Interaction of lime application and straw retention on ammonia emissions from a double-cropped rice field

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108309Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Liming alone increased NH3 emissions and NH3 emission factors (EFs) in a double-cropped rice field.

  • Straw retention alone promoted NH3 emissions in the early rice growth season but reduced them in the late rice growth season.

  • Liming interacted with straw retention to increase NH3 emissions and EFs in the early rice growth season.

  • Liming had no significant interactions with straw retention on NH3 emissions and EFs in the late rice growth season.

Abstract

Ammonia (NH3) emissions are an important pathway of nitrogen (N) losses in rice paddies. Lime application and straw retention are common practices to enhance soil fertility in acidic soils. However, the interaction of lime and straw application on NH3 emissions from paddies remain unclear. Here, a factorial experiment was employed to examine the interactive effects of slaked lime (i.e., Ca(OH)2) and straw retention on NH3 emissions and NH3 emission factors (EFs) in a double-cropped rice field. The results showed that compared to unlimed treatments, liming promoted NH3 emissions and EFs by 98.6% and 90.2% in the early rice growth season, respectively, with increases of 16.3% and 15.7% in the late rice growth season. Relative to straw removal, straw retention increased NH3 emissions by 52.8% in the early rice growth season but did not alter EFs, while reducing NH3 emissions by 9.9% and EFs by 25.7% in the late rice growth season. Liming interacted with straw retention to increase NH3 emissions and EFs in the early rice growth season. Under straw retention, liming promoted NH3 emissions by 147.7% and EFs by 148.3%, whereas liming raised NH3 emissions and EFs only by 45.3% and 45.5% under straw removal, respectively. Liming had no significant interactions with straw retention on NH3 emissions and EFs in the late rice growth season. It is likely that the decomposition extent of straw can alter the response of NH3 emissions to liming. Thus, NH3 emission inventories should take into account the interaction of liming and straw retention and its dependence on rice growth seasons in double-cropped rice systems with acidic soils.

Introduction

Ammonia (NH3) is an essential precursor to the formation of atmospheric secondary aerosols that can significantly impact human health (Ma et al., 2021a). In addition, emitted NH3 returns to water and soil surfaces via nitrogen (N) deposition, thereby aggravating groundwater contamination, surface water eutrophication, soil acidification, and biological diversity loss (Pan et al., 2016). Agricultural activities account for 80% of total NH3 emissions from anthropogenic sources worldwide (Behera et al., 2013). Rice (Oryza sativa L.) paddies represent a notable emission source of NH3 (Wang et al., 2018), accounting for 24% of the global NH3 emissions from croplands (Ma et al., 2021b). As an important rice-producing system in China, double rice cultivation (i.e., rice planted twice annually) represents up to approximately 35% of planting area and 30% of rice production (NBS, 2019). However, the double-cropped rice system is mostly practiced in subtropical China, where soil acidification and soil degradation are the critical constraints to the sustainability of rice production (Liao et al., 2018, Tang et al., 2022).

Limes are generally recommended to mitigate soil acidity and increase grain yield in rice paddies (e.g., Shamshuddin et al., 2017; Liao et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022). However, liming alone has a limited role in enhancing soil fertility such as soil organic carbon (C) and N (Liao et al., 2018). In contrast, straw retention can improve soil fertility in rice paddies due to the input of large amounts of organic matter and nutrients (e.g., Ding et al., 2018; Guo et al., 2021). However, increasing evidence indicates that straw incorporation can only reduce the rate of soil acidification relative to inorganic fertilization alone rather than markedly raising soil pH like limes can in acidic paddies (Liao et al., 2018, Hao et al., 2022, Tang et al., 2022). Thus, combining lime and straw application has been advocated to simultaneously enhance soil fertility and ameliorate soil acidification in order to promote rice production in acidic paddy soils (Jiang et al., 2018, Liao et al., 2018). In addition, liming combined with straw incorporation could improve soil aggregation, thereby promoting root growth (Haynes and Naidu, 1998). However, while most of these previous studies have main focused on the impacts of combining liming and straw retention on soil quality and grain yield, little is known regarding the interaction of lime application and straw retention specifically on NH3 emissions from double-cropped rice fields.

It is well known that NH3 emissions are largely derived from the application of mineral N fertilizers in rice paddies (Lian et al., 2018, Zhong et al., 2021, Wang et al., 2022a). Meanwhile, NH3 emissions are affected by soil environmental variables (e.g., soil pH, soil organic N and C) (Jiang et al., 2017, Wang et al., 2021). Therefore, lime application and straw retention can affect NH3 emissions in rice paddies (Huang et al., 2016). For instance, Smith et al. (2009) demonstrated that for every 0.1 unit increase in soil pH through liming, NH3 emissions increased by about 3.3 kg ha−1. In addition, straw retention has been reported to alleviate (Cao et al., 2018), promote (Xu et al., 2017, Xia et al., 2018), or have no impact (Li et al., 2021, Xu et al., 2022) on NH3 emissions in paddies. The differential responses of NH3 emissions to straw retention are likely due to the variation in C/N ratios of crop residue that regulate soil microbial activity and thus affect the dynamics of soil N immobilization-mineralization (Pan et al., 2017, Liu et al., 2021). Previous findings have indicated that applying lime promotes the activities of soil enzymes associated with N and C cycling, thereby stimulating the decomposition of crop residue and N mineralization (Heyburn et al., 2017, Liao et al., 2018). Thus, we hypothesized that applying limes may promote N release in straw and thus increase NH3 emissions under straw retention in double-cropped rice fields with acidic soils. Although many studies have examined the individual impact of lime application or straw retention on NH3 emissions in rice paddies, no study to our knowledge has explored their interactive effects on NH3 emissions in the double-cropped rice system (Besen et al., 2022, Xu et al., 2022). To test this hypothesis, a factorial designed experiment with lime application and straw retention was used to explore the impacts of their interaction on NH3 emissions in a double-cropped rice field.

