The emergency surgical airway: Bridging the gap from quality outcome to performance improvement through a novel simulation based curriculum

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.09.026Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Patient safety is a significant driving force for simulation.

  • Gaps in training for low frequency, high risk scenarios can be addressed.

  • Design and implementation of an advanced surgical airway curriculum is feasible.

  • Measuring the effectiveness of this curriculum on clinical practice remains elusive.

Abstract

Background

Emergency surgical airway is a low frequency, high risk clinical scenario. Implementing a simulation-based curriculum may bridge the gap in surgical training and address quality assurance/performance improvement (QAPI) needs.

Methods

We designed and implemented an Advanced Surgical Airway Curriculum (ASAC) modeled after proficiency-based training. General Surgery residents and student nurse anesthetists were enrolled. Evaluation consisted of cognitive tests, procedure checklists and questionnaire.

Results

In total, 78 participants successfully completed the ASAC. Trainees agreed that the curriculum provided the cognitive and psychomotor skills necessary to perform both an open and needle cricothyroidotomy.

Conclusions

In the age of increased patient safety concerns, QAPI initiatives can serve as a driver for simulation-based training curricula, with particular focus on individualized, active learning. This may be particularly useful in high risk, low frequency scenarios in which the traditional method of “See one, Do one, Teach one,” is not feasible.

Introduction

Simulation has become a cornerstone in surgical education, with dedicated simulation experience now required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education for all surgical programs. The advent of the 80-h work week, combined with the continued five-year training paradigm, has created a gap in surgical training and experience.1 We have certainly observed a shift from the Halsted inspired, “See one, Do one, Teach one,” to a more active, contextualized process of constructing knowledge and entrusting task performance. The role of simulation in education is evolving with strong and varying opinions as to the ideal how, when, and whom concerning design and implementation.2 Several studies have strived to determine the best form of curriculum implementation and in the process, outline the various challenges faced.3,4,5,6 While the ideal form of implementation is debated, it is likely that simulation will remain embedded in surgical education for many years to come.2

In addition to the gap in surgical training experience, a large driving force for surgical simulation is patient safety.3 In the present healthcare environment, hospital administrators are now focusing on certain quality measures linked to patient outcomes and process of care, since payments are increasingly tied to outcome measures (i.e. catheter and central line related infections). Surgical simulation aims not necessarily to replace hands-on training and experience, but to augment the traditional taxonomy of learning by providing deliberate opportunities for practice outside of the operating room.7 The goal is to decrease the learning curve in both low frequency and high risk surgical procedures, with the hope of improving patient safety and outcomes.

Section snippets

Curriculum development

The residency advisory committee (RAC) of the department of Surgery at Rush University Medical Center initiated a proficiency based curriculum during the 2016/2017 Academic year. This curriculum, following guidelines from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) division of education, focused on common ICU procedures including needle cricothyroidotomy, arterial line placement, central venous catheter placement, and tube thoracostomy.8 Initially, this curriculum focused on junior surgical

Results

Following a pilot course given to senior anesthesia residents, 78 participants completed the ASAC, out of which thirty-two participants were junior (PGY-1 or PGY-2) surgical residents: nine (9) PGY-2 categoricals, eight (8) PGY-1 categoricals, and fifteen (15) PGY-1 preliminary residents. Twenty-four participants were senior (PGY-3, PGY-4, or PGY-5) surgical residents, all of them categorical. The remaining 22 participants were student nurse anesthetists. Within the junior resident group, the

Discussion

K. Anders Ericsson in his address “Deliberate Practice and the Acquisition and Maintenance of Expert Performance in Medicine and Related Domains.” defined principles that are applicable to the use of simulation in surgical education.9 Several other authors have described the crucial elements required in simulation-based curriculum design, including Aggarwal, Stefanidis and Heniford.3,10 They describe a framework that combines cognitive learning with simulation, allowing for training to

Conclusion

In an age of increased safety concerns and measures, QAPI initiatives can serve as a driver for simulation-based training curricula. We demonstrated the feasibility of designing and implementing a mandatory surgical airway course, highlighting the challenges faced. While clinical scenarios that are high risk, low frequency are well suited for simulation based training, measuring the effectiveness of the simulation via patient outcome metrics remains elusive.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (11)

  • Harnessing power of simulation training effectiveness with Kirkpatrick model in emergency surgical airway procedures

    2022, Heliyon
    Citation Excerpt :

    Needs of developing a simulator for medical professionals to practice this “low frequency but high impact procedure” have been identified in military and hospital. However, the knowledge gap in choosing or validating simulators was large, not to mention how it affects training effectiveness nor how it brings positive impact on organization management [14, 15, 16]. Since 2013, Cricothyroidotomy had been incorporated into a local “Advanced Surgical Trauma Course” where pig larynx-trachea models were used as a traditional training modality.

  • Pediatric Surgery Simulation-Based Training for the General Surgery Resident

    2021, Journal of Surgical Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Over the last 20 y, surgical training has significantly evolved. The traditional approach has been challenged by increasing financial restraints, regulation, concern for patient safety, the need for efficiency, the requirement of attending surgeons in the OR, the implementation of an 80-h work week, and a push for further subspecialization, among others.2,4,5 Consequently, on graduation, residents feel less prepared to operate autonomously and program directors and attending surgeons feel residents may be inadequately trained.1,4,27,28

  • Implementing a QAPI framework for improvement in an academic setting: A roadmap to success

    2021, Journal of Professional Nursing
    Citation Excerpt :

    The QAPI framework was intended to help improve processes involved in health care delivery and resident quality of life in nursing homes. While the QAPI process was originally designed for use by nursing homes, the methodology has since been used in other healthcare settings, and it is commonly the framework hospitals employ for quality improvement initiatives (Fisher et al., 2020; Mathur et al., 2019; Veenstra et al., 2019; Givens, 2018; Mathur & Talwalkar, 2017). The QAPI framework is the coordinated application and merger of two interconnected and complementary aspects of a quality management system: quality assurance (QA) and performance improvement (PI).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text