight Secondary Ions Mass Spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) analysis, which can be at the origin of less leaching of tungsten species during reaction and thus explain their better resistance towards deactivation. The lower efficiency of incorporated catalysts compared to impregnated ones in ODS reaction carried out in a batch reactor is clearly compensated by their resistance towards leaching of the active phase in a continuous test. These results highlight the importance of evaluating not only the catalysts performance but also their lifetime in conditions more representative of industrial ones.

Introduction

Hydrodesulfurization (HDS) is the main industrial process for the removal of undesirable sulfur containing compounds present in petroleum feedstocks. However the continuous tightening of environmental regulations concerning the sulfur content in diesel led to consider and develop complementary and/or alternative solutions, among which oxidative desulfurization (ODS) is arousing an increasing interest [[1], [2], [3]]. In the ODS process, the sulfur containing molecules are oxidized in sulfones, which, due to their polar properties, can be further separated from the reaction mixture by extraction or adsorption [[4], [5], [6]]. One major advantage of this reaction is that it is carried out under mild conditions regarding temperature and pressure and without the use of costly hydrogen [7]. Moreover, refractory compounds in HDS such as 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene (4,6-DMDBT) are more readily converted in the ODS process than benzothiophene (BT), which has been related to the higher electron density on the sulfur atom in DBT than in BT [[8], [9], [10], [11]].

Polyoxometalates (POM) have been extensively used as ODS catalysts in homogeneous systems, in particular Keggin-type heteropolyacids (HPA), like phospho(silico)tungstic or molybdic acids [[12], [13], [14], [15]]. Due to the difficulty associated to catalyst recovery, heterogeneous systems are however preferred, with dispersion of the HPA at the surface of a carrier. Mesoporous silica have been reported as suitable supports for ODS catalysts, due to their large surface area and high stability, like HMS [16], MCM-41 [17,18] and SBA [19,20]. However these impregnated catalysts suffer from strong deactivation, which major sources have been identified as sulfones adsorption on the catalysts as well as leaching of the active phase during reaction [15,21]. It is thus of paramount importance to optimize not only the efficiency of a catalyst but also its resistance regarding deactivation. If sulfones retention on the catalyst surface is important in the ODS of model molecules, it is much less present in the ODS of real feedstocks, as sulfones are more soluble in these media [19]. Concerning the active phase leaching, several strategies aiming at the stabilization of the active phase have been developed, either by anchoring the HPA on a modified surface or through encapsulation within the silica framework by direct synthesis. For instance phosphotungstic acid (HPW) has been immobilized on the surface of MCM-41 [22,23] and SBA-15 [24] functionalized by amino groups and in all the cases the obtained catalysts could be reused without significant loss of activity in the ODS of model compounds. However modification of the support requires extra steps in the catalyst synthesis which may be detrimental to the overall cost of the process. Alternatively one-pot synthesis approaches have been developed for the incorporation of polyoxometalates, introduced during the silica support preparation [[25], [26], [27], [28], [29]]. Several authors reported on the use of such one-pot catalysts in ODS reaction [[30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35]] but only a few addressed the reusability of the catalytic solids. With one exception [32], the majority of the authors reported the preservation of the catalytic efficiency after several runs [33,[31], [32], [33], [34], [35]]. Interaction of HPW with the support was claimed to be responsible for this activity stabilization, but only Du et al. brought experimental evidence by FT-IR of this interaction [33].

In this work we propose to evaluate the efficiency and the lifetime in ODS of incorporated HPW catalysts with various HPW contents, prepared by a direct synthesis method in the presence of poly-(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide) copolymer (Pluronic P123) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as structure directing agents. Impregnated catalysts on SBA-15 with similar HPW contents were also prepared for comparison purpose. The originality of our work lies first in the testing of these solids, whose efficiency is not only evaluated in the ODS of model feed in batch reactor, but also in the ODS of a Straight Run Gas Oil (SRGO) 2000 ppmS using a fixed bed reactor during a 9 days period, when most of the literature deals with model feeds in batch reactors. Moreover Time-of-Flight Secondary Ions Mass Spectrometry (Tof-SIMS) analysis allowed probing the interaction between the HPW and the support depending on the preparation method.

Section snippets

Materials

The main SRGO characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Phosphotungstic acid (HPW, 99.995%), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, 99%), P123 (30% PEG), dodecane (99%), tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP, 5.0–6.0 M in decane), chlorhydric acid (HCl, 11.3 mol.L−1), dibenzothiophene (DBT, 98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 99%) from Fluka.

