The effect of P6 acupressure on nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Introduction
Approximately 50–80% of pregnant women experience nausea and vomiting of early pregnancy (NVP) as common complaints that range from reluctance to eat certain foods to severe and recurrent vomiting [[1], [2], [3]]. Women may experience physical, social and psychological disturbances from these complaints. Since NVP can have significant effects on the quality of life, even in mild cases, it should not be neglected and its early detection and management are crucial [4].
Many pharmacological treatments are available for NVP, but concerns about their effect on fetal outcomes make many healthcare providers and pregnant women wish to avoid or minimize the use of medications and prefer non-pharmacological therapies [5,6]. One of the most commonly applied non-pharmacological approaches in this regard is acupressure, which is a modality of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM).
According to TCM, a vital energy in the human body provides strength to the body. This energy, Chi, flows in invisible channels under the skin, called the Meridians. The quality of Chi depends on the balance among the sensory, mental, physical and psychological aspects of the body. Disturbances in any of these components cause imbalance in the energy and could lead to disease. The most common method of acupressure is to apply pressure to particular points in these energy channels to treat diseases [7,8]. The stimulation of the P6 point or Neiguan is commonly used in TCM to relieve nausea and vomiting [5]. Applying pressure on the P6 point relieves chest and abdominal congestion, relaxes the mind and helps reduce excitement, nausea and motion sickness [7,8]. The P6 point is located on the medial surface of the forearm, three finger-widths up from the wrist crease, between the long flexor tendons (Fig. 1) [2].
Several studies have evaluated the effect of P6 stimulation on NVP [[9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]]. The results of trials on the subject are rather mixed. Some clinical studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of P6 stimulation for NVP [9,10,13,[10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]]. Other studies, however, could not find any significant effects [5,16,17]. The lack of control groups, the application of pressure on non-P6 points in placebo groups, adopting different approaches for P6 stimulation and underreporting dietary modifications have been some of the reasons for the disparity in the results of these studies. More clinical studies are therefore needed to overcome these weaknesses.
The present randomized, placebo-controlled trial was carried out to determine the effect of P6 acupressure (wristband with a pressure button) on the severity and frequency of NVP in comparison with a placebo group (wristband without a pressure button) and a control group (no intervention) with dietary modifications being the same across all three groups.
Section snippets
Setting and participants
This randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial was carried out on pregnant women who received prenatal care in five public healthcare centers in Ardebil, Iran, from 04.17.2006 to 11.20.2006.
The inclusion criteria consisted of having mild to moderate nausea and/or vomiting (based on a Likert scale three days before the start of the intervention), a planned and normal pregnancy and a gestational age under 20 weeks (confirmed by the ultrasound before the 10th week and/or the last
Baseline characteristics
From the 78 eligible mothers, three declined to participate in the study. All the 75 participants completed the study and provided their diaries for analysis (Fig. 2). There was no significant difference among the three groups in terms of the baseline characteristics (Table 1). Also, the three groups were not significantly different in terms of their symptoms at baseline (P > 0.05; Table 2).
Nausea and vomiting
Table 2 presents the differences in the mean scores of nausea frequency, duration and severity within the
Discussion
In this randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the effect of three days of P6 acupressure (with Sea-band) on the severity and frequency of NVP was investigated and then compared with a placebo and a control group. Acupressure decreased the frequency and severity of nausea in this study, but it was not more effective than placebo in reducing the duration of nausea and the frequency of vomiting.
In a similar study, Steele et al. found that the use of Sea-Band on the P6 point for four
Conclusion
This randomized, controlled trial showed that three days of P6 acupressure with Sea-Band can reduce the frequency and severity of nausea. Also, both the P6 acupressure and the placebo procedure resulted in a significant reduction in the duration of nausea and the frequency of vomiting. Further trials are needed to make sure that Sea-Band without a button has not actually stimulated the P6 points in the placebo group. Overall, it seems that acupressure on the P6 point is a safe method for relief
Declaration of competing interest
There are no conflicts of interest regarding the use of Sea-Band as an intervention.
Ethical statement
The protocol of the study has been registered in Iranian Registry of Clinical trials (registration reference: IRCT20190205042624N1). The Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (ethical approval code: IR.SBMU.PHNM.1396.959) and Ardebil University of Medical Science approved the study. The purpose and methodology of study had explained to all the participants by one of the researchers, verbally. It was explained to eligible participants that the intervention outcomes
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to appreciate the kind assistance and financial support provided by the Research Chancellor of Ardebil University of Medical Sciences, as well as colleagues, especially Dr. Nayyere Rasaeian for scientific consultations, and the women who participated in this study. Also, we are thankful to Ali Gholamrezaei (M.D., Isfahan University of Medical Sciences) for editing this paper.
References (23)
Women’s use of complementary and alternative therapies in reproductive health care
J. Nurse.
(1998)- et al.
Determinants of women’s decision making on whether to treat nausea and vomiting of pregnancy pharmacologically
J. Midwifery Womens Health
(2004) - et al.
Acupuncture for nausea and vomiting: an update of clinical and experimental studies
Auton. Neurosci.
(2006) - et al.
Efficacy of P6 acupressure in the treatment of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
(1996) - et al.
Effect of acupressure by Sea-Bands on nausea and vomiting of pregnancy
J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs.
(2001) - et al.
Efficacy of P6 acupressure in the treatment of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
(1996) - et al.
Meta-analysis of acustimulation effects on nausea and vomiting in pregnant women
Explor. J. Sci. Heal.
(2006) Complementary medicine for pregnancy complications
Aust. Fam. Physician
(2006)- et al.
Epidemiology of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: prevalence, severity, determinants, and the importance of race/ethnicity
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
(2009) - et al.
Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy
Am. Fam. Physician
(2003)
Interventions for nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy
Cochrane Libr.
Cited by (4)
Efficacy and safety of acupressure in nausea and vomiting during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
2024, Archives of Gynecology and ObstetricsEffect of Acupressure at PC6 on Nausea and Vomiting During Pregnancy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
2023, JAMS Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies