Major Article
Enhancement of hand hygiene compliance among health care workers from a hemodialysis unit using video-monitoring feedback

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.01.040Get rights and content

Background

The importance of hand hygiene in the prevention of health care–associated infection is well known. Experience with hand hygiene compliance (HHC) evaluation in hemodialysis units is scarce.

Methods

This study was a 3-phase, prospective longitudinal intervention study during a 5-month period in a 13-bed hemodialysis unit at a university hospital in Northern Mexico. The unit performs an average of 1,150 hemodialysis procedures per month. Compliance was evaluated by a direct observer and a video assisted observer. Feedback was given to health care workers in the form of educational sessions and confidential reports and video analysis of compliance and noncompliance.

Results

A total of 5,402 hand hygiene opportunities were registered; 5,201 during 7,820 minutes of video footage and 201 by direct observation during 1,180 minutes. Lower compliance during the baseline evaluation was observed by video monitoring compared with direct observation (P <0.05). Discrepancy between both methods was 29.2% (0.4%-59.8%); the average improvement in compliance during the study was 30.6% (range, 7.3%-75.5%). Global and Individual results for each subject revealed a statistically significant Improvement in the majority. Noncompliance according to WHO's 5 Moments for HH was greater for moment 5 (30.1%). We estimated that a health care worker in a hemodialysis unit could take 22-44.3% of working hours for proper hand hygiene compliance.

Conclusions

Video-assisted monitoring of hand hygiene is an excellent method for the evaluation of HHC in a hemodialysis unit; enhanced HHC can be achieved through a feedback program to the hemodialysis staff that includes video examples and confidential reports.

Section snippets

Study design

We designed a 3-phase prospective longitudinal intervention study during a 4-month period (February 5-May 22, 2015).

Setting

The study was conducted in the HU of the Hospital Universitario “Dr. José Eleuterio González” in Monterrey, Mexico, a 13-bed unit that performs an average of 1,150 hemodialysis procedures per month. There is an average of 4 nurses per shift, with a supervisor to nurse ratio of 3:1. There are also 4 attending nephrologists and 6-7 fellows.

Compliance monitoring

Two observers participated in the study.

Results

During the 3 study phases, a total of 5,402 HHOs were registered. For VAO, 782 ten-minute video monitoring sessions were performed; during these sessions, 7,820 minutes of video footage were taken, for a total of 5,201 HHOs identified. The DO registered 118 direct observations, 10 minutes each, representing 1,180 observation minutes in which 201 HHOs were found.

The HH compliance percentages under direct observation were reported as follows: 57%, 65%, and 73% for the preintervention and first

Discussion

Although HH importance for preventing and controlling HAI is widely known, HHC remains a complex issue because of multiple factors, such as HH personal materials and disposition and location of sinks,11, 12 insufficient time for adequate HH, insufficient knowledge regarding the WHO's My 5 Moments for HH, skepticism about HH impact,4 and acknowledgment of personal risk, such as treating those patients under contact isolation.13

Although the most used method for evaluating HHC is trained

Conclusions

Video-assisted monitoring of HH is a useful method for the evaluation of HHC in an HU. Enhanced HHC can be achieved by a feedback program to the hemodialysis staff that includes video examples and confidential reports.

Cited by (27)

  • Implementing an electronic hand hygiene system improved compliance in the intensive care unit

    2021, American Journal of Infection Control
    Citation Excerpt :

    The targeted interventions should be more precise to design programs and incentives for individuals to achieve the best results. Other well-known factors associated with the levels of HH compliance are staff profession, workload, and location of sanitizers,17-19 which could be analyzed and used for designing precision interventions. This study measured not only HH quantity but also HH quality.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Conflicts of Interest: None to report.

View full text