Elsevier

Air Medical Journal

Volume 37, Issue 2, March–April 2018, Pages 124-125
Air Medical Journal

Original Research
Should Helicopters Transport Patients Who Become Sick After a Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive Attack?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2017.11.010Get rights and content

Abstract

The local fire department executed a training simulation for chemical and explosive incidents at a large sports facility. In this training simulation, a physician-staffed helicopter arrived at the request of the fire department and landed just outside the cold zone in the parking area. The doctor and nurse of the helicopter were escorted to a red area in the cold zone, which was selected based on the results of postdecontamination triage. After the patients had been treated, they were air medically evacuated to the base hospital. In the Tokyo subway sarin attack in 1995, St Luke's International Hospital admitted over 600 victims. During this incident, 23.2% of medical staff suffered secondary injury from sarin exposure. If air medial crews respond with subsequent postexposure effects during flight, an affected pilot could lose control of the helicopter, resulting in a fatal crash. Based on potential safety concerns for air medical and ground personnel, our recommendation would be that air medical helicopters not be dispatched to sites of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive incidents.

References (5)

  • A. Mayama et al.

    Secondary damage from Tokyo subway sarin attack in St. Luke's International Hospital

    Jpn Med J

    (1995)
  • H. Koyama

    Risk management of mass disaster induced by chloropicrin

    Chudoku Kenkyu

    (2009)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
View full text