Section snippets

Experimental site

The field experiment was initiated in 2015. It is located in Shanggao County (altitude 36.8 m, 28°31'N, 115°09'E) of Jiangxi Province, China. Liao et al. (2018) has reported detailed information regarding the climatic parameters and original soil properties at the experimental site. Briefly, this region has a subtropical monsoon climate; the mean annual precipitation and temperature are 1650 mm and 17.5 °C, respectively, with a frost-free period of 270 days. The paddy soil at the experimental

Ammonia fluxes

The temporal dynamics of NH3 fluxes were similar among treatments (Fig. 1). NH3 fluxes peaked following each N fertilization event and then dropped progressively to a low level in about 10 days at early and late rice growth seasons. Overall, the peak of NH3 fluxes was lower at panicle initiation than at basal fertilization and at tillering. The highest NH3 peak was observed at tillering and basal fertilization during the early and late rice growth seasons, respectively. Liming increased NH3

Effects of liming on NH3 emissions

Our results indicated that liming significantly increased NH3 emissions and EFs in the acidic paddy soil, consistent with previous studies (Mkhabela et al., 2006, Besen et al., 2022). First, lime application promotes the activity of urease that accelerates the rate of urea hydrolysis and increases the concentration of soil NH4+-N (Table 3) (Liao et al., 2018, Jiang et al., 2021). Second, liming provides abundant alkaline cations (e.g., Mg2+ and Ca2+) that reduce the potential capability of

Conclusions

The present field experiment indicated that liming increased NH3 emissions from the double-cropped rice field. Straw retention increased NH3 emissions in the early rice growth season, while reducing NH3 emissions in the late rice growth season. Lime application positively interacted with straw retention to promote NH3 emissions in the early rice growth season, but not in the late rice growth season. Further investigation is needed to improve our understanding of the process of NH3 emissions and

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Special Grant for Jinggangshan Agricultural Hi-Tech Zone ([2022] No. 18), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32260547, 31701383), the Jiangxi Agriculture Research System (JXARS-02-03), the Science and Technology Innovation Project for Young Talents (Gan ke Ji zi [2018] No. 175), and the Youthful Innovation Research Team of Jiangxi Agricultural University (JXAUCXTD004).

References (49)

  • Y.X. Jiang et al.

    Responses of microbial community and soil enzyme to heavy metal passivators in cadmium contaminated paddy soils: an in situ field experiment

    Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.

    (2021)
  • H.T. Li et al.

    Film mulching, residue retention and N fertilization affect ammonia volatilization through soil labile N and C pools

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2021)
  • Z.M. Lian et al.

    Changes in fertilizer categories significantly altered the estimates of ammonia volatilizations induced from increased synthetic fertilizer application to Chinese rice fields

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2018)
  • P. Liao et al.

    Liming and straw retention interact to increase nitrogen uptake and grain yield in a double rice-cropping system

    Field Crops Res

    (2018)
  • T.Q. Liu et al.

    Rice-crayfish co-culture reduces ammonia volatilization and increases rice nitrogen uptake in central China

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2022)
  • X. Liu et al.

    Transformations of N derived from straw under long-term conventional and no-tillage soils: a 15N labelling study

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2021)
  • B.B. Pan et al.

    Ammonia volatilization from synthetic fertilizers and its mitigation strategies: a global synthesis

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2016)
  • E. Smith et al.

    Simulated management effects on ammonia emissions from field applied manure

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2009)
  • H. Song et al.

    Negligible ammonia volatilization loss with one-time root-zone targeted application of common nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers in transplanted rice cultivation

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2022)
  • H.M. Tang et al.

    Effects of long-term organic matter application on soil carbon accumulation and nitrogen use efficiency in a double-cropping rice field

    Environ. Res.

    (2022)
  • H.Y. Wang et al.

    Ammonia emissions from paddy fields are underestimated in China

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2018)
  • J.X. Wang et al.

    Mitigation of ammonia volatilization on farm using an N stabilizer-a demonstration in Quzhou, North China Plain

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2022)
  • K.K. Wang et al.

    Straw returning mediates soil microbial biomass carbon and phosphorus turnover to enhance soil phosphorus availability in a rice-oilseed rape rotation with different soil phosphorus levels

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2022)
  • Y.L. Wang et al.

    Ammonia volatilization from urea in alfalfa field with different nitrogen application rates, methods and timing

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2021)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Ping Liao and Lei Liu contributed equally to the present work

    View full text