Elsevier

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumes 198–199, November–December 2014, Pages 259-264
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Short communication
Estimation of leaf area index in understory deciduous trees using digital photography

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.09.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We tested digital photography to estimate leaf area (L) of understory tree species.

  • Nadir photography provided accurate estimates of cover, gap fraction and clumping.

  • A leveled camera approach provided accurate leaf angle measurements.

  • Estimates from photography were validated against L measurements from harvesting.

  • Digital photography can be used to characterize forest understory.

Abstract

Fast and accurate estimates of understory leaf area are essential to a wide range of ecological applications. Indirect methods have mainly been used to estimate leaf area of overstory but their application in understory remains largely unexplored. In this study we described a combination of digital photographic methods to obtain rapid, reliable and non-destructive estimate of leaf area index of understory deciduous trees. Nadir photography was used to estimate foliage cover, vertical gap fraction and foliage clumping index. Leveled photography was used to characterize the leaf angle distribution of the examined tree species. Leaf area index estimates obtained combining the two photographic methods were compared with direct measurements obtained from harvesting (L).

We applied these methods in Quercus cerris, Carpinus betulus and Fagus sylvatica stands. Foliage cover estimates derived from two nadir image classification methods were significantly correlated with leaf area index measurements obtained from harvesting. The leveled digital photographic method, previously tested in tall trees and field crops, provided reliable leaf angle measurements in understory tree species. Digital photography provided good indirect estimates of L. We conclude that digital photography is suitable for routine estimate and monitoring of understory leaf area, on account of its fast and cost-effective procedure.

Introduction

Accurate estimates of leaf area index (L) are essential to the ecological characterization of forest ecosystems (Chen et al., 1997) and for modeling stand structure and dynamics (Xue et al., 2011). Because direct measurements of L in forests are destructive, time-consuming and often impractical, indirect optical methods have been widely used to indirectly estimate L from measurements of radiation transmittance through the canopy (for a review, see Bréda, 2003, Jonckheere et al., 2004, Welles and Norman, 1991). Beer–Lambert's law has often been used to model canopy transmittance (Eq. (1), based on Nilson, 1971):P(θ)=expG(θ)×Ω(θ)×Ltcosθwhere P(θ) is the canopy gap fraction, G(θ) is the foliage projection coefficient and Ω(θ) is the foliage clumping index at zenith angle θ. Lt is the plant area index, including foliar and woody materials. Over the last few decades, several comparisons have been made between direct and indirect methods to estimate the overstory leaf area index in forest ecosystems, as demonstrated in the previously cited reviews. However, very few attempts have been made to estimate the leaf area index of forest understory. Some studies showed that the understory leaf area may exceed that of the overstory (Law et al., 2001, Macfarlane et al., 2010). Accurate estimates of the understory leaf area index are also required for processed-based canopy photosynthesis models (Beaudet et al., 2002, Jolly et al., 2004), for designing silvicultural systems aimed at promoting natural tree regeneration (Caccia and Ballaré, 1998) and for understanding energy and mass exchange processes (Xue et al., 2011). As a consequence, rapid, non-destructive and reliable methods are strongly needed to estimate the understory leaf area index.

Thanks to recent technological development, digital cameras with high spatial and radiometric resolutions are becoming increasingly affordable and promote the use of digital photographic methods to indirectly estimate canopy structural variables such as gap fraction, foliage cover, leaf angle distribution and leaf area index. In addition, the digital image format is well suited to process photographs taken from above the canopy looking downward. For example, the use of vegetation indices has long been explored in crops and weed plants for indirectly estimating L from downward-looking cameras (e.g., Liu et al., 2013, Meyer and Neto, 2008). Basically, vegetation indices involve the transformation of the digital number (DN) of image pixels from each channel to generate features that are able to separate green vegetation (foreground) from non-vegetation elements (background). The use of vegetation indices derived from downward-looking photography has rarely been explored in forest ecosystems (e.g., Graham et al., 2009). Recently, Macfarlane and Ogden (2012) tested nadir photography in forest stands and proposed robust and affordable image classification methods to estimate the understory foliage cover (i.e., the portion of the ground area covered by the vertical projection of the foliage; Walker and Tunstall, 1981). Unfortunately, the authors did not test the accuracy of their photographic methods to estimate L because they had no estimates of the foliage projection coefficient or foliage clumping available to invert leaf area from the foliage cover at the time. In addition, they had no direct measurements available to verify the performance of their method. This calls for a validation of their method using direct reference measurements.

