Methods—review
Comparison of Cardioprotective Benefits of Vigorous Versus Moderate Intensity Aerobic Exercise

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.130Get rights and content

Aerobic fitness, not merely physical activity, is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease. Vigorous intensity exercise has been shown to increase aerobic fitness more effectively than moderate intensity exercise, suggesting that the former may confer greater cardioprotective benefits. An electronic search of published studies using PubMed was conducted for 2 types of investigations, epidemiologic studies that evaluated the benefits of physical activity of varying intensity levels and clinical trials that trained individuals at different intensities of exercise while controlling for the total energy expenditure. A secondary search was conducted using the references from these studies. The epidemiologic studies consistently found a greater reduction in risk of cardiovascular disease with vigorous (typically ≥6 METs) than with moderate intensity physical activity and reported more favorable risk profiles for individuals engaged in vigorous, as opposed to moderate, intensity physical activity. Clinical trials generally reported greater improvements after vigorous (typically ≥60% aerobic capacity) compared with moderate intensity exercise for diastolic blood pressure, glucose control, and aerobic capacity, but reported no intensity effect on improvements in systolic blood pressure, lipid profile, or body fat loss. In conclusion, if the total energy expenditure of exercise is held constant, exercise performed at a vigorous intensity appears to convey greater cardioprotective benefits than exercise of a moderate intensity.

Section snippets

Methods

Epidemiologic studies and clinical trials were examined. For the former, only those that controlled for EE, or that found a relation between 1 intensity level and the study end points (incidence of CHD or development of CHD risk factors) but not for other intensity levels, were included. For clinical trials, only those that controlled for EE were included. A meta-analysis of the data was not feasible, because the number of studies that examined any 1 end point (such as blood pressure or insulin

Epidemiologic studies

Table 1, Table 2 list the epidemiologic studies of exercise intensity and incidence of CHD, or risk factors for CHD, respectively. In such studies, the determination of exercise intensity was imprecise. Subjects reported their physical activity, and investigators designated activities as “moderate” or “vigorous,” or assigned an intensity on the basis of estimated multiples of metabolism at rest (METs; 1 MET = 3.5 ml · min−1 · kg−1). However, the actual intensity of a given activity can vary

Discussion

Although many studies have evaluated the cardioprotective benefits of exercise, relatively few have compared different intensities while controlling EE. Although additional studies are warranted, a consistent picture has emerged. Several epidemiologic studies found benefits for accumulated EE performed at a vigorous intensity but not at a moderate intensity.6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14, 17 The epidemiologic studies that specifically controlled EE all found greater benefits at higher intensities.8, 10, 15

References (47)

  • I.M. Lee et al.

    Relative intensity of physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease

    Circulation

    (2003)
  • J.E. Manson et al.

    A prospective study of walking as compared with vigorous exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease in women

    N Engl J Med

    (1999)
  • H.D. Sesso et al.

    Physical activity and coronary heart disease in menthe Harvard Alumni Health Study

    Circulation

    (2000)
  • M. Tanasescu et al.

    Exercise type and intensity in relation to coronary heart disease in men

    JAMA

    (2002)
  • S. Yu et al.

    What level of physical activity protects against premature cardiovascular death? The Caerphilly study

    Heart

    (2003)
  • F.B. Hu et al.

    Walking compared with vigorous physical activity and risk of type 2 diabetes in women

    JAMA

    (1999)
  • F.B. Hu et al.

    Physical activity and television watching in relation to risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus in men

    Arch Int Med

    (2001)
  • J. Lynch et al.

    Moderately intense physical activities and high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness reduce the risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in middle-aged men

    Arch Int Med

    (1996)
  • J. Marrugat et al.

    Amount and intensity of physical activity, physical fitness, and serum lipids in men

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1996)
  • G.B. Mensink et al.

    Intensity, duration, and frequency of physical activity and coronary risk factors

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1997)
  • R.S. Paffenbarger et al.

    Intensity of physical activity related to incidence of hypertension and all-cause mortalityan epidemiologic view

    Blood Press Monit

    (1997)
  • D.S. Siscovick et al.

    Exercise intensity and subclinical cardiovascular disease in the elderly

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1997)
  • P.T. Williams

    Relationships of heart disease risk factors to exercise quantity and intensity

    Arch Intern Med

    (1998)
  • Cited by (468)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text