Macroscopic approaches to root water uptake as a function of water and salinity stress

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.06.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Computer simulation models can be important tools for analyzing and managing site-specific irrigation, soil salinization, or crop production problems. For many of these problems, computer analyses require simulations of root water uptake as a function of water and salinity stress. We give an overview of macroscopic modeling approaches that are based on the Richards equation with a sink term specifying water uptake. Various parameterizations of the sink term as functions of water and salinity stress are reviewed. An example application demonstrates the simulation of drainage for a wide range of salinity and water stress conditions. The example shows that in practice it is very difficult to discriminate among the various functional forms proposed for the sink term. Future improvements to models may involve the incorporation of more dynamic root functions, such as the ability of roots to respond actively to growing conditions. As an example, we consider modeling compensated uptake, in which plants react to stress in one section of the root zone by increasing uptake in sections with more favorable conditions. Lastly, the challenge of estimating uptake reduction parameters from crop salt tolerance databases is discussed.

Introduction

Irrigation has contributed significantly to increased crop production worldwide. Unfortunately, irrigation has contributed also to increased salinization of agricultural lands, and has caused the destruction of agriculture in many areas (Van Schilfgaarde, 1980, Van Schilfgaarde, 1984, Van Schilfgaarde, 1994). About 20–30 million ha of irrigated land are seriously damaged by the build-up of salts and 0.25–0.5 million ha are estimated to be lost from production every year as a result of salt build-up (FAO, 2002). The FAO/AGL SPUSH network (http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/spush/intro.htm) estimates that 19.5% of the world's 230 million ha of irrigated land is salt-affected. In the United States, 9% of cropland and pastureland suffers from reduced productivity due to salinity (Ghassemi et al., 1995). Still, despite the negative impacts, irrigation is critical to sustaining and increasing agricultural production. While about 17% of agricultural land worldwide is irrigated, this 17% accounts for about 40% of the total global food harvest (FAO, 2002). Moreover, per capita arable land has decreased over the years, from a worldwide average of 0.38 ha in 1970 to 0.28 ha in 1990, and some analysts project a further decrease to 0.15 ha in 2050 (Ghassemi et al., 1995). Hence, increased production must come from increased average yields, increases that will be possible only through high-yielding irrigated agriculture.

Effective management of salt-affected soils requires knowledge of many coupled physicochemical processes affecting soil conditions. Computer models such as SWAP (van Dam et al., 1997, Kroes and van Dam, 2003) and HYDRUS-1D (Šimunek et al., 2005) have become increasingly important tools for analyzing site-specific irrigation, soil salinization, or crop production problems. Most of these models are based on the Richards equation for variably saturated water flow and the advection–dispersion equation for solute transport. In their simplest one-dimensional forms, these equations areθt=zK(h)hzK(h)S(θRc)t=zθDczqcϕrespectively, where θ is the volumetric water content, h the soil water pressure head (L), t the time (T), z the depth (L), K the hydraulic conductivity (L T−1), R a retardation factor accounting for sorption or exchange, c the solute concentration of the liquid phase (M L−3), D the solute dispersion coefficient (L2 T−1), q the Darcy–Buckingham volumetric water flux (LT−1), and S (T−1) and ϕ (M L−3 T−1) are sinks or sources for water and solutes, respectively. In this paper, S and ϕ are associated exclusively with root uptake processes.

While models based on Eqs. (1), (2) are critical tools in irrigation and drainage studies, the equations pose challenges because of (i) the many highly nonlinear processes involved, including water and energy exchange between the biosphere and the atmosphere; (ii) issues of scale, especially for studies at larger field and watershed scales; (iii) lack of data on the many parameters required in the model. Proper parameterization of root water uptake as a function of water and salinity stress remains one of those challenges.

A large number of microscopic and macroscopic approaches to modeling water uptake have been proposed over the years. Comprehensive reviews from a mostly hydrological perspective include Molz (1981), Hopmans and Bristow (2002), Wang and Smith (2004), and Feddes and Raats (2004). The microscopic approach generally involves descriptions of radial flow to, and uptake by, individual roots (Hillel et al., 1975, Raats, in press). In contrast, modeling uptake with a sink term in the Richards equation (Eq. (1)) is a typical macroscopic approach that averages uptake over a large number of roots. The approach ignores or implicitly averages pore-scale variations in the pressure head or solute concentration in the immediate vicinity of individual roots.

This paper is limited to the macroscopic approach. Specifically, we review relatively standard macroscopic approaches to modeling root water uptake in the presence of water and salinity stress, provide an example application involving a lysimeter study, briefly raise the issue of compensatory uptake, and discuss some practical issues concerning the use of salt tolerance databases to determine uptake reduction parameters. Elsewhere in this issue, Green et al. (this issue) provide an overview of root uptake that is complimentary to our discussion, focusing on new technologies for measuring plant water use and observing compensatory uptake, and on the use of modeling to develop better irrigation policies for allocating water.