To infer leaf area from foliage cover ff and its complement, vertical gap fraction P(0), information of the foliage leaf angle distribution f(θL), which is related to the foliage projection coefficient G(θ), is required. These estimates can be obtained from digital photography using a leveled camera approach, a method recently proposed by Ryu et al. (2010) that has also been validated with direct leaf angle measurements in tall trees by Pisek et al. (2011). The method is potentially suitable for estimating the leaf angle distribution in understory owing to the accessible height of leaves in short canopies. For example, Zou et al. (2014) tested and validated this method in field crops.

Another variable needed for the indirect estimation of L is foliage clumping; by knowing the foliage cover, the vertical clumping index Ω(0) can be estimated from the vertical gap fraction using theoretical gap fraction formulas.

In this paper, we tested whether digital photography can be used to estimate the leaf area index in understory deciduous trees. Different photographic methods were combined for this purpose. Nadir photography was used to estimate foliage cover and its complementary vertical gap fraction. Leveled digital photographs were used for estimating leaf angle and the foliage projection coefficient G(0). Finally, we estimated the foliage clumping index Ω(0) from a gap size distribution approach (Chen and Cihlar, 1995, Leblanc, 2002). Leaf area index derived from digital photography was compared with destructive L measurements obtained from harvesting.

Section snippets

Study site and experimental design

The study was performed in May 2014 at the Forestry Research Centre, Arezzo, Italy (43.48°N; 11.88°E), in understory plots established within a 0.25 ha, 30-year old, 15-m tall Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.) forest. Three deciduous forest understory species were examined: hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.), Turkey oak and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). For each species, a rectangular 60 × 40 cm understory plot was established in which 40 three-year old saplings that were about 0.5 m tall were planted with

Results

Leaf area index measured by harvesting (L) ranged from 0.5 to 2.4 m2 m−2. Specifically, L ranged from 1.0 to 2.4 in hornbeam (average ± standard error 1.5 ± 0.1), from 0.5 to 1.4 in Turkey oak (average 0.9 ± 0.1) and from 0.7 to 2.2 in beech (average 1.4 ± 0.2).

The foliage cover estimates (ff) obtained from the LAB2 method ranged from 0.18 to 0.84 in hornbeam (average 0.58 ± 0.07), from 0.11 to 0.70 in Turkey oak (average 0.43 ± 0.06) and from 0.11 to 0.85 in beech (average 0.53 ± 0.08). The foliage cover

Discussion and conclusions

In this study, we have demonstrated that digital photography can be used to obtain indirect estimates of leaf area index of understory tree species. Both of the tested image classification methods yielded good estimates of ff, although we observed that LAB2 was the most accurate method overall. In contrast, the accuracy of Rosin's method was sensitive to larger ff and thus to L values. Macfarlane and Ogden (2012) first indicated that the LAB2 method should be used to estimate ff in nadir images

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the research grant “Relationships between stand structure and biodiversity in forest ecosystems—ForBIO”. We thank Giulio Puletti for providing the extendable pole for the nadir photograph acquisition. We thank the Forest Service staff of Pieve Santo Stefano, AR, particularly the chief officer Alberto Veracini, for providing vegetation materials. We thank two anonymous reviewers for helping to greatly improve the manuscript with their comments.

References (35)

Cited by (40)

  • hemispheR: an R package for fisheye canopy image analysis

    2023, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Using fractal dimension to correct clumping effect in leaf area index measurement by digital cover photography

    2021, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Another method is to remove the large between-crown gaps that are considered the main factor of the clumping effect. The between-crown gaps are selected from the DCP images according to a threshold (e.g., larger than 2.1% of the total image area; Chianucci et al. 2014). Then crown porosity (i.e., one minus the ratio of foliage cover to crown cover) can be calculated, and the LAI can be estimated using a modified Beer-Lambert law.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text