SBA preparation

The SBA-15 support was prepared under classical acidic conditions [36]. Triblock copolymer P123 (EO20PO70EO20, 12.0 g) was

Physical properties of the catalysts

On the small angle XRD patterns of the calcined bare SBA-15 and catalysts (Fig. 1a and b), one clearly observes the three characteristic peaks of SBA-15 corresponding to the (100), (110) and (200) lattice plan of its hexagonally ordered mesophase [39]. For all the catalysts, the three peaks were maintained, indicating the preservation of the mesoporous structure of the SBA support upon impregnation as well as incorporation. Decrease in intensity of the peaks when the W content increased can be

Conclusions

HPW-SBA based catalysts (xWSBA) were prepared by a direct synthesis method involving P123 and CTAB as structure directing agents and by incipient wetness impregnation for comparison purpose (xW/SBA). SBA textural properties were preserved upon incorporation and the HPW species were still present after calcination. The solids were first evaluated in batch reactor in the ODS of DBT (500–1500 ppmS) and of a SRGO 2000 ppmS. The xWSBA solids were found efficient, with, for the catalyst having the

Acknowledgements

Chevreul Institute (FR 2638), Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, Région Nord – Pas de Calais and FEDER are acknowledged for supporting and partially funding this work.

References (52)

  • S. Wei et al.

    Fuel

    (2017)
  • L. Kang et al.

    Fuel

    (2018)
  • A. Ishihara et al.

    Appl. Catal. A Gen.

    (2005)
  • T.C. Chen et al.

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2016)
  • A. Stanislaus et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2010)
  • M.A. Rezvani et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2012)
  • M. Li et al.

    J. Mol. Cat. A: Chem.

    (2015)
  • S. Xun et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2015)
  • H. Zheng et al.

    Appl. Catal. A Gen.

    (2013)
  • W. Trakarnpruk et al.

    Fuel Proc. Technol.

    (2009)
  • A.E.S. Choi et al.

    Sustain. Environ. Res.

    (2016)
  • M. Te et al.

    Appl. Catal. A Gen.

    (2001)
  • D. Wang et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A Chem.

    (2014)
  • Z.E.A. Abdalla et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2012)
  • A. Chica et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2006)
  • G. Luo et al.

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2014)
  • D. Xie et al.

    Chin. J. Catal.

    (2015)
  • X.N. Pham et al.

    Adv. Powder Technol.

    (2018)
  • L. Tang et al.

    J. Ind. Eng. Chem.

    (2013)
  • B.C. Gagea et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2009)
  • B. Li et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2011)
  • X. Li et al.

    Transit. Metal Chem.

    (2009)
  • J. Qiu et al.

    Fuel

    (2015)
  • Y. Du et al.

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (2018)
  • D. Shen et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2018)
  • J.C. Juan et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A Chem.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (23)

    • Phosphotungstic acid-supported zirconia mesoporous material for deep and fast oxidative desulfurization

      2021, Inorganic Chemistry Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      An important problem of the adsorption desulfurization is that the desulfurization process significantly depends on the adsorbent's adsorption capability and this technique needs to regenerate the adsorbent frequently [17]. In comparison, oxidative desulfurization is more promising and has been investigated by many researchers worldwide [18–24]. In this process, refractory sulfur-containing heterocyclic compounds (eg, DBT) can be easily oxidized to more polar products (eg, DBTO or DBTO2) under mild conditions, which will be further extracted from the oil by an extractant such as acetonitrile to obtain a clean fuel oil.

    • Catalytic behavior of the WO<inf>x</inf>-ZrO<inf>2</inf> system in the clean selective oxidation of diphenyl sulfide (DPS)

      2021, Catalysis Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, the products of ODS are important intermediates in the fine chemical industry [7]. ODS heterogeneous catalysts with high performances and long duration life are basically oxides of transition metals (Mo or W) dispersed on various supports possessing acid properties such as alumina (Al2O3), modified alumina and zirconia (ZrO2), or modified silica-zirconia [8–19]. During the past few years, solid acid catalysts based on zirconia-supported oxoanions, MoOx-ZrO2 and WOx-ZrO2, have received much attention for oxidative desulfurization (ODS) because of their high thermal stability combined with the possibility of tuning acid properties by varying the oxoanions content [20–24].

    • Catalytic oxidation of sulfur compounds over Ce-SBA-15 and Ce-Zr-SBA-15

      2021, Catalysis Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      The selection of the catalytic material is relevant in the efficiency of the catalytic oxidation process, particularly the structural properties of the support, the nature of the active sites, as well as their mutual interaction. Consequently, a wide range of studies have been carried out with different catalysts [2,16–21]. Zain et al. [22] used activated carbon (AC) supported cerium/iron oxide for catalytic oxidative desulfurization of commercial diesel.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text