Section snippets

General model for the root water uptake term

The root water uptake term S in Eq. (1) should in general be a function of the soil water pressure head, the osmotic pressure head, root characteristics, and meteorological conditions such as evaporative demand. Several approximations have been used for S in the macroscopic approach. A popular early approach assumed that uptake rate is proportional to the difference between the soil water pressure head, h, and an effective root water or plant pressure head (or potential), hr, leading to the

Uptake reduction models for water and salinity stress

Eq. (7) defines a very general equation for the effects of drought stress on water uptake. Similar forms can be postulated for salinity stress (or for any other variable such as nutrient stress), i.e.:S(z)=β(z)α(π)TpOne important question is how to combine water and salinity stress. That question is discussed in Section 3.3. We focus first on reduction functions for water stress (Section 3.1) and salinity stress (Section 3.2) separately.

Many of the functional forms that have been proposed for

An application

In practice, it is difficult to determine which of the reduction functions (those noted here as well as others, reviewed for example by Feddes and Raats (2004)) best describes root water uptake. The detailed root zone and transpiration data needed to discriminate the models are difficult to obtain and rarely available. We illustrate this using data from a recent experiment (Skaggs et al., 2006a, Skaggs et al., 2006b) conducted in a lysimeter facility consisting of 24 volumetric lysimeters, each

Compensated water uptake

One area of research that may improve hydrologically oriented models of root water uptake involves the development of sink terms which incorporate a wider range of dynamic root and plant function. As biological organisms, plants and roots may respond in various ways to environmental stresses. Of interest are root functions that could be represented without having to model plant physiology in detail. One example is compensated water uptake in which plants may respond to non-uniform stress

Estimation of uptake parameters from databases

Uptake reduction functions such as those given in Fig. 1, Fig. 2 are generally very difficult to determine experimentally. We noted earlier that the various forms for the uptake reduction functions are similar to, and sometimes based on, forms that have been observed for whole-plant responses to stress. Because of this similarity, it has been anticipated (e.g., van Genuchten, 1987, van Dam et al., 1997) that uptake reduction parameters for different crops could be derived from literature

Concluding remarks

In this paper we gave an overview of macroscopic modeling approaches for root water uptake as a function of water and salinity stress. We showed that, at least for one set of lysimeter experiments involving a wide range of salinity and water stress conditions, it is very difficult to discriminate among alternative functional forms for the sink term. Future improvements to root water uptake models may involve the incorporation of more dynamic root functions, such as the ability of roots to

References (64)

  • J. Van Schilfgaarde

    Irrigation—a blessing or a curse

    Agric. Water Manage.

    (1994)
  • J.E. Ayars et al.

    Realizing the potential of integrated irrigation and drainage water management for meeting crop water requirements in semi-arid and arid areas

    Irrig. Drain. Syst.

    (1999)
  • E. Bresler et al.

    Irrigation management for soil salinity control: theories and tests

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.

    (1986)
  • E. Bresler et al.

    Saline and Sodic Soils

    (1982)
  • G.E. Cardon et al.

    Plant water uptake terms evaluated for soil water and solute movement models

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.

    (1992)
  • G.E. Cardon et al.

    Soil-based irrigation and salinity management model. I. Plant water uptake calculations

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.

    (1992)
  • S.W. Childs et al.

    Model of soil salinity effects on crop growth

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.

    (1975)
  • C.T. De Wit
    (1958)
  • Doorenbos, J., Kassam, A.H., 1979. Yield response to water. FAO Irrig & Drain Paper No. 33. FAO, Rome, Italy, p....
  • L.M. Dudley et al.

    Modeling plant response to drought and salt stress: reformulation of the root-sink term

    Vadose Zone J.

    (2003)
  • H.M. du Plessis

    Evapotranspiration of citrus as affected by soil water deficit and soil salinity

    Irrig. Sci.

    (1985)
  • FAO

    Crops and Drops: Making the Best Use of Water for Agriculture

    (2002)
  • R.A. Feddes et al.

    Parameterizing the soil–water–plant root system

  • R.A. Feddes et al.

    Field test of a modified numerical model for water uptake by root systems

    Water Resour. Res.

    (1974)
  • Feddes, R.A., Kowalik, P.J., Zaradny, H., 1978. Simulation of Field Water Use and Crop Yield. Simulation Monograph....
  • W.R. Gardner

    Relation of root distribution to water uptake and availability

    Agron. J.

    (1964)
  • F. Ghassemi et al.

    Salinisation of and Water Resources. Human Causes, Extent, Management and Case Studies

    (1995)
  • Green, S.R., Kirkham, M.B., Clothier, B.E., this issue. Root uptake and transpiration: from measurements and models to...
  • X. Hao et al.

    Effects of root density distribution models on root water uptake and water flow under irrigation

    Soil Sci.

    (2005)
  • S. Hasegawa et al.

    Water uptake by dryland rice root system during soil drying cycle

    Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.

    (1982)
  • Cited by (182)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text